Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-9klzr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T12:08:44.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Intermediate Period Funerary Traditions, Population Aggregation, and the Ayllu in the Sihuas Valley, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Justin Jennings*
Affiliation:
Department of Art and Culture, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, M65 2C6, Canada
Willy Yépez Álvarez
Affiliation:
Department of Art and Culture, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, M65 2C6, Canada
Stefanie L. Bautista
Affiliation:
Department of Religion and Classics, University of Rochester, Rush Rhees Library, P.O. Box 270074, Rochester, New York14627, USA
Beth K. Scaffidi
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Heritage Studies, University of California, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, California95343, USA
Tiffiny A. Tung
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, VU Station B #356050, Nashville, Tennessee37235, USA
Aleksa K. Alaica
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, OntarioM5S 2S2, Canada
Stephen Berquist
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, OntarioM5S 2S2, Canada
Luis Manuel González La Rosa
Affiliation:
Archaeology Centre, University of Toronto, 19 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S2, Canada
Branden Rizzuto
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, OntarioM5S 2S2, Canada
*
(justinj@rom.on.ca, corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Late Intermediate period in the south-central Andes is known for the widespread use of open sepulchres called chullpas by descent-based ayllus to claim rights to resources and express idealized notions of how society should be organized. Chullpas, however, were rarer on the coast, with the dead often buried individually in closed tombs. This article documents conditions under which these closed tombs were used at the site of Quilcapampa on the coastal plain of southern Peru, allowing an exploration into the ways that funerary traditions were employed to both reflect and generate community affiliation, ideals about sociopolitical organization, and land rights. After a long hiatus, the site was reoccupied and quickly expanded through local population aggregation and highland migrations. An ayllu organization that made ancestral claims to specific resources was poorly suited to these conditions, and the site's inhabitants instead seem to have organized themselves around the ruins of Quilcapampa's earlier occupation. In describing what happened in Quilcapampa, we highlight the need for a better understanding of the myriad ways that Andean peoples used mortuary customs to structure the lives of the living during a period of population movements and climate change.

El período intermedio tardío en los Andes centro-sur es conocido por el uso generalizado de monumentos funerarios llamados chullpas, por los ayllus, basados en la ascendencia, para reclamar derechos sobre los recursos y expresar creencias idealizadas de cómo debería organizarse la sociedad. Las chullpas, sin embargo, eran inusuales en la costa, los muertos eran enterrados individualmente en tumbas cerradas. Este artículo documenta las circunstancias bajo las cuales se utilizaron estos últimos tipos de tumbas en el sitio de Quilcapampa, en la llanura costera del sur del Perú, permitiendo la exploración de las formas en que se emplearon las tradiciones funerarias para reflejar y generar afiliación comunitaria, ideales sobre la organización sociopolítica y el derecho sobre la tierra. Después de una larga pausa, el sitio se volvió a ocupar y rápidamente se expandió mediante la concentración de la población local y las migraciones desde la sierra. Una organización ayllu que hizo reclamos ancestrales a recursos específicos era poco adecuada para estas condiciones, los habitantes del sitio en cambio, se organizaron alrededor de las ruinas de la ocupación anterior de Quilcapampa. Al destacar lo que sucedió en Quilcapampa, esperamos llamar la atención sobre la necesidad de una mejor comprensión de las innumerables formas en que los pueblos andinos utilizaron las costumbres mortuorias para estructurar las vidas de los vivos durante un período de migraciones poblacionales y de cambio climático.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology

The Late Intermediate period (AD 1000–1450) was an era of considerable political, social, and economic variability across the south central Andes after the collapse of the Wari and Tiwanaku polities (Conlee et al. Reference Conlee, Jalh Dulanto, Mackey, Stanish and Silverman2004; Dulanto Reference Dulanto, Silverman and Isbell2008). In many places, the ayllu—an elastic concept that can be defined as “related families that held land in common and traced their descent from a common ancestor” (Kolata Reference Kolata2013:52)—came to be the basic building block of society and was expressed in a number of ways. Open sepulchres (chullpas) are one of the clearest examples of an ayllu-related institution: this burial practice materialized ancestral-based claims to resources (e.g., Bouyse-Cassagne and Chacama Reference Bouyse-Cassagne and Chacama R.2012; Dean Reference Dean2005; Duchesne Reference Duchesne2005; Duchesne and Chacama Reference Duchesne and Chacama R.2012; Hyslop Reference Hyslop1977; Isbell Reference Isbell1997; Kesseli and Pärssinen Reference Kesseli and Pärssinen2005; Kurin Reference Kurin2016; Lau Reference Lau2002; Mantha Reference Mantha2009; Salomon Reference Salomon and Dillehay1995; Stanish Reference Stanish, Vranich, Klarich and Stanish2012; Tantaleán Reference Tantaleán2006; Velasco Reference Velasco2014).

These “tombs for the living” have long fascinated Andean archaeologists (Dillehay Reference Dillehay and Dillehay1995:17). Important actors in many Late Intermediate period societies (Nielsen Reference Nielsen, Mills and Walker2008:220), chullpas, and those buried within them, were often prominently displayed in the landscape (Bongers et al. Reference Bongers, Arkush and Harrower2012; Rossi et al. Reference Rossi, Kesseli, Liuha, Meneses and Bustamente2002). In contrast, single-inhumation burial in cists, walls, and floors was the dominant burial practice along much of the coast at this time (e.g., Arriola Reference Arriola, Eeckhout and Owens2015; Bongers Reference Bongers2019; Buikstra Reference Buikstra and Dillehay1995; Bürgi et al. Reference Bürgi, Williams, Buikstra, Clark, Cerna, Pino, Rice, Stanish and Scarr1989; Chacaltana Cortez Reference Chacaltana Cortez2015; Conlee et al. Reference Conlee, Buzon, Gutierrez, Simonetti and Creaser2009; Sharrat Reference Sharratt2011; Williams Reference Williams1990), with chullpas only becoming more common after the Inca conquest (e.g., Bongers Reference Bongers2019; Bürgi Reference Bürgi1993; deFrance and Olson Reference deFrance and Olson2013; Nuñez Flores Reference Nuñez Flores2013).

Single-inhumation burials remained in widespread use on the coast despite the increasing aridity in the sierra that pushed people into lower elevations by the mid-twelfth century (Dillehay and Kolata Reference Dillehay and Kolata2004; Fehren-Schmitz et al. Reference Fehren-Schmitz, Haak, Mächtle, Masch, Llamas, Cagigao, Sossna, Schittek, Cuadrado, Eitel and Reindel2014; Schittek et al Reference Schittek, Forbriger, Mächtle, Schäbitz, Wennrich, Reindel and Eitel2015). The new pressure on coastal resources had to be navigated by families who were not used to living together (Murra Reference Murra and Murra1972; Stanish Reference Stanish1989). People solved the problems of increasing population density and heterogeneity on the coast during the Late Intermediate period in several ways—violence flared in some regions, for example, and strong ties were often maintained with one's homeland—and their solutions changed over time (e.g., Arkush and Tung Reference Arkush and Tung2013; Baitzel and Rivera Infante Reference Baitzel and Rivera Infante2019; Gordillo Begazo Reference Gordillo Begazo1996; Llagostera Reference Llagostera2010; McCool Reference McCool2017; Santoro et al. Reference Santoro, Dillehay, Jorge Hidalgo, Valenzuela R., Romero, Rothhammer and Standen2010; Zori and Brandt Reference Zori and Brant2012). Yet chullpas remained rare.

Does the paucity of Late Intermediate period chullpas on the coast suggest that alternatives to descent-based ayllus were also used to make resource claims? If so, what were these alternative structures, and under what conditions were they created and sustained? In this article, we explore these questions at the site of Quilcapampa la Antigua in southern Peru's Department of Arequipa. The Late Intermediate period was an era of accelerated cultural change in the department, and Quilcapampa was one of several sites in Sihuas that emerged quickly in response to population movements and burgeoning coast–highland exchange. The valley's increasing highland entanglements meant that many of Quilcapampa's families were at least familiar with the chullpa burial tradition in the Arequipa sierra (e.g., Baca et al. Reference Baca, Martyna, Weglenski and Stankoviv2014; Duchesne Reference Duchesne2005; Jennings and Yépez Álvarez Reference Jennings and Yépez Álvarez2009; Linares Málaga Reference Linares Málaga1990, Reference Linares Málaga1993; Morante Reference Morante1949; Neira Avendaño Reference Neira Avendaño, Avendaño, Galdós Rodríguez, Málaga Medina, Quiroz Paz Soldán and Guillermo Carpio Muñoz1990, Reference Neira Avendaño1998; Sobczyk Reference Sobczyk2000; Velasco Reference Velasco2018a). Almost everyone at Quilcapampa was nonetheless buried in small grave plots that each contained a handful of cist tombs.

