Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:51:15.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two biases in estimating range sizes of Amazonian plant species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2002

Kalle Ruokolainen
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
Hanna Tuomisto
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
Jaana Vormisto
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
Nigel Pitman
Affiliation:
Center for Tropical Conservation, Box 90381, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Amazonian rain forests form one of the largest areas of continuous forest in the world, and they harbour a substantial part of the world's biodiversity (World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1992). The extravagant species richness of Amazonia makes collecting information on species distribution patterns there a formidable challenge. Relatively few studies have been able to provide data that cover both a large enough number of species and wide enough geographical areas to allow relevant biogeographical and ecological generalizations (such studies concerning plants include Balslev 1988, de Oliveira & Daly 1999, Pitman et al. 1999, Prance 1973, ter Steege et al. 2000, Terborgh & Andresen 1998, Tuomisto & Poulsen 1996). The scarcity of field observations is undoubtedly one of the reasons why very different ideas exist about the mechanisms that control plant distributions and patterns of species richness in Amazonia (Balslev 1988, Condit 1996, Gentry 1988, Nelson et al 1990, Pitman et al. 1999, Prance 1973, 1982; ter Steege et al. 2000, Tuomisto et al. 1995).

Type
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press