Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T05:21:43.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial–temporal variation of Achirus larvae (Actinopterygii: Achiridae) in mangrove, beach and reef habitats in north-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

Elisabeth Cabral Silva-Falcão*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Necton, Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50730-540, Avenida da Arquitetura – s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil
William Severi
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ictiologia, Departamento de Pesca e Aqüicultura, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, 52171-900 Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros – s/n, Dois Irmãos, Recife, PE, Brazil
Maria Elisabeth De Araújo
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Necton, Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50730-540, Avenida da Arquitetura – s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: E.C. Silva-Falcão, Laboratório de Necton, Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50730-540, Avenida da Arquitetura – s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, Brazil email: elisabeth_cabral@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Achirus is made up of demersal fish that have a close relationship with the substrate and exhibit peculiar aspects during their larval stage. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the abundance of Achirus larvae differed among a set of habitats in the estuary of the Formoso River in the State of Pernambuco (north-eastern Brazil). Sampling was performed monthly between April 2009 and March 2010, and comprised horizontal hauls with plankton net during the day and night in mangrove, beach and reef habitats. Fish larvae were sorted, identified, measured and larval stage recorded. Density and body length values were used in a non-parametric analysis of variance for the determination of variations between seasons, habitats and diel periods. A total of 204 larvae were collected, with an average density of 2.1 larvae.100 m−3. Density was greater in the nocturnal samplings, with no differences found between habitats. The larvae occurred in the yolk-sac to post-flexion stage, with pre-flexion the most abundant stage (78%). Size segregation was observed. Larger larvae were captured at night and in the mangrove. The smallest larvae were caught on the reef, with length increasing toward the mangrove. The results indicate that Achirus larvae come from deeper regions near reefs, where spawning probably occurs, and perform ontogenetic migration towards the shallow waters of mangrove, where they settle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

INTRODUCTION

The family Achiridae is made up of species of small fish that mainly inhabit coastal zones of tropical and subtropical seas (Munroe, Reference Munroe and Carpenter2002). Like other representatives of the Pleuronectiformes, the group is known to exhibit peculiar life history aspects, especially during the early stages of development, with a pronounced metamorphosis in comparison to other teleosts and a movement from a pelagic to benthic habitat (Geffen et al., Reference Geffen, Van der Veer and Nash2007). The plankton larvae initially have a symmetrical, laterally compressed body, with the subsequent migration of the left eye, a change in the position of the gut and an increase in the pigmentation on the eyed side (Richards, Reference Richards2006). Achiridae larvae also have a deep body, large gut, a peculiar cephalic bulge and large eyes and maxilla (Ahlstrom et al., Reference Ahlstrom, Amaoka, Hensley, Moser, Sumida, Moser, Richards, Cohen, Fahay, Kendall and Richardson1984).

Following the complete metamorphosis of the planktonic larva, the organism passes to the juvenile phase and settles on the nursery habitat (Van der Veer & Leggett, Reference Van der Veer, Leggett and Gibson2005). The change to this habitat is influenced by behavioural patterns that begin in the larval stage, such as vertical migrations synchronized with the tide, which can lead to either retention or export to more favourable environments for larval development (Bailey et al., Reference Bailey, Nakata, Van der Veer and Gibson2005). The attributes of the habitat, such as the type of substrate and structural complexity, also influence distribution patterns (Moles & Norcross, Reference Moles and Norcross1995), settlement (Walsh et al., Reference Walsh, Peters and Cyrus1999) and feeding habits (Florin & Lavados, Reference Florin and Lavados2010) in the early phases of Pleuronectiformes. Also, the survival and dispersion of these organisms is reported to be affected by hydrographic conditions (Yamashita et al., Reference Yamashita, Tanaka and Miller2001).

The genus Achirus (Lacépède) encompasses four species described on the Brazilian coast: A. achirus (Linnaeus, 1758), A. declivis Chabanaud, 1940, A. lineatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Menezes et al., Reference Menezes, Buckup, Figueiredo and Moura2003) and A. mucuri Ramos, Ramos & Lopes, Reference Ramos, Ramos and Lopes2009 (Ramos et al., Reference Ramos, Ramos and Lopes2009). However, only A. lineatus has been characterized with regard to its larval development (Richards, Reference Richards2006), which is valuable information for the identification and differentiation of individuals collected in this phase. The scarcity of studies describing the different larval stages hinders the identification of larvae in plankton samples and leaves a gap in the knowledge on the ecological aspects of these larvae, such as their abundance and spatial–temporal distribution.

