Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-9k27k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T10:38:03.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The contribution of interspecific variation in maximum tree height to tropical and temperate diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2005

David A. King
Affiliation:
Center for Tropical Forest Science – Arnold Arboretum Asia Program, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
S. Joseph Wright
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA
Joseph H. Connell
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Maximum height was assessed for tree species from seven temperate deciduous forests, one subtropical forest and one tropical forest and combined with published tree heights for three other tropical forests. The temperate deciduous forests showed a strong concentration of canopy species and a dearth of subcanopy species. In contrast, the four tropical forests showed more uniform distributions of maximum heights, while the subtropical forest had an intermediate distribution. The tropical and subtropical sites had greater densities of small trees than did the temperate sites and most of these small trees were members of small-to medium-sized species. Sapling recruitment per unit stem basal area increased with declining maximum height in Panama, which is consistent with the criterion for coexistence of species of differing stature derived from Kohyama's forest architecture hypothesis. Greater penetration of light into gaps and favourable conditions for growth over most of the year may allow more smaller-statured species to coexist with canopy trees in tropical vs. temperate forests.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press