Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T05:57:30.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation in the composition and diversity of ground-layer herbs and shrubs in unburnt and burnt landscapes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

Daniel F. R. Cleary*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, CESAM – Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Karl A. O. Eichhorn
Affiliation:
Eichhorn Ecologie, Zeist, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: cleary@ua.pt or dfrcleary@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Forest fires pose an important threat to tropical rain-forest biodiversity. In the present study, we assessed ground layer (herb and shrub) communities in six differentially disturbed landscape plots in East Kalimantan, Indonesia, including primary and logged forest and once-, twice- and frequently-burnt forest. Overall, we recorded 175 species of herbs and shrubs; richness was highest in twice-burnt forest and lowest in logged forest. Vegetation and topographical variables including the percentage of the plot burnt and tree abundance were significant predictors of variation in composition. The main compositional gradient showed a clear distinction between subplots in unburnt versus burnt forest. A subset of subplots in burnt forest, however, clustered together with subplots from unburnt forest. These plots were located in a network of relatively unscathed forest along floodplains that persisted in the burnt-forest matrix. Small plant species associated with unburnt forest included several species of Dryopteridaceae, Marantaceae and Rubiaceae. Species associated with once- and twice-burnt forest included Mikania scandens (Compositae), Microlepia speluncae (Dennstaedtiaceae), Nephrolepis cf. biserrata (Nephrolepidaceae), Lygodium microphyllum (Schizaeaceae) and Hornstedtia cf. reticulata (Zingiberaceae). The frequently-burnt landscape plot was characterized by a high cover of the grass species Imperata cylindrica and the invasive exotic shrub Chromolaena odorata. Importantly, these species and other exotics had also invaded the once- and twice-burnt forest and represent a potential threat to forest recovery.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

INTRODUCTION

Tropical deforestation results from a complex interplay of social, political, ecological and climatological interactions in which fires play a key role (Cochrane Reference COCHRANE2003). Although forest flora and fauna tend to recover following forest fires (Cleary & Genner Reference CLEARY and GENNER2006, Cleary & Priadjati Reference CLEARY and PRIADJATI2005), the importance of fire is not so much the incidence, but rather the frequency. Fires are much more frequent today than in the past with intervals of less than 15 y at present compared to hundreds or thousands of years in the past (Cochrane & Schultze Reference COCHRANE and SCHULZE1998, Cochrane et al. Reference COCHRANE, ALENCAR, SCHULZE, SOUZA, NEPSTAD, LEFEBRE and DAVIDSON1999). This increase in the frequency of forest fires has been related to increased ignition sources as human population density has increased and people move into previously inaccessible forest areas (Laurance Reference LAURANCE1998, Laurance et al. Reference LAURANCE, COCHRANE, BERGEN, FEARNSIDE, DELAMONICA, BARBER, D'ANGELO and FERNANDES2001, Nepstad et al. Reference NEPSTAD, CARVALHO, BARROS, ALENCAR, CAPOBIANCO, BISHOP, MOUTINHO, LEFEBRE, LOPES SILVA and PRINS2001, Peres Reference PERES2001). In addition to this, moist tropical forests in Indonesia and elsewhere have been subjected to severe droughts during intense El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events (Cochrane Reference COCHRANE2003, Siegert et al. Reference SIEGERT, RUECKER, HINRICHS and HOFFMANN2001).

El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events occur irregularly but typically once every 3–6 y. The occurrence of severe ENSO events has had major implications for ecosystem functioning and biodiversity in deserts, tropical rain forests and marine systems (Cleary et al. Reference CLEARY, FAUVELOT, GENNER, MENKEN and MOOERS2006a, Holmgren et al. Reference HOLMGREN, SCHEFFER, EZCURRA, GUTIERREZ and MOHREN2001). With respect to tropical rain forests, ENSO events can cause extended periods of drought and promote forest fires. Using charcoal records, Haberle & Ledru (Reference HABERLE and LEDRU2001) showed a strong relationship between the occurrence of fires in Latin America and South-East Asia and ENSO events during the past 16000 y. Recent ENSO-related fires, however, seem to be much more severe than their historic counterparts as ENSO events themselves have become more intense (Tudhope et al. Reference TUDHOPE, CHILCOTT, MCCULLOCH, COOK, CHAPOPELL, ELLAM, LEA, LOUGH and SHIMMIELD2001). The most destructive ENSO fires in human history were recorded in 1997–1998, when over 20 million ha were burnt in South-East Asia and Latin America and 5.2 million ha in the Indonesian province of East Kalimantan alone (Cochrane Reference COCHRANE2003, Siegert et al. Reference SIEGERT, RUECKER, HINRICHS and HOFFMANN2001). These fires surpassed the previous record of 1982–1983 where 3.5 million ha were burnt in East Kalimantan alone (Goldammer et al. Reference GOLDAMMER, SEIBERT, SCHINDELE, Schulte and Schöne1996). These fires affected logged and secondary forests and an estimated 0.8 million ha of primary forest.

In the moist tropics, forest fires are often merely a thin, slowly creeping ribbon of flames a few decimetres high (Cochrane & Schulze Reference COCHRANE and SCHULZE1998) and previously deemed not to be particularly harmful until it was shown that they are able to kill numerous trees (Cochrane & Schulze Reference COCHRANE and SCHULZE1999, Peres Reference PERES1999) and affect extensive areas of forest (Nepstad et al. Reference NEPSTAD, VERISSIMO, ALENCAR, NOBRE, LIMA, LEFEBRE, SCHLESINGER, POTTER, MOUTINHO, MENDOZA, COCHRANE and BROOKS1999). The fires themselves are also the starting point in a series of destructive processes and positive feedback loops that can culminate in extensive deforestation if left unchecked (Cochrane et al. Reference COCHRANE, ALENCAR, SCHULZE, SOUZA, NEPSTAD, LEFEBRE and DAVIDSON1999). For example, burning itself makes a forest more susceptible to subsequent burning as the canopy is opened up and woody debris accumulates as a source of future kindling. The loss of vegetation cover also promotes climatological change and the promotion of future droughts by reducing evaporation, increasing radiation and inhibiting rainfall (Berbet & Costa Reference BERBET and COSTA2003, Durieux et al. Reference DURIEUX, MACHADO and LAURENT2003, Laurance Reference LAURANCE1998, Shukla et al. Reference SHUKLA, NOBRE and SELLERS1990). Burning also leads to increased logging pressure and land conversion as farmers take the opportunity to expand their land holdings (Curran et al. Reference CURRAN, TRIGG, MCDONALD, ASTIANI, HARDIONO, SIREGAR, CANIAGO and KASISCHKE2004, Kartawinata et al. Reference KARTAWINATA, JESSUP, VAYDA, Lieth and Werger1989, Laurance Reference LAURANCE1998, van Nieuwstadt et al. Reference VAN NIEUWSTADT, SHEIL and KARTAWINATA2001). The unpredictable occurrence of fires also discourages farmers from investing in environmentally benign forest agricultural systems that may not yield the desired return on investments should they burn (Nepstad et al. Reference NEPSTAD, CARVALHO, BARROS, ALENCAR, CAPOBIANCO, BISHOP, MOUTINHO, LEFEBRE, LOPES SILVA and PRINS2001). Instead slash-and-burn agriculture is practiced, which further increases the probability of forest loss. Finally, invasive and often exotic species can invade burnt forests and promote future fires as a means of competing with the native forest plant species (Chapin et al. Reference CHAPIN, ZAVALETA, EVINER, NAYLOR, VITOUSEK, REYNOLDS, HOOPER, LAVOREL, SALA, HOBBIE, MACK and DÍAZ2000, Otsamo et al. Reference OTSAMO, ÅDJERS, SASMITO HADI, KUUSIPALO, TUOMELA and VUOKKO1995).

