Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T02:34:43.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of big life decisions – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2024

Adrian R. Camilleri
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

decision-makingautobiographical memorylife eventslife storyprospectionerratum
Type
Erratum
Information
Judgment and Decision Making , Volume 19 , 2024 , e37
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making and European Association for Decision Making

This article was published with errors in the labelling of three figures, for which the publisher apologises. The corrected figures and captions are below.

Figure 3 Scatterplot of average decision rank against average decision evaluation for each decision type in Study 3. Note: The size of the point indicates the relative frequency of each decision type.

Figure 4 Correlations between decision factors and decision evaluation for each decision type and cluster in Study 3. Note: Horizontal lines demarcate different clusters. Clusters are based on the correlation between the decision factor and decision evaluation for each decision type.

Figure 5 Percent of recalled past big decisions for each decision age period and age group in Study 3.

References

Camilleri, A. R. (2023). An investigation of big life decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 18, e32. doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 3 Scatterplot of average decision rank against average decision evaluation for each decision type in Study 3. Note: The size of the point indicates the relative frequency of each decision type.

Figure 1

Figure 4 Correlations between decision factors and decision evaluation for each decision type and cluster in Study 3. Note: Horizontal lines demarcate different clusters. Clusters are based on the correlation between the decision factor and decision evaluation for each decision type.

Figure 2

Figure 5 Percent of recalled past big decisions for each decision age period and age group in Study 3.