Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:46:34.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of patch size on liana diversity and distributions in the tropical montane evergreen forests of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2014

Dharmalingam Mohandass*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan 666303, P.R.China
Alice C. Hughes
Affiliation:
Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan 666303, P.R.China
Mason Campbell
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science (T.E.S.S.), School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Priya Davidar
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry – 605 014, India
*
1Corresponding author. Email: dmohandass@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We investigate the effect of patch size on liana diversity and distribution in 19 patches of montane evergreen forest in the Nilgiri hills, Western Ghats, southern India. Additionally, we examined how liana species richness and community assemblage in both edge (within 10 m of the forest edge) and interior regions of forest patches respond to patch size, in order to infer the impact of forest expansion or reduction on the liana communities. A total of 1276 woody liana individuals of 15 species were identified, belonging to 10 genera and nine families. Total species richness of lianas was significantly positively related to forest-patch area, both when analysed for the entire patch, in addition to both core and edge regions when examined separately. Species richness of larger lianas also showed a significant positive relationship with increasing forest patch area. Community assemblage varied with respect to forest edge, with shade-dependent species only occurring in interior patch regions, shade-averse species in edge regions, and shade-tolerant species occurring throughout. Disturbance also played a role in determining the response of liana diversity to patch size, with heavily disturbed patches showing no relationship between patch size and diversity, whereas positive relationships exist in low to moderately disturbed patches. The most significant result is the change in liana community composition between small and larger fragments. Many species present in smaller patches are also present in edge zones of larger fragments. This suggests that lianas are important structural components of montane forest ecosystems, and their compositional patterns are possibly driven by succession. Moreover, this study reveals the importance of edge effect and patch size in influencing liana species richness and compositional patterns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

INTRODUCTION

Many studies have used species-area relationships (SARs) to evaluate the effect of patch size on species richness in a variety of habitats, including natural forest patches (Estavillo et al. Reference ESTAVILLO, PARDINI, BERNARDO and ROCHA2013, Gignac & Dale Reference GIGNAC and DALE2007, Mohandass & Davidar Reference MOHANDASS and DAVIDAR2010). Studies suggest that lianas and trees show positive relationships between species richness and patch area (Liu et al. Reference LIU, ZANG, DING and ZHANG2013, Morgan et al. Reference MORGAN, WONG and CUTLER2011). However, the exact nature of the relationship between forest patch area and species richness of lianas has received much less attention.

Within forest patches, the forest edge and interior zones differ considerably in their localized environmental and disturbance conditions (Laurance & Yensen Reference LAURANCE and YENSEN1991, Laurance et al. Reference LAURANCE, LOVEJOY, VASCONCELOS, BRUNA, DIDHAM, STOUFFER, GASCON, BIERREGAARD, LAURANCE and SAMPIAO2002). Consequently the edge and interior zones are often populated by vegetation at different successional stages, different species assemblages and with different species richness (Harper et al. Reference HARPER, MACDONALD, BURTON, CHEN, BROSOFSKE, SAUNDERS, EUSKIRCHEN, ROBERTS, JAITEH and ESSEEN2005, Ries et al. Reference RIES, FLETCHER, BATTIN and SISK2004). Though the effects of forest patch size and shape on tree and herbaceous diversity has been investigated in numerous studies around the world (Agra & Néeman Reference AGRA and NÉEMAN2012, Gonzalez et al. Reference GONZALEZ, LADET, DECONCHAT, CABANETTES, ALARD and BALENT2010, Wulf & Kolk Reference WULF and KOLK2014, Yineger et al. Reference YINEGER, SCHMIDT and HUGHES2014, Zmihorski et al. Reference ZMIHORSKI, CHYLARECKI, REJT and MAZGAJSKI2010), liana communities have largely been neglected in these former studies, despite their known roles in ecosystem functioning in tropical forests (Laurance Reference LAURANCE2008, Schnitzer & Bongers Reference SCHNITZER and BONGERS2002). Therefore, further research is required to understand the relationship between patch area and edge effects on liana diversity within forest patches.

Liana abundance may either increase or decrease as a direct and indirect consequence of various disturbance levels, depending on the exact nature and duration of the disturbance (Addo-Foudjour et al. Reference ADDO-FORDJOUR, DUAH and AGBESI2013, Anbarashan & Parthasarathy Reference ANBARASHAN and PARTHASARATHY2013, Laurance et al. in press). In former studies disturbance was found to increase liana abundance (Mohandass et al. in press) and high disturbance decreased liana diversity (Addo-Fordjour et al. Reference ADDO-FORDJOUR, DUAH and AGBESI2013).

