Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T23:10:31.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaf tissue water relations in tree species from contrasting habitats within the upper Rio Negro forests of the Amazon region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

M. A. Sobrado*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Biología Ambiental de Plantas, Departamento de Biología de Organismos, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apartado 89.000, Caracas 1080 A, Venezuela
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The landscape of the upper Rio Negro basin (North Amazon) exhibits distinctive habitats that are associated with differential soil characteristics and topographical conditions as well as species composition (Herrera et al. 1978). The mixed forests thrive on well-structured oxisols on slightly more elevated areas. The valleys with sandy podzols are occupied by the ‘Amazon caatinga’ complex with three distinct zones: the bottom valley and the gentle slopes, both of which have closed forests, and the sandy domes with open forests (‘bana’ or sclerophyllous forest; Breimer 1985). From the mixed forest towards the caatinga valley-slope-dome habitats, the leaf δ15N signatures become increasingly negative, suggesting a trend in N limitation in the same direction (Sobrado 2010). Thus, negative leaf δ15N signatures depleted in 15N compared with the soil indicate a very tight N cycle in all of the habitats. Water availability follows a similar pattern from the top of the oxisol towards the flooded valley bottom of the caatinga, with extreme water-table fluctuations in the sandy domes (Klinge 1978). Thus, parallel variation in nutrient and water availabilities exist in this area that are associated with soil characteristics and topography. Under such contrasting habitats, species-specific responses would be linked to particular conditions of the habitat at a local scale (Comita & Engelbrecht 2009, Engelbrecht et al. 2007). A number of studies in these habitats have shown that this is the case for soil fertility (Coomes 1997, Medina et al. 1990, Sobrado 2010, Sobrado & Medina 1980). Similarly, the hydraulic characteristics and long-term water use are species specific and related to particular conditions of the habitat at the local scale (Sobrado 2010). In this report, it was hypothesized that the leaf tissue water relations of species thriving in different habitats may reflect the water availability at the particular sites as well. The leaf tissue water relations of species thriving in the extreme nutrient and water-supply conditions of the sandy domes from the caatinga complex have been previously studied in detail (Sobrado 2009a). However, these data are currently not available for the species that thrive in the surrounding area of the closed forests, and importantly, such information would allow for a comparison across habitats. Therefore, the present study assessed the minimum leaf water potential (midday) under field conditions as well as the leaf tissue water relations by using pressure-volume analysis of dominant tree species in the top canopy of these high-stature forests.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

The landscape of the upper Rio Negro basin (North Amazon) exhibits distinctive habitats that are associated with differential soil characteristics and topographical conditions as well as species composition (Herrera et al. Reference HERRERA, JORDAN, KLINGE and MEDINA1978). The mixed forests thrive on well-structured oxisols on slightly more elevated areas. The valleys with sandy podzols are occupied by the ‘Amazon caatinga’ complex with three distinct zones: the bottom valley and the gentle slopes, both of which have closed forests, and the sandy domes with open forests (‘bana’ or sclerophyllous forest; Breimer Reference BREIMER, Breimer, van Kekem and van Reuler1985). From the mixed forest towards the caatinga valley-slope-dome habitats, the leaf δ15N signatures become increasingly negative, suggesting a trend in N limitation in the same direction (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2010). Thus, negative leaf δ15N signatures depleted in 15N compared with the soil indicate a very tight N cycle in all of the habitats. Water availability follows a similar pattern from the top of the oxisol towards the flooded valley bottom of the caatinga, with extreme water-table fluctuations in the sandy domes (Klinge Reference KLINGE1978). Thus, parallel variation in nutrient and water availabilities exist in this area that are associated with soil characteristics and topography. Under such contrasting habitats, species-specific responses would be linked to particular conditions of the habitat at a local scale (Comita & Engelbrecht Reference COMITA and ENGELBRECHT2009, Engelbrecht et al. Reference ENGELBRECHT, COMITA, CONDIT, KURSAR, TYREE, TURNER and HUBBELL2007). A number of studies in these habitats have shown that this is the case for soil fertility (Coomes Reference COOMES1997, Medina et al. Reference MEDINA, GARCIA and CUEVAS1990, Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2010, Sobrado & Medina Reference SOBRADO and MEDINA1980). Similarly, the hydraulic characteristics and long-term water use are species specific and related to particular conditions of the habitat at the local scale (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2010). In this report, it was hypothesized that the leaf tissue water relations of species thriving in different habitats may reflect the water availability at the particular sites as well. The leaf tissue water relations of species thriving in the extreme nutrient and water-supply conditions of the sandy domes from the caatinga complex have been previously studied in detail (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2009a). However, these data are currently not available for the species that thrive in the surrounding area of the closed forests, and importantly, such information would allow for a comparison across habitats. Therefore, the present study assessed the minimum leaf water potential (midday) under field conditions as well as the leaf tissue water relations by using pressure-volume analysis of dominant tree species in the top canopy of these high-stature forests.