Descent-based ayllus could have been maintained on the coast by dress, daily household rituals, and other actions. Yet we argue that the predominance of individual inhumations at Quilcapampa and other coastal settlements occurs because the ayllu as commonly organized in the highlands—keyed to ideas of common land, shared descent, and an idealized sense of community—was ill suited to conditions of migration and rapid population nucleation. Settling into new homes, Quilcapampa's residents were likely atomized into smaller, family-centered units. Cohesion, in this case, appears to have been buttressed in part through feasts and other ritually charged events in the site's 400-year-old plaza where a collectively imagined past helped create a civic body.

By the time of the Spanish conquest, Sihuas was organized into nested, descent-based ayllus similar to those seen elsewhere in the south central Andes (Galdos Rodríguez Reference Galdós Rodríguez, Avendaño, Galdós Rodríguez, Malaga Medina, Quiroz Paz Soldán and Guillermo Carpio Muñoz1990:193–195). This social landscape arose after highland polities established vertical archipelagos of ayllu-based settlements near the end of the Late Intermediate period and after the subsequent Inca reorganizations of Sihuas society. Quilcapampa was founded before these transformations, when people first sought mechanisms to organize life in the larger, more heterogeneous settlements that were emerging in Sihuas.

The Archaeology of the Mid-Sihuas Valley

The archaeology of the mid-Sihuas fits well within the broader history of Arequipa (see Supplemental Text 1 on the archaeology of Arequipa). The earliest evidence for human occupation comes from La Chimba, San Juan, La Ramada, and other single-individual cist tomb cemeteries located in an arid stretch of the valley just below the contemporary town of San Juan de Sihuas (Haeberli Reference Haeberli2002, Reference Haeberli, Isbell and Silverman2006, Reference Haeberli2009; Quequezana Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997, Reference Quequezana Lucano2009; Ravines Reference Ravines2007; Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1980; Figure 1). Maize, guinea pigs, and other domesticated plants and animals are associated with these burials (Haeberli Reference Haeberli2002:95; Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1976:160), and it is likely that the dead and their offerings were transported to the cemetery from ephemeral settlements located in the more arable part of the valley a few kilometers to the north. Alluvium and heavy farming of the valley floor, however, make the discovery of these ancient settlements difficult, and pedestrian surveys have not yet recovered clear evidence of early domestic sites (Linares Delgado Reference Linares Delgado2009; Quequezana Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997; Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1976).

Figure 1. Late Intermediate period settlements and earlier cemeteries in the mid-Sihuas Valley. The inset shows neighboring valleys mentioned in the text and indicates where the region is found in Peru (site locations adapted from Quequezana Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997). (Color online)

Villages remain elusive into the Middle Horizon. The cemeteries below San Juan de Sihuas were still in use, and people seem to have continued to live on the valley bottom in small, dispersed settlements (Linares Delgado Reference Linares Delgado2009; Quequezana Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997; Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1976). The only site with a definitive Middle Horizon occupation is Quilcapampa, a short-lived Wari colony located above a cliff overlooking the river (Jennings, Yépez Álvarez, and Bautista Reference Jennings, Rizzuto, Yépez Álvarez, Jennings, Álvarez and Bautista2021). The dearth of domestic sites in Sihuas contrasts sharply with the neighboring middle Majes Valley, where a steep population rise pushed villages onto the valley's flanks by the beginning of the eighth century AD (Owen Reference Owen and Jennings2010; Tung Reference Tung2007). Wari influence was pervasive in the Middle Majes (Tung Reference Tung2007, Reference Tung2012) and would spread to Chuquibamba (Goldstein Reference Goldstein2010; Sciscento Reference Sciscento1989), Cotahuasi (Jennings and Yépez Álvarez Reference Jennings and Yépez Álvarez2015), and, to a lesser extent, Colca by the beginning of the tenth century (Doutriaux Reference Doutriaux2004; Wernke Reference Wernke2003).

Sihuas was separated from Majes by a wide, sandy pampa that helped insulate the valley from the transformations occurring to the north and east (Bingham Reference Bingham1912:492). Population expansion, agricultural intensification, and social stratification nonetheless occurred in Sihuas, but would happen in the context of the Late Intermediate period's growing coast–highland interactions. More than 80% of the sherds collected in the valley by Santos Ramírez are from this period, and all his domestic contexts date to this period or later, with the exception of Quilcapampa (Reference Santos Ramírez1976:169). Subsequent surveys by Linares Delgado (Reference Linares Delgado2009) and Quequezana Lucano (Reference Quequezana Lucano1997) confirm that mid-valley villages date to the Late Intermediate period, and this was our impression when visiting nearby sites during fieldwork at Quilcapampa.

People tended to live, as they do today, on the western flank of the valley where the gentler, more consolidated, slopes made it easier to construct residential terraces. Pitay, Quilcapampa, Sóndor, Tintín, San Basilo, and Pampa de Timirán were the largest of these settlements, each exceeding 50 ha (Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1976:63; Yépez Álvarez et al. Reference Yépez Álvarez, Jennings and Berquist2018:128–129; Figure 1). The cemeteries below San Juan de Sihuas were abandoned during this period, with the dead buried on-site in cemeteries fringing each settlement. A variety of funerary traditions are documented in Sihuas—including chullpa towers associated with Late Intermediate and Late Horizon period pottery—but most people were buried in individual cist tombs.

Since the mid-Sihuas Valley is located within the “breadbasket” of Arequipa (Scaffidi Reference Scaffidi2018:100), more people chose to settle in this underdeveloped region. Survey-collected ceramic assemblages suggest that families moved down from the adjoining highlands to take advantage of new economic opportunities (Linares Delgado Reference Linares Delgado2009; Quequezana Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997; Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1976). These archaeological data dovetail with ethnohistoric accounts stating that highlanders were well established in Sihuas by the Inca conquest (Echevarria y Morales Reference Echevarria y Morales and Barriga1949 [1805]:165–166; Galdos Rodríguez Reference Galdós Rodríguez1985:133; Takahashi Reference Takahashi and Masuda1988:61).

The written accounts describe how the coastal communities established by highlanders were seen as offshoots of highland centers, linked by shared ayllu affiliations that facilitated population movement and economic exchange. In the case of Sihuas, we have records of eight such communities linked to Cabanaconde in the Colca Valley at the time of the Spanish conquest (Galdos Rodríguez Reference Galdós Rodríguez1985:166). At least two of these communities predate the migrants’ arrival on the coast, suggesting that highland enclaves sometimes developed within preexisting villages. Yet, the highlanders living in Sihuas after the conquest were adamant that they never served local leaders (Galdos Rodríguez Reference Galdós Rodríguez1985:36). Whatever the case, these particular ayllu-based vertical archipelagos appear to have arrived on the scene after Quilcapampa, with its links to Huambo and other closer sierra valleys, was already established (see the later discussion and Figure 1).

The Site of Quilcapampa

Quilcapampa straddles two precolumbian trails that provide access to the pampa (Bikoulis et al. Reference Bikoulis, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Spence-Morrow, Álvarez, Bautista and Jennings2016, Reference Bikoulis, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Spence-Morrow, Álvarez, Bautista and Jennings2018; Jennings, Yépez Álvarez, and Bautista Reference Jennings, Yépez Álvarez and Bautista2021; Jennings et al. Reference Jennings, Berquist, Spence-Morrow, Bikoulis, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Yépez Álvarez, Bautista, Jennings and Swenson2018). These trails and at least a few of the petroglyphs on the cliffs below the site predate the settlement by about a thousand years (Berquist et al. Reference Berquist, Spence-Morrowa, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Rizzuto, Álvarez, Bautista and Jennings2018, Reference Berquist, Macqueen, Jennings, Jennings, Álvarez and Bautista2021). The site's earliest occupation would not occur until the mid-ninth century AD, when Wari settlers founded a 2 ha settlement (Jennings, Yépez Álvarez, and Bautista Reference Jennings, Yépez Álvarez and Bautista2021). Consisting of a raised plaza, three compounds, and a scattering of surrounding houses, Quilcapampa was abandoned a few years after its founding in ceremonies that closed off entrances and filled in rooms. Only a few Wari sherds have been found in the Sihuas Valley outside of Quilcapampa, all in funerary contexts (Linares Delgado Reference Linares Delgado2009; Quequezano Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997; Santos Ramírez Reference Santos Ramírez1976).