In different estuaries along the Brazilian coast, Achiridae larvae account for a significant proportion of the ichthyoplankton community (Barletta-Bergan et al., Reference Barletta-Bergan, Barletta and Saint-Paul2002; Bonecker et al., Reference Bonecker, Castro, Namiki, Bonecker and Barros2007; Sarpedonti et al., Reference Sarpedonti, Anunciação and Nahum2008). However, no studies have yet recorded data and focused on the larval ecology of these individuals. Moreover, ichthyoplankton surveys on Brazilian coastal ecosystems have mainly been carried out in estuarine areas with muddy bottoms associated with mangroves (e.g. Mafalda Jr et al., Reference Mafalda, Souza and Velame2008), and there is less information about fish larvae on reef (Nonaka et al., Reference Nonaka, Matsuura and Suzuki2000) and beach (Godefroid et al., Reference Godefroid, Hofstaetter and Spach1999) habitats.

The aim of the present study was to carry out the first description of the spatial–temporal distribution patterns of Achirus larvae at a tropical coastal system in north-eastern Brazil, including mangrove, beach and reef habitats. The following were the main points addressed: (1) does larval density differ between coastal habitats?; (2) are there size and larval stage segregation among these environments?; and (3) is there a correlation between density variations and abiotic variables? This study attempts to provide information that can support the understanding of seasonal and daily density patterns, as well as the influence of habitat characteristics on the distribution and settlement of these organisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

The present study was carried out in the lower region of the estuarine complex of the Formoso River, which is formed by the confluence of the Formoso, Passos, Ariquindá and Lemenho Rivers. The complex covers about 2724 hectares and is located in Rio Formoso municipality, 92 km from Recife, the state capital of Pernambuco (north-eastern Brazil). The estuary is divided into three different zones (upper, middle and lower), each one with particular biotic and abiotic characteristics (Lira et al., Reference Lira, Zapata and Fonseca1979; Silva et al., Reference Silva, Passavante, Silva-Cunha, Nascimento-Vieira, Grego and Muniz2004; Paiva et al., Reference Paiva, Lima, Souza and Araújo2009). North-eastern Brazil has two distinct seasons—a rainy season from March to August and a dry season from September to February. The rainy season is accompanied by an increase in primary production, and can be characterized by eutrophic conditions in the estuary (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Passavante, Silva-Cunha, Nascimento-Vieira, Grego and Muniz2004).

Three distinct habitats were chosen for ichthyoplankton sampling—mangrove, beach and reef (Figure 1). Located within two Marine Protected Areas (MPAs: Costa dos Corais and Guadalupe), the habitats sampled cover a distance of 6 km. A total of 185 fish species have been recorded in Costa dos Corais MPA (Ferreira & Cava, Reference Ferreira and Cava2001), including Achirus lineatus and A. declivis among the Achiridae (Paiva et al., Reference Paiva, Lima, Souza and Araújo2009). The mangrove habitat, mainly composed of Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa, Avicennia schaueriana and A. germinans (Nascimento-Filho et al., Reference Nascimento-Filho, Coelho-Junior, Correa, Longo, Gaspar and Schwamborn2007), is located on the left margin of the estuary, in a small creek known as Maria-Açu. This site represents a tidal channel flanked by mangrove plants, which provide significant structural complexity through its roots, with a substrate of fine mud rich in organic matter. On the right bank of the estuary is located Carneiros Beach, selected as the beach habitat. This site has a sandy substrate with patches of macroalgae and seagrass meadows, composed mainly of Halodule wrightii, and is considered an intermediate habitat. The meadows act as shelter for estuarine and reef fish recruits, functioning as a corridor between the other ecosystems (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Ferreira and Rezende2010). The reef habitat is located at the Formoso River mouth, forming part of a complex set of reef formations parallel to the coastline. Among the 105 fish species recorded in the Tamandaré reef, located offshore the Formoso River (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Maida and Souza1995), 40 were recorded in the adjacent estuary and have been considered to play a structuring role on the estuarine community (Paiva et al., Reference Paiva, Lima, Souza and Araújo2009).