In the Nilgiri Mountains, previous studies show that tree species richness within montane forest patches increases with forest patch area (Mohandass Reference MOHANDASS2007, Mohandass & Davidar Reference MOHANDASS and DAVIDAR2010), but the relationship between patch size and liana richness has yet to be investigated. This study aims to provide a comprehensive survey of how lianas respond to patch size, and to determine how edge and forest interior communities vary with fragment size. Many forest patches in and around the study areas have been disturbed through tea cultivation and exotic tree plantations (such as Acacia dealbata Link., Eucalyptus globulus Labill. and Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham.), which have fragmented the formerly more extensive forest and degraded some forest regions. This landscape modification has created a landscape mosaic, which offers an ideal setting to explore how patch size affects the distribution and diversity of lianas under a number of conditions.

The aim of the study is to test the following hypotheses: (1) Total species richness of lianas and species richness in forest edge and interior zones will increase with increasing patch size (both in total and when examined separately); (2) The within-patch distribution and species richness of lianas as delineated by various eco-physiological guilds (shade tolerance, dispersal mode, climbing mechanism etc.) will respond to increasing patch size; (3) Disturbance influences liana species richness, especially as patch size increases.

METHODS

Study area

The study occurred in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (NBR), which represents a component of UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere Programme (Puyravaud & Davidar Reference PUYRAVAUD and DAVIDAR2013). The study was carried out in the tropical montane evergreen rain forest of Korakundah (11°13.840′N, 76°35.115′E) and Upper Bhavani Reserve Forest (c. 11°14′N, 76°33′E, Figure 1). We sampled 19 forest patches of various sizes in the Korakundah and Upper Bhavani Reserve Forests (Figure 1). The total area of all 19 patches was 39.2 ha, of which 11.5 ha was sampled.

Figure 1. Map of the study area in Korakundah and Upper Bhavani regions of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Marking points: L, large patches; M, medium patches; and S: small patches. Symbols indicate various disturbance levels: diamond, low disturbance; triangle, moderate disturbance; and star, highly disturbed.

The area ranges from 2200 to 2400 m asl, with varying slope. Climatic and topographic information for this region have been recorded during former studies (Mohandass Reference MOHANDASS2007, Mohandass & Davidar Reference MOHANDASS and DAVIDAR2010).

Montane forests within the Nilgiri region usually exist as small, discrete patches of vegetation, although they do occasionally occur as larger stands. Montane forests in the region are largely evergreen and generally stunted (10–20 m height) with a densely crowned canopy.

Sampling procedure

All sampling occurred between November 2002 and September 2004. The forest patches were selected randomly from across the study region, but were all separated by a minimum distance of 100 m, and fell into three distinct size classes. Selected forest patches were classed as large (> 5 ha), medium (> 1– < 5 ha) or small (< 1 ha). Sampling of lianas was terminated where the species area curves reached their asymptote in the two large (GOLD2 and UPMD1) and three medium (ESHD, GDMD and KOMD) patches.

A quadrat of 30 × 30 m was placed randomly within each medium-large patch, and subdivided into 10 × 10-m subplots. In small patches all lianas were inventoried, and later sampling area was corrected to 30 m2 by removing forest areas of under 30 m2 from analysis. Though forest patches in the area showed a number of different shapes, there were approximately equal numbers of elongated and rounded patches, and we therefore did not differentiate between shapes for the purpose of analysis.

All individual lianas of ≥ 1 cm dbh were measured, tagged, identified to species level, and geo-referenced to the nearest metre. Diameter at breast height of each individual liana was measured at 1.3 m above ground level and each was tagged using sequentially numbered aluminium tags (Gerwing et al. Reference GERWING2006, Muthuramkumar & Parthasarathy Reference MUTHURAMKUMAR and PARTHASARATHY2000). Liana specimens were identified to species using various local and regional floras (Fyson Reference FYSON1932, Gamble & Fischer Reference GAMBLE and FISCHER1915–1935, Matthew Reference MATTHEW1999) and identification of each sample was confirmed by the Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore. Voucher specimens were deposited at the Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Herbarium section, Pondicherry University.

The effect of total forest patch area

After field sampling, the area of small forest patches were corrected to ensure an equal sample area size (30 m2) and therefore a total of 10.98 ha sampled area was used for data analysis. After the sampled area correction a total of 4.41 ha was sampled from 13 small forest patches (> 1 ha), 4.32 ha from four medium forest patches (> 1 ha to < 5 ha) and 2.25 ha from two large forest patches (> 5 ha). The corrected sampled area was logarithmically transformed for each forest patch.