Bayesian modeling of radiocarbon dates from our excavations suggest that Quilcapampa was left unoccupied for more than 200 years after its Middle Horizon abandonment and was then abandoned for the second time before or at the beginning of the Inca expansion into the region near the end of the fifteenth century (see Supplemental Text 2 for dates and modeling). Surface survey suggests that the Late Intermediate occupation sprawled across some 70 ha (Figure 2), but Quilcapampa's precise extent is unknown because erosion has destroyed the standing architecture across most of the site. The construction of a canal and pumping station for an ambitious 1970s irrigation project compounded this damage, wiping out the northern edge of the site (Stensrund Reference Stensrund2016). In those few places where intact structures can be found today, the Late Intermediate period occupation is organized into single-family residences with external patios and associated storage facilities (Figure 3). The excavated botanical and faunal remains in four of these residences reflect an agropastoral subsistence strategy typical of the era.

Figure 2. Map of Quilcapampa showing the locations of the North Cemetery, South Cemetery, and Middle Horizon occupation. The dotted lines mark the approximate boundaries of the Late Intermediate period occupation. (Color online)

Figure 3. Orthophoto of Unit 12 excavations into a typical Late Intermediate period domestic structure with associated patio. (Color online)

When people returned to Quilcapampa in the Late Intermediate period, they built their homes on the slopes above the Middle Horizon portion of the site. Old Quilcapampa was left undisturbed and venerated by placing stacks of painted stones (placas pintadas) in the ruins—65 postabandonment placas were recovered during excavations (Rizzuto and Jennings Reference Rizzuto, Jennings, Jennings, Álvarez and Bautista2021). A regional offering tradition dating to the first millennium BC, placas were generally painted on one side, paired with another placa, and then stacked in piles (Cabrera Reference Cabrera2020; Linares Málaga Reference Linares Málaga1988; Tung Reference Tung2007). Although not directly dated, the postabandonment placas in old Quilcapampa are sandwiched between the ninth-century wall fall and an ash layer from the Huaynaputina eruption in AD 1600 (Bouysse-Cassagne and Bouysse Reference Bouyse-Cassagne and Bouysse1984). They are also consistent in decoration with those found in the site's Late Intermediate period houses.

The only area of the Middle Horizon ruins that may have been reused was the raised plaza. We suggest this for two reasons. An excavation unit on the plaza documented two construction phases. The earliest phase, radiocarbon dated to the Middle Horizon, was followed after a hiatus by a refurbishment of the plaza's short boundary wall. Although we were unable to directly date this refurbishment, four Late Intermediate period sherds were surface-collected from the plaza—our second reason for suggesting this area's reuse. No other Late Intermediate period ceramics or reoccupations were found in the Middle Horizon section of the site that surrounds the raised plaza, despite three field seasons of mapping, surface collection, wall trenching, and excavations (Jennings, Rizzuto, and Yépez Álvarez Reference Rizzuto, Jennings, Jennings, Álvarez and Bautista2021).

Of particular interest to this article are two cemeteries that are found at either end of the site. Much of the larger North Cemetery is missing because of the 1970s irrigation work, and the remains of newspaper, sardine cans, and other modern artifacts from looted contexts suggest that clandestine digging at Quilcapampa occurred around that time. The single-inhumation cist tombs in this cemetery begin on a ridgetop and then drape to the north across a wide quebrada. Where the topography is steep, terraces were constructed before burial. In some cases, terraces were quite small, designed to accommodate two to six tombs. In other cases, much larger terraces were built that were then subdivided into sections by single stone courses or elevated platforms that bound a tomb cluster. The smaller South Cemetery is more intact but mirrors the North Cemetery in many ways. It also begins on a ridgetop and drapes across a quebrada. It has a mix of small and large terraces, the latter of which are often subdivided into sections by single stone courses. Gentler slopes contain tomb clusters that are marked but not terraced.

The cist tombs in the North Cemetery number in the low thousands, whereas there are several hundred similar cists in the South Cemetery. The only possible collective tombs in Quilcapampa are the remains of five razed rectangular foundations on the ridgetops crowning each cemetery (four in the North Cemetery and one in the South Cemetery). Since no surface artifacts or skeletal remains were found in these contexts, the buildings’ functions remain unknown. Their location at least raises the possibility that selected residents were buried in chullpas. If so, efforts to institute open sepulchre traditions took place amidst a funerary pattern where almost everyone else chose to bury the dead as individuals.

Variation in grave assemblages both within and between cemeteries suggests possible markers of origin. Contingent and mutable, identity is difficult to trace in the archaeological record (Díaz-Andreu et al. Reference Díaz-Andreu, Sam Lucy and Edwards2005; Shennan Reference Shennan1989; Stovel Reference Stovel2013). Yet excavations and surface collection recovered only local ceramics from the South Cemetery, whereas the North Cemetery contained a section featuring ceramic styles from the Lluta, Huanca, and Huambo Valleys in the mountains just above Quilcapampa (Figure 4). Only this section of the North Cemetery contained slate placas, rather than the locally available river cobble placas that dominate the site's assemblage; the slate placas were likely quarried from Yura Group formations in the adjacent sierra (Romero Fernández and Ticona Turpo Reference Romero Fernández and Ticona Turpo2003). The imported placas were sealed under tomb lintels in a familiar highland practice that was unique to the North Cemetery (see the later discussion).

Figure 4. (A) A cántaro from Tomb 19 and (B) pitcher from Tomb 26 in the South Cemetery, and (C–D) a bowl and (E) cántaro fragments from the surface collection in the North Cemetery. Iconography, form, and paste can be used to distinguish the ceramic assemblages. Additional images of South Cemetery ceramics are found in Figure 7. Figure by Justin Jennings. (Color online)

As the adage goes, pots do not equal people, especially in funerary contexts where exotics often signal a group's long-distance connections rather than its foreign origins (Stanish Reference Stanish and Reycraft2005:230). Yet it is clear that at least one group at Quilcapampa chose to consistently place pots and placas in their tombs that linked their dead to foreign locations, and we saw similar clusters of tombs with highland-style pottery during our visits to other Late Intermediate period sites in Sihuas. How people were buried was nonetheless similar enough across Quilcapampa to define a Late Intermediate period cist burial funerary pattern typical for the site and the valley in general.

A Late Intermediate Period Funerary Tradition at Quilcapampa

We excavated 28 tombs, all of which were single-inhumation cist tombs. Two tombs (T7 and T16) had no human remains. Sixteen tombs were in the North Cemetery: 3 were intact, 2 were partially disturbed with their contents largely or completely intact, and 11 were looted. Of the 12 tombs excavated in the South Cemetery, 5 were intact and 7 were looted. We conducted a range of osteological and isotopic analyses on a subsample of skeletal remains, which will be reported elsewhere. Here we report only the age and sex of the 26 recovered individuals (Table 1), along with a few observations relevant to how the bodies were treated before burial.

Table 1. Age, Sex, and Associated Offerings for Excavated Burials at Quilcapampa.

Note: No skeletal remains were found in Tombs 7 and 16.

Of the 19 individuals for whom skeletal sex could be estimated, 8 were female and 11 were male/probable male, a nearly equal sex distribution. Among the 26 individuals, 6 (22%) were under the age of 12. In preindustrial societies, the expectation is that approximately half of the death assemblage will include juveniles (Howell and Kintigh Reference Howell and Kintigh1996). Their relative absence at Quilcapampa may suggest that some children were marked differently in life and death. The razed ridgetop buildings are one possible location for their interment.

The first step in cist tomb construction was the delineation of the funerary space in which a handful of tombs would be placed. For Tombs 20–24, for example, the builders created a small funerary platform by fabricating a retention wall on three sides that was then filled in with soil (Figure 5). This burial plot may represent a family group interred during a single generation, because an adult female, adult male, a young child (2–4 years old), an older child (9–12 years old), and an adolescent identified as a probable male (15- to 19-years-old) were interred (Table 1). The jaw of the adult female was covered in hematite or cinnabar, evidence that mourners used a red pigment during funerary rituals.

