Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T11:53:19.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taxonomy of Cladorhiza in the deep SW Atlantic: C. nicoleae sp. nov. and redescription of C. inversa (Cladorhizidae, Poecilosclerida, Demospongiae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Cristiana Castello-Branco*
Affiliation:
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, 20940-040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Jon Thomassen Hestetun
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A/B, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
Hans Tore Rapp
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A/B, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
Eduardo Hajdu
Affiliation:
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, 20940-040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:C. Castello-Branco, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, 20940-040, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil email: cristianacbranco@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Until now only two species of Cladorhiza have been reported from the SW Atlantic, namely C. diminuta and C. inversa, despite a total of 39 species reported from various parts of the globe. Here we describe a new species, C. nicoleae sp. nov., dredged from 750 m depth on the continental slope off SE Brazil during the French RV ‘Marion Dufresne’ expedition in 1987. It is an erect, pedunculated and club-shaped sponge, 26 mm high and with 12 radially arranged whip-like projections (each up to 3 mm long). The new species differs from its closest relative, C. inversa (redescribed here), by its possession of sigmas and sigmancistras. The holotype of Cladorhiza inversa is also a pedunculated sponge, 1.9 cm tall, with a cup-shaped body with an apical spur-like continuation of the stem and a crown of 16 projections (up to 8 mm long) radiating from the rim of the body.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

INTRODUCTION

Cladorhizid sponges are most frequently found in deep-water habitats, where the carnivorous feeding mode has been considered as a response to a nutrient-poor environment (Vacelet & Boury-Esnault, Reference Vacelet and Boury-Esnault1995). Given the currently accepted classification (Van Soest et al., Reference Van Soest, Boury-Esnault, Hooper, Rützler, de Voogd, Alvarez de Glasby, Hajdu, Pisera, Manconi, Schoenberg, Janussen, Tabachnick, Klautau, Picton, Kelly, Vacelet, Dohrmann, Díaz and Cárdenas2014), carnivory is distributed within the three families Cladorhizidae Dendy, Reference Dendy1922, Esperiopsidae Hentschel, Reference Hentschel, Kükenthal and Krumbach1923 and Guitarridae Dendy, Reference Dendy1924. Eight cladorhizids have so far been reported from the SW Atlantic (Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014). Two of these belong to Cladorhiza, namely C. diminuta Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014 and C. inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886. Altogether 39 species of Cladorhiza have been reported from various parts of the world (Hestetun et al., Reference Hestetun, Fourt, Vacelet, Boury-Esnault and Rapp2013; Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014; Lundsten et al., Reference Lundsten, Reiswig and Austin2014).

The Franco-Brazilian MD-55 Vitória-Trindade Seamounts expedition was carried on board the RV ‘Marion Dufresne’ in 1987, and from a rich collection of sponges only the Hexactinellida have been described so far (Tabachnick et al., Reference Tabachnick, Menshenina, Lopes and Hajdu2009). In this paper we aim to give the first contribution into the study of the Demospongiae in this collection by describing a new species of carnivorous sponge as well as redescribing the morphologically most similar species, Cladorhiza inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The holotype of the new species is deposited in the Porifera collection of the Museum Nacional/UFRJ. The material was studied and described following standard procedures for the group (Hajdu et al., Reference Hajdu, Peixinho and Fernandez2011; Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014). The micrometric data of spicules were obtained from 30 measures of each category. Figure 1 indicates the type locality of the new species, off SE Brazil. The redescription of C. inversa was based on re-examination of the holotype in the BMNH, Natural History Museum (London), followed by anatomical studies conducted in Bergen (Norway). Abbreviations used: MNRJ, Porifera Collection, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; TAAF, Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises; MD55, 55th Oceanographic Campaign of RV ‘Marion Dufresne’.

Fig. 1. Collecting locality of Cladorhiza nicoleae sp. nov. – continental slope off SE Brazil. Insert shows South America and the SE sector of the Brazilian coast shown in the expanded figure.