Fig. 1. Estuarine complex of the Formoso River, with indication of sampled mangrove, beach and reef areas.

Sampling

Sampling was carried out on a monthly basis between April 2009 and March 2010 during the day and at night, with triplicates in the three habitats studied, totalling 216 samples. In order to begin the nocturnal collections at dusk and operate under adequate navigation conditions, especially on the reefs, such collections were only performed during the low neap tide. The ichthyoplankton hauls were performed horizontally at the subsurface with 500 µm mesh plankton net. The net was hauled at a constant speed of approximately two knots for 10 minutes and the filtered volume was estimated with a flowmeter attached to the centre of the mouth of the net. Temperature (°C), salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen (mg.l−1) and local depth (m) were measured at the surface during each haul, using portable monitors. No salinity data were collected in May 2009 or March 2010 and no oxygen data were collected in February or March 2010, as the necessary equipment was unavailable. Data on monthly rainfall at the Tamandaré station over the study period were from the databank of the Pernambuco Meteorology Laboratory.

Fixation of the samples was achieved with the addition of formalin solution buffered with calcium carbonate and diluted in seawater to a final concentration of 4%. In the laboratory, the material was sorted under a stereomicroscope, with the larvae identified, body length (BL) measured and larval development stage determined, based on Kendall et al. (Reference Kendall, Ahlstrom, Moser, Moser, Richards, Cohen, Fahay, Kendall and Richardson1984). Achirus larvae were distinguished from other larvae of the family through the unique traits of the genus that distinguish it from Trinectes. These include the presence of an elongated third dorsal ray and a cephalic foramen in the intermediate and advanced stages as well as the absence of pigmentation in the early stages (yolk-sac and beginning of pre-flexion) (Ahlstrom et al., Reference Ahlstrom, Amaoka, Hensley, Moser, Sumida, Moser, Richards, Cohen, Fahay, Kendall and Richardson1984; Richards, Reference Richards2006). The total number of larvae in each sample was determined and abundance values were converted into density values, expressed as larvae.100 m−3.

Data analysis

Density and BL values were considered in the analysis of spatial–temporal distribution. The fixed factors were habitat, period of the day and seasons. The data were standardized and transformed (log10 x + 1) before statistical procedures. Variables normality was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov–Lilliefors test (Zar, Reference Zar1999) and homoscedasticity was determined using Bartlett's test. As the prerequisites for analysis of variance were not met, the variables were submitted to non-parametric tests: Mann–Whitney for the analysis of differences between periods of the day and seasons; and Kruskal–Wallis for the analysis of differences among habitats. Results with P values <0.05 were considered significant. The Scheffé's test was used as a posteriori analysis to determine what mean values were significantly different. Associations between environmental variables and larval density were determined using Spearman's non-parametric correlation test. This test was only considered as an exploratory analysis, as it is subject to generating results with random positive correlations.

RESULTS

Hydrographic conditions

The depth of the collection sites ranged from 0.8 to 14.9 m. The reef habitat was the deepest (mean depth: 6.0 ± 3.1 m) while the beach and mangrove habitats were shallower (mean depth: 1.95 ± 0.7 and 1.30 ± 0.5, respectively). Mean temperature during the sampling period was 28.42°C. The lowest temperatures occurred between May and August (mean: 27.1°C) and the highest occurred in February and March (mean: 30.18°C). This parameter varied significantly only between seasons (P < 0.0001) and was higher in the dry season (mean: 29°C). No significant variation in temperature was found between periods of the day or habitats.

Mean salinity was 30.78, ranging from 26 in June to 36 in November. Salinity values were higher in the dry season (P = 0.0049) in the daytime samples (P = 0.0294) collected from the beach and reef habitats (P < 0.0001). Monthly distribution of mean precipitation was inversely correlated to salinity, with rainfall greater than 200 mm recorded between April and August (rainy season) (Figure 2).

Fig. 2. Mean and standard deviation values for abiotic variables in different estuarine habitats of the Formoso River, Pernambuco, Brazil (– + –, precipitation).

The mean concentration of dissolved oxygen in the water was highest in August (7.58 mg.l−1). Higher concentrations occurred during the day (P = 0.0247), with a mean value of 6.25 mg.l−1. Between habitats, the lowest concentration was recorded in the mangrove samples, reaching 5.01 mg.l−1, whereas the reef habitat had the highest values (mean: 6.82 mg.l−1; P < 0.0001).

