Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T19:01:53.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meridianelia, a new genus in the Elixiaceae (Ascomycota) from Tasmania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2009

Gintaras KANTVILAS
Affiliation:
Tasmanian Herbarium, Private Bag 4, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. Email: gkantvilas@tmag.tas.gov.au
H. Thorsten LUMBSCH
Affiliation:
The Field Museum, Department of Botany, 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meridianelia maccarthyana Kantvilas & Lumbsch, gen. et sp. nov., is described, based on collections from Tasmania. This taxon represents only the second member of the family Elixiaceae. It is compared to Elixia flexella (Ach.) Lumbsch and to the superficially similar genus Trapelia. The family Elixiaceae is redefined briefly to account for the inclusion of a second genus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009

Introduction

During the course of the ongoing project to document the lichen flora of the island of Tasmania, a curious epiphytic species was collected in subalpine woodland. This lichen displayed an unusual combination of characters: hemiangiocarpous ascomata, a reduced, cupulate excipulum, delicate, branched and anastomosing paraphyses, eight-spored, lecanoralean asci, and simple, hyaline ascospores. Whereas some of these attributes are also found in the genus Trapelia M. Choisy, others suggested alternative relationships within the Agyriinae in the sense of Lumbsch (Reference Lumbsch1997). The systematic position of this lichen was ultimately resolved using DNA sequence data that supported our earlier anatomical observations, particularly those pertaining to ascus structure, which had hinted at links with the monotypic family, Elixiaceae. We describe this lichen as a new monotypic genus, Meridianelia, within this unique family of lichenized fungi.

The Elixiaceae was erected by Lumbsch (Reference Lumbsch1997) to accommodate the single species Elixia flexella (Ach.) Lumbsch. The relationships of this lichen to other seemingly related groups, such as the families Agyriaceae (including Trapeliaceae), Anamylopsoraceae and Schaereriaceae, were elucidated in detail therein (Lumbsch op. cit.). These families have subsequently undergone considerable scrutiny using molecular data. The Agyriaceae was shown to be unrelated to the Trapeliaceae, but grouped with the Pertusariales (Lumbsch et al. Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Mangold and Wedin2007b). The placement of the Anamylopsoraceae needs further studies, but preliminary studies suggest it may not be closely related to the Trapeliaceae either (Lumbsch et al. Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Döring and Wedin2001). The Schaereriaceae is also shown to be not closely related to the Trapeliaceae, but again, the relationships remain uncertain (Wedin et al. Reference Wedin, Wiklund, Crewe, Döring, Ekman, Nyberg, Schmitt and Lumbsch2005). In fact, the Elixiaceae appears to be closest to the Umbilicariaceae (Lumbsch et al. Reference Lumbsch, Palice, Wiklund, Ekman and Wedin2004; Wedin et al. Reference Wedin, Wiklund, Crewe, Döring, Ekman, Nyberg, Schmitt and Lumbsch2005).

Materials and Methods

Morphology, anatomy and chemistry

The study is based chiefly on collections housed in the Tasmanian Herbarium (HO) and the Field Museum (F). Anatomical and morphological observations were undertaken using light microscopy, with thin hand-cut sections mounted in water, 10% KOH (K), lactophenol Cotton Blue and Lugol's iodine, either with pretreatment with KOH (indicated as K/I) or without (I). Ascospore measurements are based on at least 100 observations and are presented in the format: smallest measurement–mean–largest measurement; single outlying values are given in parentheses. Nomenclature of asci follows Lumbsch (Reference Lumbsch1997). Nomenclature of apothecial pigments follows Meyer & Printzen (Reference Meyer and Printzen2000), although we used concentrated acids for N (HNO3) and H (HCl), whereas Meyer & Printzen used 50% N and 10–20% H. Chemical constituents were identified by thin layer chromatography (Culberson Reference Culberson1972; Culberson et al. Reference Culberson, Culberson and Johnson1981; Culberson & Johnson Reference Culberson and Johnson1982; Elix & Ernst-Russell Reference Elix and Ernst-Russell1993).