The study area is located 4 km north-east of San Carlos de Rio Negro (Amazonas, Venezuela; 1°54′N; 67°03′W) within the upper Rio Negro basin. The zone features a mean temperature of 26.2 °C and an annual rainfall of 3500 mm. No month receives less than 100 mm of precipitation. Similar to previous studies conducted in these habitats (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2010, Reference SOBRADO2011), the experiments assessed Caryocar glabrum (Aubl.) Pers. (Caryocaraceae) and Ocotea aciphylla (Nees & Mart. ex Nees) Mez (Lauraceae) from the mixed forest (oxisol soil) and Eperua leucanta Benth. (Caesalpiniaceae) and Micranda sprucei (Müll.Arg.) R. E. Schultes (Euphorbiaceae) from the caatinga complex (podzol soil). Eperua leucantha is the dominant species of the bottom valley of the caatinga forest (‘yaguacana’ forest), and M. sprucei is the dominant species in the ecotone (‘cunuri’ forest) between the bottom valley and the sandy mounds, which is where the sclerophyllous forest is located (‘bana’; Breimer Reference BREIMER, Breimer, van Kekem and van Reuler1985, Klinge Reference KLINGE1978). In all species, top-canopy leaves are typical sun leaves that possess a dorsiventral anatomy with bundle-sheath extensions (heterobaric) and a chlorophyll a to b ratio of approximately 3:1 (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2011). However M. sprucei from the caatinga slopes possesses the thickest leaves, lowest-density tissue, lowest palisade to spongy parenchyma ratio, highest sclerophylly index, highest carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and most negative δ15N of all of the species in this study (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2010). The characteristics of M. sprucei are comparable to those found in the sclerophyllous forest.

For all measurements, fully exposed top-canopy branches were selected from three trees per species that were tagged for the experiments during August 2011. Samples were collected by climbing each tree to reach the canopy top. Twenty leaf punches with a 3-cm diameter were collected from three twigs, respectively, at predawn in each tree species and their fresh weight was measured. Subsequently, the dry mass was determined after the leaves were oven-dried at 60 °C. The data were used to calculate the water content and expressed based upon the leaf area (Wa) as well as fresh (Wf) and dry mass (Wd). The minimum tree water status was characterized by measuring the midday leaf water potential (Ψ, MPa) under rainy conditions and after six rainless days that occurred during August 2011. Ψ was measured with a pressure chamber (PMS, Model 1000, Corvallis, Oregon, USA) in two–three twig samples per tree species. Pressure–volume (P–V) curves were determined for two twigs from each tagged sample collected in the field at predawn for a total of six samples per species. Sampled twigs were allowed to dehydrate naturally on the laboratory bench and P–V curves were generated. During dehydration, the weight loss was determined on an analytical balance and Ψ was immediately measured using the pressure chamber. The reciprocal of Ψ (1/Ψ) was plotted as a function of relative water content (RWC). These plots were used to calculate the osmotic potential at full (Ψ(100)) and zero (Ψ(0)) turgor, RWC at zero turgor (RWC0), and apoplastic (A) water content (Tyree & Hammel Reference TYREE and HAMMEL1982). The volumetric elastic modulus (ɛ) was calculated as the slope of the relationship of turgor pressure (Ψp) above zero as a function of RWC. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Holm–Sidak test was used to compare data across species if the data were normally distributed, and equal variance was measured. ANOVA-on-ranks test was used if data normality and/or equal variance tests failed, followed by a Tukey test. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SigmaStats 3.1 software for Windows (Systat Software, Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