The pH values ranged from 6.32 in December to 8.71 in March, with higher values occurring in the rainy season (mean: 7.97), although no statistically significant difference between seasons was found (P = 0.1125). The mangrove habitat had the lowest pH values (mean: 7.8) and the other habitats had mean values greater than 8.0 (Figure 2).

Density of larvae

A total of 204 Achirus larvae were collected, with a mean density of 2.1 ± 4.92 larvae.100 m−3 per haul. Density values were significantly different between months (P = 0.0001), with a maximum of 31.28 larvae.100 m−3 in December 2009 and a minimum of 1.36 larvae.100 m−3 in April 2010. Density also differed significantly between seasons and period of the day (Table 1). Mean density ranged from 0.83 larvae.100 m−3 in the rainy season to 3.34 larvae.100 m−3 in the dry season (P < 0.0001). The results of the Mann–Whitney test indicated significant differences between periods of the day (P < 0.0001), with mean larval abundance of 3.46 larvae.100 m−3 in the nocturnal samples and 0.74 larvae.100 m−3 in the daytime samples. No significant differences in total density values were detected between habitats (P = 0.1478), but a greater mean value was recorded in the reef (3 larvae.100 m−3), followed by the beach (2.07 larvae.100 m−3) and mangrove habitat (1.23 larvae.100 m−3). Among the hydrographic variables measured, larval density was only positively correlated to temperature (r = 0.2; P < 0.05) and salinity (r = 0.2; P < 0.05).

Table 1. Mean larval density and significance levels for non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis (habitat) and Mann–Whitney (period of day and season) analyses of variance of log densities of Achiridae collected between April 2009 and March 2010.

P*, Kruskal-Wallis test; P**, Mann-Whitney test; SD, standard deviation.

Larval stages and variations in length

All larval development stages of Achirus were found throughout the sampling period. Ten per cent were yolk-sac, 78% were in pre-flexion, 4% were in flexion and 8% were in post-flexion. The percentage participation of stages was similar among habitats, since the mean proportion of each stage did not differ significantly among them. In each habitat the stage proportion was uneven. In the mangrove (P = 0.003) the post-hoc test distinguished the post-flexion (33%) and pre-flexion (58%) stages as the most representative. On the beach (P = 0.001) and reef (P = 0.001) habitats the mean proportion of pre-flexion larvae was 60 and 58%, respectively.

Analysis of variance revealed significant results regarding density per larval stage only for the pre-flexion and post-flexion stages (Table 1). The pre-flexion stage was more abundant in the dry season (P < 0.0001) during nocturnal collections (P = 0.0005) carried out in the reef and beach habitats (P = 0.0430). Significantly different values in post-flexion density were detected only between periods of the day (P = 0.0086), with greater mean values recorded during the nocturnal collections, whereas no differences were found between habitats or seasons (Table 1). However, there was a general tendency toward greater mean density of post-flexion larvae in the mangrove (0.33 larvae.100 m−3), whereas the lowest values were recorded in the reef habitat (0.1 larvae.100 m−3) (Figure 3).

Fig. 3. Density of different larval stages of Achirus collected from different estuarine habitats of the Formoso River, Pernambuco, Brazil (shaded, nocturnal period; non-shaded, daytime).

Considering the peak density values in the different larval stages, the early stages (yolk-sac and pre-flexion) were more abundant in the reef habitat. There was a general increase in larvae during the nocturnal collections (Figure 3), although a high number of larvae in the pre-flexion stage was collected in the mangrove during the day (P = 0.0322). The flexion stage was distributed more evenly among the habitats, with peak density values in the nocturnal collections in the dry season and no differences between habitats. Greater density values of post-flexion larvae were found in the mangrove, with higher values in the dry season. On the mangrove and beach habitats, post-flexion larvae were caught exclusively during the nocturnal period.

Body length ranged from 1.4 to 4.5 mm (mean: 2.2 ± 0.64 mm), with higher values found in the rainy season (P = 0.0362). Significant differences were found between periods of the day (P = 0.0178), with a mean value of 2.5 mm in the nocturnal samples versus 1.9 mm in the daytime samples. Significant differences were also found between habitats (P = 0.0320), with the largest sizes collected from the mangrove (Figure 4).