Numerous studies have focused on the impact of disturbance on tree composition in tropical rain-forest settings. There is, however, a paucity of studies examining the distribution and response of smaller plants to large-scale perturbations such as logging and forest fires (Vieira et al. Reference VIEIRA, POLISEL, IVANAUSKAS, SHEPHERD, WAECHTER, YAMAMOTO and MARTINS2015). Forest fires in particular should have a major impact on the herb and shrub community by opening up the forest canopy. Frequent burn events, however, may lead to the demise of shade-tolerant forest herbs that require a moist habitat without direct sun exposure (Marschall & Proctor Reference MARSCHALL and PROCTOR2004). In the present study, our main hypothesis was to test if disturbance including logging and (multiple) burn events have affected the richness and composition of the herb and shrub layer of forests in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. A secondary hypothesis was to test if there was a significant association between the composition of the herb and shrub community and environmental variables related to tree and liana structure, previous burn events and topography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

Sampling took place in the Balikpapan-Samarinda region of East Kalimantan, Indonesia from January to October 2000. The Balkipapan-Samarinda region of East Kalimantan mainly consisted of small remnant patches of unburnt forest and a few larger isolates following the 1982–1983 and 1997–1998 ENSO burn events. The larger isolates included a 3500-ha unburnt forest isolate in the Sungai Wain protected forest and a 108000 ha unburnt isolate in the foothills of Mount Meratus. Despite severe species loss immediately after the fires (Cleary & Grill Reference CLEARY and GRILL2004), the burnt forests have shown vigorous regrowth and steadily increasing biodiversity as plants and animals recolonized fire-affected forest (Cleary & Genner Reference CLEARY and GENNER2006, Cleary & Priadjati Reference CLEARY and PRIADJATI2005, Cleary et al. Reference CLEARY, PRIADJATI, SURYOKUSUMO and MENKEN2006b, Dennis et al. Reference DENNIS, HOFFMANN, APPLEGATE, VON GEMMINGEN and KARTAWINATA2001, Siegert et al. Reference SIEGERT, RUECKER, HINRICHS and HOFFMANN2001).

In order to test the previously mentioned hypotheses, six 450-ha landscape plots of differentially disturbed forest were selected prior to sampling. These included two relatively pristine landscape plots (P1 and P2), one in the large unburnt forest isolate (108000 ha; P1) and one in the small (3500-ha; P2) unburnt forest isolate, a logged-landscape plot (L1) in the large unburnt forest isolate (108000 ha), a once-burnt landscape plot (B1) adjacent to the small (3500-ha) unburnt forest isolate, a twice-burnt landscape plot (B2) and a frequently-burnt, largely grassland landscape plot (B3); 16–40 10 × 20-m subplots were randomly allocated to each landscape plot using grid cells on maps. All landscape plots were located within a 5.2 million-ha area of East Kalimantan in the Balikpapan-Samarinda region that was predominantly undisturbed forest prior to the severe 1982–1983 and 1997–1998 ENSO events. After these events the area was turned into a mosaic of burnt and regenerating forest with smaller and larger unburnt isolates (Siegert et al. Reference SIEGERT, RUECKER, HINRICHS and HOFFMANN2001). B3 was located in a predominantly grassland area, with patches of degraded forest, that has been affected by slash-and-burn agriculture since the 1970s. See Appendix 1 and Cleary (Reference CLEARY2003) and Cleary et al. (Reference CLEARY, MOOERS, EICHHORN, VAN TOL, DE JONG and MENKEN2004) for a more detailed description of the sampling design and plot layout.

In the large unburnt isolate, rocks from the Middle-late Miocene and Early Miocene dominated the geology, largely consisting of tertiary sedimentary rocks. Alternating layers of sandstone, claystone, mudstone and siltstone dominated the lithology, but there were only slight differences in soil characteristics. Deep clay-rich soils dominated the area, predominantly ultisols, but also some inceptisols (van Bremen et al. Reference VAN BREMEN, IRIANSYAH and ANDRIESSE1990). Only soils over Miocene sandstone had different soil characteristics, but these spodosols were very rare (less than 3% of area). Most differences in soil chemistry were limited to the top-soil and were due to slight mineralogical differences in parent material and vegetation. Overall the logged-forest landscape plot had a slightly more fertile A horizon than primary forest. The topography was very heterogeneous; steeply dissected hills and hillocks (150–500 m asl) with short, steep slopes and narrow crests and valley floors dominated the area (van Bremen et al. Reference VAN BREMEN, IRIANSYAH and ANDRIESSE1990). In the small unburnt isolate and the surrounding burnt-forest matrix, the topography was characterized by gentle to steep hills intersected by many small rivers. The soil type comprised mainly Alisols, very deep, acid and infertile soils with a high fraction of loam and clay (van Bremen et al. Reference VAN BREMEN, IRIANSYAH and ANDRIESSE1990). Rainfall in the region is about 2472 mm per year and relatively aseasonal. Note that the unburnt primary forest in the small unburnt isolate and the surrounding burnt-forest mosaic were considered to be very similar with respect to their pre-fire vegetation, soil type and rainfall (Van Nieuwstadt et al. Reference VAN NIEUWSTADT, SHEIL and KARTAWINATA2001).

It is important to note that the burnt forest was not uniformly burnt but had networks of remnant unburnt forest that traversed the burnt vegetation. These networks made up an estimated 10.6% (B1) and 8.1% (B2) respectively of the total area in each landscape (Eichhorn Reference EICHHORN2006) and were primarily found along the floodplain. Vegetation in these remnants was visually similar to unburnt forest (pers obs. DFRC and KAOE). The frequently-burnt landscape plot also had areas of forest along streams that primarily consisted of pioneer tree species.