The leaf Wa was significantly higher in the thicker leaves of M. sprucei compared with C. glabrum, O. aciphylla and E. leucantha (Table 1; Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2010). Moreover, Wf and Wd were species specific and not differentially associated with forest types (Table 1). Values of Wf were comparable to those of the species from the open sclerophyllous forest (0.58 ± 0.02 g g−1; Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2008). On rainy days, the minimum Ψ averaged −0.98 ± 0.05 MPa, which was significantly higher than that found during rainless days (−1.2 ± 0.05 MPa) (Table 1). The osmotic potential at full (Ψπ(100)) and zero (Ψπ(0)) turgor was not statistically different in C. glabrum, O aciphylla and E. leucantha and averaged −1.19 ± 0.04 and −1.38 ± 0.06 MPa, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1a–c). However, the values of these parameters for M. sprucei were significantly higher (−0.75 ± 0.06 and −1.12 ± 0.12 MPa, respectively; Table 1, Figure 1d). Therefore, M. sprucei develops lower leaf turgor (Ψp) and loses it at the highest Ψ compared with the other species (Figure 1e–h). Conversely, M. sprucei had the highest elasticity (< ɛ; Table 1), which resulted in the highest leaf dehydration among the species (Figure 1a–d), while still maintaining Ψ within the range of positive turgor (Figure 1e–h). Thus, high elastic cells of M. sprucei allow for the partial compensation of unfavourable high Ψπ. Turgor maintenance as Ψ declines can be achieved through low Ψπ and high cell elasticity. However, variation in Ψ across species for turgor loss arises predominantly from differences in Ψπ rather than from differences in ɛ (Lenz et al. Reference LENZ, WRIGHT and WESTOBY2006). The apoplastic water content (A) was comparable across species and averaged 27.7 ± 1.84% (Table 1). Therefore, values of Ψπ(100) and Ψπ(0) were higher (less negative) in all of the species than values found in the open sclerophyllous forest (−1.48 ± 0.05 and −1.92 ± 0.05 MPa, respectively) (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2009a). These results implied that dominant species in the mixed forest as well as in the valley and slope of the caatinga maintain turgor pressure at considerably higher Ψ than those located on top of the sandy mounds. Importantly, the values of ɛ and A found in these species overlapped with those found in the open forests on the top of the sandy domes except in M. sprucei with the lowest ɛ. In the open sclerophyllous forests, the range of ɛ and A are 6–16 MPa and 18–43%, respectively (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2009a).

Figure 1. Leaf water potential (Ψ) and osmotic potential (Ψπ) as a function of relative water content (a–d) as well as leaf turgor pressure (Ψp) as a function of leaf water potential (e–h) in two species of the mixed forest (Caryocar glabrum and Ocotea aciphylla) and two species of the Amazon caatinga forest (Eperua leucantha and Micranda sprucei). Plots were derived from six pressure–volume (P–V) curves for each species. Linear regressions are shown with the following equations: Ψ = 0.15 RWC – 14.9 (r = 0.97; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.03 RWC – 4.25 (r = 0.77; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.85 Ψ + 1.17 (r = 0.98; P < 0.001) for C. glabrum, Ψ = 0.14 RWC – 14.3 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.03 RWC – 3.96 (r = 0.80; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.93 Ψ +1.32 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) for O. aciphylla, Ψ = 0.09 RWC – 10.2 (r = 0.95; P < 0.01), Ψπ = 0.02 RWC – 2.75 (r = 0.83; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.79 Ψ +1.16 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) for E. leucantha and Ψ = 0.05 RWC – 4.84 (r = 0.94; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.02 RWC – 2.66 (r = 0.82; P < 0.001) and Ψp = 0.61 Ψ +0.76 (r = 0.96; P < 0.001) for M. sprucei.