Figure 5. Orthophoto of Tombs 19–23 in Unit 30. Note the platform used to define the edge of the burial plot. (Color online)

Stones could also be used as a boundary between burial plots, or sometimes a gap was sufficient enough to distinguish plots. Once the space was delineated, mourners then dug a cylindrical hole with a flat bottom and lined the hole's sides, and occasionally its base, with cobbles set in a pink mortar that was used only in tombs. The end result was a stone-lined cist large enough to accommodate a tightly flexed individual who was either seated cross-legged or with the knees pulled into the chest. Plain-weave textile fragments found in some of the tombs suggest that the dead were bundled, as do the remains of congealed bodily fluid on these bundle fragments.

We suspect that a cist was constructed at the time of death for two reasons. First, tomb size reflects the size of the interred individual. Burial plots often contain a mix of adult and subadult burials. The adult burials tend to be placed in approximately 1 m deep cists, but subadults were buried in smaller cists that decreased to the size of an infant (Figure 6). Because tombs were seemingly built to fit the individual, it is unlikely that they were made before death. The skeletal articulations and the paucity of insect remains also suggest that people were buried soon after they died. The deceased were therefore likely bound into a flexed position, wrapped in textiles, and then lowered into the tomb within a few days of their death.

Figure 6. Orthophoto of Tombs 25–28 in Unit 32. Tomb 26 is shown still sealed with its capstone in red mortar; Tomb 28 contains a child burial. (Color online)

Mourners often placed a few objects on top of or around the bundle. Among the eight intact tombs for which we could be confident of original grave associations, one tomb with a child (Tomb 20) had no offerings, and the others had one to seven offerings. These objects varied—such as a pot, gourd, spindle, or fetal camelid (Figure 7)—but we would need a larger sample to determine whether grave goods can be linked to gender, class, or other factors. After the objects were placed with the bundle, a thick layer of red mortar was used to secure a capstone. The stone was usually a slab of white rhyolite tuff locally known as sillar. Only on the ridgetop in the North Cemetery was a layer of slate placas embedded within the capstone mortar. Once sealed, the cists do not appear to have been reopened, and there is no evidence for an opening, or ttoco, that would have enabled the living to directly speak or give offerings to the dead (e.g., Isbell Reference Isbell2004).

Figure 7. Examples of the few offerings found in each cist tomb: (A) painted cobbles found under the woman buried in Tomb 1 (Locus 1307), (B) fetal camelid buried in Tomb 19, and (C) a bowl and cántaro from Tomb 24. Figure by Justin Jennings. (Color online)

The final act of construction used larger stones to create either a circular or square collar around the tomb. The end result was a capped cist tomb sitting in a small depression ringed by upright stones (Figure 8). The collar shape appears to have been the same across plots, but circular and square collars were found in both cemeteries. On occasion, new collar walls were made by incorporating part of the collar of a preexisting tomb, providing additional evidence that cists were built one at a time as needs arose. Burnt botanical remains found on top of a few of the capstones may represent offerings made after the burial, but they are close enough to the modern surface that these contexts are not secure.

Figure 8. Tomb 19 contents and profile. Figure by Stephen Berquist. (Color online)

The Chullpas of the Colca Valley

When Quilcapampa began growing, there were already well-established polities in highland Arequipa. Most of the people in these polities were being buried in a wide variety of chullpas (Duchesne Reference Duchesne2005; Jennings and Yépez Álvarez Reference Jennings and Yépez Álvarez2009; Sobczyk Reference Sobczyk2000; Velasco Reference Velasco2014; Wernke Reference Wernke2013), and the little that we know about the archaeology of the Lluta, Huanca, and Huambo Valleys suggests that chullpas were also important in the possible homelands of some of Quilcapampa's residents (Linares Delgado Reference Linares Delgado1988). Yet to better understand the relationships between the living and the dead in highland Arequipa, we need to turn to the Colca Valley just to the north of Huambo and its wealth of colonial documents and archaeological research (e.g., Brooks Reference Brooks1998; Cook Reference Cook and Cook)2007; de la Vera Cruz Chávez Reference de la Vera Cruz Chávez, Albó, Arratia, Hidalgo, Núñez, Llagostera, Remy and Revesz1996; Doutriaux Reference Doutriaux2004; Malpass and de la Vera Cruz Chávez Reference Malpass and Chávez1990; Pease Reference Pease1977; Velasco Reference Velasco2014, Reference Velasco2018a, Reference Velasco2018b; Wernke Reference Wernke, Elson and Alan Covey2006a, Reference Wernke2006b, Reference Wernke2007, Reference Wernke2013). Although the particular relationships between chullpas and ayllus undoubtedly varied across highland Arequipa, the data from the Colca Valley contrast sharply with Quilcapampa's funerary practices.

By the Late Intermediate period, Colca was divided between two polities, the Collaguas and Cabanas, whose members spoke different languages (Ulloa Mogollón Reference Ulloa Mogollón and Jímenez de la Espada1965 [1586]). Each was organized into a nested political structure that determined, among other matters, access to resource zones and arable land (Wernke Reference Wernke2007, Reference Wernke2013). Matthew Velasco (Reference Velasco2014, Reference Velasco2018a, Reference Velasco2018b), Steven Wernke (Reference Wernke2003, Reference Wernke, Elson and Alan Covey2006a, Reference Wernke2007, Reference Wernke2013), and their colleagues provide a particularly nuanced understanding of mortuary practices among the Collaguas. Chullpas began proliferating by the end of the Middle Horizon and had become a highly visible part of the landscape by the beginning of the Late Intermediate period. They were agglutinated single-chambered structures with a lone entrance, which were built up horizontally and vertically as more space was needed to inter the dead (Velasco Reference Velasco2014). A line of chullpas was often built along a cliff face, with mourners returning to these cemeteries year after year to bury their dead. A mummy bundle was brought in—its body flexed and wrapped in textiles—and left with other mummies, a practice that continued until the Spanish conquest.

Most of Colca's cemeteries were linked to particular long-standing communities. A few contained chullpas of high-status adults from distinct ethnic groups, as suggested by the diverse cranial modification styles among the people buried within them (Velasco Reference Velasco2018a). The dead's position on the landscape “allowed the ancestral power to endure and influence the actions of the living for centuries” (Velasco Reference Velasco2014:462). They marked territory, fertilized lands, and performed a variety of other functions similar to those described elsewhere in the south central Andes. Yet not everyone in the Colca Valley was buried in chullpas. Children, for example, were significantly underrepresented in the chullpas of Yuraq Qaqa near modern-day Coporaque (comprising only 24% of the sample), and a few cist tombs can be found in and around settlements (Velasco Reference Velasco2014:456, Reference Velasco2018b:909; Wernke Reference Wernke2003).

Velasco's bioarchaeological research demonstrate that those buried in two Collaguas heartland cemeteries were closely related, suggesting that corporate identity was based at least in part on common descent (Reference Velasco2018b). This pattern occurs throughout the Late Intermediate period, but as time wore on there was increasing homogenization in cranial modification styles. This homogeneity can be linked to the creation of a new ethnic identity superseding that of the competing ayllus whose members remained tied to particular cemeteries. Velasco (Reference Velasco2018a:105) argues that this shift toward corporal homogeneity in the late Late Intermediate period “may have promoted cohesion among local elites and facilitated cooperation at higher levels of inclusiveness to coordinate agropastoral exchange, manage irrigation, or mobilize against outside forces, including (but not limited to) the encroaching Inka state.” The change may relate to increasing political centralization and violence in the second half of the Late Intermediate period (Kohut Reference Kohut2016:168)—a development that likely helped spur the fourteenth century's more formal coastal migrations.

The particulars of kinship relations and burial practices outside of Colca remain elusive, but DNA research elsewhere in Arequipa further suggests that biological relatedness was a critical factor in determining where one should be buried throughout much of the highlands (Baca et al. Reference Baca, Martyna, Weglenski and Stankoviv2014). Chullpas were also generally located in visible locations and were revisited for hundreds of years (Jennings and Yépez Álvarez Reference Jennings and Yépez Álvarez2009; Sobczyk Reference Sobczyk2000). If chullpas had a similar function on the coast, then it makes sense that they were not regularly used until the last decades of the Late Intermediate period. The social environment of incipient village aggregation and family-based migration of the mid-twelfth through early fourteenth centuries in the mid-Sihuas and other coastal valleys was ill suited to chullpa burials that signaled a group's ancestral connections to particular places on the landscape. Other means of materializing identity and affiliation were therefore needed.