The effects of edge and forest interior in relation to patch size on liana species richness

Within each forest patch, the liana species richness in the forest edge zone and forest interior zone were recorded separately. The forest edge zone was defined as a 10-m-wide strip starting from the border of each forest patch and extending into the forest, and the forest interior zone as the remaining forest area. The community composition, and selected eco-physiological traits (species shade tolerance, dispersal modes and climbing mechanism) of species within forest edge and forest interiors were also recorded.

Shade tolerance and dispersal mode

Shade tolerance of liana species was divided into three categories, depending on their tolerance to different levels of available light: (a) shade-dependent: species which were only found in the forest interior and shaded conditions; (b) shade-tolerant: species found in both forest interior and edge zones; (c) shade-averse: species only found in edge zones and open conditions.

For data analysis, we used the frequency of occurrence of each liana species (with a minimum of 10 occurrences) found in each forest patch in a particular habitat, and compared abundance in the forest and edge zones to investigate habitat specificity.

The fruit dispersal method of each liana species was categorized as one of four types, depending on the dominant dispersal agent/agents. Mammal dispersal was normally by Nilgiri langur (Trachypithecus johnii) or dhole (Cuon alpinus); bird dispersal was from various frugivorous birds; explosive dispersers used an explosive dehiscent method, and wind-dispersed species relied on air-currents. No water-dispersed species were found within the study region.

Based on climbing guild descriptions in other studies (Muthuperumal & Parthasarathy Reference MUTHUPERUMAL and PARTHASARATHY2009, Muthuramkumar & Parthasarathy Reference MUTHURAMKUMAR and PARTHASARATHY2000) we identified five commonly occurring climbing mechanisms for lianas in this study: hook climbers, root climbers, scramblers, tendril climbers and twiners. The frequency of each of these in both edge and interior zones were inventoried and relative abundance compared.

Effects of disturbance factors

During 1950s, the local government introduced exotic plantations around many of the forest patches across the Nilgiri region. These plantations included a considerable number of species, but Acacia dealbata, Eucalyptus globulus and Pinus patula plantations were among the most common. Between the 1970s and 1990s there was considerable logging of these exotic trees around the montane forests. Remaining forest fragments are now protected under nature reserve forest and protected area network agreements. However, severity and frequency of various forms of disturbance (both present and historical) varies between forest patches in the region. Therefore in the present study we categorized all forest patches within the study area into three distinct current disturbance categories: (1) Low disturbance (LD): past disturbances i.e. exotic tree logging occurred in the 1950s to 1990s, although there was little other human-induced disturbance pressures. Currently there is no longer any overt anthropogenic disturbance in patches defined as LD; (2) Moderate disturbance (MD): past disturbance effects greater than that of LD sites, minimal ongoing disturbance by humans (normally only firewood collection); (3) High disturbance (HD): higher levels of past disturbance than either LD or MD sites; high levels of disturbance continue to the present, with regular tree-cutting and other forms of disturbance. Highly disturbed forest patches are normally smaller and located near human habitation. Species richness of seven relatively undisturbed forest patches (LD), seven moderately disturbed forest patches (MD) and five highly disturbed forest patches (HD) were analysed.

Data analyses

As montane forest fragments represent isolated patches we tested whether liana species richness would increase linearly with area on a log-log scale as assumed by the theory of island biogeography (MacArthur & Wilson Reference MACARTHUR and WILSON1967). Species richness and patch size were log-transformed, and species richness (total and for large lianas separately) of various areas (edge and interior) normalized before further analysis using the arcsine transformation. We also used principal component analysis in Spatial Analysis for Macroecology (Rangel et al. Reference RANGEL, DINIZ-FILHO and BINI2010), followed by ANOSIM to determine if community composition varied significantly in patches of different sizes. Degree of similarity in liana community composition was analysed using ANOSIM in PAST (http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/) using the Bray–Curtis metric. Numbers of each species found in the forest edge and interior of different patch sizes (small, medium and large) were compared to examine if patches of different sizes had the same or different species communities in their edge and interior zones.

A Pearson correlation (r) was used to assess the relationship between patch size and species richness of lianas in forest edge and interior zones. The relationship between the number of species of different eco-physiological guilds (i.e. shade tolerance) in forest edge and interior zones in relation to patch size was analysed using a linear regression. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test whether mean species richness of lianas with different dispersal modes and climbing mechanisms showed any relationship with patch size. A t-test was then used to compare mean species richness of dispersal mode and climbing mechanism in forest edge and interior zones. The relationship between degree of disturbance, species richness and patch size was analysed using a linear regression analysis. All the statistical analyses were performed using the software SPSS® Statistics version. 17.0.

