Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:09:53.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Catastrophic natural origin of a species-poor tree community in the world's richest forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2005

Nigel C. A. Pitman
Affiliation:
Center for Tropical Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90381, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0381 USA (email: ncp@duke.edu)
Carlos E. Cerón
Affiliation:
Escuela de Biología, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Casilla 17-01-2177, Quito, Ecuador
Carmita I. Reyes
Affiliation:
Escuela de Biología, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Casilla 17-01-2177, Quito, Ecuador
Mark Thurber
Affiliation:
Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, Miravalle 242 y Julio Zaldumbe, Quito, Ecuador
Jorge Arellano
Affiliation:
Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, Miravalle 242 y Julio Zaldumbe, Quito, Ecuador
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Upper Amazonian tree communities are famous for their very high alpha-diversity. This paper describes an anomalous forest just 6 km south of the equator in lowland Ecuador that is structurally mature, surrounded by hyperdiverse forest, but strikingly poor in species. To investigate the anomaly, a 1-ha tree inventory and soil analysis were carried out and compared with 15 similar surveys of upland forest in the same region. The anomalous forest contains only 102 tree species ha−1, compared with a regional mean of 239±28 species ha−1. It is structurally indistinguishable from richer forests, and closest in composition to upland forest, but lacks the uplands' typically rich understorey tree community. Three hypotheses for its origin are examined: recovery from anthropogenic disturbance, unique soil conditions and recovery from a large-scale natural catastrophe. The third hypothesis is the best supported. Mineralogical, geological and remote-sensing evidence, and 14C-dating suggest that the forest grows on a vast debris plain left by a catastrophic flooding event roughly 500 y ago. The forest's low diversity today is most likely due to the failure of a full complement of the region's tree species – especially understorey taxa – to recolonize the outwash plain in the time since the disaster.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press