Discussion

The lack of Late Intermediate period radiocarbon dates from other Sihuas sites makes it difficult to relate Quilcapampa's growth and abandonment to its neighbors. Yet the ethnographic and archaeological evidence for the period in general suggests that the more formal ayllu-based highland migrations were occurring to the coast by at least the mid-fourteenth century (Supplemental Text 1), and there are specific accounts of people from Colca living in Sihuas by the time of the Inca conquest (Echevarria y Morals Reference Echevarria y Morales and Barriga1949 [1805]:165–166; Galdos Rodríguez Reference Galdós Rodríguez1985:133; Takahashi Reference Takahashi and Masuda1988:61). We caution that more work is needed on Sihuas's chullpa burials to determine their dates and ethnic affiliation. More extensive work at Quilcapampa could also extend the site's time frame and reveal more than the cist burials that have been documented to date.

Current data suggest that families from both the area and surrounding highlands settled at Quilcapampa by as early as the mid-twelfth century. They lived on the slope above the Middle Horizon ruins and buried their dead in family plots in the cist tomb cemeteries that bracketed the site. Quilcapampa's 400-year-old plaza may have been refurbished by these new settlers, providing a space for collective rituals that helped create civic bonds. The first families came to the site before the ayllu-based migrations that brought people to Sihuas from even greater distances and then abandoned the site while these migrations were still ongoing.

Reclaiming a Powerful Place

Those who moved to Quilcapampa in the thirteenth century left the Middle Horizon ruins intact, and they built their homes above them on an as-needed basis as families moved into the site. Whether these families settled in neighborhoods based on ethnicity or other factors remains unclear because so little of the site remains, but ceramic assemblage differences between the North and South Cemetery suggest that locals drawn from the smaller, more ephemeral sites on the valley floor may have been distinguished from foreigners arriving from the adjacent sierra, something that future isotopic studies will evaluate. In either case, those moving to Quilcapampa were coming together into a new site, setting down roots next to people whom they may not have known.

Wari-affliated settlers briefly occupied Quilcapampa in the Middle Horizon. Yet Wari influence was limited elsewhere in the valley, and hundreds of years later, it is doubtful that those moving to Quilcapampa felt a direct connection to its earlier residents. The site's monumental walls, colorful potsherds, and enigmatic petroglyphs nonetheless marked Quilcapampa as a special place, and people still frequented the intervalley trails that climbed through the site (Jennings et al. Reference Jennings, Berquist, Spence-Morrow, Bikoulis, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Yépez Álvarez, Bautista, Jennings and Swenson2018). When Late Intermediate period population expansion in Sihuas pushed people up the valley's arid slopes, it is therefore unsurprising that people chose to settle at Quilcapampa.

Regardless of their origins, almost everyone shared a view of the Middle Horizon ruins from their patios, especially its raised plaza set on top of the petroglyph-filled cliff that bordered the river (Supplemental Figure 1). This plaza was the only part of the ruins that was likely reused in the Late Intermediate period, and one can imagine people making their way through fallen structures to attend the kinds of feasts and other ritually charged events that typically occurred in precolumbian Andean plazas (Lane Reference Lane2013). The placas placed on the ruins during this period may relate to plaza activities.

Burying the Dead

Cist burials were customary in Sihuas by the time of Quilcapampa's founding (Quequezano Lucano Reference Quequezana Lucano1997; Ravines Reference Ravines2007), with almost everyone seemingly buried in a designated funerary zone at a distance from where people lived. Those living in low-population density areas generally make claims to broader communities through extensive social ties rather than through asserting rights to particular territories or resources, especially if groups remain more mobile (Binford Reference Binford2001; McCorriston et al. Reference McCorriston, Michal Harrower and Oches2012). Resource tethering and intensification often occur as locations fill in with people or come under environmental stress—conditions that were both in place by the middle of the Late Intermediate period as aridity in the sierra fueled coastal migrations and decreased the average discharge of the Sihuas River.

Ayllus, at least as mechanisms that linked people to resources, would have been poorly developed in Sihuas, and those migrating into the valley who had been formally organized into ayllus had left many of their kinfolk—alive and dead—behind. As the landscape of Sihuas filled in, access to fields and other resources needed to be assured. People had to find new ways to make resource claims, and a highly visible, ancestral place on the landscape that could have supported Quilcapampa's claims was the Middle Horizon ruins and its renovated plaza. Families therefore set up their houses around old Quilcapampa, made offerings of placas in the ruins, and likely celebrated group rituals in the plaza.

Quilcapampa's residents then buried their dead in family plots along the site's margins. This location buffered their new homes from the outside world, using the bodies of the deceased as a material marker of their new claims to this powerful place and the arable land below it. Together, the living and the dead—adults and children—did the work of collectively creating community and claiming what they saw as their rightful place in a newly crowded and heterogeneous landscape.

A Different Kind of Place

There are hints of class and regional divisions in our data—hints that would undoubtedly be clarified with further research—and the foundations of a few possible collective tombs on the ridgetops. Yet Quilcapampa's cemeteries overwhelmingly consist of single-inhumation cist burial with modest offerings. The distinctions that stand out on the ground are small-scale ones: the terraces and lines of stones that define what may be family plots. In Colca, dozens of people were routinely buried together, with the same tombs being reused over generations (Velasco Reference Velasco2014; Wernke Reference Wernke2013). This burial practice turned the dead into a collective force who, if properly propitiated, worked for the living and aided in substantiating their claims to arable lands, residential places, and sacred spaces. Quilcapampa's residents also celebrated their dead, but the domestic and mortuary evidence suggest that affiliations spanning multiple families were, at best, weakly developed. Burials in the site's cemeteries and the ceremonial activities in old Quilcapampa nonetheless served to unite disparate families around a shared—though largely imagined—past, allowing people to weather the social disruption of early aggregation and migrations.

Intermediate sodalities would develop once people settled down. Over the next few generations, particular families grew closer through marriage, labor reciprocity, and other mechanisms. Ayllu organizations at Quilcapampa that relied on ancestral claims to resources thus became more feasible over time and were concepts already familiar to many living in Sihuas. As more people from Colca and other highland regions began to shoulder their way into the valley near the end of the Late Intermediate period, those living in the settlement likely recognized that claims to land and other resources would be best made through broader groupings of the dead rather than via the ruins of a short-lived outpost.

Conclusions

Cieza de León (Reference Cieza de León1959 [1553]:311–312), one the earliest Spanish chroniclers, noted,

In many valleys of the [coastal] plain . . . one finds great walls and divisions where each family has its allotted place to bury its dead, and for this purpose they have dug great hollows and cavities, each with its door, with all possible care. And it is a marvellous thing to behold the number of dead . . . separated one from the other . . . a vast number of skeletons and their clothing, rotted and corroded by time.

In part a lament of the Spanish conquest's widespread looting, Cieza de León's comments were also meant to draw a contrast between the burial towers of the highlands and the individual burials he saw on the coast. People were buried in a wide variety of ways across the south central Andes (Mantha Reference Mantha2015), but his broad distinction between the highlands and the coast still holds true after more than a century of archaeological fieldwork.

Ayllus structured life along much of the coast at the time of the Spanish conquest (Murra Reference Murra1975), but the dearth of chullpas raises what should be two central questions in Andean archaeology: How did ayllu organizations develop in different places on the coast, and what was the role of chullpas in their development? In a recent dissertation, Bongers (Reference Bongers2019) addresses these questions by looking at cist and chullpa burials in the middle Chincha Valley. His radiocarbon dates and excavations suggest that cist burials were no longer used in the valley after the Inca conquest. Although the reasons were likely varied, Bongers argues that the shift occurred in part “to establish and expand new bases of authority and reinforce territorial claims” during a time of cultural transition (Bongers Reference Bongers2019:368; see also Nuñez Flores Reference Nuñez Flores2013).

A similar rationale appears to have been in play in Sihuas in the mid-Late Intermediate period, but “bases of authority” and “territorial claims” were initially made by placing cist tombs in a new location. Highland migration per se did not lead to new funerary practices, because the conditions were not in place to sustain an ayllu organization centered on the veneration of the dead. Conditions had changed by the end of the period, and only further research will tell whether Sihaus's chullpa burials are more closely related to the circa fourteenth-century establishment of vertical archipelagos or the late fifteenth-century Inca conquest. Whatever the case, the Late Intermediate period's social, economic, and political dynamism is readily apparent in Sihuas, and much more work needs to be done in the valley and elsewhere to understand life in the Andes on the eve of the Spanish conquest.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant #43150212), the National Geographic Society (Grant #9730015), the Royal Ontario Museum (Kircheis Family, Louise Hawley Stone Charitable Trust, and New World Archaeology grants), and the University of Toronto Archaeology Centre. Permission to conduct the fieldwork was granted by Peru's Ministry of Culture.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available from the Royal Ontario Museum.

