Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:47:15.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resource partitioning within a browsing guild in a key habitat, the Chobe Riverfront, Botswana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2005

Shimane W. Makhabu
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway Department of Wildlife and National Parks, P. O. Box 48, Ghanzi, Botswana
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Resource partitioning between elephant, giraffe, kudu and impala was assessed. This was to address concerns that elephant population increase adversely affects other species through depleting their food in key areas close to permanent water. Resources considered were woody species browsed, height browsed and plant parts browsed. Animals were observed as they browsed and the plant species, browsing heights and plant parts browsed were recorded. Observations were made over 1 y and the data were divided between wet and dry season. Schoener's index of resource use overlap was calculated for plant species, browsing heights and plant parts eaten and differences in overlap between wet and dry season were tested. Levin's measure of niche breadth in plant species utilized by the different browsers was calculated. Woody species identity was the main separator between food resources that elephant used and those giraffe, impala and kudu used. Giraffe, kudu and impala mainly browsed the same species and plant parts but browsed at different heights. There was no difference in resource use overlap between seasons with different resource availability. Since elephant browsed different woody species from those browsed by the others, it is unlikely that the increasing elephant population will deplete food resources for the other browsers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press