Field sampling

All landscape plots were sampled from January to October 2000. Plant (i.e. herb and shrub) species were sampled in small 2 × 2-m subplots nested within larger 10 × 20-m subplots demarcated with ironwood poles. Subplots were located in the field with compass and clinometer and georeferenced with a handheld GPS device (Garmin 12XL; Garmin Ltd, Lenexa, Kansas). In the larger subplots, all trees and climbers higher than 1.3 m and greater than 1 cm diameter at breast height (dbh) were counted, dbh measured and height visually estimated (Cleary Reference CLEARY2017, Eichhorn Reference EICHHORN2006, Slik & Eichhorn Reference SLIK and EICHHORN2003). In each subplot, altitude was recorded and slope/inclination was measured with a clinometer. In the smaller 2 × 2-m subplots the percentage cover of herbs and shrubs, i.e. monocot herbs, dicot herbs, ferns, herbaceous climbers, sedges, grasses and shrubs were visually estimated and samples collected for further identification. Field assistants assisted with estimation and sample collection. Collected samples were identified to (morpho-)species by K.A.O. Eichhorn. Collected samples have been stored at the Wanariset, Samboja Herbarium and at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center Herbarium in the Netherlands.

Analyses

Vegetation and topographical structure (e.g. tree abundance, liana abundance and inclination per subplot) and plant species data matrices (species × subplot) were imported into R (https://cran.r-project.org) using the read.table() function. Rarefied species richness was assessed per landscape plot with the specaccum() function in the vegan package using 999 permutations and random subsampling of subplots without replacement (http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan). In addition to identifying each recorded plant to a (morpho-)species, the growth form was also recorded as fern, grass, dicot herb, monocot herb, climber, sedge or shrub. Mean values (based on subplot values) of these growth forms are presented per landscape in the Results section.

Given that similarity measures have been shown to be sensitive to sparse samples (Clarke et al. Reference CLARKE, SOMERFIELD and CHAPMAN2006), we removed all samples with less than 5% cover when comparing composition among landscapes. Both vegetation structure and species data matrices were loge (x + 1) transformed. A vegetation structure distance matrix was subsequently constructed using the Euclidean distance and a herb and shrub composition distance matrix using the Bray–Curtis index with the vegdist() function in the vegan package in R (http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan). The Bray–Curtis index is one of the most frequently applied (dis)similarity indices used in ecology (Cleary Reference CLEARY2003, de Voogd et al. Reference DE VOOGD, CLEARY, HOEKSEMA, NOOR and VAN SOEST2006, Legendre & Gallagher Reference LEGENDRE and GALLAGHER2001). Variation in herb and shrub species composition among landscapes was assessed with principal coordinates analysis (PCO) using the cmdscale() function in R with the Bray–Curtis distance matrix as input. Weighted average scores were computed for species on the first two PCO axes using the wascores() function in the vegan package. Using the envfit() function, we also tested for significant relationships between vegetation and topographical variables, namely, the percentage of the plot burnt (Fire), altitude (Alti), inclination (Incl), total basal area (trees and liana combined; Bas.tot), tree basal area (Bas.tr), mean tree diameter (Dia.tr), maximum tree diameter (Dia.mx.tr), tree density (Ab.tr) and liana density (Ab.li) and the PCO ordination of herb and shrub composition using 999 permutations; all other arguments in the function were left as default. Detailed descriptions of the functions used here can be found in R (e.g. ?cmdscale) and online in reference manuals (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html).

RESULTS

Vegetation cover differed strongly among different landscape plots with a clear effect of burning (Figure 1). Ferns were present but had relatively low cover in unburnt forest, but were an important cover in once- and twice-burnt forest. In the frequently-burnt landscape plot, however, ferns were only a minor component of the plant community. Dicot herbs and grasses in contrast were the major cover in the frequently-burnt landscape. Monocot herbs were important components of the plant community in all landscape plots except the frequently-burnt landscape plot. Both shrub and herbaceous climber cover increased in burnt forest with the highest mean cover in the frequently-burnt landscape plot. There was, however, pronounced variation in the cover of the various plant (i.e. herb and shrub) components within landscape plots. Plant cover per subplot, for example, varied from 2% to 93% in primary forest in the large unburnt isolate, 0–92% in logged forest and 80–100% in the frequently-burnt landscape plot.

Figure 1. Mean percentage cover (error bars represent a single standard deviation) of ferns (a), grasses (b), monocot herbs (c), dicot herbs (d), sedges (e), shrubs (f) and herbaceous climbers (g) in primary forest in the large (P1) and small (P2) unburnt isolates, logged forest (L1) in the large unburnt isolate, once-burnt forest (B1), twice-burnt forest (B2) and the frequently-burnt landscape plot (B3) in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. (h) Total herb and shrub species richness.

Burning also had an effect on landscape-scale richness, which was highest in twice-burnt forest and lowest in logged forest with relatively little difference between both primary landscape plots, once-burnt forest and the frequently-burnt-landscape plot. Overall, we recorded 175 herb and shrub (morpho)species. Plant (i.e. herb and shrub species) richness (n = 15 plots) varied from 18.4 ± 0.69 in logged forest to 23.1 ± 0.78 in primary forest in the large unburnt isolate, 26.6 ± 4.60 in primary forest in the small unburnt isolate, 27.1 ± 1.11 in the frequently-burnt landscape, 30.2 ± 4.11 in once-burnt forest and 45.8 ± 4.48 in twice-burnt forest (Figure 1).

Herb composition was primarily structured by burning (Figure 2). Significant variables associated with variation along the first two PCO axes included fire (r2 = 0.763, P < 0.001), altitude (r2 = 0.122, P < 0.001), inclination (r2 = 0.188, P < 0.001), total basal area (r2 = 0.091, P = 0.005), tree basal area (r2 = 0.090, P = 0.005), tree diameter (r2 = 0.312, P < 0.001), maximum tree diameter (r2 = 0.265, P < 0.001), tree abundance (r2 = 0.282, P < 0.001) and liana abundance (r2 = 0.098, P = 0.005). The first axis separated burnt from unburnt forest. There was considerable overlap between subplots from once- and twice-burnt forest, but no overlap between these subplots and subplots from the frequently-burnt landscape plot. There was pronounced overlap among subplots from different unburnt landscape plots and a small subset of subplots from once- and twice-burnt landscape plots that clustered together with subplots from unburnt forest. Axis 2 mainly separated subplots in the frequently-burnt landscape plot from subplots of the other burnt- and unburnt-forest-landscape plots.

Figure 2. Variation in the composition of herbs and shrubs showing the first two axes of the PCO analysis. Large symbols and codes refer to subplots in primary forest in the large (P1) and small (P2) unburnt isolates, logged forest (L1) in the large unburnt isolate, once-burnt forest (B1), twice-burnt forest (B2) and the frequently-burnt landscape plot (B3) sampled in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Black codes refer to loadings for selected species; for species codes see Table 1. Abbreviations of vegetation and topography variables (indicated by blue arrows) are: percentage of the plot burnt (Fire), altitude (Alti), inclination (Incl), total basal area (trees and liana combined; Bas.tot), tree basal area (Bas.tr), mean tree diameter (Dia.tr), maximum tree diameter (Dia.mx.tr), tree density (Ab.tr) and liana density (Ab.li).