Molecular methods

Sequence data of 70 species were assembled using sequences of the mitochondrial small subunit rDNA ( Table 1) with a newly obtained sequence extracted from the isotype of Meridianelia maccarthyana [Genbank no: FJ763185]. Three Umbilicaria species were used as the out-group since the genus has a basal placement in Lecanoromycetes in previous studies (e.g., Lumbsch et al. Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Lücking, Wiklund and Wedin2007a,Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Mangold and Wedinc). Total DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Dilutions (10−1 up to 10−2) of DNA were used for PCR amplifications. Primers for amplification were mr SSU1 (Zoller et al. Reference Zoller, Scheidegger and Sperisen1999) and MSU 7 (Zhou & Stanosz Reference Zhou and Stanosz2001). The 25 μl PCR reactions contained 2·5 μl buffer, 2·5 μl dNTP mix, 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 5 μl BSA, 2 μl Taq, 2 μl genomic DNA extract and 9 μl distilled water. Thermal cycling parameters were: initial denaturation for 3 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 52°C, 1 min at 73°C, and a final elongation for 7 min at 73°C. Amplification products were viewed on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and subsequently purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Fragments were sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator reaction kit (ABI PRISM, Applied Biosystems). Sequencing and PCR amplifications were performed using the same sets of primers. Cycle sequencing was executed with the following program: 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 48°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 4 min. Sequenced products were precipitated with 10 μl of sterile dH2O, 2 μl of 3 M NaOAc and 50 μl of 95% EtOH, before being loaded on an ABI 3100 (Applied Biosystems) automatic sequencer. Sequence fragments obtained were assembled with SeqMan 4.03 (DNASTAR) and manually adjusted.

Table 1 Sequences obtained from Genbank for the study. Family placement after Eriksson (2006).

Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analysis

The alignment was carried out using Clustal W (Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Higgins and Gibson1994). Ambiguously aligned regions were removed manually. The alignment was analysed by maximum parsimony (MP) and a Bayesian approach (B/MCMC). Maximum parsimony analyses were performed using the program PAUP* (Swofford Reference Swofford2003). Heuristic searches with 200 random taxon addition replicates were conducted with TBR branch swapping and MulTrees option in effect, equally weighted characters and gaps treated as missing data. Bootstrapping (Felsenstein Reference Felsenstein1985) was performed based on 2000 replicates with random sequence additions. The B/MCMC analyses were conducted using the MrBayes 3.1.1 program (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist Reference Huelsenbeck and Ronquist2001). The analyses were performed assuming the general time reversible model of nucleotide substitution (Rodriguez et al. Reference Rodriguez, Oliver, Martín and Medina1990) including estimation of invariant sites, assuming a discrete gamma distribution with six rate categories. A run with 4 000 000 generations starting with a random tree and employing 12 simultaneous chains was executed. Every 100th tree was saved into a file. The first 200 000 generations (i.e., the first 2000 trees) were deleted as the ‘burn in’ of the chain. The log-likelihood scores of sample points were plotted against generation time using TRACER 1.0 (http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/software.html?id=tracer) to ensure that stationarity was achieved after the first 200 000 generations by checking whether the log-likelihood values of the sample points reached a stable equilibrium value (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist Reference Huelsenbeck and Ronquist2001). Of the remaining 76 000 trees (38 000 from each of the parallel runs) a majority rule consensus tree with average branch lengths was calculated using the sumt option of MrBayes. Posterior probabilities were obtained for each clade. Only clades that received bootstrap support equal or above 70% under MP and posterior probabilities ≥ 0·95 were considered as strongly supported. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using the program Treeview (Page Reference Page1996).

Phylogenetic analyses

The new sequences of Meridianelia maccarthyana were aligned with sequences obtained from GenBank as listed in Table 1. A matrix of 715 unambiguously aligned nucleotide position characters was produced; 327 characters in the alignment were constant. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 68 most parsimonious trees (1928 steps long). The strict consensus tree did not contradict the Bayesian tree topology. In the B/MCMC analysis of the combined data set, the likelihood parameters in the sample had the following mean (Variance): LnL = −9628·635 (0·15), base frequencies π(A) = 0·333 (0·00046), π(C) = 0·139 (0·00025), π(G) = 0·204 (0·00026), π(T) = 0·324 (0·00017), the gamma shape parameter alpha = 0·776 (0·0065), and p(invar) = 0·285 (0·00029).

