Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:27:07.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two new species of Roccellaceae (Ascomycota: Arthoniales) from Brazil, with the description of the new genus Sergipea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2013

André APTROOT
Affiliation:
ABL Herbarium, G.v.d.Veenstraat 107, NL-3762 XK Soest, The Netherlands. Email andreaptroot@gmail.com
Damien ERTZ
Affiliation:
National Botanic Garden of Belgium, Domein van Bouchout, 1860 Meise, Belgium
Edvaneide Leandro de LIMA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Micologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Katia Almeida de JESUS
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, CEP: 49500-000, Itabaiana, Sergipe, Brazil
Leonor Costa MAIA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Micologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Marcela Eugenia da Silva CÁCERES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, CEP: 49500-000, Itabaiana, Sergipe, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new lichen genus Sergipea M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot is described in the Roccellaceae, based on the new species Sergipea aurata M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot from NE Brazil. The species was found in a remnant of Atlantic transition forest in Sergipe. It is similar in many respects to species of the genus Enterographa, but it is characterized by bright orange stromata, due to the presence of an anthraquinone, and a thallus with a somewhat byssoid hypothallus. Phylogenetically it is close to the genera Dichosporidium and Erythrodecton. The phylogenetic position of the generic type of Dichosporidium confirms the close relationship of the genus to Erythrodecton in the basal branch of the Roccellaceae. A new species of Enterographa is also described from NE Brazil. Enterographa rotundata E. L. Lima, M. Cáceres & Aptroot has solitary, round apothecia, which is unusual in this genus with mainly elongated apothecia or punctiform apothecia arranged in lines. It was found in Caatinga forest in Pernambuco.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2013 

Introduction

The Roccellaceae are a predominantly tropical group of lichens. The basal branch in the phylogeny contains the core group of Enterographa [including its type, E. crassa (DC.) Fée], as well as Erythrodecton (Ertz & Tehler Reference Ertz and Tehler2011). The genus Enterographa Fée is a predominantly tropical group of crustose Roccellaceae comprising c. 50 species (Sparrius Reference Sparrius2004; Ertz et al. Reference Ertz, Christnach, Wedin and Diederich2005; Sparrius et al. Reference Sparrius, Saipunkaew, Wolseley and Aptroot2006; Sparrius & Aptroot Reference Sparrius and Aptroot2007; Jagadeesh Ram et al. Reference Jagadeesh Ram, Sinha and Singh2008; Lücking Reference Lücking2008; Sparrius & Björk Reference Sparrius and Björk2008; Ertz Reference Ertz2009a , Reference Ertz b ; Seaward & Aptroot Reference Seaward and Aptroot2009; Yeshitela et al. Reference Yeshitela, Fischer, Killmann and Sérusiaux2009; Sipman Reference Sipman2011). Phylogenetic studies have shown the genus to be polyphyletic (Ertz et al. Reference Ertz, Miądlikowska, Lutzoni, Dessein, Raspe, Vigneron, Hofstetter and Diederich2009), and two species that were accepted in the genus by Sparrius (Reference Sparrius2004) were shown to fall into a different clade than the type species of Enterographa, E. crassa (DC.) Fée. These were transferred to the genera Opegrapha Ach. (Ertz et al. Reference Ertz, Miądlikowska, Lutzoni, Dessein, Raspe, Vigneron, Hofstetter and Diederich2009) and Fulvophyton Ertz & Tehler (Ertz & Tehler Reference Ertz and Tehler2011). It is likely that the many species remaining in the genus still do not form a monophyletic group.

The Atlantic rainforests and the Caatinga forests in NE Brazil are rich in lichen species but still incompletely explored (Cáceres Reference Cáceres2007; Menezes et al. Reference de Menezes, Xavier-Leite, Otsuka, de Jesus and Cáceres2011; Lima et al. Reference Lima, Mendoça, Maia, Aptroot and Cáceres2013). The Arthoniales, including the Roccellaceae, is one of the three dominant crustose lichen groups on bark in NE Brazil, and crustose Roccellaceae are common and sometimes abundant (Cáceres et al. Reference Cáceres, Lücking and Rambold2007, Reference Cáceres, Lücking and Rambold2008).