RESULTS

SYSTEMATICS

Phylum Porifera Grant, Reference Grant and Todd1836
Class Demospongiae Sollas, Reference Sollas1885
Order Poecilosclerida Topsent, Reference Topsent1928
Family Cladorhizidae Dendy, Reference Dendy1922
Genus Cladorhiza Sars, Reference Sars1872
Cladorhiza nicoleae sp. nov.
(Figure 2)

TYPE MATERIAL

Holotype. MNRJ 15991, continental slope off Quissamã (TAAF MD55, Stn 4 DS08, 22°34.6′S – 40°05.4′W, SE Brazilian EEZ), 750 m depth, coll. N. Boury-Esnault, 10.V.1987.

DIAGNOSIS

Erect and pedunculated Cladorhiza with two categories of mycalostyles as megascleres, and microscleres comprising tridentate anchorate anisochelae up to 45 µm long, sigmas and sigmancistras up to 40 µm long.

DESCRIPTION

The single specimen is an erect, delicate and pedunculated sponge, 2.6 cm long, with a 2.0 cm long peduncle. Its globular body is slightly flattened sideways (diameter 0.45 cm), with radial projections up to 0.3 cm long, supported by a calyx-like thickening of the peduncle (Figure 2A, B). Surface slightly velvety and consistency very fragile. No oscule was observed. Colour yellowish-brown in ethanol.

Fig. 2. External morphology, skeleton and spicules of Cladorhiza nicoleae sp. nov. (holotype, MNRJ 15991). (A) external morphology of holotype, (B) detail of external morphology of holotype, (C) appendages skeleton, (D) skeleton of peduncle, (E) skeleton of globular body, (F) mycalostyle I, (G) mycalostyle II, (H) detail of mycalostyle II, (I) anchorate anisochelae, (J) sigma, (K) sigmancistras. Scale bars: A = 0.5 cm; B = 0.10 cm; C–E = 100 µm; F–G = 100 µm; H = 10 µm; I–K = 5 µm.

SKELETON

Peduncle and body formed by an axis of longitudinally arranged mycalostyles. Microscleres abundant, distributed around the bundles of mycalostyles. Radial projections composed by similar longitudinal axes of mycalostyles surrounded by a layer of microscleres (Figure 2C–E).

SPICULES

Megascleres, mycalostyles in two size categories (Figure 2F–H); both straight or slightly curved mixed in different parts of the sponge. Microscleres, one category each of anchorate anisochelae, sigmas and sigmancistras (Figure 2I–K).

  • Mycalostyles I, acerate, 939–1252.3–1618 µm long, 15–21.5–24 µm thick.

  • Mycalostyles II, with short, acerate to conical point, 445–659.5–832 µm long, 4.8–9.1–9.7 µm thick.

  • Anchorate anisochelae, 34–38.9–44 µm long, with tridentate head bearing spatuliferous alae, 9.7–14.4–17 µm tall, and tridentate unguiferate foot, 4.9–6.7–9.7 µm tall (Figure 2I).

  • Sigmas, smooth, contorted, with relatively large hooks, 24–32.3–39 µm long (Figure 2J).

  • Sigmancistras, contorted, concave side lined by long and large fimbriae (giving an overall flat appearance to the shaft), with very sharp, spur-like terminations, 19–29.8–39 µm long (Figure 2K).

DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY

The species is known only from its type locality, off Quissamã (SE Brazilian EEZ).

ETYMOLOGY

The species is named in honour of Dr Nicole Boury-Esnault, the expert on sponges on board the RV ‘Marion Dufresne’ when the holotype was collected, and one of the greatest specialists on sponge taxonomy in recent times, with an important contribution to the taxonomic study of Brazilian species.

Remarks

Of the 39 species of Cladorhiza known worldwide, 11 have been reported from the Atlantic Ocean, and only two from the SW Atlantic, namely C. diminuta Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014 and C. inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886. Cladorhiza nicoleae sp. nov. differs from both mainly by its distinct set of spicules. Cladorhiza diminuta has only one category of much smaller mycalostyles (298–595/8–15 µm), smaller tridentate anisochelae (13–18 µm), and somewhat larger sigmas (28–53 µm). Cladorhiza inversa can be distinguished from C. nicoleae sp. nov. by its larger category of styles (1496–2111/31–48 µm), the presence of tylostyles (270–365/8–13 µm), and by having smaller tridentate anisochelae (30 µm) as its sole category of microscleres (see redescription below).