Since the topologies of the MP and B/MCMC analyses did not show any strongly supported conflicts, only the 50% majority-rule consensus tree of Bayesian tree sampling is shown (Fig. 1). Those nodes that received strong support (i.e. PP ≥0·95 in B/MCMC analysis and MP bootstrap ≥70%) in both the MP and Bayesian analyses are in bold as shown in Figure 1. In the majority-rule consensus tree, Meridianelia maccarthyana clusters strongly supported with Elixia flexella (MP-bootstrap support 99%, B/MCMC posterior probability 1·0) and hence supports placement of the new taxon in the Elixiaceae as circumscribed by Lumbsch (Reference Lumbsch1997). Members of the Trapeliaceae sensu Lumbsch et al. (Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Mangold and Wedin2007b) form a strongly supported group within Ostropomycetidae. The strongly supported topology of the other parts of the phylogenetic tree is in agreement with previously published phylogenies (Lumbsch et al. Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Lücking, Wiklund and Wedin2007a, Reference Lumbsch, Schmitt, Mangold and Wedinb) and is not discussed further here.

Fig. 1. Phylogeny of Lecanoromycetes as inferred from a mt SSU rDNA sequence analysis to investigate the phylogenetic placement of Meridianelia maccarthyana. This is a 50% majority-rule consensus tree based on 38 000 trees from a B/MCMC tree sampling procedure. Branches with posterior probabilities equal to or above 0·95 and MP bootstrap support values above 70% are indicated by wide internodes.

Taxonomy

Meridianelia Kantvilas & Lumbsch gen. nov

Mycobank: MB 513000

Genus fungorum lichenisatorum, ad Elixiaceas pertinens, thallo crustaceo, algas chlorococcaleas continenti. Apothecia hemiangiocarpia, excipulo cupulato, prosoplectenchymato, reducto, gelatina hymenialia non-amyloidea, ascis octosporis, Elixia-typis, paraphysibus subtilibus, ramosis anastomosantibusque, ascosporis simplicibus, non-halonatis, hyalinis. Pycnidia ignota.

Typus: Meridianelia maccarthyana Kantvilas & Lumbsch.

Thallus crustose, ecorticate. Photobiont chlorococcoid.

Ascomata apothecia, hemiangiocarpous. Excipulum cupulate, prosoplectenchymatous, very reduced. Hymenial gel non-amyloid. Paraphyses very delicate, branched and anastomosing, non-capitate. Asci 8-spored, of the Elixia-type. Ascospores simple, non-halonate, thin-walled. Pycnidia not seen.

Etymology. The generic name is derived from the Latin meridianus (meaning ‘southern’), in reference to the geographic distribution of the taxon, and also infers the similarity of this lichen to members of the genus Trapelia M. Choisy.

The genus contains the single species, M. maccarthyana Kantvilas & Lumbsch.

Meridianelia maccarthyana Kantvilas & Lumbsch sp. nov

Mycobank: MB 513001

Thallus crustosus, ecorticatus, sordide griseo-albidus, aliquando sorediatus, acidum protolichesterinicum continens. Apothecia adnata vel leviter immersa, 0·3–1 mm lata, disco concavo, plano vel undulato, dense albido-pruinosa. Paraphyses intricatae, 0·8–1 μm crassae, apicibus non capitatis. Asci elongato-clavati, 130–170 μm longi, 17–25 μm lati. Ascosporae uniseriatae, globosae vel subglobosae vel ovato-ellipsoideae, 14–23(–26) μm longae, 9–20 μm latae.

Typus: Australia, Tasmania, 1 km SE of Lake Fenton, 42°41′S 146°38′E, 950 m altitude, on trunk of Eucalyptus coccifera in subalpine woodland, 17 December 2003, G. Kantvilas 752/03 (HO—holotypus; F—isotypus).

Figs (2, 3A–C)

Fig. 2. Meridianelia maccarthyana, habitus (holotype). Scale = 1 mm.

Fig. 3. Asci (with amyloid parts stippled) and ascospores. A–C, Meridianelia maccarthyana; D, Elixia flexella. Scale: A = 40 μm; B–D = 20 μm.