During ecological studies focusing on epiphytic crustose lichens in NE Brazil, an Enterographa-like lichen was found with bright orange stromata, due to the presence of an anthraquinone. It was found in a remnant of Atlantic transition forest in Sergipe. It was clear that it was an undescribed species, but as this would be the first Enterographa with anthraquinones, it was sequenced to ascertain that it really belongs to the genus Enterographa. However, it clustered with strong support in the sister group of the well-supported core group of Enterographa, together with species of Dichosporidium and Erythrodecton. Although it shares some characters with Erythrodecton in particular (the presence of an anthraquinone), it differs in several respects from both genera, markedly by the firm, not byssoid thallus, the absence of ascoma carbonization, and the ascospore type. Therefore, this new species is described here in the new genus Sergipea.

Also, a new species of the genus Enterographa was found as part of the ecological studies. Enterographa rotundata has solitary round apothecia, which is unusual in this genus with mainly elongated apothecia or punctiform apothecia arranged in lines. It was found in the Vale do Catimbau National Park, a Caatinga forest reserve, in Pernambuco State.

Material and Methods

Identification and descriptive work was carried out in Itabaiana, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, using a Leica EZ4 stereomicroscope and a Leica DM500 compound microscope, and also in Soest using an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope and an Olympus BX50 compound microscope with interference contrast, connected to a Nikon Coolpix digital camera. Sections were mounted in tap water, on which all measurements were also taken. The specimens from this study are preserved in ISE. The chemistry of the type specimens was investigated by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using solvent A (Orange et al. Reference Orange, James and White2001).

The mtSSU of the holotype of Sergipea aurata and of two specimens of Dichosporidium nigrocinctum (Ehrenb.) G. Thor were sequenced, using primers mrSSU1 and mrSSU3R (Zoller et al. Reference Zoller, Scheidegger and Sperisen1999) and following the procedures cited by Ertz et al. (Reference Ertz, Miądlikowska, Lutzoni, Dessein, Raspe, Vigneron, Hofstetter and Diederich2009). For the phylogenetic analyses, 17 sequences were retrieved from GenBank in addition to our own sequences (Table 1). The outgroup species, Opegrapha vulgata Ach., was chosen based on Ertz & Tehler (Reference Ertz and Tehler2011).

Table 1. Specimens and DNA sequences used in this study, with their respective voucher information. GenBank accession numbers in bold refer to sequences (3) generated by this project. All other sequences (17 GenBank accession numbers) were obtained directly from GenBank.

The mtSSU sequences were aligned manually to the existing alignment of Ertz et al. (Reference Ertz, Miądlikowska, Lutzoni, Dessein, Raspe, Vigneron, Hofstetter and Diederich2009) using MacClade 4.05 (Maddison & Maddison Reference Maddison and Maddison2002). Ambiguously aligned regions and introns representing a total of 727 bp (mainly due to an intron in the sequence of Roccella fuciformis) were delimited manually and excluded from the analyses.

Maximum Parsimony (MP) analysis was performed in PAUP*4.0b10 (Swofford Reference Swofford2002) on the mtSSU matrix of 735 unambiguously aligned characters, including 251 variable characters of which 195 are parsimony-informative. Heuristic searches were used with 1000 random addition sequence replicates, MaxTrees set to autoincrease, tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, MulTrees option in effect and gaps treated as missing data. The MP analysis yielded four most parsimonious trees (448 steps) with topological differences present only in the clade Lecanactis-Chiodecton. Bootstrap values (MP-bs) were obtained from 1000 replicates with three random addition sequences (all other parameters identical to the original MP search).