Fig. 4. Mean and standard deviation of body length values of Achirus larvae collected from different estuarine habitats of the Formoso River, Pernambuco, Brazil.

DISCUSSION

Ichthyoplankton in estuarine regions is dominated by estuary-dependent species, which find potential nursery areas in this ecosystem due to its favourable biotic and abiotic attributes (Reyier & Shenker, Reference Reyier and Shenker2007). Many of these species, including Pleuronectiformes, are known to exhibit ontogenetic migration from spawning areas to estuaries (Bailey, Reference Bailey1997). In tropical Brazilian estuaries, Achiridae larvae are frequent in ichthyoplankton samples and, in some cases, may figure among the most abundant taxa (Barletta-Bergan et al., Reference Barletta-Bergan, Barletta and Saint-Paul2002; Barletta & Barletta-Bergan, Reference Barletta and Barletta-Bergan2009). Among the species of Achirus that occur on the Brazilian coast, only A. lineatus and A. declivis are recorded for the estuary of the Formoso River (Paiva et al., Reference Paiva, Lima, Souza and Araújo2009), although Araújo et al. (Reference Araújo, Teixeira and Oliveira2004) also cite A. achirus for the north-eastern region of the country. The lack of information on the diagnostic characteristics of the larval forms of Achirus occurring in the studied area (Richards, Reference Richards2006), render it difficult to affirm what exact species the present study addressed.

The occurrence of larvae throughout the year indicated that spawning activity was continuous in the estuarine complex of the Formoso River, with a likely peak in December. In the estuary of the Caeté River (northern Brazil), Achirus also predominated in this month, which occurs in the dry season, with higher temperature and salinity values (Barletta & Barletta-Bergan, Reference Barletta and Barletta-Bergan2009). While there is little available information on the life cycle of Achiridae, fish from this family are known to exhibit more intensive spawning activity when the water temperature is above 20°C (Futch, Reference Futch1970). Temperatures above this value were recorded in the present study, which may explain the occurrence of early-stage larvae in nearly every month. The only exception was June 2009, when there was a lower larval density, a month occurring in the rainy season.

High temperatures lead to an increase in growth rate, resulting in an increase in size at metamorphosis for some species (Geffen et al., Reference Geffen, Van der Veer and Nash2007), whereas high temperatures accelerate metamorphosis in other species, leading to a smaller size at metamorphosis and shorter larval period (Yamashita et al., Reference Yamashita, Tanaka and Miller2001). In any case, spawning in hotter seasons favours larval development and survival. Moreover, high salinity may also contribute to a greater density of larvae in the early stages. In species of sole which spawn in offshore waters and exhibit migration toward coastal areas in the larval phase, laboratory experiments have indicated that early-stage larvae do not tolerate low salinities, but pre-settlement larvae do (Burke et al., Reference Burke, Tanaka and Seikai1995; Yamashita et al., Reference Yamashita, Tanaka and Miller2001). The data obtained for the studied area lend support to these observations, as the reef habitat, which is the furthest ecosystem from the coast, had the greatest density of newly-hatched and pre-flexion larvae. This high occurrence prevailed in the dry season and the nocturnal period.

Under favourable hydrographic conditions, a synchrony is often reported to occur between the hatching of the larvae and the plankton production cycle, which increases the survival of the pelagic eggs and larvae (Rijnsdorp et al., Reference Rijnsdorp, Berghahn, Miller and Van Der Veer1995). However, comparing the larval density data in the present study with peak primary production reported in studies by Silva et al. (Reference Silva, Passavante, Silva-Cunha, Nascimento-Vieira, Grego and Muniz2004, Reference Silva, Silva-Cunha, Passavante, Grego and Muniz2009) carried out in the same estuary, this synchrony is not apparent. Thus, plankton production may not be a limiting factor for these larvae in the area in question, likely due to the fact that it is a quite productive estuary (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Silva-Cunha, Passavante, Grego and Muniz2009) and has a high amount of biomass throughout the year.