Species mainly associated with once- and twice-burnt forest included the ferns Pteridium aquilinum subsp. caudatum, Nephrolepis biserrata, Blechnum orientale, Stenochlaena palustris and Microlepia speluncae and the monocot herbs Hornstedtia cf. reticulata, Hornstedtia sp. 2, Cheilocostus speciosus, Curculigo sp. 1, Amomum sp. 18 and the shrub Solanum jamaicense. Species associated with unburnt forest included the monocot herb Phrynium jagorianum, the fern Trichomanes javanica and the grass Leptaspis urceolata. Species associated with the frequently-burnt landscape plot included the grass Imperata cylindrica and the shrub Chromolaena odorata. A small subset of subplots in the frequently-burnt landscape plot had relatively high cover of shrubs and sedges including Melastoma malabathricum and Scleria sp. 1.

The most frequently encountered species included Phrynium jagorianum that was recorded in all landscape plots except the frequently-burnt landscape plot, Nephrolepis biserrata, Microlepia speluncae, Pteridium aquilinum subsp. caudatum, Hornstedtia sp. 2 and Blechnum orientale mainly found in once- and twice-burnt forest, Mapania cuspidata, Hedyotis congesta and Scleria terrestris mainly found in the primary-forest-landscape plot in the small unburnt isolate, once- and twice-burnt forest and Leptaspis urceolata mainly found in the primary- and logged-landscape plots in the large forest isolate (Table 1). Costus sp. was only found in logged forest and Etlingera fimbriobracteata was only found in twice-burnt forest. Species found in once- and twice-burnt forest and the frequently-burnt landscape plot included Nephrolepis biserrata, Lygodium microphyllum, Stenochlaena palustris, Imperata cylindrica, Mikania scandens, Clidemia hirta, Melastoma malabathricum, Blechnum orientale, Solanum jamaicense, Chromolaena odorata and Scleria sp. 1.

Table 1. Family, species, growth form and abundance of the most frequently encountered species of herbs and shrubs in primary forest in the large (P1) and small (P2) unburnt isolates, logged forest (L1) in the large unburnt isolate, once-burnt forest (B1), twice-burnt forest (B2) and the frequently-burnt-landscape plot (B3) in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The numbers refer to the number of subplots in which the species in question was encountered. Form refers to the growth form whereby HerMon refers to monocot herb and HerDic to dicot herb.

DISCUSSION

Plant species richness was similar among both primary-forest-landscape plots, once-burnt forest and the frequently-burnt landscape plot. Logged forest, however, had lower richness than proximate primary forest and the highest overall richness was recorded in twice-burnt forest. Logging appeared to adversely affect richness by the loss of rare forest herbs that may have been affected by the logging-induced modification to the forest microclimate. This effect also appeared to hold in burnt versus proximate primary forest, but richness between primary and once-burnt forest was similar due to the colonization of burnt forest by species that had apparently colonized the burnt forest from proximate degraded grassland or secondary forest.

The very high richness of twice-burnt forest is interesting in that this forest type consisted of plants associated with unburnt forest and those associated with the degraded frequently-burnt landscape plot. A number of species were also, however, only recorded in this forest type suggesting that it provides a unique habitat to a number of herb species, particularly members of the ginger family, Zingiberaceae.

Compositionally, there was a clear distinction between unburnt and burnt forest on the one hand and between burnt and unburnt forest versus the frequently-burnt landscape plot on the other. Structurally, this culminated in the dominance of grass, dicot herbs, shrubs and herbaceous climbers in the frequently-burnt landscape plot along with the almost complete disappearance of monocot herbs and ferns. Ferns were most abundant in the once- and twice-burnt forest. Once- and twice-burnt forest landscape plots were also characterized by the presence of shrubs and climbers that were relatively abundant in the frequently-burnt landscape plot, but largely absent from unburnt forest. This indicates an influx of these widespread and often exotic plants into the burnt forest matrix from surrounding, severely disturbed areas of grassland and secondary scrub habitat. In contrast, many species found in burnt forest were largely restricted to remnant areas of forest along the floodplains of burnt forest. These low-lying areas were least affected by the previous burn events and contained vegetation similar to that found in unburnt forest. Slik & Eichhorn (Reference SLIK and EICHHORN2003) previously stressed the importance of these floodplains in preserving tree diversity in burnt-forest landscapes. In twice-burnt forest, the unburnt forest network along floodplains covered less than 10% of the area, but housed the majority of all species recorded and numerous rare species were restricted to it (Slik & Eichhorn Reference SLIK and EICHHORN2003).

The monocot herb Phrynium jagorianum (Marantaceae) was the most abundant herb in terms of occurrence and percentage cover in unburnt forest and was also relatively common in once- and twice-burnt forest but completely absent from the frequently-burnt landscape plot. It was particularly abundant in temporarily flooded areas of the forest where it often formed a continuous layer. It was much less prevalent in areas that were never waterlogged or that were permanently flooded. In the burnt forest, it apparently recovered from the fires by resprouting from rhizomes that survived in the ground. Other species of Marantaceae were much less abundant and were mainly restricted to floodplains.

The sedge Mapania cuspidata (Cyperaceae) was also relatively common in the unburnt primary forest landscape plot in the small unburnt isolate (P2), but not recorded in logged or primary forest in the large unburnt isolate, where the sedge Mapania palustris was recorded. Both Phrynium jagorianum and Mapania cuspidata were also found along unburnt floodplains of the burnt forests. Unidentified species that were also rather common in these floodplain areas included the genera Curculigo (Hypoxidaceae) and Alocasia (Aracaeae). Importantly, this floodplain network was still present in twice-burnt forest, 18 y after the initial fires of 1982–1983 and mainly consisted of non-pioneer tree species and herb species such as Phrynium jagorianum and Mapania cuspidata that were absent in the burnt-forest matrix itself. This demonstrates the persistence of the network and its ability to withstand recurrent fires. Not only is this network a refuge for non-pioneer tree and herb species, but it also probably functions as a dispersal network for animals, enabling them to recolonize the burnt forest (Cleary & Genner Reference CLEARY and GENNER2006). Tropical riparian forests are believed to have functioned as persistent forest refuges during Pleistocene dry periods and subsequently to have served as loci enabling the reconversion of the surrounding savanna into forest (Meave et al. Reference MEAVE, KELLMAN, MACDOUGALL and ROSALES1991). The unburnt-forest network may well serve a similar function in an environment where fire has become a more frequent phenomenon in tropical forest landscapes and should be a focus of conservation concern.