The best-fit model of DNA evolution GTR+G was chosen using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), as implemented in Modeltest v. 3.06 (Posada & Crandall Reference Posada and Crandall1998). Bayesian analyses were carried out using the Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo method (MCMCMC) in MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist Reference Huelsenbeck and Ronquist2001; Ronquist & Huelsenbeck Reference Ronquist and Huelsenbeck2003) on the CIPRES portal (Miller et al. Reference Miller, Pfeiffer and Schwartz2010). Analyses were run under the GTR model of nucleotide substitution, including a discrete gamma distribution with six rate categories. Two parallel MCMCMC runs were performed, each using four independent chains and 10000000 generations, sampling trees every 1000th generation. TRACER v.1.5 (Rambaut & Drummond Reference Rambaut and Drummond2007) was used to ensure that stationarity was reached by plotting the log-likelihood values of the sample points against generation time. Posterior probabilities (PP) were determined by calculating a majority-rule consensus tree generated from the last 15 002 of the 20 002 trees sampled.

The MP tree did not contradict the Bayesian tree topology for the strongly supported branches, and hence only the majority-rule consensus tree of the Bayesian analysis is shown here with the branch supports of the MP analysis. PP≥95% and MP-bs≥70% were considered to be significant.

The Species

Sergipea aurata M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot gen. et sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB 803755 (genus) & 803756 (species)

Roccellaceae with non-carbonized ascomata immersed in stromata covered with orange anthraquinone, ascospores 7–9-septate, 35–40(–50)×5–6 µm, narrowly clavate, rather thick-walled with elongated lumina, thallus with lichexanthone, stromata with anthraquinone.

Type: Brazil, Sergipe, Areia Branca, Fonte da Bica, on tree bark, c. 400 m alt., 19 May 2012, M. E. S. Cáceres & K. A. Jesus 12539 (ISE—holotype).

(Fig. 1)

Fig. 1. Sergipea aurata, holotype. A, habitus; B, section through ascoma; C & D, ascospores. Scales: A=0·5 mm; B=50 µm; C & D=5 µm. In colour online

Thallus crustose, cracked, not corticate, dull, pale greenish grey, very thin and closely following the bark surface, patchily interspersed with slightly byssoid hypothallus (visible only at high magnification), surrounded by a brown prothallus line. Algae trentepohlioid.

Ascomata not carbonized, c. 0·1 mm diam., globose, immersed and visible from above only by the ostiole, 5–25 clustered together in 1–2 mm wide, bright orange stromata. Excipulum hyaline, continuous below the hymenium. Epihymenium internally with pale brown pigmentation and externally with orange crystals. Hamathecium not inspersed, IKI+ blue (amyloid), paraphysoids 1·0–1·5 µm wide, anastomosing and often somewhat curled. Asci cylindrico-clavate, 73–89×21–27 µm. Ascospores 8 per ascus, hyaline, 7–9-septate, narrowly clavate, 35–40(–50)×5–6 µm, without gelatinous sheath, rather thick-walled with elongated lumina.

Pycnidia not observed.

Chemistry

Thallus partly UV+ yellow, partly UV−, C−, P−, K−, stromata K+ purple. TLC: thallus with lichexanthone, stromata with an unidentified anthraquinone that resembles parietin in Rf-value and KOH-reaction.

Ecology and distribution

On smooth bark of trees in Caatinga forest. Known only from Brazil. It grows together with the equally endemic Enterographa subquassiaecola M. Cáceres & Lücking (Cáceres Reference Cáceres2007), which is quite common in NE Brazil.

Discussion

As only one species is known in this genus, the description above refers to both the genus and the species (a so-called descriptio generico-specifica, ICBN Art. 38), as it would be impossible to discern generic and specific characters at this stage. The thallus and the internal structures, including the internal pigmentation, fit some species in the genus Enterographa well. It seems in habitus close to E. pertusarioides Sparrius (Sparrius Reference Sparrius2004), which however lacks anthraquinones, contains psoromic acid and has 3-septate ascospores of a much smaller size. Sergipea aurata is a truly remarkable and unexpected species.

Additional specimen seen. Brazil: same as the type, M. E. S. Cáceres & K. A. Jesus 12540 (ISE).

Enterographa rotundata E. L. Lima, M. Cáceres & Aptroot sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB 802592

Corticolous Enterographa species with round apothecia, ascospores (3–)7-septate, 50–60×3·5–5·0 µm, without substances.