Larvae carry out vertical circadian migrations, concentrating at the surface at night and migrating to the bottom during the day. This behaviour is known for many fish larvae as a strategy for feeding and/or escaping from visual predators and may be associated with selective tidal stream transport (STST), which is a strategy for either exportation or retention through vertical migrations synchronized with the tide (Boehlert & Mundy, Reference Boehlert and Mundy1988). A number of studies have documented this behaviour, such as the retention of the larval forms of Achirus species, which migrate to deeper layers during the ebb tide (Aceves-Medina et al., Reference Aceves-Medina, Saldierna-Martínez, Hinojosa-Medina, Jiménez-Rosenberg, Hernández-Rivas and Morales-Ávila2008) or are more abundant during the flood tide, suggesting transportation upstream (Barletta & Barletta-Bergan, Reference Barletta and Barletta-Bergan2009). The estuarine region of the Formoso River is an inlet, with considerable penetration of tide and often with a relatively low fluvial influence (Lira et al., Reference Lira, Zapata and Fonseca1979), with no vertical salinity stratification, except in the innermost portions during the rainy season (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Passavante, Silva-Cunha, Nascimento-Vieira, Grego and Muniz2004). This condition stems from the strong influence of the ocean and may favour the retention of larvae in the water column in the estuarine zone. In this case, vertical migrations may be triggered mainly by the photoperiod rather than tidal variations. In the mangrove, larval density was not significantly influenced by the period of the day, although greater mean values were found in the daytime period. It is likely that the greater number of larvae captured in this environment was due to the turbidity of the water, greater in the mangrove area than the reef one (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Silva-Cunha, Passavante, Grego and Muniz2009), which reduces visibility and, consequently, net evasion (Lemke & Ryer, Reference Lemke and Ryer2006).

Nearly 90% of the larvae collected were in the yolk-sac and pre-flexion stages of development, with the latter accounting for 78% of the total. The predominance of larvae in the early stages is a common finding due to the direct relationship between the duration of larval period and mortality rate (Van der Veer & Leggett, Reference Van der Veer, Leggett and Gibson2005). Pre-flexion larvae were more abundant in the reef and beach habitats and at night. This corroborates the pattern observed by Able et al. (Reference Able, Fahay, Witting, McBride and Hagan2006); these authors studied ichthyoplankton on the coast of the state of New Jersey (USA) and found that 77% of the pre-flexion larvae were collected from coastal sites and 90% of the post-flexion larvae were collected from the estuary. In the present study, most pre-flexion larvae were collected from the reef and beach environments, whereas post-flexion larvae were mainly collected from the mangrove. As larval development period is approximately one month for some species of Achirus (Ortíz-Galindo et al., Reference Ortíz-Galindo, Matus-Nivón, Ramírez-Sevilla and González-Acosta1990; Flores-Coto et al., Reference Flores-Coto, Sánchez-Iturbe, Zavala-García and López-García1992), no seasonal pattern (dry or rainy season) was related to the occurrence of different stages. However, a larger number of newly-hatched larvae arrived to the first ecosystem they inhabit (the reef) in the dry season. Salinity is lower during the rainy season, which favours the survival of larger larvae (Yamashita et al., Reference Yamashita, Tanaka and Miller2001). The largest larvae caught in the estuarine complex of the Formoso River occurred in the rainy season, although at a lower density in comparison to the dry season.

With growth, fish larvae become less dependent on the currents, but may still benefit from the STST in the search for an appropriate habitat (Gibson, Reference Gibson1997). However, the change in habitat will only occur after the development of the structures necessary for survival. There is evidence to indicate that the period of the ontogenetic habitat shift is more related to body size than development phase (Fuiman, Reference Fuiman1997), which do not always coincide. The gradual increase in the length of the larvae from the reef toward the mangrove is an indication of their migration from the spawning area to their likely settlement habitat. Among the habitats investigated, the reef had the greatest concentration of larvae, especially those in the early stages. It is likely that the hatching of these individuals occurs in deeper waters of the adjacent marine environment, with favourable currents allowing the eggs and larvae to drift towards the coast.

In the study area, the juvenile ichthyofauna occurring in the the seagrass meadows off Carneiros Beach have been surveyed, but no Achiridae juveniles were found (Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Ferreira and Rezende2010). Similarly, a survey carried out in an adjacent reef area found no specimens of this family (Ferreira et al., Reference Ferreira, Maida and Souza1995). Small juveniles of Achirus lineatus and A. declivis have been reported from the innermost areas associated with the mangroves (Paiva et al., Reference Paiva, Lima, Souza and Araújo2009), suggesting that these mangroves are a potential nursery for species of Achirus.