With respect to all Cladorhiza congeners a similar body shape (pedunculate with radial projections) can be found in 12 species (C. arctica Koltun, Reference Koltun1959, C. bathycrinoides Koltun, Reference Koltun1955, C. diminuta Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014, C. ephyrula Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. flosabyssi Topsent, Reference Topsent1909, C. grandis Verrill, Reference Verrill1879, C. inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. longipinna Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. mirabilis (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886), C. moruliformis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. nematophora Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. similis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886). However, none of these species have the same spicular set of the species described above.

Nineteen species of Cladorhiza have tridentate anisochelae (C. arctica Koltun, Reference Koltun1959, C. bathycrinoides Koltun, Reference Koltun1955, C. corona Lehnert, Watling & Stone, Reference Lehnert, Watling and Stone2005, C. diminuta Lopes & Hajdu, Reference Lopes and Hajdu2014, C. ephyrula Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. flosabyssi Topsent, Reference Topsent1909, C. inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. linearis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. longipinna Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. mani Koltun, Reference Koltun, Pavlovskii, Andriyashev and Ushakov1964, C. microchela Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. mirabilis (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886), C. moruliformis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. nematophora Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. pentacrinus Dendy, Reference Dendy1887, C. pteron Reiswig & Lee, Reference Reiswig, Lee, Custódio, Lôbo-Hajdu, Hajdu and Muricy2007, C. schistochela Lévi, Reference Lévi and Crosnier1993, C. similis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. tridentate Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886) but these species all differ from C. nicoleae sp. nov. with respect to further important features of their spicular set.

The only species with a similar spicular set as C. nicoleae sp. nov. are C. abyssicola Sars, Reference Sars1872 from the boreal Arctic and C. segonzaci Vacelet, Reference Vacelet2006 and C. septemdentalis Koltun, Reference Koltun and Bogorov1970 both from the Pacific Ocean. Besides the body shape (these three species are pinnate or branching), C. abyssicola differs from C. nicoleae sp. nov. by the presence of megasclere styles (only one category), smaller anisochelae (20 µm) with five alae, larger sigmas (100 µm) and sigmancistras with ‘C’ to ‘S’ shape and both tips hastate; Cladorhiza segonzaci differs from C. nicoleae sp. nov. by the presence of one category of styles, smaller anisochelae (15–17.5 µm) with five alae, larger sigmas (50–80 µm) and sigmancistras with two hastate tips. Cladorhiza septemdentalis differs from C. nicoleae sp. nov. by the presence of styles (in two categories), anisochelae with seven alae and larger sigmas. Although C. nicoleae sp. nov. has the same spicule complement and spicule sizes as the species above, its tridentate chelae and body shape suggest that these species are more distantly related.

Thus C. nicoleae sp. nov. is well separated from any previously known Cladorhiza species. Based on a total assessment of body shape, chela shape and spicule complement, the closest relatives to C. nicoleae sp. nov. seem to be the other two SW Atlantic species C. diminuta and C. inversa. More generally, C. nicoleae sp. nov. could be seen as part of a larger assemblage of pedunculate Cladorhiza-species where the head of the chelae have three teeth rather than five or sometimes seven which is common for single-axis or branching Cladorhiza. Curiously, a similar division seems to occur also within genus Chondrocladia (Topsent, Reference Topsent1902, Reference Topsent1930). In addition to species mentioned above, the species C. arctica Koltun, Reference Koltun1959, C. bathycrinoides Koltun, Reference Koltun1955, C. ephyrula Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. flosabyssi Topsent, Reference Topsent1909, C. inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. linearis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. longipinna Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. mani Koltun, Reference Koltun, Pavlovskii, Andriyashev and Ushakov1964, C. mirabilis (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886), C. moruliformis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, C. nematophora Lévi, Reference Lévi1964, C. pentacrinus Dendy, Reference Dendy1887, C. similis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886 could be considered as part of this group.

Cladorhiza inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886
(Figure 3)

EXAMINED MATERIAL

Holotype. BMHN 87.5.2.145, between Rio de la Plata and Tristan da Cunha, Challenger Expedition (Station 332, 37°29′S 27°31′W), 4023 m depth.

COMPARATIVE MATERIAL EXAMINED

Cladorhiza similis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, holotype (BMNH 87.5.2.142); Cladorhiza longipinna Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, holotype (BMNH 87.5.2.143); Cladorhiza mirabilis (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886), holotype (BMNH 87.5.2.141).