RESULTS

Liana sampling

Within the examined 10.98 ha of montane forest from 19 discrete forest patches (Appendix 1) we recorded a total of 1276 individual (≥ 1 cm dbh) woody lianas, belonging to 15 species, 11 genera and 10 families. The number of lianas in each forest patch ranged from 9–262 (Appendix 1). Species richness varied from 12 (in a large patch: 1.17 ha) to four species (in a small patch of 0.09 ha) (Appendix 1).

The effect of patch size on liana species richness

Both total species richness of lianas overall and of large lianas (logn species richness) increased significantly with increasing forest patch size (R2 = 0.43, N = 18, P = 0.002; Figure 2a; R2 = 0.44, N = 11, P = 0.01; Figure 2b). Species richness of lianas in both edge and interior zones also increased significantly with increasing forest patch size (R2 = 0.29, N = 15, P = 0.02; Figure 2c; R2 = 0.395, N = 16, P = 0.004; Figure 2d).

Figure 2. The relationship between total species richness of lianas (≥ 1 cm dbh) (a), larger lianas (≥10 cm dbh) (b), total species richness of lianas in forest edge-zones (c) and interior zones (d), and patch area (log transformed, in ha) were examined in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Significant regression lines are shown.

The effect of edge and forest interior in relation to patch size on liana species richness

Species richness of lianas in forest edge (r = 0.68, P = 0.001) and interior zones (r = 0.74, P = 0.0003) was significantly positively related to patch size. Species richness in the forest edge zones (4.89 ± 0.55) and interior zones (4.94 ± 0.33) do not differ significantly (t = 0.07, df = 28, P = 0.94). The species richness of lianas ranged from 2–11 in edge zones and 2–7 in interior zones in patches overall, therefore edge zones are frequently more diverse than interior zones.

Of the 15 liana species, eight were more frequent in the edge zone than in the interior zone. Of these, four species were found only in the edge zone, and were absent from the forest interior (Jasminum brevilobum, Lonicera ligustrina, Decaloba leschenaultii and Rosa leschenaultiana; Appendix 2). However, seven species were more common in the interior zone than the edge zone, and four species were equally abundant in the edge and interior zones (Cissampelopsis walkeri, Elaeagnus conferta, Gardneria ovata, Toddalia asiatica).

Shade tolerance

In the edge zone, shade-averse and shade-tolerant species showed significant positive responses to increasing patch area. In the forest-interior zone however, both shade-tolerant species and shade-dependent species showed no significant response to increasing patch area (Table 1). There were more shade-averse and shade-tolerant lianas found in the edge zone (12 species including seven shade-averse and five shade-tolerant) than shade-dependent species found in the interior zone (three species).

Table 1. Regression statistics of the species-area relationship (with log area) for the examined liana species related to patch size, and the forest edge and interior zones in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Species are grouped according to the shade tolerance (N = 19 patches).

Dispersal mode

The species richness of lianas with different modes of dispersal was significantly related to patch size (F3, 75 = 13.5, P = 0.0001). Lianas dispersed by mammals and birds were the most species rich in both the edge and interior patch zones, whilst lianas dispersed by the wind or an explosive mechanism were the least diverse (Figure 3a).

Figure 3. Differences in frequency (number of lianas) of different dispersal modes (a) and climbing mechanisms (b) in forest edge-zones (black bars) and the interior zones (white bars) were examined in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Significance levels are *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; and ns = not significant.

Climbing mechanisms

The climbing mechanism used by species of liana also varied significantly with increasing patch area (F3, 11 = 69.7, P = 0.0001). Of the five types of climbing mechanism identified, hook climbers were significantly more abundant in the edge zone, whereas root climbers were more abundant in the forest interior (t = −2.33, df = 36, P = 0.03, t = 3.67, df = 36, P = 0.001; Figure 3b).

The effect of disturbance level and patch size on liana species richness

There was no significant difference in liana diversity between each category of habitat disturbance (LD: 7.14 ± 0.94 species; MD: 6.71 ± 0.60; HD: 7.20 ± 0.80: Table 2). However, species richness within areas with low to moderate levels of disturbance significantly increased with increasing patch size, though no significant relationship was found in highly disturbed areas (R2 = 0.40, P = 0.25) (Table 2).

Table 2. Effect of disturbance on liana species richness related with (log10) forest patch area according to disturbance level: low disturbance (LD), moderate disturbance (MD) and highly disturbed (HD) patches in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India.

Community compositional change in different-sized patches

Small patches had significantly different liana communities (in both edge and interior zones) from the communities in large and medium patches (forest interior: Bray–Curtis similarity R = 0.52, P = 0.001; Small patch: Medium patch, P = 0.003, small patch: large patch, P = 0.008, medium patch: large patch, P = 0.67) (forest edge zone: R = 0.47, P = 0.002; small patch: medium patch, P = 0.04, small patch: large patch, P = 0.01, medium patch: large patch P = 0.14). This indicates that a size threshold exists between small and medium patches below which a patch can no longer sustain the original community and therefore small patches hold different communities from larger-sized fragments.

