Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:50:08.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical defences of fruits and mast-fruiting of dipterocarps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

Shinya Numata
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1–1 Minami-Osawa, Hachiouji, Tokyo, 192–0397 Japan
Naoki Kachi
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1–1 Minami-Osawa, Hachiouji, Tokyo, 192–0397 Japan
Toshinori Okuda
Affiliation:
National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16–2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305–0053 Japan
N. Manokaran
Affiliation:
Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, 52109 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mast-fruiting is the intermittent and synchronous production of large fruits by a population of plants at long intervals (Herrera et al. 1998, Kelly 1994). Several hypotheses have been proposed concerning the adaptive advantages of mast-fruiting (Janzen 1971, 1974; Kelly 1994), and some field observations have provided evidence for these hypotheses (Norton & Kelly 1988, Shibata et al. 1998, Sork 1993). The predator-satiation hypothesis is one well-known explanation for reproductive synchrony in plants and animals (Janzen 1971, 1974; Kelly 1994). This hypothesis claims that mast fruiting at irregular intervals of several years is an effective means of satiating vertebrate fruit predators: low seed production can only support low densities of predators during the periods between mast-fruiting events, but more fruits are produced than predators can consume in masting years (Janzen 1971, Kelly 1994). Thus, it may be said that mast-fruiting is a defence strategy of plants against post-dispersal vertebrate fruit predators.

Type
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press