Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T02:05:01.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When up is down and down is up: Body orientation, proximity, and gestures as resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2002

WOLFF-MICHAEL ROTH
Affiliation:
Applied Cognitive Science, MacLaurin Building A548, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3100 STN CSC, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 3N4, mroth@uvic.ca
DANIEL V. LAWLESS
Affiliation:
Applied Cognitive Science, MacLaurin Building A548, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3100 STN CSC, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8W 3N4, mroth@uvic.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article is concerned with understanding situations in which speakers talk in the presence of scientific inscriptions (lectures in science classes, public presentations). Drawing on extensive video materials accumulated in middle and high school science classrooms and university lectures, we develop a framework for the resources speakers make available to their audience for understanding what the talk is about. We distinguish three situations according to the nature of reference to the phenomenon talked about: (i) talk is about phenomenon but mediated by reference to a two-dimensional (2-D) inscription; (ii) talk is about phenomenon but mediated by reference to a three-dimensional (3-D) inscription; and (iii) talk is directly about phenomenon. Associated with these three situations are different body orientations, distances from inscriptions, and types of gestures. When speakers laminate talk characteristic of two different types of situations, the orientation “up” can become “down” and “down” can become “up,” potentially leading to confusing statements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press