Thallus crustose, not delimited, forming spreading colonies to 10–20 cm wide, dull greyish white, somewhat glossy, ecorticate, to 120–200 μm thick, smooth at first, becoming verruculose to tuberculate, with individual verrucae 0·5–1 mm wide, at length becoming abraded, eroded or ± coarsely sorediate; soredia generally aggregated in irregularly roundish, erose soralia to c. 1 mm wide, occasionally becoming diffuse and spreading, concolorous with the thallus or occasionally tinged greenish grey, inspersed with angular-rhomboidal crystals to 20 μm wide that fluoresce in polarized light and do not dissolve in KOH. Photobiont a unicellular green alga with individual cells globose to broadly ellipsoid, 9–20 × 9–16 μm, generally clustered in fascicles within the thallus.

Apothecia erupting from abraded thalline warts, broadly adnate to somewhat immersed in the thallus, roundish to irregularly rhomboidal or angular, 0·3–1 mm wide, generally clustered in groups of 2–3(–5), each usually orientated obliquely to the thallus surface and to each other; disc at first deeply concave, then plane to undulate, dark grey, thickly whitish pruinose; ‘thalline margin’ ragged, incomplete, comprised of abraded, adhering remnants of thallus; proper margin barely evident. Excipulum in section cupulate, Trapelia-like, very reduced, to c. 10 μm thick, pale greyish green, K± olive, composed of poorly differentiated, intertwined, prosoplectenchymatous hyphae to c. 1 μm thick. Hypothecium colourless, 40–60 μm thick, poorly differentiated from the hymenium, sparsely inspersed with scattered oil droplets. Hymenium colourless, 160–200 μm thick, separating readily in water and KOH, likewise inspersed, I+ and K/I+ blue, with the reaction confined to the asci, with a grey-green, K± olive epihymenial layer 30–50 μm thick, composed of the entangled uppermost portions of the paraphyses, inspersed with amorphous crystalline material insoluble in KOH. Asci 8-spored, 130–170 × 17–25 μm, elongate-clavate with a very long attenuate ‘tail’, approximating the Elixia-type: outer wall K/I+ blue; tholus well-developed, K/I+ pale blue, with an intensely K/I+ blue cap or ‘plug’ at the apex; ascoplasm generally truncate or concave at the apex, occasionally with a short, beak-like ocular chamber. Paraphyses very delicate, highly branched, anastomosing and entangled, 0·8–1 μm thick; apices tapered. Ascospores uniseriate in the ascus, thin-walled, non-halonate, globose to subglobose to ovate-ellipsoid, 14–18·1–23(–26) × 9–13·4–20 μm [length: width ratio 1–1·4–1·8(–2)], often deformed by mutual pressure when within the ascus, typically with a single, large vacuole.

Pycnidia not found.

Chemistry. Protolichesterinic acid; thallus K−, KC−, C−, P−, UV−.

Etymology. The specific epithet honours our friend and colleague, Dr Patrick McCarthy,who prepared the habit illustration and has made very significant contributions to the knowledge of lichens, especially in Australasia.

Distribution and ecology. The new species has been recorded from open subalpine woodland dominated by Eucalyptus coccifera Hook. f. growing on a dolerite boulder field. In this vegetation, the understorey is generally sparse and comprises scattered low shrubs, chiefly Nothofagus gunnii (Hook.f.) Oerst. and Olearia pinifolia (Hook.f.) Benth., or patches of Bauera rubioides Andrews intermixed with species of Epacridaceae and Proteaceae. Meridianelia maccarthyana forms conspicuous white patches up to 20 cm wide on the lowermost 1–2 metres of the eucalypt trunks as well as on larger individuals of Olearia that have very loose, papery bark. Although a generally lichen-rich environment, particularly with respect to saxicolous and terricolous species, these corticolous habitats are not highly colonized by lichens, and species associated with the new taxon are relatively few. These include Mycoblastus campbellianus (Nyl.) Zahlbr., M. coniophorellus (Elix & A.W. Archer) Kantvilas & Elix, Ochrolechia sp., Pertusaria jamesii Kantvilas, P. pertractata Stirt., Pseudoramonia richeae Kantvilas & Vĕzda, Ramboldia stuartii (Hampe) Kantvilas & Elix, Trapeliopsis granulosa (Hoffm.) Lumbsch and Usnea oncodes Stirt. On the eucalypts, below this ‘Meridianelia-zone’, there is a basal stocking of bryophytes and species of Cladia and Cladonia, whereas above, the eucalypt bark is generally too unstable for epiphytes. At a second locality, the new taxon was found in subalpine eucalypt woodland at the margins of a Nothofagus cunninghamii (Hook.) Oerst.-dominated cool temperate rainforest.