DIAGNOSIS

Erect and pedunculated Cladorhiza with a crown-shaped body, two categories of mycalostyles and one category of tylostyles as megascleres, and tridentate anchorate anisochelae up to 27 µm as microscleres.

DESCRIPTION

The holotype is a small, erect and pedunculated sponge 1.9 cm tall. The base of the sponge is missing. The peduncle is 1.5 cm long and supports a short, cup-shaped body with a fine central continuation of the stem and a crown of 16 up to 8 mm long projections pointing apically away from the sponge (Figure 3A, B). The sponge is fragile, partly damaged and with a slightly hispid surface. No oscules or any signs of an aquiferous system were observed. The colour is light brown in ethanol.

Fig. 3. Cladorhiza inversa Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886 (A–B) holotype (BMNH 87.5.2.145), (C) mycalostyle I of the stem and main body, (D) mycalostyle II from the projections with (E) detail, (F) tylostyle and (G) anchorate anisochelae. Scale bars: A, B = 3 mm; C, D = 250 µm; E, F = 50 µm; G = 5 µm.

SKELETON

Peduncle and body formed by axis of longitudinally arranged mycalostyles. Projections composed of larger mycalostyles with a cover of microscleres. Chelae are abundant in body and projections but nearly absent in peduncle, possibly due to the condition of the specimen (Figure 3C–E).

SPICULES

Megascleres are straight and fusiform mycalostyles in two size categories (Figure 3C–E). Microscleres are anchorate anisochelae in a single size category (Figure 3G).

  • Mycalostyles I in peduncle and body, with acerate point, 542–975.4–1500 µm long and 11.1–19.0–30 µm thick.

  • Mycalostyles II in the projections only with acerate point, 1496–1799.6–2111 µm long and 31–35.9–48 µm thick.

  • Tylostyles in the body, fusiform, straight or slightly bent 270–303.4–365 µm long and 7.9–10.8–12.6 µm thick (Figure 3F).

  • Anchorate anisochelae 22.4–25.2–27.1 µm long with a tridentate spatuliferous head 9.6–12.6 µm long and tridentate unguiferate foot ~5 µm long (Figure 3G).

DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY

The species is known only from its type locality, the South Atlantic abyssal plain between Rio de la Plata and Tristan da Cunha.

Remarks

In Ridley and Dendy's original measurements the mycalostyles are given as about 2000 µm long and 37 µm thick while tylostyles are given as 630 µm long and 19 µm thick (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, Reference Ridley and Dendy1887). It is possible that the measurements given of the smaller mycalostyles and tylostyles by Ridley and Dendy were mixed up as the tylostyles are shorter (270–365 µm) in our measurements and the smaller type of mycalostyle is not mentioned in the original description. The cryptic statements ‘bihamates (?)’ (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886) and ‘sigmata (?)’ (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1887) are given in Ridley and Dendy's descriptions. Possibly they were expecting these spicules but were unable to find them. We did not find any trace of sigmas or sigmancistras in our examination of the holotype.

The name of the species derives from the original assumption by Ridley and Dendy that the body represents the basal part of the sponge with the projections acting as roots preventing the sponge from getting buried in the sediment (Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886, Reference Ridley and Dendy1887). This interpretation was challenged by Topsent (Reference Topsent1902) who correctly noted that the sponge is pedunculated with the body apical to the stem.

The spicule set and habit of C. inversa differs from that of the two other Cladorhiza-species known from the SW Atlantic, most significantly by its conical rather than clavate habit and by the lack of sigmas or sigmancistras in C. inversa (see remarks for C. nicoleae sp. nov. above).