DISCUSSION

Species-area relationships

Positive species-area relationships have previously been found in many fragmented forests globally (Gonzalez et al. Reference GONZALEZ, LADET, DECONCHAT, CABANETTES, ALARD and BALENT2010, Laurance Reference LAURANCE2008, Mohandass & Davidar Reference MOHANDASS and DAVIDAR2010). In our study species richness overall, and in both forest edge and interior zones increased with increasing forest patch area, however there was no significant difference in the average diversity of the two zones. Similar trends have been identified in a number of forests in the western hemisphere (Echeverría et al. Reference ECHEVERRÍA, NEWTON, LARA, REY-BENAYAS and COOMES2007, Gonzalez et al. Reference GONZALEZ, LADET, DECONCHAT, CABANETTES, ALARD and BALENT2010, Lawesson et al. Reference LAWESSON, DE BLUST, GRASHOF, FIRBANK, HONNAY, HERMY, HOBITZ and JENSEN1998).

We found significant differences in the communities of liana present between small and larger patch sizes. Small forest patches differ from larger patch sizes due to changes in biotic and abiotic parameters resulting from forest fragmentation (Farmilo et al. Reference FARMILO, NIMMO and MORGAN2013, Laurance et al. Reference LAURANCE, LOVEJOY, VASCONCELOS, BRUNA, DIDHAM, STOUFFER, GASCON, BIERREGAARD, LAURANCE and SAMPIAO2002). These alterations of biotic and abiotic parameters particularly impact the interior regions of small forest patches. These smaller forest patches show the greatest relative loss in interior forest area, whereas edge-zone area is more closely tied to perimeter length. Not only does the creation of a small forest patch dramatically shift the edge: core area ratio, but furthermore it may increase disturbance, vulnerability to invasion, micro-climatic conditions, air currents, light availability and therefore plant species survival and turnover (MacDonald et al. Reference MACDONALD, CHEN, PALIK and PREPAS2014). Smaller forest patches are also at the greatest risk of drying out, and are therefore especially vulnerable to fire during the dry season (Caner et al. Reference CANER, LO SEEN, GUNNELL, RAMESH and BOURGEON2007). The loss of liana interior-specialist species in smaller forest patches may result at least in part from the high frequency of disturbance in addition to the decreased area of suitable forest in many of these smaller fragments (Caruso et al. Reference CARUSO, RUDOLPHI and RYDIN2011, Hill & Curan Reference HILL and CURRAN2003, Laurance Reference LAURANCE2008). Other than species eco-physiology, minimum viable populations for some liana species or dependencies on interacting species such as pollinators which require larger fragments may also require larger fragments to maintain communities over time.

Dispersal agent and distributions

Most liana species were found to require vertebrate dispersal agents, both overall and in edge and interior areas. This may in part be due to the greater dispersal distance possible when a vertebrate disperser is used. Birds often drop seeds and defecate in the forest and are therefore good dispersal agents (Gonzalez et al. Reference GONZALEZ, LADET, DECONCHAT, CABANETTES, ALARD and BALENT2010), thus it is no surprise that 80% of liana species in the study region were dispersed by birds.

Liana species confined to forest-edge regions are likely to be in part the result of the deposition of liana propagules from outside sources, which may in many cases be from avian dispersers (Ewers & Didham Reference EWERS and DIDHAM2006). Birds may therefore facilitate transfer of propagules between forest patches, and thus play a role in maintaining connectivity in a seemingly fragmented landscape, though this may be more evident in edge than interior zones.

Shade tolerance and distributions

Degree of shade tolerance appears to have a major role in determining the distribution of liana species in relation to distance from the forest edge. Shade-tolerant species, such as Cissampelopsis walkeri, Elaeagnus conferta, Gardneria ovata and Toddalia asiatica occurred at much higher frequencies in the forest edge zone, as did species classed as shade-averse. Shade-averse species (though less common than shade-tolerant species) such as Decaloba leschenaultii, Jasminum brevilobum, Lonicera ligustrina, Parsonia alboflavescens and Rosa leschenaultiana were common in edge zones, and occurred at lower frequencies in the forest interior (Laurance et al. Reference LAURANCE, PEREZ-SALICRUP, DELAMONICA, FEARNSIDE, D’ANGELO, JEROZOLINSKI, POHL and LOVEJOY2001). These changing ratios of species in accordance with their light and shade-tolerance levels may have important consequences in forest succession, with the gradual replacement of initially shade averse, and then shade-tolerant species by shade-dependent species with increasing distance from the forest edge.