Meridianelia occurs most frequently in sunny conditions, being restricted to trees where the understorey is most sparse; it is absent where the undershrubs form a closed cover. It is curious that the new lichen has been encountered so infrequently. The vegetation community in which it has been found is not uncommon in Tasmania, nor is the lichen itself uncommon at the localities where it has been recorded. Further field observations are clearly required to better understand its ecological requirements.

Remarks. This new species is a most enigmatic lichen. Its spreading, white thallus is reminiscent of such unrelated taxa as Pertusaria or Ochrolechia, both of which occur in the same or similar habitats. The often-clustered, pruinose ascomata, arising from ruptured thalline warts, are not unlike those seen in certain species of Phlyctis, which is likewise unrelated. Only with careful study of the asci do the relationships to Elixia become evident. The asci of Meridianelia have a prominent, weakly amyloid tholus with an intensely amyloid cap that sometimes extends down into the tholus as a ‘plug’ (Fig. 3A & B). The asci of Elixia are very short and compact and rather more difficult to observe, but display essentially the same salient features (Fig. 3D).

The differences between Elixia and Meridianelia are stark, leaving no doubt that a new genus for the latter is justified. Superficially the two taxa are completely dissimilar, with Elixia having a highly reduced to inapparent thallus and often rather angular to almost lirelliform apothecia to only c. 0·4 mm wide. The excipulum of Elixia is well-developed and opaque dark brown, not unlike that seen in Rimularia. The hymenial gel is hemiamyloid in Elixia, whereas in Meridianelia, the amyloid reaction is confined to the asci. The paraphyses in Elixia are also robust and apically brown-pigmented. Furthermore, the ascospores of Elixia are rather small (8·5–13 × 4·5–6·5μm), whereas those of Meridianelia are comparatively large (Fig. 3C & D).

The genus shows the strongest superficial links with Trapelia, which also has hemiangiocarpous apothecia, surrounded by a ‘margin’ of adhering thallus fragments, delicate, branched and anastomosing paraphyses, a highly reduced excipulum of prosoplectenchymatous hyphae, and uniseriate, often-vacuolate ascospores. The grey-green apothecial pigment in the new taxon approximates caesiocinerea-green of Meyer & Printzen (Reference Meyer and Printzen2000); this has also been recorded in Trapeliopsis, Xylographa and a range of other, unrelated taxa. Furthermore, the shape of the asci is very Trapelia-like, being very elongate-clavate, and with the apex of the ascoplasm being generally concave or truncate. Only after staining with Lugol's solution do the fundamental structural differences between the asci of the two genera become evident.

The addition of a further genus to the Elixiaceae necessitates a recircumscription of the family. Accordingly, the Elixiaceae is defined as: lichenized Ascomyctes with the thallus crustose, containing a coccoid, green photobiont; ascomata apothecia, hemiangiocarpous, with excipulum cupulate, prosoplectenchymatous, often reduced; asci 8-spored, of the Elixia-type; ascospores simple, hyaline, non-halonate, thin walled; pycnidia unknown; chemistry: aliphatic acids or nil.

Specimens examined. Australia: Tasmania: 1 km SE of Lake Fenton, 42°41′S 146°38′E, 950 m alt., 2003, G. Kantvilas 752/03 (HO); Lake Fenton Hut, 42°41′S 146° 38′E, 1010 m alt., 2008, G. Kantvilas 345/08 (HO); Hartz Mountains Road, 43°12′S 146°46′E, 730 m, 2008, G. Kantvilas 376/08 (HO) (all specimens sterile only); track to Lake Nicholls, 42°40′S 146°39′E, 1000 m, 2008, G. Kantvilas 353/08 (BM, HO).