Supplemental Material

For supplemental material accompanying this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2021.15.

Supplemental Text 1. The Archaeology of Arequipa.

Supplemental Text 2. Radiocarbon Dating and Bayesian Modeling.

Supplement Figure 1. Vista from the plaza to the ridges where the Late Intermediate period occupation was located. In the foreground are the ruins of the Middle Horizon occupation.

References

References Cited

Arkush, Elizabeth, and Tung, Tiffiny A. 2013 Patterns of War in the Andes from the Archaic to the Late Horizon: Insights from Settlement Patterns and Cranial Trauma. Journal of Archaeological Research 21:307369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriola, Luisa Díaz 2015 Preparation of Corpses and Mummy Bundles in Ychsma Funerary Practices at Armatambo. In Funerary Practices and Models in the Ancient Andes: The Return of the Living Dead, edited by Eeckhout, Peter and Owens, Lawrence C., pp. 186209. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baca, Matusz, Martyna, Maciej Sobczyk, Weglenski, Pitor, and Stankoviv, Ann 2014 Locals, Resettlers, and Pilgrims: A Genetic Portrait of Three Pre-Columbian Andean Populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 154:402412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baitzel, Sarah L., and Rivera Infante, Arturo F. 2019 Prehispanic Presence, Settlement Patterns and Ecological Complementarity in the Lomas of the Sama Valley, Tacna, Peru. Chungara 51:381402.Google Scholar
Berquist, Stephen, Macqueen, Felipe Gonzalez, and Jennings, Justin 2021 Making Quilcapampa. In Quilcapampa: A Wari Enclave in Southern Peru, edited by Jennings, Justin, Álvarez, Willy Yépez, and Bautista, Stefanie L., pp. 86130. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berquist, Stephen, Spence-Morrowa, Giles, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Felipe, Rizzuto, Branden, Álvarez, Willy Yépez, Bautista, Stefanie, and Jennings, Justin 2018 A New Aerial Photogrammetric Survey Method for Recording Inaccessible Rock Art. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 8:4656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikoulis, Peter, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Felipe, Spence-Morrow, Giles, Álvarez, Willy Yépez, Bautista, Stefanie, and Jennings, Justin 2016 A New Methodology for Geoglyph Research: Preliminary Survey Results and Practical Workflow from the Quilcapampa Geoglyph Survey (Sihuas Valley, Peru). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10:119129.Google Scholar
Bikoulis, Peter, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Felipe, Spence-Morrow, Giles, Álvarez, Willy Yépez, Bautista, Stefanie, and Jennings, Justin 2018 Ancient Pathways and Geoglyphs in the Sihuas Valley of Southern Peru. Antiquity 92:13771391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis 2001 Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Ethnographic and Environmental Data Sets. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bingham, Hiram 1912 The Ascent of Coropuna. Harper's Monthly Magazine 124:489502.Google Scholar
Bongers, Jacob 2019 Mortuary Practice, Imperial Conquest, and Sociopolitical Change in the Middle Chincha Valley, Peru (ca. AD 1200–1650). PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bongers, Jacob, Arkush, Elizabeth, and Harrower, Michael 2012 Landscapes of Death: GIS-Based Analyses of Chullpas in the Western Lake Titicaca Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science 39:16671693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouyse-Cassagne, Thérése, and Bouysse, Philippe 1984 Volcan Indien, Volcan Chrétien a propos de L’éruption du Huyanaputina en l'an 1600 (Pérou Méridional). Journal de la Société des Américanistes 70:4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouyse-Cassagne, Thérése, and Chacama R., Juan 2012 Partición colonial del territorio, cultos funerarios, y memoria ancestral en Carangas y precordillera de Arica (Siglos XVI-XVII). Chungara 44:669689.Google Scholar
Brooks, Sarah Osgood 1998 Prehistoric Agricultural Terraces in the Rio Japo Basin, Colca Valley, Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Buikstra, Jane E. 1995 Tombs for the Living . . . or . . . for the Dead: The Osmore Ancestors. In Tombs for the Living: Andean Mortuary Practices, edited by Dillehay, Tom D., pp. 229279. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bürgi, Peter T. 1993 The Inka Empire's Expansion in the Coastal Sierra Region West of Lake Titicaca. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bürgi, Peter T., Williams, Sloan A., Buikstra, Jane E., Clark, Niki R., Cerna, Maria C. Lozada, and Pino, Elva Torres 1989 Aspects of Mortuary Differentiation at the Site of Estuquiña, Southern Peru. In Ecology, Settlement, and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru, edited by Rice, Don S., Stanish, Charles, and Scarr, Phillip R., pp. 347369. BAR International Series 545, Vol. 2. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Jesús E. 2020 Mobiliary Art of Pampacolca, Peru: A Palaeoart Unique in the World. Rock Art Research 37:5966.Google Scholar
Chacaltana Cortez, Sofia 2015 Regional Interfaces between Inca and Local Communities in the Colesuyo Region of Southern Peru. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cieza de León, Pedro 1959 [1553] The Incas. Translated by Harriet de Onis. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Conlee, Christina A., Buzon, Michele R., Gutierrez, Aldo Noriega, Simonetti, Antonio, and Creaser, Robert A. 2009 Identifying Foreigners versus Locals in a Burial Population from Nasca Peru: An Investigation Using Strontium Isotope Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:27552764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlee, Christina A., Jalh Dulanto, Carol J. Mackey, and Charles Stanish, 2004 Late Prehispanic Sociopolitical Complexity. In Andean Archaeology, edited by Silverman, Helaine, pp. 209236. Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cook, David Noble (with Cook), Alexandra Parma 2007 People of the Volcano: Andean Counterpoint in the Colca Valley of Peru. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Emily Marie 2005 Ancestors, Mountains, Shrines, and Settlements: Late Intermediate Period Landscapes of the Southern Vilcanota River Valley, Peru. PhD dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
deFrance, Susan D. and Olson, Elizabeth 2013 Late Prehispanic Coquina Quarrying and Tomb Construction in Coastal Southern Peru. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 8:316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Vera Cruz Chávez, Pablo 1996 El papel de la sub región norte de los valles occidentales en la articulación entre los andes centrales y los andes centro sur. In La integración surandina: Cinco siglos después, edited by Albó, Xavier, Arratia, María Inés, Hidalgo, Jorge, Núñez, Lautaro, Llagostera, Agustín, Remy, María Isabel, and Revesz, Bruno, pp. 135158. Estudios y Debates Regionales Andinos 91. Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos “Bartolomé de Las Casas,” Cuzco.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, Margarita, Sam Lucy, Staša Babić, and Edwards, David N. 2005 The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity, and Religion. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Dillehay, Tom D. 1995 Introduction. In Tombs for the Living: Andean Mortuary Practices, edited by Dillehay, Tom D., pp. 126. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dillehay, Tom D., and Kolata, Alan L. 2004 Long-Term Human Response to Uncertain Environmental Conditions in the Andes. PNAS 101:43254330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doutriaux, Miriam Agnes 2004 Imperial Conquest in a Multiethnic Setting: The Inka Occupation of the Colca Valley, Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Duchesne, Frédéric 2005 Tumbas de Coporaque: Aproxiamaciones a concepciones funerarias Collaguas. Bulletin de l'Institut Français d’Études Andines 34:411429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchesne, Frédéric, and Chacama R., Juan 2012 Torres funerarias prehispánicas de los Andes centro-sur: Muerte, ocupación del espacio y organización social. Chungara 44:605619.Google Scholar
Dulanto, Jalh 2008 Between Horizons: Diverse Configurations of Society and Power in the Late Pre-Hispanic Central Andes. In Handbook of South American Archaeology, edited by Silverman, Helaine and Isbell, William H., pp. 761782. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echevarria y Morales, Francisco Xavier 1949 [1805] Memorias de la Santa Iglesia de Arequipa. In Memorias para la historia de Arequipa, edited by Barriga, Víctor M., Vol. 4. Imprenta Portugal, Arequipa.Google Scholar
Fehren-Schmitz, Lars, Haak, Wolfgang, Mächtle, Bertil, Masch, Florian, Llamas, Bastien, Cagigao, Elsa Tomasto, Sossna, Volker, Schittek, Karsten, Cuadrado, Johnny Isla, Eitel, Bernhard, and Reindel, Markus. 2014 Climate Change Underlies Global Demographic, Genetic, and Cultural Transitions in pre-Columbian Southern Peru. PNAS 111:94439448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galdós Rodríguez, Guillermo 1985 Kuntisuyu: Lo que encontraron los Españoles. Fundación M. J. Bustamante de la Fuente, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Galdós Rodríguez, Guillermo 1990 Naciones ancestrales y la conquista Incaica. In Historia general de Arequipa, edited by Avendaño, Maximo Neira, Galdós Rodríguez, Guillermo, Malaga Medina, Alejandro, Quiroz Paz Soldán, Eusebio, and Guillermo Carpio Muñoz, Juan, pp. 185213. Fundación M. J. Bustamante de la Fuente, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Robin Coleman 2010 Negotiating Power in the Wari Empire: A Comparative Study of Local-Imperial Interactions in the Moquegua and Majes Regions during the Middle Horizon (550–1050 CE). PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gordillo Begazo, Jesús 1996 Desarrollo regional tardío y ocupación Inca en la pre-cordillera de Tacna. Ciencia y Desarrollo 3:96111.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Joerg 2002 Tiempo y tradición en Arequipa, Perú, y el surgimiento de la cronología del tema de la deidad central. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 5:89137.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Joerg 2006 When and Where Did the Nasca Proliferous Style Emerge? In Andean Archaeology III: North and South, edited by Isbell, William H. and Silverman, Helaine, pp. 410434. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Joerg 2009 Tradiciones del Horizonte Temprano y del Período Intermedio Temprano en los valles de Sihuas, Vitor, y Majes, Departamento de Arequipa, Perú. Andes 7:205227.Google Scholar
Howell, Todd L., and Kintigh, Keith W. 1996 Archaeological Identification of Kin Groups Using Mortuary and Biological Data: An Example from the American Southwest. American Antiquity 61:537554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, John 1977 Chulpas of the Lupaca Zone of the Peruvian High Plateau. Journal of Field Archaeology 4:149170.Google Scholar
Isbell, William H. 1997 Mummies and Mortuary Monuments: A Postprocessual Prehistory of Central Andean Social Organization. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Isbell, William H. 2004 Mortuary Preferences: A Huari Case Study from Middle Horizon Peru. Latin American Antiquity 15:332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Justin, Berquist, Stephen, Spence-Morrow, Giles, Bikoulis, Peter, Gonzalez-Macqueen, Felipe, Yépez Álvarez, Willy J., and Bautista, Stefanie 2018 A Moving Place: The Creation of Quilcapampa. In Powerful Places in the Ancient Andes, edited by Jennings, Justin and Swenson, Edward R., pp. 399426. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Jennings, Justin, Rizzuto, Branden, and Yépez Álvarez, Willy J. 2021 Living at Quilcapampa—Brief Occupation and Orderly Abandonment. In Quilcapampa: A Wari Enclave in Southern Peru, edited by Jennings, Justin, Álvarez, Willy Yépez, and Bautista, Stefanie L., pp. 168208. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Jennings, Justin, and Yépez Álvarez, Willy J. 2009 El Intermedio Tardío en el valle de Cotahuasi, Perú. Andes 7:481500.Google Scholar