Diversity of shade-dependent species was lower than either that of shade-tolerant or shade-averse species, and this may in part relate to less access to avian dispersal agents. Smaller patches will suffer disproportionate loss of shade-dependent species due to the greater relative loss of the interior regions of the patch, as the edge zone area relates to the length of the perimeter rather than simply the volume. As patch area decreases, the area of forest core decreases more rapidly than that of forest edge, and therefore species dependent on shady conditions are likely to be rarer overall than those capable of tolerating brighter conditions. As a consequence, overall diversity of shade-dependent species is also likely to be lower.

Climbing mechanism and distributions

Four types of liana climbing mechanisms were common in both edge and interior zones (Figure 3b). At the early stages of liana colonization, species favoured show rapid growth and proliferation which is often determined by their climbing mechanism. In forest edges, tendril and hook climbers are more frequent. Root climbers and twiners were found at greater frequencies in forest interiors, and increased in abundance and diversity with increasing area. Some scramblers (e.g. Elaeagnus conferta) grew well in both edge and interior zones. However other guilds, such as hook climbers, are more abundant at patch edges, and are sensitive to various disturbances.

Disturbance

Lianas show different assemblages in forests with differing degrees of disturbance, depending on the sensitivity of each species and type of disturbance (Rice et al. Reference RICE, BROKAW and THOMPSON2004, Schnitzer & Bongers Reference SCHNITZER and BONGERS2011). Disturbance levels in the study patches were relatively low impact, and caused by the harvesting of plant parts by local people for firewood and other resource harvesting. Human encroachment into montane forest patches (i.e. road and path development) influences liana success by changing light levels and microclimates of areas. The removal of larger trees for firewood collection or for house construction purposes forms larger gaps in the middle of the forests, and thus simulates natural light gaps from tree fall, and initiates natural successional processes.

Liana species richness increased in the low-disturbance patches and moderate-disturbance patches in response to increasing patch area, but did not increase with increasing forest area in the highly disturbed patches (Table 2). Therefore high disturbance and over-usage of montane forests may negatively affect liana species establishment and growth, and therefore may hinder succession.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that liana species richness of montane forests in the Nilgiri Mountains increases with forest patch size. Liana prevalence and the existence of different species at forest edge zones suggests they play a possible role in forest expansion and forest succession, as has been found in a previous study on trees in the Western Ghats (Mohandass & Davidar Reference MOHANDASS and DAVIDAR2010, Puyravaud et al. Reference PUYRAVAUD, DUFOUR and ARAVAJY2003). Overall, to maintain diversity and aid natural successional processes, the protection of both large and small forest patches is necessary, and additionally the minimization of disturbance in their outer forest margin. In conclusion, lianas play a key ecological role in montane forest ecosystems, however further experimental study is needed to fully understand their ecological role in the processes of patch size expansion and plant community succession.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Our sincere thanks go to Dr Jean Philippe Puyravaud who provided useful suggestions for experimental design and support for this study. Our sincere thanks also go to Professor Qing-Jun Li who provided logistic support and facilities for writing this paper. We are thankful to anonymous reviewers for helping us improve the manuscript. This study was partially supported by a small grant from the Center for Tropical Forest Science and assistance from Dr Egbert G Leigh Jr. This publication was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through Young Scientist Grant no. 31200173, P.R. China. We thank Mr Hegde and staff of UNITEA Pvt. Ltd, the Tamil Nadu Forest Department and Electricity Board for logistical help and support.

Appendix 1. Site code, corrected sampled area (ha), total patch area (ha), species richness of lianas, species richness in edge zone, species richness in forest interior zone, number of occurrence of lianas in each site and the disturbance regime of the studied 19 montane forest patches in the Korakundah and Upper Bhavani Reserve forest, Nilgiri Mountains, southern India.

Appendix 2. Frequency of the 15 liana species in forest edge and forest interior zones, including their shade tolerance, dispersal modes and climbing mechanism in the examined tropical montane forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India.