Other herb species found in unburnt forest included the herbaceous dicot Hedyotis congesta (Rubiaceae) and the sedge Scleria terrestris (Cyperaceae) that were more often present in canopy gaps and were also common in burnt forest. Overall, monocot herbs were clearly the most abundant plant type in unburnt forest, while monocot herbs and herbaceous ferns were both abundant in terms of cover in burnt forests. Dicot herbs encountered included Thottea grandiflora (Aristolochiaceae) and Labisia pumila (Myrsinaceae), which were mainly present in the forest understorey and Spermacoce sp. and Vernonia cinerea in the frequently-burnt landscape plot. With the exception of Hedyotis congesta, dicot herbs were a rare component in all forest landscapes but were somewhat more common in the frequently-burnt landscape plot.

Ferns, grasses and sedges were markedly less abundant in twice-burnt than once-burnt forest. All of these growth forms appear to have been affected by the dense canopy of saplings that developed in twice-burnt forest and mainly consisted of rapidly growing pioneer trees belonging to the genera Macaranga, Mallotus and Homolanthus among others (Slik & Eichhorn Reference SLIK and EICHHORN2003). In contrast to the above, monocot herbs were more abundant in twice-burnt forest, mainly due to a high cover of Zingiberaceae. The species Cheilocostus speciosus was abundant in the twice-burnt forest but was not recorded in the other landscape plots including the frequently-burnt landscape plot. Although unlogged and logged forest did appear to differ in terms of composition, this difference was much less pronounced than that between unburnt and burnt forest. In a study of the impact of logging on Amazonian herbs, there was no impact of logging on herb diversity or composition although the area of logging roads and skid trails did appear to influence composition (Costa & Magnusson Reference COSTA and MAGNUSSON2002). Of the other monocot herb genera, Etlingera and Hornstedtia were particularly abundant in the once- and twice-burnt-landscape plots, while species of Elettaria and Plagiostachys were more common in unburnt-landscape plots.

Grasses were rare in primary forest in the small unburnt isolate and twice-burnt forest, moderately abundant in primary and logged forest in the large unburnt isolate and once-burnt forest and the dominant cover in the frequently-burnt landscape plot where Imperata cylindrica covered an estimated 65% of the area. The most common grass species in unburnt forest was Leptaspis urceolata, which was not recorded in burnt-forest-landscape plots. Sedges were most abundant in once-burnt forest and the frequently-burnt-landscape plot, mainly due to a high cover of Scleria spp. (Cyperaceae).

Ferns were clearly most abundant in the once-burnt forest where they were the dominant cover. This was mainly due to three species: Pteridium aquilinum subsp. caudatum, Microlepia speluncae (Dennstaedtiaceae) and Nephrolepis biserrata (Nephrolepidaceae). Two other ferns were also often present in the burnt landscape plots but were never dominant: Pteris tripartita (Pteridaceae) and Blechnum orientale (Blechnaceae). Ferns belonging to the genus Pteridium in particular now cover an immense area of fire-degraded forest across the globe (Gallegos et al. Reference GALLEGOS, HENSEN, SAAVEDRA and SCHLEUNING2015). Previous studies have suggested that these ferns (and grasses such as Imperata cylindrica) inhibit forest regeneration and promote future fires (Aide & Cavelier Reference AIDE and CAVELIER1994, Holl Reference HOLL2002, Holl et al. Reference HOLL, LOIK, LIN and SAMUELS2000). The accumulated dry, dead fronds, for example, of Pteridium species are highly inflammable. Pteridium spp. also possess traits such as a large and persistent rhizome system and dense frond canopy that enable them to out-compete other species. Interestingly the dense frond canopy may also provide conditions that facilitate the reestablishment of shade-tolerant climax tree species (Gallegos et al. Reference GALLEGOS, HENSEN, SAAVEDRA and SCHLEUNING2015). Pteridium spp. have, furthermore, been shown to rapidly colonize degraded forest and to be highly resilient, quickly returning after new burn events (Ramírez-Trejo et al. Reference RAMÍREZ-TREJO, PÉREZ-GARCÍA, PÉREZ-SALICRUP and OROZCO-SEGOVIA2010). It is, therefore, interesting that Pteridium aquilinum subsp. caudatum in our study only managed to dominate once-burned forest, but was largely absent from twice-burned forest and the frequently-burnt-landscape plot.

The most striking difference between the once- and twice-burnt landscape plots was the dominance of ferns in the former and the high densities of pioneer trees in the latter (Slik & Eichhorn Reference SLIK and EICHHORN2003). In the twice-burnt forest, ferns apparently suffered from shading under the dense low canopy of pioneer trees as most ferns were present but largely dying off. The prevalence of pioneer trees in twice-burnt forest would appear to reflect the densities of pioneer tree seeds in the soil seed bank before the 1998 fires due to the previous 1982–83 fires. As pioneer species typically have a well-developed soil seed bank (Garwood Reference GARWOOD, Leck, Parker and Simpson1989, Swaine & Whitmore Reference SWAINE and WHITMORE1988), many more tree seeds may have been present in the topsoil of the twice-burnt forest, that is before the second burn. Similarly, post-clearing regeneration is generally better developed when a site has previously been occupied by successional vegetation rather than old-growth forest (Guariguata & Ostertag Reference GUARIGUATA and OSTERTAG2001). This explanation implies that even a third fire will not lead to permanent deforestation, since tree seeds in the topsoil were most abundant at this site. Thus far, recurrent fires have not led to permanent deforestation and it seems unlikely that subsequent fires will change this very soon, but this may change if fires increase in frequency (Cochrane & Schultze Reference COCHRANE and SCHULZE1998, Cochrane et al. Reference COCHRANE, ALENCAR, SCHULZE, SOUZA, NEPSTAD, LEFEBRE and DAVIDSON1999).

Ferns in general were only a relatively minor component of the frequently-burnt-landscape plot. The marked difference in fern abundance among burnt-landscape plots is probably related to their specific burn history. In previously unburnt forests, there are relatively few pioneer trees and thus relatively few pioneer seeds in the seed bank. When these forests burn for the first time, this leaves large areas of bare ground available for ferns to colonize and expand thus explaining the relatively high fern cover in once-burnt forest. In previously burnt forests in contrast, pioneer seeds form an abundant component of the seed bank and quickly germinate and occupy the available bare ground thus pre-empting the bare ground before ferns, which are strongly light-dependent, have had a chance to effectively colonize it. In contrast to the two previous examples, the frequently-burnt-landscape plot does not really represent a pioneer situation. The frequency of the fires has instead shifted the landscape from a forest to a grassland dynamic. Ferns are typically pioneer species that are able to use their very small propagules to colonize suitable habitat over a very large area. They are, however, poor competitors with grass species that are prevalent in the frequently-burnt-landscape plot. These grass species are able to rapidly colonize the burnt area due to the large reserves in their seeds and root system before the ferns have had a chance to establish themselves.