Jennings, Justin, and Yépez Álvarez, Willy J. 2015 Tenahaha and the Wari State: A View of the Middle Horizon from the Cotahuasi Valley. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Jennings, Justin, Yépez Álvarez, Willy J., and Bautista, Stefanie L. (editors) 2021 Quilcapampa: A Wari Enclave in Southern Peru. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Kesseli, Risto, and Pärssinen, Martti 2005 Identidad étnica y muerte: Torres funerarias (chullpas) como símbolos de poder étnico en el altiplano boliviano de Pakasa (1250-1600 d.C.). Bulletin de L'Institut Français d’ Études Andines 34:379410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohut, Lauren Elizabeth 2016 Cooperation through War: Late Intermediate Period Warfare and Community Formation in the South-Central Andes. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
Kolata, Alan 2013 Ancient Inca. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kurin, Danielle S. 2016 The Bioarchaeology of Societal Collapse and Regeneration in Ancient Peru. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Kevin 2013 Plazas, Palaces, and Peripheries in Ancient Peru. Antiquity 87:918920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, George 2002 Feasting and Ancestor Veneration at Chinchawas, North Highlands of Ancash, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 13:279304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linares Delgado, Lucy 1988 Estudio arqueológico en el valle de Huanca, Arequipa. Bachelor's thesis, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Linares Delgado, Lucy 2009 Reconocimiento arqueológico del valle de Sihuas. Boletín de Lima 31:5170.Google Scholar
Linares Málaga, Eloy 1988 Arte mobiliar con tradición rupestre en el sur del Perú. Rock Art Research 5:5466.Google Scholar
Linares Málaga, Eloy 1990 Prehistoria de Arequipa, Vol. 1. CONCYTEC-UNSA, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Linares Málaga, Eloy 1993 Prehistoria de Arequipa, Vol. 2. CONCYTEC-UNSA, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Llagostera, Augustín 2010 Retomando los límites y las limitaciones del “archipiélago vertical.” Chungara 42:283295.Google Scholar
Malpass, Michael A., and Chávez, Pablo de la Vera Cruz 1990 Cronología y secuencia de la cerámica de Chijra, valle de Colca. Gaceta Arqueológica Andina 5:4157.Google Scholar
Mantha, Alexis 2009 Territoriality, Social Boundaries, and Ancestor Veneration in the Central Andes of Peru. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28:158176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantha, Alexis 2015 Houses, Residential Burials, and Identity in the Rapayán Valley and Upper Marañón Drainage, Peru during Late Andean Prehistory. Latin American Antiquity 26:433451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCool, Weston C. 2017 Coping with Conflict: Defensive Strategies and Chronic Warfare in the Prehispanic Nazca Region. Latin American Antiquity 28:373393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorriston, Joy, Michal Harrower, Louise Martin, and Oches, Eric 2012 Cattle Cults of the Arabian Neolithic and Early Territorial Societies. American Anthropologist 114:4563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morante, José María 1949 Arqueología de Arequipa. Publicaciones “Revista Universitaria” No. 1. Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Murra, John V. 1972 El control “vertical” de un máximo de pisos ecológicos en la economía de las sociedades andinas. In Visita de la provincia de León de Huánuco en 1562, Tomo 2, edited by Murra, John V., pp. 429476. Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán, Huánuco, Peru.Google Scholar
Murra, John V. 1975 Formaciones económicas y políticas del mundo andino. Instituto de Estudos Peruanos, Lima.Google Scholar
Neira Avendaño, Máximo 1990 Arequipa prehispánica. In Historia general de Arequipa, edited by Avendaño, Máximo Neira, Galdós Rodríguez, Guillermo, Málaga Medina, Alejandro, Quiroz Paz Soldán, Eusebio, and Guillermo Carpio Muñoz, Juan, pp. 5184. Fundación M. J. Bustamente de la Fuente, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Neira Avendaño, Máximo 1998 Arqueología de Arequipa. Chronos 1:950.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Axel 2008 The Materiality of Ancestors: Chullpas and Social Memory in the Late Prehispanic History of the South Andes. In Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices, edited by Mills, Barbara J. and Walker, William H., pp. 207231. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Nuñez Flores, Claudia Lisbeth 2013 Identidad y muerte en Tacahuay Tambo: Aproximaciones desde el análisis de una chullpa del Colesuyo. Tesis para optar al título de licenciada en arqueología, Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Owen, Bruce 2010 Wari in the Majes-Camaná Valley: A Different Kind of Horizon. In Beyond Wari Walls: Regional Perspectives on Middle Horizon Peru, edited by Jennings, Justin, pp. 5077. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Pease, Franklin G. Y. (editor) 1977 Collaguas 1. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Quequezana Lucano, Gladys Cecilia 1997 Análisis de la tecnología textil del valle de Siguas, cementerios prehispánicos: San Juan, Cornejo, Hornillos, Santa Ana, y La Chimba. Tesis para optar al título de licenciada en arqueología, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Quequezana Lucano, Gladys Cecilia 2009 Tecnología textil prehispánica del valle de Siguas, Arequipa. Boletín de Lima 31:79117.Google Scholar
Ravines, Rogger 2007 El Zarzal: Anima amissa. Boletín de Lima 29:4966.Google Scholar
Rizzuto, Branden, and Jennings, Justin 2021 Quilcapampa's Stone Tools and Placas Pintadas. In Quilcapampa: A Wari Enclave in Southern Peru, edited by Jennings, Justin, Álvarez, Willy Yépez, and Bautista, Stefanie L., pp. 258306. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero Fernández, Darwin, and Ticona Turpo, Pedro J. W. 2003 Memoria descriptiva de la revisión y actualización del cuadrángulo de Huambo (32-r). INGEMMET, Lima.Google Scholar
Rossi, Matti J., Kesseli, Risto, Liuha, Petri, Meneses, Jédu Sagárnaga, and Bustamente, Jonny 2002 A Preliminary Archaeological and Environmental Study of Pre-Columbian Burial Towers at Huachacalla, Bolivia. Geoarchaeology 17:633648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, Frank 1995 “The Beautiful Grandparents”: Andean Ancestor Shrines and Mortuary Ritual as Seen through Colonial Records. In Tombs for the Living: Andean Mortuary Practices, edited by Dillehay, Tom D., pp. 315353. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Santoro, Calogero M., Dillehay, Tom D., Jorge Hidalgo, Daniela Valenzuela R., Álvaro L. Romero, Francisco Rothhammer, and Vivien G., and Standen, 2010 Revista al tercer caso de verticalidad de John Murra en las costas de los Andes Centrales y Centro Sur. Chungara 10:325340.Google Scholar
Santos Ramírez, René S. 1976 Investigación Arqueológica en el valle de Siguas. PhD dissertation, Academic Program in History and Anthropology, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín, Arequipa, Peru.Google Scholar
Santos Ramírez, René S. 1980 Cerámica temprana estilo: “La Ramada.” Arqueos Perú 1(1):229.Google Scholar
Scaffidi, Cassandra Koontz 2018 Networks of Violence: Bioarchaeological and Spatial Perspectives on Physical, Structural, and Cultural Violence in the Lower Majes Valley, Arequipa, Peru, in the Pre- and Early-Wari Eras. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
Schittek, K., Forbriger, M., Mächtle, B., Schäbitz, F., Wennrich, V., Reindel, M., and Eitel, B. 2015 Holocene Environmental Changes in the Highlands of the Peruvian Andes (14o S) and their Impact on Pre-Columbian Cultures. Climate of the Past 11:2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciscento, Mary M. 1989 Imperialism in the High Andes: Inka and Wari Involvement in the Chuquibamba Valley, Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Sharratt, Nicola 2011 Social Identities and State Collapse: A Diachronic Study of Tiwanaku Burials in the Moquegua Valley, Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shennan, Stephen (editor) 1989 Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobczyk, Maciej 2000 Arquitectura funeraria prehispánica en la región del Nevado Coropuna, Perú. Andes 4. University of Warsaw, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Stanish, Charles 1989 Household Archaeology: Testing Models of Zonal Complementarity in the South Central Andes. American Anthropologist 91:724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanish, Charles 2005 Migration, Colonies, and Ethnicity in the South-Central Andes. In Us and Them: Archaeology and Ethnicity in the Andes, edited by Reycraft, Richard M., pp. 226232. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanish, Charles 2012 Above-Ground Tombs in the Circum-Titicaca Basin. In Advances in Titicaca Basin Archaology III, edited by Vranich, Alexi, Klarich, Elizabeth, and Stanish, Charles, pp. 203220. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology 51. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Stensrund, Astrid B. 2016 Dreams of Growth and Fear of Water Crisis: The Ambivalence of “Progress” in the Majes-Siguas Irrigation Project, Peru. History and Anthropology 27:569584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stovel, Emily M. 2013 Concepts of Ethnicity and Culture in Andean Archaeology. Latin American Antiquity 24:320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Hitoshi 1988 Algunos datos sobre la utilización de los recursos naturales en la costa de Arequipa: época colonial. In Recursos naturales andinos, edited by Masuda, Shozo, pp. 5979. University of Tokyo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Tantaleán, Henry 2006 Regresar para construir: Prácticas funerarias e ideología(s) durante la ocupación Inka en Cutimbo, Puno-Perú. Chungara 38:129143.Google Scholar
Tung, Tiffany A. 2007 The Village of Beringa at the Periphery of the Wari Empire: A Site Overview and New Radiocarbon Dates. Andean Past 8:253286.Google Scholar
Tung, Tiffany A. 2012 Violence, Ritual, and the Wari Empire: A Social Bioarchaeology of Imperialism in the Ancient Andes. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulloa Mogollón, Juan D 1965 [1586] Relación de la provincia de los Collaguas. In Relaciones Geográficas de Indías-Perú, edited by Jímenez de la Espada, Marcos, Vol. 1, pp. 326333. Ediciones Atlas, Madrid.Google Scholar
Velasco, Matthew C. 2014 Building on the Ancestors: Mortuary Structures and Extended Agency in the Late Prehispanic Colca Valley. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24:453465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco, Matthew C. 2018a Ethnogenesis and Social Difference in the Andean Late Intermediate Period (AD 1100–1450). Current Anthropology 59:98106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco, Matthew C. 2018b Open Sepulchers and Closed Boundaries? Biodistance Analysis of Cemetery Structure and Postmarital Residence in the Late Prehispanic Andes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 166:905920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernke, Steven A. 2003 An Archaeo-History of Andean Community and Landscape: The Late Prehispanic and Early Colonial Colca Valley, Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Wernke, Steven A. 2006a Collagua “Eco-Logistics”: Intermediate Elites and Hybrid Community Structures in the Colca Valley, Peru. In Intermediate Elites in Pre-Columbian States and Empires, edited by Elson, Christina M. and Alan Covey, R., pp. 175211. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wernke, Steven A. 2006b The Politics of Community and Inka Statecraft in the Colca Valley, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 17:177208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernke, Steven A. 2007 Negotiating Community and Landscape in the Peruvian Andes: A Trans-Conquest View. American Anthropologist 109:130152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernke, Steven A. 2013 Negotiated Settlements: Andean Communities and Landscapes under Inka and Spanish Colonialism. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Sloan R. 1990 The Skeletal Biology of Estuquiña: A Late Intermediate Period Site in Southern Peru. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Yépez Álvarez, Willy J., Jennings, Justin, and Berquist, Stephen 2018 Patrón arquitectónico y uso del espacio durante el horizonte tardío en el valle de Siguas, Arequipa. Cuadernos de Qhapaq Ñan 5:126148.Google Scholar
Zori, Colleen, and Brant, Erika 2012 Managing the Risk of Cultural Variability in Late Prehistoric Northern Chile. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31:403421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Late Intermediate period settlements and earlier cemeteries in the mid-Sihuas Valley. The inset shows neighboring valleys mentioned in the text and indicates where the region is found in Peru (site locations adapted from Quequezana Lucano 1997). (Color online)