References

LITERATURE CITED

ADDO-FORDJOUR, P., DUAH, P. E. & AGBESI, D. K. K. 2013. Factors influencing liana species richness and structure following anthropogenic disturbance in a tropical forest, Ghana. ISRN Forestry. doi: 10.1155/2013/920370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AGRA, H. & NÉEMAN, G. 2012. Composition and diversity of herbaceous patches in woody vegetation: the effects of grazing, soil seed bank, patch spatial properties and scale. Flora 207:310317.Google Scholar
ANBARASHAN, M. & PARTHASARATHY, N. 2013. Diversity and ecology of lianas in tropical dry evergreen forests on the Coromandel Coast of India under various disturbance regimes. Flora 208:2232.Google Scholar
CANER, L., LO SEEN, D., GUNNELL, Y., RAMESH, B. R. & BOURGEON, G. 2007. Spatial heterogeneity of land cover response to climatic change in the Nilgiri highlands (southern India) since the last glacial maximum. Holocene 17:195205.Google Scholar
CARUSO, A., RUDOLPHI, J. & RYDIN, H. 2011. Positive edge effects on forest-interior cryptogams in clear-cuts. PLoS ONE 6: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ECHEVERRÍA, C., NEWTON, A. C., LARA, A., REY-BENAYAS, J. M. & COOMES, D. A. 2007. Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:426439.Google Scholar
ESTAVILLO, C., PARDINI, R. & BERNARDO, D. A., ROCHA, P. L. 2013. Forest loss and the biodiversity threshold: an evaluation considering species habitat requirements and the use of matrix habitats. PLoS ONE 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EWERS, R. M. & DIDHAM, R. K. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews 81:117142.Google Scholar
FARMILO, B. J., NIMMO, D. G. & MORGAN, J. W. 2013. Pine plantations modify local conditions in forest fragments in southeastern Australia: insights from a fragmentation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 305:264272.Google Scholar
FYSON, P. F. 1932. The flora of the south Indian hills. Volumes 1–2. Government Press, Madras.Google Scholar
GAMBLE, J. S. & FISCHER, C. E. C. 1915–1935. Flora of the Presidency of Madras. Volumes 1–3. Adlard and Son, London.Google Scholar
GERWING, J. J. 2006. The influence of reproductive traits on liana abundance 10 years after conventional and reduced-impact logging in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management 221:8390.Google Scholar
GIGNAC, L. D. & DALE, M. R. T. 2007. Effects of size, shape, and edge on vegetation in remnants of the upland boreal mixed-wood forest in agro-environments of Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 85:273284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GONZALEZ, M., LADET, S., DECONCHAT, M., CABANETTES, A., ALARD, D. & BALENT, G. 2010. Relative contribution of edge and interior zones to patch size effect on species richness: an example for woody plants. Forest Ecology and Management 259:266274.Google Scholar
HARPER, K. A., MACDONALD, S. E., BURTON, P. J., CHEN, J. Q., BROSOFSKE, K. D., SAUNDERS, S. C., EUSKIRCHEN, E. S., ROBERTS, D., JAITEH, M. S. & ESSEEN, P. A. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19:768782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HILL, J. L. & CURRAN, P. J. 2003. Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. Journal of Biogeography 30:13911403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F. 2008. Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biological Conservation 141:17311744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F. & YENSEN, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation 55:7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., PEREZ-SALICRUP, D., DELAMONICA, P., FEARNSIDE, P. M., D’ANGELO, S., JEROZOLINSKI, A., POHL, L. & LOVEJOY, T. E. 2001. Rain forest fragmentation and the structure of Amazonian liana communities. Ecology 82:105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., LOVEJOY, T. E., VASCONCELOS, H. L., BRUNA, E. M., DIDHAM, R. K., STOUFFER, P. C., GASCON, C., BIERREGAARD, R. O., LAURANCE, S. G. & SAMPIAO, E. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology 16:605618.Google Scholar
LAURANCE, W. F., ANA, S., ANDRADE, A. S., MAGRACH, A., CAMARGO, J. C., VALSKO, J. J., CAMPBELL, M., PHILIP, M., FEARNSIDE, P. M., EDWARDS, W., LOVEJOY, T. E. & LAURANCE, S. G. 2014. Long-term changes in liana abundance and forest dynamics in undisturbed Amazonian forests. Ecology 95:16041611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LAWESSON, J. E., DE BLUST, G., GRASHOF, C., FIRBANK, L., HONNAY, O., HERMY, M., HOBITZ, P. & JENSEN, L. M. 1998. Species diversity and area relationships in Danish beech forests. Forest Ecology and Management 106:235245.Google Scholar
LIU, W.-D., ZANG, R.-G., DING, Y. & ZHANG, W.-Y. 2013. Species-area relationships of different plant functional groups in tropical monsoon rainforests (Hainan Island, China). Polish Journal of Ecology 61:311.Google Scholar
MACARTHUR, R. H. & WILSON, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 203 pp.Google Scholar
MACDONALD, R. L., CHEN, H. Y. H., PALIK, B. P. & PREPAS, E. E. 2014. Influence of harvesting on understory vegetation along a boreal riparian-upland gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 312:138147.Google Scholar
MATTHEW, K. M. 1999. The flora of the Palni Hills, South India. Volumes 1–3. The Rapinat Herbarium, Thiruchirapalli.Google Scholar
MOHANDASS, D. 2007. Plant diversity and forest dynamics in montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Ph.D. thesis, Pondicherry University, Puducherry.Google Scholar