Other ferns were rare or absent in all landscapes and only a few of them could be reliably identified to the species level: Trichomanes javanica (Hymenophyllaceae), Taenitis blechnoides (Pteridaceae), Pleocnemia irregularis (Dryopteridaceae) and Pityrogramma calomelanos (Pteridaceae). Pityrogramma calomelanos was very abundant along roadsides in the Wanariset area (K.A.O. Eichhorn, pers. obs.), but rare in the forest itself and was also recorded in the frequently-burnt-landscape plot. Other species-rich genera encountered that warrant further study were Diplazium (Dryopteridaceae), Tectaria (Dryopteridaceae) and the clubmoss Selaginella (Selaginellaceae).

Shrubs and to a lesser extent herbaceous climbers were on average more abundant in twice-burnt than once-burnt forest. This was mainly due to the abundance of invasive species such as Chromolaena odorata, Clidemia hirta (Melastomataceae) and Solanum jamaicense (Solanaceae). Other shrubs encountered mainly belonged to genera of Rubiaceae, namely, Ixora, Lasianthus and Psychotria. The first two genera consisted of species that were mainly restricted to unburnt forest, while Psychotria viridiflora was most abundant in the burnt forests. Chromolaena odorata, Clidemia hirta and Solanum jamaicense are all exotics and Chromolaena odorata and Clidemia hirta have a growth form almost intermediate between herbs and shrubs. These species were also all encountered in the frequently-burnt-landscape plot. Solanum jamaicense is a shrub, native to the neotropics, that has been reported to displace native shrubs and impede animal movement due to its dense and intertwining prickly stems (Diaz et al. Reference DIAZ, OVERHOLT and LANGELAND2008). Clidemia hirta is native to Central and South America, is now present in Africa and Asia and is also a problematic species in Hawaii (Schulten et al. Reference SCHULTEN, COLE, CORDELL, PUBLICO, OSTERTAG, ENOKA and MICHAUD2014).

Chromolaena odorata together with Imperata cylindrica formed the dominant cover in the frequently-burnt landscape plot and both were present in 13 of 16 subplots. Chromolaena odorata is native to North America but has invaded numerous areas of the globe including Africa, Asia and Australia and appears to be rapidly spreading (Yu et al. Reference YU, AKIN-FAJIYE, MAGAR, REN and GUREVITCH2016). It has also established widespread monocultures in high biodiversity areas of Africa and Asia. It has already been reported to have adversely affected native species, reduced agricultural productivity and caused general economic losses due to it forming dense thickets where it shades out other vegetation (Yu et al. Reference YU, AKIN-FAJIYE, MAGAR, REN and GUREVITCH2016). Imperata cylindrica in turn colonizes land degraded by frequent forest fires and has established itself as a highly problematic, weedy species on all continents except Antarctica. The species also competes with other plants by extracting moisture from the soil and produces allelopathic chemicals in its rhizomes (Bryson et al. Reference BRYSON, KRUTZ, ERVIN, REDDY and BYRD2010). Once established the dense I. cylindrica thatch promotes intense fire that kills off other above-ground vegetation leaving I. cylindrica to regenerate from its dense subterranean rhizomes. This frequent burning leads to nitrogen and carbon losses and the erosion of agricultural productivity (Chapin et al. Reference CHAPIN, ZAVALETA, EVINER, NAYLOR, VITOUSEK, REYNOLDS, HOOPER, LAVOREL, SALA, HOBBIE, MACK and DÍAZ2000, Otsamo et al. Reference OTSAMO, ÅDJERS, SASMITO HADI, KUUSIPALO, TUOMELA and VUOKKO1995) making it one of the most problematic of weedy species (Estrada & Flory Reference ESTRADA and FLORY2015, MacDonald Reference MACDONALD2004).

The fact that these species appear to be established in the frequently-burnt-landscape plot and have invaded burnt forest is certainly cause for concern, particularly because they can increase the probability of future fires occurring. Under a frequent-burn regime, newly established pioneer trees are often burnt before seed reproduction can begin leading to successive stands of pioneer trees having a more open structure with the open spaces filling up with fire-promoting species such as I. cylindrica. Recurrent fires then have a much higher intensity, destroying remnant climax species that survived the initial fires and even affecting the low-lying unburnt forest remnants (Cochrane & Schultze Reference COCHRANE and SCHULZE1998, Cochrane et al. Reference COCHRANE, ALENCAR, SCHULZE, SOUZA, NEPSTAD, LEFEBRE and DAVIDSON1999, Goldammer Reference GOLDAMMER1999). Mechanisms used by climax trees to regenerate following fires such as resprouting are also lost as this capacity is lost at high fire frequencies (Van Nieuwstadt et al. Reference VAN NIEUWSTADT, SHEIL and KARTAWINATA2001). The resultant permanent deforestation that is the end phase of this process will result in a depauperate grass-dominated landscape similar to the frequently-burnt-landscape plot in this study with impoverished plant and animal communities largely consisting of widespread and generalist species in addition to exotics such as Chromolaena odorata and Clidemia hirta (Cleary Reference CLEARY2016). Importantly, the riparian forest network was also prevalent in the frequently-burnt-landscape plot, but this had been severely degraded to areas of stunted pioneer trees and shrubs along streams.

In summary, we conclude that previous burn events appear to have had an important impact on the composition of herbs and shrubs in the forests of East Kalimantan. Although richness was similar or higher in burnt forests than unburnt forest, this was largely due to invasion of the burnt forest by widespread and often exotic species that were recorded in the frequently-burnt-landscape plot. Numerous species of herbs associated with unburnt forest were, however, recorded along the floodplains of burnt forest. Preserving these floodplains from further disturbance should be a conservation priority. The twice-burnt-forest-landscape plot additionally had the highest overall recorded richness and contained numerous species not recorded elsewhere. Burnt forest should not, therefore, be seen as unimportant for conserving forest diversity and measures should be taken to avoid future burn events.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The following people helped make this study possible: L. Eichhorn, D. Wielakker, A. Bijlmer, L. du Pon, Y. Pitoy, M. Buntu, A. Pakala, I. Sharif, I. Arbainsyah, B. van Helvoort, T. de Kam, W. Smits, M. Oman, N. Boestani and all field assistants who helped sample the plant species. This study was supported by grant 895.100.005 of the Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research (NWO-WOTRO), within the Priority Programme ‘Biodiversity in Disturbed Ecosystems’.

Appendix 1. Table of subplots sampled in the present study. The columns show longitude and latitude in decimal degrees, Landscape (landscape plot), Mosaic (burnt, small unburnt isolate and large unburnt isolate), Fire (percentage of subplot burnt), altitude (metres above sea level) and inclination (slope of plot in degrees) of all subplots sampled in East Kalimantan, Indonesia.