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of Quilcapampa showing the locations of the North Cemetery, South Cemetery, and Middle Horizon occupation. The dotted lines mark the approximate boundaries of the Late Intermediate period occupation. (Color online)

Figure 2

Figure 3. Orthophoto of Unit 12 excavations into a typical Late Intermediate period domestic structure with associated patio. (Color online)

Figure 3

Figure 4. (A) A cántaro from Tomb 19 and (B) pitcher from Tomb 26 in the South Cemetery, and (C–D) a bowl and (E) cántaro fragments from the surface collection in the North Cemetery. Iconography, form, and paste can be used to distinguish the ceramic assemblages. Additional images of South Cemetery ceramics are found in Figure 7. Figure by Justin Jennings. (Color online)

Figure 4

Table 1. Age, Sex, and Associated Offerings for Excavated Burials at Quilcapampa.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Orthophoto of Tombs 19–23 in Unit 30. Note the platform used to define the edge of the burial plot. (Color online)

Figure 6

Figure 6. Orthophoto of Tombs 25–28 in Unit 32. Tomb 26 is shown still sealed with its capstone in red mortar; Tomb 28 contains a child burial. (Color online)

Figure 7

Figure 7. Examples of the few offerings found in each cist tomb: (A) painted cobbles found under the woman buried in Tomb 1 (Locus 1307), (B) fetal camelid buried in Tomb 19, and (C) a bowl and cántaro from Tomb 24. Figure by Justin Jennings. (Color online)

Figure 8

Figure 8. Tomb 19 contents and profile. Figure by Stephen Berquist. (Color online)

Supplementary material: File

Jennings et al. supplementary material

Jennings et al. supplementary material 1

Download Jennings et al. supplementary material(File)
File 32.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Jennings et al. supplementary material

Jennings et al. supplementary material 2

Download Jennings et al. supplementary material(File)
File 244.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Jennings et al. supplementary material

Jennings et al. supplementary material 3

Download Jennings et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 6 MB