MOHANDASS, D. & DAVIDAR, P. 2010. The relationship between area, and vegetation structure and diversity in montane forest (shola) patches in southern India. Plant Ecology and Diversity 3:6776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOHANDASS, D., DAVIDAR, P., SOMASUNDARAM, S., VIJAYAN, L. & BENG, K. C. (in press). Influence of disturbance regime on liana species composition, density and basal area of the tropical montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains. Tropical Ecology 56.Google Scholar
MORGAN, J. W., WONG, N. K. & CUTLER, S. C. 2011. Life-form species-area relationships in a temperate eucalyptus woodland community. Plant Ecology 212:10471055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MUTHURAMKUMAR, S. & PARTHASARATHY, N. 2000. Alpha diversity of lianas in a tropical evergreen forest in the Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Diversity and Distributions 6:114.Google Scholar
MUTHUPERUMAL, C. & PARTHASARATHY, N. 2009. Angiosperms, climbing plants in tropical forests of southern Eastern Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. Check List 5:92111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUYRAVAUD, J.-P. & DAVIDAR, P. 2013. The Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve: an unrealized vision for conservation. Tropical Conservation Science 6:468476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUYRAVAUD, J.-P., DUFOUR, C. & ARAVAJY, S. 2003. Rain forest expansion mediated by successional processes in vegetation thickets in the Western Ghats of India. Journal of Biogeography 30:10671080.Google Scholar
RANGEL, T. F., DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F. & BINI, L. M. 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography 33:4650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICE, K., BROKAW, N. & THOMPSON, J. 2004. Liana abundance in a Puerto Rican forest. Forest Ecology and Management 190:3341.Google Scholar
RIES, L., FLETCHER, R. J., BATTIN, J. & SISK, T. D. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:491522.Google Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2002. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:223230.Google Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2011. Increasing liana abundance and biomass in tropical forests: emerging patterns and putative mechanisms. Ecology Letters 14:397406.Google Scholar
WULF, M. & KOLK, J. 2014. Plant species richness of very small forests related to patch configuration, quality, heterogeneity and history. Journal of Vegetation Science. doi: 10.1111/jvs.12172.Google Scholar
YINEGER, H., SCHMIDT, D. J. & HUGHES, J. M. 2014. Genetic structuring of remnant forest patches in an endangered medicinal tree in North-western Ethiopia. BMC Genetics 5: 31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-31.Google Scholar
ZMIHORSKI, M., CHYLARECKI, P., REJT, L. & MAZGAJSKI, T. D. 2010. The effects of forest patch size and ownership structure on tree stand characteristics in a highly deforested landscape of central Poland. European Journal of Forest Research 129:393400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the study area in Korakundah and Upper Bhavani regions of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Marking points: L, large patches; M, medium patches; and S: small patches. Symbols indicate various disturbance levels: diamond, low disturbance; triangle, moderate disturbance; and star, highly disturbed.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The relationship between total species richness of lianas (≥ 1 cm dbh) (a), larger lianas (≥10 cm dbh) (b), total species richness of lianas in forest edge-zones (c) and interior zones (d), and patch area (log transformed, in ha) were examined in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Significant regression lines are shown.

Figure 2

Table 1. Regression statistics of the species-area relationship (with log area) for the examined liana species related to patch size, and the forest edge and interior zones in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Species are grouped according to the shade tolerance (N = 19 patches).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Differences in frequency (number of lianas) of different dispersal modes (a) and climbing mechanisms (b) in forest edge-zones (black bars) and the interior zones (white bars) were examined in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Significance levels are *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; and ns = not significant.

Figure 4

Table 2. Effect of disturbance on liana species richness related with (log10) forest patch area according to disturbance level: low disturbance (LD), moderate disturbance (MD) and highly disturbed (HD) patches in the tropical montane evergreen forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India.

Figure 5

Appendix 1. Site code, corrected sampled area (ha), total patch area (ha), species richness of lianas, species richness in edge zone, species richness in forest interior zone, number of occurrence of lianas in each site and the disturbance regime of the studied 19 montane forest patches in the Korakundah and Upper Bhavani Reserve forest, Nilgiri Mountains, southern India.

Figure 6

Appendix 2. Frequency of the 15 liana species in forest edge and forest interior zones, including their shade tolerance, dispersal modes and climbing mechanism in the examined tropical montane forest patches of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India.