Type: Brazil, Pernambuco, Buíque, Vale do Catimbau National Park, on bark of tree, c. 900 m alt., 3 February 2012, E. L. Lima 668 (ISE—holotype).

(Fig. 2)

Fig. 2. Enterographa rotundata, holotype. A, habitus; B, section through ascoma; C, hamathecium and young ascus; D–F, ascospores. Scales: A=0·5 mm, B & C=50 µm; D–F=5 µm. In colour online

Thallus crustose, continuous but often seemingly absent, not corticate, dull, pale pinkish to pale brownish, very thin and closely following the bark surface, without prothallus. Algae trentepohlioid.

Ascomata round or slightly ellipsoidal, dark brown to black, 0·1–0·2 mm wide, margin raised above the disc, ochraceous white, c. 0·05 mm wide. Excipulum hyaline to pale brownish. Epihymenium internally with pale brown pigmentation. Hamathecium not inspersed, IKI+ pale blue (weakly amyloid), paraphysoids 1·0–1·5 µm wide, anastomosing and often somewhat curled. Asci cylindrico-clavate, 65–79×15–23 µm, tholus amyloid. Ascospores 8 per ascus, hyaline, (3–)7-septate, narrowly clavate, 50–60×3·5–5·0 µm, surrounded by a 1·5–2·5 µm wide gelatinous sheath, lumina somewhat rounded.

Pycnidia not observed.

Chemistry

Thallus and apothecia UV−, C−, P−, K−. TLC: no substances detected.

Ecology and distribution

On smooth bark of trees in Caatinga forest. Known only from Brazil. It grows together with, for example, Dirinaria leopoldii (Stein) D. D. Awasthi, Lecanora leprosa Fée, L. leproplaca Zahlbr., Pertusaria ventosa Malme, Phaeographis ventosa Redinger, and Ramboldia haematites (Fée) Kalb et al.

Discussion

One of very few Enterographa species with round apothecia and the third corticolous one with that character. Enterographa lecanoracea Sipman (Sipman Reference Sipman2011) differs by having larger ascomata (0·5–1·5 mm) that are sessile to nearly stalked, and a C+ red thallus. Enterographa mesomela Sparrius et al. is superficially similar to the new species but differs by a grey-green, slightly cracked to areolate thallus, slightly shorter ascospores (32–40 µm) and a different chemistry (confluentic acid in the thallus, and norstictic acid in the hypothecium; Sparrius et al. Reference Sparrius, Saipunkaew, Wolseley and Aptroot2006). The morphs of E. anguinella (Nyl.) Redinger [now Opegrapha anguinella (Nyl.) Ertz & Diederich] that were described as E. lecanoroides R. C. Harris also have nearly round apothecia (Sparrius Reference Sparrius2004), but they differ by nearly flush apothecia without a prominent margin and by a different chemistry (presence of psoromic acid). Three foliicolous species of Enterographa, viz. E. batistae Lücking & Sérus. (Lücking et al. Reference Lücking, Sérusiaux, Maia and Pereira1998), E. byssoidea Lücking (Lücking Reference Lücking1991) and E. perez-higaredae Herrera-Campos & Lücking (Herrera-Campos & Lücking Reference Herrera-Campos and Lücking2002), also have usually rounded apothecia (Lücking Reference Lücking2008). All differ by various characters from the new species, besides their foliicolous habitat, in each case also by very tiny ascomata which are smallest in E. batistae (c. 0·1 mm diam.); E. byssoidea differs also by the byssoid apothecium margin and E. perez-higaredae by the presence of psoromic acid. A superficially similar species is Lecanographa atropunctata Sparrius et al.; it differs from the new species by a thick dark brown to black excipulum and hypothecium, more septate ascospores (7–13-septate) and a different chemistry (presence of schizopeltic acid; Sparrius et al. Reference Sparrius, Saipunkaew, Wolseley and Aptroot2006).

Additional specimens examined. Brazil: same as the type, E. L. Lima 662, 665, 670 & 673 (ISE).