Selected comparative material examined. Elixia flexella (Ach.) Lumbsch. Great Britain: Scotland: V.C. 105, West Ross: Kinlochewe, Beinn Eighe NNR, 150–200 m, 2001, B. J. Coppins 19753 & A. M. Coppins (HO).—Austria: Salisburgia, Hohe Tauern, 960 m, 1986, R. Türk (A. Vĕzda: Lich. Sel. Exsicc. 2101) (HO).

We thank Dr Patrick McCarthy for providing the habit drawing of the new lichen, and Professor Jack Elix for confirming the chemical composition. The newly obtained DNA sequence was generated in the Pritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics and Evolution at the Field Museum. Fabian Ernemann (Chicago) assisted with laboratory work. Dr Jean Jarman prepared the line drawings for publication.

References

Culberson, C. F. (1972) Improved conditions and new data for the identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chromatographic method. Journal of Chromatography 72: 113125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culberson, C. F., Culberson, W. L. & Johnson, A. (1981) A standardized TLC analysis of β-orcinol depsidones. Bryologist 84: 1629.Google Scholar
Culberson, C. F. & Johnson, A. (1982) Substitution of methyl tert.-butyl ether for diethyl ether in the standardized thin-layer chromatographic method for lichen products. Journal of Chromatography 238: 483487.Google Scholar
Elix, J. A. & Ernst-Russell, K. D. (1993) A Catalogue of Standardized Thin Layer Chromatographic Data and Biosynthetic Relationships for Lichen Substances, 2nd edn. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES, Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T. (1997) Systematic studies in the suborder Agyriinae (Lecanorales). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 83: 173.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T., Schmitt, I., Döring, H & Wedin, M. (2001) ITS sequence data suggest variability of ascus types and support ontogenetic characters as phylogenetic discriminators in the Agyriales (Ascomycota). Mycological Research 105: 265274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T., Palice, Z., Wiklund, E., Ekman, S. & Wedin, M. (2004) Supraordinal phylogenetic relationships of Lecanoromycetes based on Bayesian analysis of combined nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 822832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumbsch, H. T., Schmitt, I., Lücking, R., Wiklund, E. & Wedin, M. (2007 a) The phylogenetic placement of Ostropales within Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota) revisited. Mycological Research 111: 257267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumbsch, H. T., Schmitt, I., Mangold, A. & Wedin, M. (2007 b) Ascus types are phylogenetically misleading in Trapeliaceae and Agyriaceae (Ostropomycetidae, Ascomycota). Mycological Research 111: 11331141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumbsch, H. T., Archer, A. W. & Elix, J. A. (2007 c) A new species of Loxospora (lichenized Ascomycota: Sarrameanaceae) from Australia. Lichenologist 39: 509517.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. & Printzen, C. (2000) Proposal for the standardized nomenclature and characterization of insoluble lichen pigments. Lichenologist 32: 571583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. D. M. (1996) Treeview: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12: 357358.Google ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J. F., Martín, A. & Medina, J. R. (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142: 485501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D. L. (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 46734680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedin, M., Wiklund, E., Crewe, A., Döring, H., Ekman, S., Nyberg, Å., Schmitt, I. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2005) Phylogenetic relationships of Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota) as revealed by analyses of mtSSU and nLSU rDNA sequence data. Mycological Research 109: 159172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, S. & Stanosz, G. R. (2001) Primers for amplification of mt SSU rDNA, and a phylogenetic study of Botryosphaeria and associated anamorphic fungi. Mycological Research 105: 10331044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoller, S., Scheidegger, C. & Sperisen, C. (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31: 511516.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Sequences obtained from Genbank for the study. Family placement after Eriksson (2006).

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Phylogeny of Lecanoromycetes as inferred from a mt SSU rDNA sequence analysis to investigate the phylogenetic placement of Meridianelia maccarthyana. This is a 50% majority-rule consensus tree based on 38 000 trees from a B/MCMC tree sampling procedure. Branches with posterior probabilities equal to or above 0·95 and MP bootstrap support values above 70% are indicated by wide internodes.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Meridianelia maccarthyana, habitus (holotype). Scale = 1 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Asci (with amyloid parts stippled) and ascospores. A–C, Meridianelia maccarthyana; D, Elixia flexella. Scale: A = 40 μm; B–D = 20 μm.