Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T14:22:34.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of Thomas W. Schubert and Anne Maass (eds.). Spatial dimensions of social thought. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2011, 353pp., ISBN: 978-3110254303.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Daniël Lakens*
Affiliation:
School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands. E-mail: D.Lakens@tue.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2012

References

Barsalou, L. W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59. 617645.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75. 128.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R. & Berntson, G. G.. 1993. Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65. 517.Google Scholar
Clark, A. & Chalmers, D.. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58. 719.Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. 1995. The intelligent use of space. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 73. 3168.Google Scholar
Bogardus, E. 1947. Measurement of personal-group relations. Sociometry 10. 306311.Google Scholar
Gattis, M. (Ed.) 2001. Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. 1966. The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakens, D., Semin, G. R. & Garrido, M.. 2011. The sound of time: Cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time. Consciousness and Cognition 20. 437443.Google Scholar
Meier, B. P. & Robinson, M. D.. 2004. Why the sunny side is up: Association between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science 15(4). 243247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santiago, J., Ouellet, M., Román, A. & Valenzuela, J.. In press. Attentional factors in conceptual congruency. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Schneider, I. K., Rutjes, B., Jostmann, N. B. & Lakens, D.. 2011. Weighty matters: Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2. 474478.Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E.. 1991. The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Woelert, P. 2011. Human cognition, space, and the sedimentation of meaning. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10. 113137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar