Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T18:51:07.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global distribution of root climbers is positively associated with precipitation and negatively associated with seasonality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Jaqueline Durigon ,
Sandra Milena Durán  and
Ernesto Gianoli
Jaqueline Durigon*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil
Sandra Milena Durán
Affiliation:
Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada
Ernesto Gianoli
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología, Universidad de la Serena, La Serena, Chile Departamento de Botánica, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
*
1Corresponding author. Email: jaquelinedurigon@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Root climbers constitute a distinctive group within climbing plants and some evidence suggests that they are associated with high precipitation and low light availability at local scales, which is in contrast with general patterns of liana distribution in the tropics. The influence of precipitation and seasonality on the occurrence of root climbers was evaluated both globally and in the tropics. The presence/absence of root climbers was recorded in 174 sites of Alwyn H. Gentry Forest Transect Data Set. The effects of mean annual precipitation and dry-season length (and temperature) on their occurrence were analysed using logistic regressions. Root climbers were significantly more frequent in sites with greater precipitation and reduced seasonality. Increasing temperature reduced root-climber occurrence in tropical sites, but this effect was marginally significant at a global scale. Dry and open habitats appear unsuitable for root climbers. This can be explained by the susceptibility to desiccation of adventitious roots and/or the low acclimation ability of these climbers to high irradiance.

Keywords

climbing mechanismdistribution patternsenvironmental constraintslianas
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , July 2013 , pp. 357 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Lianas (woody climbers) play a key role in the structure and function of forest ecosystems (Schnitzer & Bongers Reference SCHNITZER and BONGERS2002), representing 10–40% of woody stems in tropical forests (Gentry Reference GENTRY, Putz and Money1991). General patterns of liana distribution, abundance and species richness in the tropics have been documented (DeWalt et al. Reference DEWALT, SCHNITZER, CHAVE, BONGERS, BURNHAM, CAI, CHUYONG, CLARK, EWANGO, GERWING, GORTAIRE, HART, IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, ICKES, KENFACK, MACIA, MAKANA, MARTINEZ-RAMOS, MASCARO, MOSES, MULLER-LANDAU, PARREN, PARTHASARATHY, PÉREZ-SALICRUP, PUTZ, ROMERO-SALTOS and THOMAS2010, Gallagher & Leishman Reference GALLAGHER and LEISHMAN2012, Schnitzer Reference SCHNITZER2005, van der Heijden & Phillips Reference VAN DER HEIJDEN and PHILLIPS2008). Precipitation and seasonality have been identified as major drivers of liana abundance in tropical regions, with lianas increasing with decreased annual rainfall and increased dry-season length (DeWalt et al. Reference DEWALT, SCHNITZER, CHAVE, BONGERS, BURNHAM, CAI, CHUYONG, CLARK, EWANGO, GERWING, GORTAIRE, HART, IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, ICKES, KENFACK, MACIA, MAKANA, MARTINEZ-RAMOS, MASCARO, MOSES, MULLER-LANDAU, PARREN, PARTHASARATHY, PÉREZ-SALICRUP, PUTZ, ROMERO-SALTOS and THOMAS2010, Schnitzer Reference SCHNITZER2005). However, in a study across Neotropical forests, van der Heijden & Phillips (Reference VAN DER HEIJDEN and PHILLIPS2008) found no relationship between liana abundance and both mean annual rainfall and dry-season length, suggesting that this issue deserves further study.

The climbing habit has evolved many times during plant evolution (Gianoli Reference GIANOLI2004), and a variety of mechanisms are utilized by climbers to access the support structure (Isnard & Silk Reference ISNARD and SILK2009, Putz & Holbrook Reference PUTZ, HOLBROOK, Putz and Money1991). The relative frequency of climbing mechanisms varies with the availability of suitable supports and with light levels (Carrasco-Urra & Gianoli Reference CARRASCO-URRA and GIANOLI2009, Hegarty & Caballé Reference HEGARTY, CABALLÉ, Putz and Money1991, Putz Reference PUTZ1984). However, the distribution of climbing mechanisms at global scales has received little attention; the single study performed to date took into account the proportion of twiners relative to tendril-bearers only, and evaluated the relationship between this proportion and latitude (Gallagher & Leishman Reference GALLAGHER and LEISHMAN2012). The association between climbing mechanisms and the environmental factors that influence liana distribution has yet to be evaluated at a global scale.

Root climbers constitute a distinctive group within climbing plants. Whereas other guilds have constraints concerning the maximum support diameter they can use (e.g. tendril-bearers), root climbers are free from this limitation (Hegarty Reference HEGARTY, Putz and Money1991, Putz Reference PUTZ1984, Putz & Holbrook Reference PUTZ, HOLBROOK, Putz and Money1991). Lianas are often considered light-demanding plants (Hegarty & Caballé Reference HEGARTY, CABALLÉ, Putz and Money1991, Putz Reference PUTZ1984, Schnitzer & Bongers Reference SCHNITZER and BONGERS2002, but see Gianoli et al. Reference GIANOLI, SALDAÑA, JIMÉNEZ-CASTILLO and VALLADARES2010), while root climbers comprise mostly shade-tolerant species (Hegarty Reference HEGARTY, Putz and Money1991, Valladares et al. Reference VALLADARES, GIANOLI and SALDAÑA2011). At least at local scales, root climbers seem to be associated with high precipitation and low light availability (Hegarty Reference HEGARTY, Putz and Money1991, Orihuela Reference ORIHUELA2010, Teramura et al. Reference TERAMURA, GOLD, FORSETH, Putz and Money1991). In extratropical regions of South America, root climbers were only recorded in rain forests, being absent from seasonal forests (Durigon et al. unpubl. data). In seasonal forests, many tree species lose their leaves in the dry season, resulting in high light penetration in the understorey (Kalacska et al. Reference KALACSKA, SANCHEZ-AZOFEIFA, RIVARD, CALVO-ALVARADO and QUESADA2008). This may be an unfavourable condition for root climbers in view of their low potential for acclimation to high irradiance (Carter & Teramura Reference CARTER and TERAMURA1988, Teramura et al. Reference TERAMURA, GOLD, FORSETH, Putz and Money1991). In the present study, we tested whether root climbers mainly occur in areas with high precipitation and low seasonality across forests worldwide, a pattern which is contrary to general patterns of distribution and abundance of lianas in the tropics. We also included the effect of temperature on the occurrence of root climbers because there is evidence that temperature may influence distribution limits of lianas (Jiménez-Castillo et al. Reference JIMÉNEZ-CASTILLO, WISER and LUSK2007).

In order to test our hypothesis, we constructed a matrix of presence/absence data of root climbers in 174 sites distributed in tropical and temperate areas. These sites correspond to a subset of the Alwyn H. Gentry Forest Transect Data Set (Phillips & Miller Reference PHILLIPS and MILLER2002), which comprises forest plots of 0.1 ha distributed across the globe (Figure 1). Gentry quantified all trees, shrubs, lianas and hemiepiphytes with stems ≥2.5 cm diameter at breast height in 225 plots worldwide. Each plot consists of 10 transects of 2 × 50 m distributed across mature forest. We used only those plots that had lianas. Some sites had more than one plot, but they were considered independent sampling units as they had contrasting soil types. From this database, we selected the species identified by Gentry as lianas, and determined which of these species climb using adventitious roots by searching the literature and herbarium collections. Environmental data for each site, i.e. mean annual precipitation, length of the dry season, and mean annual temperature, were taken from the WorldClim dataset (www.worldclim.org). Dry-season length was defined as the number of consecutive months with average precipitation <100 mm (DeWalt et al. Reference DEWALT, SCHNITZER, CHAVE, BONGERS, BURNHAM, CAI, CHUYONG, CLARK, EWANGO, GERWING, GORTAIRE, HART, IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, ICKES, KENFACK, MACIA, MAKANA, MARTINEZ-RAMOS, MASCARO, MOSES, MULLER-LANDAU, PARREN, PARTHASARATHY, PÉREZ-SALICRUP, PUTZ, ROMERO-SALTOS and THOMAS2010).

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of Gentry's forest plots used in the current study (n = 174). Presence/absence of root climbers is indicated.

We used logistic regression (R-software) to evaluate the effects of mean annual precipitation, dry-season length and mean annual temperature on the occurrence of root climbers (binary data: presence = 1, absence = 0). The analyses were performed using both the global dataset and tropical sites only.

A total of 174 plots in Gentry's dataset had liana species, with 151 plots located in the tropics and 23 plots in temperate ecosystems. We retrieved 116 liana species bearing adventitious roots as climbing mechanism. Root climbers occurred in 79 of the 174 plots considered in the study, being present in only seven plots from temperate forests (Figure 1). As expected, root climbers were positively associated with mean annual precipitation and negatively associated with dry-season length across forests worldwide; the same patterns were found for tropical forests only (Table 1). Higher temperatures reduced the probability of root-climber occurrence in tropical sites and had a marginally significant effect at the global level (Table 1). The inclusion of plots with no lianas (n = 5) did not alter the patterns found (data not shown).

Table 1. Logistic regressions to evaluate the effects of mean annual precipitation (MAP), dry-season length (DSL) and temperature on the occurrence of root climbers across forests distributed worldwide and in tropical forests only. β denotes the standardized regression coefficients, and SE their standard error.

Whereas overall liana abundance across the tropics decreases with increasing precipitation and decreasing seasonality (DeWalt et al. Reference DEWALT, SCHNITZER, CHAVE, BONGERS, BURNHAM, CAI, CHUYONG, CLARK, EWANGO, GERWING, GORTAIRE, HART, IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, ICKES, KENFACK, MACIA, MAKANA, MARTINEZ-RAMOS, MASCARO, MOSES, MULLER-LANDAU, PARREN, PARTHASARATHY, PÉREZ-SALICRUP, PUTZ, ROMERO-SALTOS and THOMAS2010, Schnitzer Reference SCHNITZER2005), we found that root climbers occurred more frequently in sites with greater precipitation and shorter seasonality. This pattern held both at the tropical and global scales. Gentry (Reference GENTRY1988, Reference GENTRY, Putz and Money1991) noted that in sites with higher precipitation the species richness and abundance of root climbers tend to increase. Besides utilizing data of a different type, Gentry included hemiepiphytes in his analysis, while in our quantitative analysis we took into account the presence/absence of root climbers only.

Open and dry habitats appear unsuitable for root climbers. This could be related to physiological adaptations to low light developed by many species from this group of climbers (Carter & Teramura Reference CARTER and TERAMURA1988, Teramura et al. Reference TERAMURA, GOLD, FORSETH, Putz and Money1991). Shade-tolerant lianas preferentially allocate resources to traits that enhance survival in light-limited understorey environments, sacrificing carbon gain and shoot growth, which are maximized by light-demanding species (Ichihashi et al. Reference ICHIHASHI, NAGASHIMA and TATENO2010, Valladares et al. Reference VALLADARES, GIANOLI and SALDAÑA2011). Susceptibility to desiccation of adventitious roots (Hegarty Reference HEGARTY1988, Wilder Reference WILDER1992) may explain the exclusion of root climbers from sites with high potential evapotranspiration and high temperatures.

The increased liana abundance in dry and seasonal forests has been attributed to a greater competitive advantage of lianas over trees, which allows the former to show higher growth rates during the dry season (Schnitzer Reference SCHNITZER2005). The higher light levels in the understorey throughout the year and the increase in light when deciduous trees shed their leaves in the dry season are likely to favour lianas (DeWalt et al. Reference DEWALT, SCHNITZER, CHAVE, BONGERS, BURNHAM, CAI, CHUYONG, CLARK, EWANGO, GERWING, GORTAIRE, HART, IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, ICKES, KENFACK, MACIA, MAKANA, MARTINEZ-RAMOS, MASCARO, MOSES, MULLER-LANDAU, PARREN, PARTHASARATHY, PÉREZ-SALICRUP, PUTZ, ROMERO-SALTOS and THOMAS2010, Schnitzer Reference SCHNITZER2005). However, the physiological adaptability and light acclimation potential of lianas are likely to be associated with their particular climbing mechanism (Carter & Teramura Reference CARTER and TERAMURA1988, Teramura et al. Reference TERAMURA, GOLD, FORSETH, Putz and Money1991). Whereas tendril climbers show broad physiological plasticity in response to variation in light availability, most root climbers have low capacity of acclimation to high irradiance (Teramura et al. Reference TERAMURA, GOLD, FORSETH, Putz and Money1991). Stems of root climbers grow away from sources of strong light (Hegarty Reference HEGARTY, Putz and Money1991) and chances of survival are greater when they grow on the less-exposed side of a tree, thus avoiding desiccation (Hegarty Reference HEGARTY1988). Root climbers cope with deep shade by intercepting light efficiently and reducing gas-exchange rates (photosynthesis and dark respiration) (Gianoli & Saldaña Reference GIANOLI and SALDAÑA2013, Kusumoto et al. Reference KUSUMOTO, ENOKI and KUBOTA2013, Valladares et al. Reference VALLADARES, GIANOLI and SALDAÑA2011); the strategy of maximization of light capture and minimization of metabolic costs is typical of shade-tolerant plants (Valladares & Niinemets Reference VALLADARES and NIINEMETS2008).

Climbing by adventitious roots is a mechanism employed by relatively few climber taxa (Gallagher & Leishman Reference GALLAGHER and LEISHMAN2012, Hegarty Reference HEGARTY, Putz and Money1991). However, some species of root climbers can be locally very abundant, both in tropical and temperate rain forests (Durigon & Waechter Reference DURIGON and WAECHTER2011, Gianoli et al. Reference GIANOLI, SALDAÑA, JIMÉNEZ-CASTILLO and VALLADARES2010, Kusumoto et al. Reference KUSUMOTO, ENOKI and KUBOTA2013). We have shown that root climbers have distinctive environmental requirements and constraints, which make their pattern of association with precipitation and seasonality contrary to the one proposed for all lianas as a group. Consequently, whereas lianas are predicted to increase in abundance and biomass with increasing frequency or duration of seasonal droughts associated with climate change (Schnitzer & Bongers Reference SCHNITZER and BONGERS2011), we can expect that root climbers will decline if the rain forests where they occur become drier in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Missouri Botanical Garden for making available the valuable dataset of Alwyn H. Gentry. JD thanks CAPES (PDSE 7138-12-1) for the scholarship during the “Sandwich” PhD Program at Universidad de la Serena, Chile. EG thanks funding by FONDECYT grant 1100585.

References

LITERATURE CITED

CARRASCO-URRA, F. & GIANOLI, E. 2009. Abundance of climbing plants in a southern temperate rain forest: host tree characteristics or light availability? Journal of Vegetation Science 20:1155–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARTER, G. A. & TERAMURA, A. H. 1988. Vine photosynthesis and relationships to climbing mechanics in a forest understory. American Journal of Botany 75:1011–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEWALT, S. J., SCHNITZER, S. A., CHAVE, J., BONGERS, F., BURNHAM, R. J., CAI, Z. Q., CHUYONG, G., CLARK, D. B., EWANGO, C. E. N., GERWING, J. J., GORTAIRE, E., HART, T., IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, G., ICKES, K., KENFACK, D., MACIA, M. J., MAKANA, J. R., MARTINEZ-RAMOS, M., MASCARO, J., MOSES, S., MULLER-LANDAU, H. C., PARREN, M. P. E., PARTHASARATHY, N., PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R., PUTZ, F. E., ROMERO-SALTOS, H. & THOMAS, D. 2010. Annual rainfall and seasonality predict pan-tropical patterns of liana density and basal area. Biotropica 42:309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DURIGON, J. & WAECHTER, J. L. 2011. Floristic composition and biogeographic relations of a subtropical assemblage of climbing plants. Biodiversity and Conservation 20:1027–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GALLAGHER, R. V. & LEISHMAN, M. R. 2012. A global analysis of trait variation and evolution in climbing plants. Journal of Biogeography 39:1757–1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1991. The distribution and evolution of climbing plants. Pp. 3–52 in Putz, F. E. & Money, H. A. (eds.). The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
GIANOLI, E. 2004. Evolution of a climbing habit promotes diversification in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 271:2011–2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GIANOLI, E. & SALDAÑA, A. 2013. Phenotypic selection on leaf functional traits of two congeneric species in a temperate rainforest is consistent with their shade tolerance. Oecologia, in press (doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2590-2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIANOLI, E., SALDAÑA, A., JIMÉNEZ-CASTILLO, M. & VALLADARES, F. 2010. Distribution and abundance of vines along the light gradient in a southern temperate rain forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 21:66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEGARTY, E. E. 1988. Canopy dynamics of lianes and trees in subtropical rainforest. Department of Botany, University of Queensland, Brisbane. 241 pp.Google Scholar
HEGARTY, E. E. 1991. Vine–host interactions. Pp. 357–376 in Putz, F. E. & Money, H. A. (eds.). The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
HEGARTY, E. E. & CABALLÉ, G. 1991. Distribution and abundance of vines in forest communities. Pp. 313–336 in Putz, F. E. & Money, H. A. (eds.). The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
ICHIHASHI, R., NAGASHIMA, H. & TATENO, M. 2010. Biomass allocation between extension- and leaf display-oriented shoots in relation to habitat differentiation among five deciduous liana species in a Japanese cool-temperate forest. Plant Ecology 211:181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISNARD, S. & SILK, W. K. 2009. Moving with climbing plants from Charles Darwin's time into the 21st century. American Journal of Botany 96:1205–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JIMÉNEZ-CASTILLO, M., WISER, S. K. & LUSK, C. H. 2007. Elevational parallels of latitudinal variation in the proportion of lianas in woody floras. Journal of Biogeography 34:163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KALACSKA, M., SANCHEZ-AZOFEIFA, G. A., RIVARD, B., CALVO-ALVARADO, J. C. & QUESADA, M. 2008. Baseline assessment for environmental services payments from satellite imagery: a case study from Costa Rica and Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 88:348–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KUSUMOTO, B., ENOKI, T. & KUBOTA, Y. 2013. Determinant factors influencing the spatial distributions of subtropical lianas are correlated with components of functional trait spectra. Ecological Research 28:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ORIHUELA, R. L. 2010. Diversidade e abundância de hemiepífitos em um gradiente altitudinal na Floresta Atlântica no sul do Brasil. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre. 29 pp.Google Scholar
PHILLIPS, O. & MILLER, J. S. 2002. Global patterns of plant diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry's forest transect data set. Monograph in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 89:1–319.Google Scholar
PUTZ, F. E. 1984. The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65:1713–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUTZ, F. E. & HOLBROOK, N. M. 1991. Biomechanical studies of vines. Pp. 73–98 in Putz, F. E. & Money, H. A. (eds.). The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. 2005. A mechanistic explanation for global patterns of liana abundance and distribution. American Naturalist 166:262–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2002. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2011. Increasing liana abundance and biomass in tropical forests: emerging patterns and putative mechanisms. Ecology Letters 14:397–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TERAMURA, A. H., GOLD, W. G. & FORSETH, I. N. 1991. Physiological ecology of mesic, temperate woody vines. Pp. 245–285 in Putz, F. E. & Money, H. A. (eds.). The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
VALLADARES, F. & NIINEMETS, U. 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 39:237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VALLADARES, F., GIANOLI, E. & SALDAÑA, A. 2011. Climbing plants in a temperate rainforest understorey: searching for high light or coping with deep shade? Annals of Botany 108:231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VAN DER HEIJDEN, G. M. F. & PHILLIPS, O. L. 2008. What controls liana success in Neotropical forests? Global Ecology and Biogeography 17:372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILDER, G. J. 1992. Comparative morphology and anatomy of absorbing roots and anchoring roots in three species of Cyclanthaceae (Monocotyledoneae). Canadian Journal of Botany 70:38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of Gentry's forest plots used in the current study (n = 174). Presence/absence of root climbers is indicated.

Figure 1

Table 1. Logistic regressions to evaluate the effects of mean annual precipitation (MAP), dry-season length (DSL) and temperature on the occurrence of root climbers across forests distributed worldwide and in tropical forests only. β denotes the standardized regression coefficients, and SE their standard error.