Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T20:50:17.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Analysis: Case to the International Court of Justice on Legality of French Nuclear Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2004

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Last year, for the second time in a little over 20 years, New Zealand asked the International Court of Justice to adjudicate the legality of French nuclear testing. This followed the announcement by the new President of France to the effect that the moratorium that his predecessor had put in place three years earlier, and had promised that France would continue to observe, would be terminated. The action by the New Zealand government was based on a unanimous decision by all political parties in New Zealand. This action reflected the anger of the countries in the South Pacific at the fact that a nuclear-weapon state was still prepared, in 1996, to explode nuclear devices in fragile marine environments on the other side of the world. In short, New Zealand wanted to utilize all available opportunities to persuade France not to proceed.

Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Court of Justice
Copyright
© 1996 Kluwer Law International