References

LITERATURE CITED

AIDE, T. M. & CAVELIER, J. 1994. Barriers to lowland tropical forest restoration in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Restoration Ecology 2:219229.Google Scholar
BERBET, M. L. C. & COSTA, M. H. 2003. Climate change after tropical deforestation: seasonal variability of surface albedo and its effects on precipitation change. Journal of Climate 12:20992104.Google Scholar
BRYSON, C. T., KRUTZ, L. J., ERVIN, G. N., REDDY, K. N. & BYRD, J. D. 2010. Ecotype variability and edaphic characteristics for cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) populations in Mississippi. Invasive Plant Science and Management 3:199207.Google Scholar
CHAPIN, F. S., ZAVALETA, E. S., EVINER, V. T., NAYLOR, R. L., VITOUSEK, P., REYNOLDS, H. L., HOOPER, D. U., LAVOREL, S., SALA, O. E., HOBBIE, S. E., MACK, M. C. & DÍAZ, S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234244.Google Scholar
CLARKE, K. R., SOMERFIELD, P. J. & CHAPMAN, M. G. 2006. On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray-Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330:5580.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R. 2003. An examination of scale of assessment, logging and ENSO-induced fires on butterfly diversity in Borneo. Oecologia 135:313321.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R. 2016. Diversity and composition of plants, butterflies and odonates in an Imperata grassland landscape. Journal of Tropical Ecology 32:555560.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R. 2017. Impact of logging on tree, liana and herb assemblages in a Bornean forest. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 36:806817.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R. & GENNER, M. J. 2006. Understanding diversity patterns of Bornean butterfly assemblages. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:517538.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R. & GRILL, A. 2004. Butterfly response to severe ENSO-induced forest fires in Borneo. Ecological Entomology 29:666676.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R. & PRIADJATI, A. 2005. Vegetation responses to burning in a rain forest in Borneo. Plant Ecology 177:145163.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R., MOOERS, A. Ø., EICHHORN, K. A. O., VAN TOL, J., DE JONG, R. & MENKEN, S. B. J. 2004. Diversity and community composition of butterflies and odonates in an ENSO-induced fire affected habitat mosaic: a case study from East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Oikos 105:426446.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R., FAUVELOT, C., GENNER, M. J., MENKEN, S. B. J. & MOOERS, A. Ø. 2006a. Parallel responses of species and genetic diversity to El Niño Southern Oscillation-induced environmental destruction. Ecology Letters 9:301307.Google Scholar
CLEARY, D. F. R., PRIADJATI, A., SURYOKUSUMO, B. K. & MENKEN, S. B. J. 2006b. Butterfly, sapling, seedling and tree diversity in a fire-affected Bornean rainforest. Austral Ecology 31:4657.Google Scholar
COCHRANE, M. A. 2003. Fire science for rainforests. Nature 421:913919.Google Scholar
COCHRANE, M. A. & SCHULZE, M. D. 1998. Forest fires in the Brazilian Amazon. Conservation Biology 12:948950.Google Scholar
COCHRANE, M. A. & SCHULZE, M. D. 1999. Fire as a recurrent event in tropical forests of the eastern Amazon: effects on forest structure, biomass, and species composition. Biotropica 31:216.Google Scholar
COCHRANE, M. A., ALENCAR, A., SCHULZE, M. D., SOUZAJR, C. M. JR, C. M., NEPSTAD, D. C., LEFEBRE, P. & DAVIDSON, E. A. 1999. Positive feedbacks in the fire dynamic of closed canopy tropical forests. Science 284:18321835.Google Scholar
COSTA, F. & MAGNUSSON, W. 2002. Selective logging effects on abundance, diversity, and composition of tropical understory herbs. Ecological Applications 12:807819.Google Scholar
CURRAN, L. M., TRIGG, S. N., MCDONALD, A. K., ASTIANI, D., HARDIONO, Y. M., SIREGAR, P., CANIAGO, I. & KASISCHKE, E. 2004. Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:10001003.Google Scholar
DENNIS, R. A., HOFFMANN, A., APPLEGATE, G., VON GEMMINGEN, G. & KARTAWINATA, K. 2001. Large scale fire: creator and destroyer of secondary forests in western Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 13:786799.Google Scholar
DE VOOGD, N. J., CLEARY, D. F. R., HOEKSEMA, B. W., NOOR, A. & VAN SOEST, R. W. M. 2006. Sponge beta diversity in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 309:131142.Google Scholar
DIAZ, R., OVERHOLT, W. A. & LANGELAND, K. 2008. Jamaican nightshade (Solanum jamaicense): a threat to Florida's hammocks. Invasive Plant Science and Management 1:422425.Google Scholar
DURIEUX, L., MACHADO, L. A. T. & LAURENT, H. 2003. The impact of deforestation on cloud cover over the Amazon arc of deforestation. Remote Sensing and Environment 86:132140.Google Scholar
EICHHORN, K. A. O. 2006. Plant diversity after rain-forest fires in Borneo. Blumea Supplement 18.Google Scholar
ESTRADA, J. A. & FLORY, S. L. 2015. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) invasions in the US: mechanisms, impacts, and threats to biodiversity. Global Ecology and Conservation 3:110.Google Scholar
GALLEGOS, S. C., HENSEN, I., SAAVEDRA, F. & SCHLEUNING, M. 2015. Bracken fern facilitates tree seedling recruitment in tropical fire-degraded habitats. Forest Ecology and Management 337:135143.Google Scholar
GARWOOD, N. C. 1989. Tropical soil seed banks: a review. Pp. 149209 in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. & Simpson, R. L. (eds). Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
GOLDAMMER, J. G. 1999. Forest on fire. Science 284:17821783.Google Scholar
GOLDAMMER, J. G., SEIBERT, B. & SCHINDELE, W. 1996. Fire in dipterocarp forests. Pp. 155–185 in Schulte, A. & Schöne, D. (eds). Dipterocarp forest ecosystems: towards sustainable management. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
GUARIGUATA, M. R. & OSTERTAG, R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148:185206.Google Scholar
HABERLE, S. G. & LEDRU, M. P. 2001. Correlations among charcoal records of fires from the past 16,000 years in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Central and South America. Quaternary Research 55:97104.Google Scholar
HOLL, K. D. 2002. Effect of shrubs on tree seedling establishment in an abandoned tropical pasture. Journal of Ecology 90:179187.Google Scholar
HOLL, K. D., LOIK, M. E., LIN, E. H. V. & SAMUELS, I. A. 2000. Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restoration Ecology 8:339349.Google Scholar
HOLMGREN, M., SCHEFFER, M., EZCURRA, E., GUTIERREZ, J. R. & MOHREN, G. M. J. 2001. El Niño effects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:8994.Google Scholar