Discussion of the phylogenetic position of Sergipea and Dichosporidium

In our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3), Sergipea aurata clusters close to the genera Dichosporidium and Erythrodecton in the basal branch of the Roccellaceae s.str. as defined by Ertz & Tehler (Reference Ertz and Tehler2011). It is included in a strongly supported clade sister to the genus Enterographa and thus cannot be described in this latter genus. The generic type of Dichosporidium, D. nigrocinctum, was here newly sequenced and our phylogenetic tree confirms the position of the genus close to Erythrodecton granulatum (Mont.) G. Thor, as first shown by Nelsen et al. (Reference Nelsen, Lücking, Grube, Mbatchou, Muggia, Rivas Plata and Lumbsch2009) for D. boschianum (Mont.) G. Thor. The relationships within the clade Erythrodecton-Sergipea are not supported. Therefore the generic position of the new taxon is uncertain within this clade.

Fig. 3. One locus (mtSSU) 50% majority-rule consensus tree produced by the Bayesian analysis and representing the proposed phylogenetic relationships among 20 specimens of Arthoniales. PP≥95% and MP-bs values≥70% are considered strongly supported and shown respectively above and below internal branches. The new genus and species Sergipea aurata is noted in bold.

Erythrodecton mainly differs from Sergipea by biclavate ascospores, a red pigment in the thallus medulla and internal carbonization of the ascomata. All species of Dichosporidium have internal carbonization of the ascomata, a different chemistry and a distinctly byssoid thallus, contrasting with Sergipea. Moreover, D. nigrocinctum differs, for example, by biclavate ascospores and D. boschianum by hooked ascospores. As a consequence, we prefer to describe a new genus to accommodate our new species.

It should be noted here that both species of Dichosporidium do not cluster together in our phylogenetic tree, suggesting that the genus might be paraphyletic. More data will have to be included in future phylogenetic studies to resolve the generic delimitation of these taxa.

The CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) is thanked for a research grant to MESC (Processo 501633/2009-0) and for financial support for the collecting trips (CNPq-Protax Process 562.330/2010-0 and INCT-Herbário Virtual Processo 573.883/2008-4). The Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco – FACEPE is also thanked for a Master's scholarship to ELL. AA is grateful to the Hugo de Vries-fonds for travel support. Leo Spier is thanked for performing thin-layer chromatography.