Table 1. Leaf water content based on surface area (Wa), fresh weight (Wf) and dry mass (Wd), midday leaf water potential (Ψ) during rainy (RY) and rainless (RL) days, as well as the following pressure-volume parameters: osmotic potential at full (Ψ) and zero turgor (Ψ), relative water content at zero turgor (RWCo), apoplastic water content (A) and elastic modulus (ɛ). All measurements were taken in Caryocar glabrum and Ocotea aciphylla from the mixed forest and Eperua leucantha and Micranda sprucei from the Amazon caatinga. Each value is the mean ± SE of measurements taken from three trees per species. For each parameter, the mean followed by a letter represent statistical differences at P < 0.05.

In conclusion, the top-canopy leaves of the species assessed in this study experienced a very mild decrease in leaf Ψ (~ −1.1 to −1.5 MPa) during the rainless period. Furthermore, the analysis of tissue water relations showed that these species were unable to develop very low Ψ within the range of turgor maintenance. Thus, drought resistance does not seem to be a highly selected trait in these particular habitats that have relatively advantageous topographical and hydrological conditions. Intriguingly, M. sprucei from the caatinga slopes, which possesses sclerophyllous leaves, was particularly susceptible to a loss in turgor pressure at high leaf Ψ (~1.1 MPa) compared with the other species. Indeed, the mechanical constitution of sclerophyll leaves confers resistance to stress and provides protection from herbivory to enhance leaf longevity and long-term carbon gain (Read et al. Reference READ, SANA, GARINE-WICHATITSKY and JAFFRÉ2006, Turner Reference TURNER1994). However, previous findings do not support the drought tolerance of sclerophyllous species (Read et al. Reference READ, SANA, GARINE-WICHATITSKY and JAFFRÉ2006, Salleo et al. Reference SALLEO, NARDINI and LO GULLO1997). Thus, sclerophyll species, such as M. sprucei and those in the open sclerophyllous forests at the mounds of the caatinga, seemed to have been selected due to the low fertility of both sites, as previously stated (Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2009b, Reference SOBRADO2010). Nevertheless, the open sclerophyllous forests (sandy domes) suffer unpredictable drought spells as well, which would favour the establishment of species that are able to tolerate both nutrient and water deficiencies. Therefore, these species have a lower minimum leaf Ψ (~ 1.5 MPa), tolerate a lower water status, and maintain turgor pressure (Ψ ~ 2 MPa; Sobrado Reference SOBRADO2009a). Conversely, M. sprucei, with sclerophyllous leaves, is confined to the slopes of the caatinga (ecotone), but is never found in the open sandy mounds, which is possibly due to its relatively high drought sensitivity. Therefore, this region, with a high rainfall pattern, possesses well-defined habitats that have contrasting nutrient and water availabilities, which seems to influence the local distribution of species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Pedro Maquirino for his invaluable help in the field by climbing trees to obtain top canopy samples. Thanks also to the anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

References

LITERATURE CITED

BREIMER, R. F. 1985. Some observations on soils in relation to forest types in San Carlos de Rio Negro, Venezuela. Pp. 108–110 in Breimer, R. F., van Kekem, A. J. & van Reuler, H. (eds). Guidelines for soil survey in ecological research. MAB Technical Notes No 17. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
COMITA, L. S. & ENGELBRECHT, B. M. J. 2009. Seasonal and spatial variation in water availability drive habitats associations in a tropical forest. Ecology 90:27552765.Google Scholar
COOMES, D. A. 1997. Nutrient status of Amazonian caatinga forests in a seasonally dry area: nutrient fluxes in fine litter fall and analysis of soils. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:831839.Google Scholar
ENGELBRECHT, B. M. J., COMITA, L. S., CONDIT, R., KURSAR, T. A., TYREE, M. T., TURNER, B. L. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2007. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature 447:8082.Google Scholar
HERRERA, R., JORDAN, C. F., KLINGE, H. & MEDINA, E. 1978. Amazon ecosystems. Their structure and functioning with particular emphasis on nutrients. Interciencia 3:223232.Google Scholar
KLINGE, H. 1978. Studies on the ecology of Amazon caatinga forest in Southern Venezuela. Acta Cientifica Venezolana 29:258262.Google Scholar
LENZ, T. I., WRIGHT, I. J. & WESTOBY, M. 2006. Interrelations among pressure-volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Physiologia Plantarum 127:423433.Google Scholar
MEDINA, E., GARCIA, V. & CUEVAS, E. 1990. Sclerophylly and oligotrophic environments: relationships between leaf structure and mineral nutrient content, and drought resistance in tropical rain forests in the upper Rio Negro region. Biotropica 22:5154.Google Scholar
READ, J., SANA, G. D., GARINE-WICHATITSKY, M. & JAFFRÉ, T. 2006. Sclerophylly in two contrasting tropical environments: low nutrient vs. low rainfall. American Journal of Botany 93:16011614.Google Scholar
SALLEO, S., NARDINI, A. & LO GULLO, M. A. 1997. Is sclerophylly of Mediterranean evergreens an adaptation to drought? New Phytologist 135:603612.Google Scholar
SOBRADO, M. A. 2008. Leaf characteristics and diurnal variation of chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of the ‘Bana’ vegetation of the Amazon region. Photosynthetica 46:202207.Google Scholar
SOBRADO, M. A. 2009a. Leaf tissue water relations and hydraulic properties of sclerophyllous vegetation on white sands of the upper Rio Negro in the Amazon region. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25:271280.Google Scholar
SOBRADO, M. A. 2009b. Cost–benefit relationships in sclerophyllous leaves of the ‘Bana’ vegetation in the Amazon region. Trees 23:429437.Google Scholar
SOBRADO, M. A. 2010. Leaf characteristics, wood anatomy and hydraulic properties in tree species from contrasting habitats within upper Rio Negro forests in the Amazon region. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26:215226.Google Scholar
SOBRADO, M. A. 2011. Leaf pigment composition and fluorescence signatures of top canopy leaves in species of the upper Rio Negro forests. Research Journal of Botany 6:141149.Google Scholar
SOBRADO, M. A. & MEDINA, E. 1980. General morphology, anatomical structure and nutrient content of sclerophyllous leaves of the ‘Bana’ vegetation. Oecologia 45:341345.Google Scholar
TURNER, I. M. 1994. A quantitative analysis of leaf form in woody plants from the world's major broad-leaved forest types. Journal of Biogeography 21:413419.Google Scholar
TYREE, M. T. & HAMMEL, M. 1982. The measurements of the turgor pressure and water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany 23:267283.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Leaf water potential (Ψ) and osmotic potential (Ψπ) as a function of relative water content (a–d) as well as leaf turgor pressure (Ψp) as a function of leaf water potential (e–h) in two species of the mixed forest (Caryocar glabrum and Ocotea aciphylla) and two species of the Amazon caatinga forest (Eperua leucantha and Micranda sprucei). Plots were derived from six pressure–volume (P–V) curves for each species. Linear regressions are shown with the following equations: Ψ = 0.15 RWC – 14.9 (r = 0.97; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.03 RWC – 4.25 (r = 0.77; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.85 Ψ + 1.17 (r = 0.98; P < 0.001) for C. glabrum, Ψ = 0.14 RWC – 14.3 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.03 RWC – 3.96 (r = 0.80; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.93 Ψ +1.32 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) for O. aciphylla, Ψ = 0.09 RWC – 10.2 (r = 0.95; P < 0.01), Ψπ = 0.02 RWC – 2.75 (r = 0.83; P < 0.05) and Ψp = 0.79 Ψ +1.16 (r = 0.99; P < 0.001) for E. leucantha and Ψ = 0.05 RWC – 4.84 (r = 0.94; P < 0.001), Ψπ = 0.02 RWC – 2.66 (r = 0.82; P < 0.001) and Ψp = 0.61 Ψ +0.76 (r = 0.96; P < 0.001) for M. sprucei.

Figure 1

Table 1. Leaf water content based on surface area (Wa), fresh weight (Wf) and dry mass (Wd), midday leaf water potential (Ψ) during rainy (RY) and rainless (RL) days, as well as the following pressure-volume parameters: osmotic potential at full (Ψ) and zero turgor (Ψ), relative water content at zero turgor (RWCo), apoplastic water content (A) and elastic modulus (ɛ). All measurements were taken in Caryocar glabrum and Ocotea aciphylla from the mixed forest and Eperua leucantha and Micranda sprucei from the Amazon caatinga. Each value is the mean ± SE of measurements taken from three trees per species. For each parameter, the mean followed by a letter represent statistical differences at P < 0.05.