The Pacific species C. similis Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886 and C. longipinna Ridley & Dendy, Reference Ridley and Dendy1886 are also close relatives but can be distinguished from C. inversa mainly by longer mycalostyles, slightly different chela sizes, the fact that projections point clearly downwards from the body as well as geographic distance. Two other species have a crown-shaped pedunculate body with apically oriented projections similar to C. inversa: C. flosabyssi Topsent, Reference Topsent1909 from the Azores, and C. corona Lehnert et al., Reference Lehnert, Watling and Stone2005 from the Aleutian Islands. Cladorhiza inversa can be distinguished from them by its smaller mycalostyles, the size of its chelae and the lack of sigmas or sigmancistras.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle and the ‘sponge team’ in Marseille (Station Marine d'Endoume), namely Jean Vacelet, Nicole Boury-Esnault and Thierry Perez, for granting us access to the TAAF-MD55 collection of sponges. We would like to thank Norwegian Oil and Gas, The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre and Det Norske Veritas for sponsoring the 2nd International Workshop on Taxonomy of Atlanto-Mediterranean Deep-Sea Sponges (Bergen, Norway), where preliminary results leading to this publication were presented. M.Sc. Amanda G. da Veiga and Beatriz C.A. Cordeiro are thanked for help with SEM operation at the Center for Scanning Electron Microscopy of Museu Nacional/UFRJ. JTH is grateful to Emma Sherlock and Clare Valentine for granting access and assisting his visit to the Natural History Museum (London), when the type specimen of C. inversa was reexamined.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The Brazilian authors thank the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), Carlos Chagas Filho Research Support Foundation of Rio de Janeiro State (FAPERJ), and Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for grants and/or fellowships.