References

Cáceres, M. E. S. (2007) Corticolous crustose and microfoliose lichens of northeastern Brazil. Libri Botanici 22: 1168.Google Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S., Lücking, R. & Rambold, G. (2007) Phorophyte specificity and environmental parameters versus stochasticity as determinants for species composition of corticolous lichen communities in the Atlantic rain forest of northeastern Brazil. Mycological Progress 6: 117136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S., Lücking, R. & Rambold, G. (2008) Corticolous microlichens in northeastern Brazil: habitat differentiation between coastal Mata Atlântica, Caatinga and Brejos de Altitude. Bryologist 111: 98117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertz, D. (2009 a) A new species of Enterographa, E. diederichiana (Roccellaceae), from Zambia. Bryologist 112: 390393.Google Scholar
Ertz, D. (2009 b) Revision of the corticolous Opegrapha species from the paleotropics. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 102: 1176.Google Scholar
Ertz, D. & Tehler, A. (2011) The phylogeny of Arthoniales (Pezizomycotina) inferred from nucLSU and RPB2 sequences. Fungal Diversity 49: 4769.Google Scholar
Ertz, D., Christnach, C., Wedin, M. & Diederich, P. (2005) A world monograph of the genus Plectocarpon (Roccellaceae, Arthoniales). Bibliotheca Lichenologica 91: 1155.Google Scholar
Ertz, D., Miądlikowska, J., Lutzoni, F., Dessein, S., Raspe, O., Vigneron, N., Hofstetter, V. & Diederich, P. (2009) Towards a new classification of the Arthoniales (Ascomycota) based on a three-gene phylogeny focussing on the genus Opegrapha . Mycological Research 113: 141152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera-Campos, M. A. & Lücking, R. (2002) The foliicolous lichen flora of Mexico. I. New species from Los Tuxtlas Tropical Biology Station, Veracruz. Lichenologist 34: 211222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagadeesh Ram, T. A. M., Sinha, G. P. & Singh, K. P. (2008) New species and new records of Enterographa (Roccellaceae) from India. Lichenologist 40: 415418.Google Scholar
Lima, E. L., Mendoça, C. O., Maia, L. C., Aptroot, A. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2013) Two new species of Pyrenula with red or orange thallus from Vale do Catimbau National Park, Pernambuco, Brazil. Lichenologist 45: 199202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücking, R. (1991) Neue Arten foliikoler Flechten aus Costa Rica, Zentralamerika. Nova Hedwigia 52: 267304.Google Scholar
Lücking, R. (2008) Foliicolous lichenized fungi. Flora Neotropica 103: 1866.Google Scholar
Lücking, R., Sérusiaux, E., Maia, L. C. & Pereira, C. G. (1998) A revision of the names of foliicolous lichenized fungi published by Batista and co-workers between 1960 and 1975. Lichenologist 30: 121191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, D. & Maddison, W. (2002) MacClade Version 4.03PPC: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
de Menezes, A. A., Xavier-Leite, A. B., Otsuka, A. Y. de Jesus, L. S. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2011) New records of crustose and microfoliose corticicolous lichens in Caatinga vegetation of the semi-arid region in Alagoas. Acta Botanica Brasilica 25: 885889.Google Scholar
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, M. P., Lücking, R., Grube, M., Mbatchou, J. S., Muggia, L., Rivas Plata, E. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2009) Unravelling the phylogenetic relationships of lichenised fungi in Dothideomyceta. Studies in Mycology 64: 135144.Google Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. (2007) Tracer v1.5. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.Google Scholar
Seaward, M. R. D. & Aptroot, A. (2009) Checklist of lichens for the Seychelles group. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 99: 335366.Google Scholar
Sipman, H. J. M. (2011) New and notable species of Enterographa, Niebla and Sclerophyton s. lat. from coastal Chile. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 106: 297308.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. (2004) A monograph of Enterographa and Sclerophyton . Bibliotheca Lichenologica 89: 1141.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. & Aptroot, A. (2007) A new lichenicolous Enterographa species from Britanny (France). Lichenologist 39: 315317.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. & Björk, C. R. (2008) Enterographa oregonensis (Roccellaceae), a new foliicolous species from the northwest coast of North America. Bryologist 111: 487489.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B., Saipunkaew, W., Wolseley, P. A. & Aptroot, A. (2006) New species of Bactrospora, Enterographa, Graphidastra and Lecanographa from northern Thailand and Vietnam. Lichenologist 38: 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Yeshitela, K., Fischer, E., Killmann, D. & Sérusiaux, E. (2009) Two new foliicolous species of Enterographa (Roccellaceae) from Kenya. Lichenologist 41: 1723.Google Scholar
Zoller, S., Scheidegger, C. & Sperisen, C. (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31: 511516.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Specimens and DNA sequences used in this study, with their respective voucher information. GenBank accession numbers in bold refer to sequences (3) generated by this project. All other sequences (17 GenBank accession numbers) were obtained directly from GenBank.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Sergipea aurata, holotype. A, habitus; B, section through ascoma; C & D, ascospores. Scales: A=0·5 mm; B=50 µm; C & D=5 µm. In colour online

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Enterographa rotundata, holotype. A, habitus; B, section through ascoma; C, hamathecium and young ascus; D–F, ascospores. Scales: A=0·5 mm, B & C=50 µm; D–F=5 µm. In colour online

Figure 3

Fig. 3. One locus (mtSSU) 50% majority-rule consensus tree produced by the Bayesian analysis and representing the proposed phylogenetic relationships among 20 specimens of Arthoniales. PP≥95% and MP-bs values≥70% are considered strongly supported and shown respectively above and below internal branches. The new genus and species Sergipea aurata is noted in bold.