No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Withholding Treatment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/203f5/203f54a4927d8406775c899995c72e080a1810f3" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1982 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
References
Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College, 331 F.2d 1000 (D.C. Cir. 1964).Google Scholar
Paris, J.J., Compulsory Medical Treatment and Religious Freedom: Whose Law Shall Prevail? University of San Francisco Law Review 10 (1): 1,6 (1975).Google ScholarPubMed
267 N.Y.S.2d 450 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Spec. Term 1965).Google Scholar
434 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., App. Div. 1980), affirmed 420 N.E.2d 64 (N.Y. 1981).Google Scholar
Annas, G.J., Help from the Dead: The Cases of Brother Fox and John Stotar, Hastings Center Report 11 (3): 19, 20 (June 1981).Google Scholar
Paris, J.J., The New York Court of Appeals Rules on the Rights of the Incompetent Dying Patient, New England Journal of Medicine 304 (23): 1424, 1425 (June 4, 1981).Google Scholar
See Los Angeles Times, August 19, 1982, at 1, 15; Los Angeles Times, September 14. 1982, at 1, 3, 15.Google Scholar