References

REFERENCES

Dendy, A. (1887) On a remarkable new species of Cladorhiza obtained from H.M.S. ‘Challenger’. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 20, 279282. pl. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, A. (1922) Report on the Sigmatotetraxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Sealark’ in the Indian Ocean. Pp. 1–164, pls 1–18. In Reports of the Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, Volume 7. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (2), 18(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, A. (1924) Porifera. Part I. Non-Antarctic sponges. Natural History Report. British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition, 1910 (Zoology) 6, 269392, pls I–XV.Google Scholar
Grant, R.E. (1836) Animal Kingdom. In Todd, R.B. (ed.) The Cyclopaedia of anatomy and physiology. Volume 1. London: Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper, pp. 107118.Google Scholar
Hajdu, E., Peixinho, S. and Fernandez, J.C.C. (2011). Esponjas Marinhas da Bahia – Guia de Campo e Laboratório. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Série Livros 45.Google Scholar
Hentschel, E. (1923) Erste Unterabteilung der Metazoa: Parazoa, Porifera-Schwämme. In Kükenthal, W. and Krumbach, T. (eds) Handbuch der Zoologie. Eine aturgeschichteder Stämme des Tierreiches. Volume 1, Protozoa, Porifera, Coelenterata, Mesozoa. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 307418. fig. 288–377.Google Scholar
Hestetun, J.T., Fourt, M., Vacelet, J., Boury-Esnault, N. and Rapp, H.T. (2013) Cladorhizidae (Porifera, Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) of the deep Atlantic collected during Ifremer cruises, with a biogeographic overview of the Atlantic species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi: 10.1017/S0025315413001100.Google Scholar
Koltun, V.M. (1955) Sponges. Atlas of the Invertebrate Fauna of the Far-Eastern Seas of the USSR. [In Russian]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR 45–50, 46.Google Scholar
Koltun, V.M. (1959) Siliceous horny sponges of the northern and fareastern seas of the U.S.S.R. [In Russian]. Opredeliteli po faune SSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim muzeem Akademii nauk 67, 1236.Google Scholar
Koltun, V.M. (1964) Sponges of the Antarctic. 1 Tetraxonida and Cornacuspongida. In Pavlovskii, E.P., Andriyashev, A.P. and Ushakov, P.V. (eds) Biological reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition (1955–1958). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, pp. 6133, 443–448. (English translation, 1966; Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translation).Google Scholar
Koltun, V.M. (1970) Sponge fauna of the northwestern Pacific from the shallows to the hadal depths. In Bogorov, V.G. (ed.) Fauna of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and its environment. Institute of Oceanology of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., 86. (Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii in P.P. Shishov and Izdatelstvo Nauka, Moskwa), pp. 165221.Google Scholar
Lehnert, H., Watling, L. and Stone, R. (2005) Cladorhiza corona sp. nov. (Porifera: Demospongiae: Cladorhizidae) from the Aleutian Islands (Alaska). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 13591366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi, C. (1964) Spongiaires des zones bathyale, abyssale et hadale. Galathea Report. Scientific Results of The Danish Deep-Sea Expedition Round the World 1950 52, 63112. pls II–XI.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. (1993) Porifera Demospongiae: Spongiaires bathyaux de Nouvelle-Calédonie, récoltés par le ‘Jean Charcot’. Campagne BIOCAL, 1985. In Crosnier, A. (ed.) Résultats des campagnes MUSORSTOM, Volume 11. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (A, Zoologie) 158, 987.Google Scholar
Lopes, D.A. and Hajdu, E. (2014) Carnivorous sponges from deep-sea coral mounds in Campos Basin (SW Atlantic), with description of six new species (Cladorhizidae, Poecilosclerida, Demospongiae). Marine Biology Research 10, 329356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundsten, L., Reiswig, H.M. and Austin, W.C. (2014) Four new species of Cladorhizidae (Porifera, Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) from the Northeast Pacific. Zootaxa 3786, 101123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiswig, H.M. & Lee, W.L. (2007) A new species of Cladorhiza (Porifera: Cladorhizidae) from S. California (USA). In Custódio, M.R., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Hajdu, E. and Muricy, G. (eds) Porifera research: biodiversity, innovation and sustainability. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, Série Livros 28, pp. 517523.Google Scholar
Ridley, S.O. and Dendy, A. (1886) Preliminary report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 18, 325351, 470–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, S.O. and Dendy, A. (1887) Report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, 1873–1876. Zoology 20, Ilxviii, 1–275 pp., pls I – LI, 1 map.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1872) On some remarkable forms of animal life from the great deeps off the Norwegian coast. Part 1, partly from posthumous manuscripts of the late prof. Michael Sars. University Program for the 1rs half-year 1869. Christiania: Brøgger & Christie, viii + 82 pp., pls 1–6.Google Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1885) A classification of the sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (5) 16, 395 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, K.R., Menshenina, L.L., Lopes, D.A. and Hajdu, E. (2009) Two new Hyalonema species (Hyalonematidae: Amphidiscosida) from eastern and south-eastern Brazil, and further Hexactinellida (Porifera) collected from seamounts off south-eastern Brazil by the RV ‘Marion Dufresne’ MD55 expedition. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 12431250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topsent, E. (1902) Sur l'orientation des Crinorhiza. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences 134, 5860.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1909) Etude sur quelques Cladorhiza et sur Euchelipluma pristina n. g. et n. sp. Bulletin de l'Institut océanographique Monaco 1909 151, 123, pls I–II.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1928) Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I. Monaco 74, 1376, pls I–XI.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1930) Chondrocladia yatsui n. sp., de la Baie de Sagami. Annotationes zoologicae Japonenses 12, 421432.Google Scholar
Vacelet, J. (2006) New carnivorous sponges (Porifera, Poecilosclerida) collected from manned submersibles in the deep Pacific. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 148, 553584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vacelet, J. and Boury-Esnault, N. (1995) Carnivorous sponges. Nature 373, 333335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, R.W.M., Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K., de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Manconi, R., Schoenberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R., Klautau, M., Picton, B., Kelly, M., Vacelet, J., Dohrmann, M., Díaz, M.-C. and Cárdenas, P. (2014) World Porifera database. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera.Google Scholar
Verrill, A.E. (1879) Notice of recent additions to the marine invertebrates of the northeastern coast of America, with descriptions of new genera and species, and critical remarks. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 2, 165205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Collecting locality of Cladorhiza nicoleae sp. nov. – continental slope off SE Brazil. Insert shows South America and the SE sector of the Brazilian coast shown in the expanded figure.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. External morphology, skeleton and spicules of Cladorhiza nicoleae sp. nov. (holotype, MNRJ 15991). (A) external morphology of holotype, (B) detail of external morphology of holotype, (C) appendages skeleton, (D) skeleton of peduncle, (E) skeleton of globular body, (F) mycalostyle I, (G) mycalostyle II, (H) detail of mycalostyle II, (I) anchorate anisochelae, (J) sigma, (K) sigmancistras. Scale bars: A = 0.5 cm; B = 0.10 cm; C–E = 100 µm; F–G = 100 µm; H = 10 µm; I–K = 5 µm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Cladorhiza inversa Ridley & Dendy, 1886 (A–B) holotype (BMNH 87.5.2.145), (C) mycalostyle I of the stem and main body, (D) mycalostyle II from the projections with (E) detail, (F) tylostyle and (G) anchorate anisochelae. Scale bars: A, B = 3 mm; C, D = 250 µm; E, F = 50 µm; G = 5 µm.