Within this article a footnote appeared as part of the main text.
The text in question appeared within the second paragraph on p. 345 and should have been footnoted as follows:
Where an individual could not enjoy security in their ownership of property, could not safeguard the profits of their labours, could not be guaranteed reward or preferment for outstanding ability or expertise, why, British commentators asked, would they outlay the capital or effort necessary for the improvement of agriculture, manufacture or education that were considered imperatives for progress?23
23 Marshall and Williams, pp. 130–131.