KARTAWINATA, K., JESSUP, T. C. & VAYDA, A. P. 1989. Exploitation in Southeast Asia. Pp. 591610 in Lieth, H. & Werger, M. J. A. (eds). Tropical rain-forest ecosystems: biogeographical and ecological studies. Ecosystems of the World, vol. 14B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F. 1998. A crisis in the making: responses of Amazonian forests to land use and climate change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:411415.Google Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., COCHRANE, M. A., BERGEN, S., FEARNSIDE, P. M., DELAMONICA, P., BARBER, C., D'ANGELO, S. & FERNANDES, T. 2001. The future of the Brazilian Amazon. Science 291:438442.Google Scholar
LEGENDRE, P. & GALLAGHER, E. D. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271280.Google Scholar
MACDONALD, G. E. 2004. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) – biology, ecology, and management. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:367380.Google Scholar
MARSCHALL, M. & PROCTOR, M. C. F. 2004. Are bryophytes shade plants? Photosynthetic light responses and proportions of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids. Annals of Botany 94:593603.Google Scholar
MEAVE, J., KELLMAN, M., MACDOUGALL, A. & ROSALES, J. 1991. Riparian habitats as tropical forest refugia. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 1:6976.Google Scholar
NEPSTAD, D. C., VERISSIMO, A., ALENCAR, A., NOBRE, C., LIMA, E., LEFEBRE, P., SCHLESINGER, P., POTTER, C., MOUTINHO, P., MENDOZA, E., COCHRANE, M. & BROOKS, V. 1999. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398:505508.Google Scholar
NEPSTAD, D. C., CARVALHO, G., BARROS, A. C., ALENCAR, A., CAPOBIANCO, J. P., BISHOP, J., MOUTINHO, P., LEFEBRE, P., LOPES SILVA, U. & PRINS, E. 2001. Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management 154:395407.Google Scholar
OTSAMO, A., ÅDJERS, G., SASMITO HADI, T., KUUSIPALO, J., TUOMELA, K. & VUOKKO, R. 1995. Effect of site preparation and initial fertilisation on the establishment and growth of four plantation tree species used in reforestation of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. dominated grasslands. Forest Ecology and Management 73:271277.Google Scholar
PERES, C. A. 1999. Ground fires as agents of mortality in a Central Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:535541.Google Scholar
PERES, C. A. 2001. Paving the way to the future of Amazonia. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:217219.Google Scholar
RAMÍREZ-TREJO, M. D. R., PÉREZ-GARCÍA, B., PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R. & OROZCO-SEGOVIA, A. 2010. Effect of fire on the germination of spores of Pteridium caudatum, an invasive fern. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26:457465.Google Scholar
SCHULTEN, J. R., COLE, T. C., CORDELL, S., PUBLICO, K. M., OSTERTAG, R., ENOKA, J. E. & MICHAUD, J. D. 2014. Persistence of native trees in an invaded Hawaiian lowland wet forest: experimental evaluation of light and water constraints. Pacific Science 68:267285.Google Scholar
SHUKLA, J., NOBRE, C. & SELLERS, P. 1990. Amazon deforestation and climate change. Science 247:13221325.Google Scholar
SIEGERT, F., RUECKER, G., HINRICHS, A. & HOFFMANN, A. A. 2001. Increased damage from fires in logged forests during droughts caused by El Niño. Nature 414:437440.Google Scholar
SLIK, J. W. F. & EICHHORN, K. A. O. 2003. Fire survival of lowland tropical rain-forest trees in relation to stem diameter and topographic position. Oecologia 137:446455.Google Scholar
SWAINE, M. D. & WHITMORE, T. C. 1988. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio 75: 8186.Google Scholar
TUDHOPE, A. W., CHILCOTT, C. P., MCCULLOCH, M. T., COOK, E. R., CHAPOPELL, J., ELLAM, R. M., LEA, D. W., LOUGH, J. M. & SHIMMIELD, G. B. 2001. Variability in the El Niño Southern Oscillation through a glacial-interglacial cycle. Science 291:15111517.Google Scholar
VAN BREMEN, H., IRIANSYAH, M. & ANDRIESSE, W. 1990. Detailed soil survey and physical land evaluation in a tropical rain forest, Indonesia. Technical Series 6. Stichting Tropenbos, Wageningen. 188 pp.Google Scholar
VAN NIEUWSTADT, M. G. L., SHEIL, D. & KARTAWINATA, K. 2001. The ecological consequences of logging in the burnt forests of East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Conservation Biology 15:11831186.Google Scholar
VIEIRA, L. T. A., POLISEL, R. T., IVANAUSKAS, N. M., SHEPHERD, G. J., WAECHTER, J. L., YAMAMOTO, K. & MARTINS, F. R. 2015. Geographical patterns of terrestrial herbs: a new component in planning the conservation of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 24:21812198.Google Scholar
YU, F., AKIN-FAJIYE, M., MAGAR, K. T., REN, J. & GUREVITCH, J. 2016. A global systematic review of ecological field studies on two major invasive plant species, Ageratina adenophora and Chromolaena odorata. Diversity and Distributions 22:11741185.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Mean percentage cover (error bars represent a single standard deviation) of ferns (a), grasses (b), monocot herbs (c), dicot herbs (d), sedges (e), shrubs (f) and herbaceous climbers (g) in primary forest in the large (P1) and small (P2) unburnt isolates, logged forest (L1) in the large unburnt isolate, once-burnt forest (B1), twice-burnt forest (B2) and the frequently-burnt landscape plot (B3) in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. (h) Total herb and shrub species richness.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Variation in the composition of herbs and shrubs showing the first two axes of the PCO analysis. Large symbols and codes refer to subplots in primary forest in the large (P1) and small (P2) unburnt isolates, logged forest (L1) in the large unburnt isolate, once-burnt forest (B1), twice-burnt forest (B2) and the frequently-burnt landscape plot (B3) sampled in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Black codes refer to loadings for selected species; for species codes see Table 1. Abbreviations of vegetation and topography variables (indicated by blue arrows) are: percentage of the plot burnt (Fire), altitude (Alti), inclination (Incl), total basal area (trees and liana combined; Bas.tot), tree basal area (Bas.tr), mean tree diameter (Dia.tr), maximum tree diameter (Dia.mx.tr), tree density (Ab.tr) and liana density (Ab.li).

Figure 2

Table 1. Family, species, growth form and abundance of the most frequently encountered species of herbs and shrubs in primary forest in the large (P1) and small (P2) unburnt isolates, logged forest (L1) in the large unburnt isolate, once-burnt forest (B1), twice-burnt forest (B2) and the frequently-burnt-landscape plot (B3) in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The numbers refer to the number of subplots in which the species in question was encountered. Form refers to the growth form whereby HerMon refers to monocot herb and HerDic to dicot herb.

Figure 3

Appendix 1. Table of subplots sampled in the present study. The columns show longitude and latitude in decimal degrees, Landscape (landscape plot), Mosaic (burnt, small unburnt isolate and large unburnt isolate), Fire (percentage of subplot burnt), altitude (metres above sea level) and inclination (slope of plot in degrees) of all subplots sampled in East Kalimantan, Indonesia.