One may infer that migration between ecosystems and consequent population connectivity occurs during pelagic larval stages. The duration of the egg and larval stages must coincide with the transport period necessary to ensure metamorphosis (Van der Veer & Leggett, Reference Van der Veer, Leggett and Gibson2005). Thus, the pelagic larval stage of Pleuronectiformes is more critical to the survival of the individual than the juvenile and adult phases, as settlement in the benthic habitat occurs in specific nurseries (Gibson, Reference Gibson1997). The duration of the pelagic phase in some species of the family is rather short—generally not surpassing 30 days before the settlement of the individuals (Ortíz-Galindo et al., Reference Ortíz-Galindo, Matus-Nivón, Ramírez-Sevilla and González-Acosta1990; Flores-Coto et al., Reference Flores-Coto, Sánchez-Iturbe, Zavala-García and López-García1992). Moreover, many pelagic larvae of flatfish exhibit quite lethargic swimming, corresponding to only 1 BL.sec−1 (Bailey et al., Reference Bailey, Nakata, Van der Veer and Gibson2005). This means that a larva in flexion, at approximately 3 mm length, is capable of travelling only 260 m in a day, which highlights the importance of vertical migrations for the optimization of larval transportation.

In conclusion, the three habitats investigated in the present study are used for the early phases of Achirus, but there was a tendency toward size segregation, indicating movement from the reef habitat (first post-hatching coastal site) to the mangrove (settlement site). The proximity of the habitats likely favoured this movement, resulting in connectivity between environments. Further studies addressing the settlement pattern and the reproduction of these fish in the region will help clarify issues related to their life cycle.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Sigrid Neumann-Leitão, Silvia H.L. Schwamborn and Robson Tamar for reading and giving suggestions on an early version of the manuscript. We also thank Manoel do Nascimento and the Ichthyology Laboratory staff for helping in sampling activities. This work is part of the Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa Duração (PELD) project supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Grant number 558286/2009-7). The CNPq also provided a scholarship to the first author (E.C.S.F, grant number 382854/2010-1) for developing this research.

References

REFERENCES

Able, K.W., Fahay, M.P., Witting, D.A., McBride, R.S. and Hagan, S.M. (2006) Fish settlement in the ocean vs. estuary: comparison of pelagic larval and settled juvenile composition and abundance from southern New Jersey, U.S.A. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 66, 280290.Google Scholar
Aceves-Medina, G., Saldierna-Martínez, R., Hinojosa-Medina, A., Jiménez-Rosenberg, S.P.A., Hernández-Rivas, M.E. and Morales-Ávila, R. (2008) Vertical structure of larval fish assemblages during diel cycles in summer and winter in the southern part of Bahía de La Paz, México. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76, 889901.Google Scholar
Ahlstrom, E.H., Amaoka, K., Hensley, D.A., Moser, H.G. and Sumida, B.Y. (1984) Pleuronectiformes development. In Moser, H., Richards, W., Cohen, D., Fahay, M., Kendall, A. and Richardson, S. (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthyology and Herpetology, pp. 640670.Google Scholar
Araújo, M.E., Teixeira, J.M.C. and Oliveira, A.M.E. (2004) Peixes estuarinos marinhos do Nordeste brasileiro. Fortaleza: Edições UFC/UFPE.Google Scholar
Bailey, K.M. (1997) Structural dynamics and ecology of flatfish populations. Journal of Sea Research 37, 269280.Google Scholar
Bailey, K.M., Nakata, H. and Van der Veer, H.W. (2005) The planktonic stages of flatfishes: physical and biological interactions in transport processes. In Gibson, R. (ed.) Flatfishes: biology and exploitation. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 94119.Google Scholar
Barletta, M. and Barletta-Bergan, A. (2009) Endogenous activity rhythms of larval fish assemblages in a mangrove fringed estuary in North Brazil. The Open Fish Science Journal 2, 1524.Google Scholar
Barletta-Bergan, A., Barletta, M. and Saint-Paul, U. (2002) Structure and seasonal dynamics of larval fish in the Caeté River Estuary in North Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54, 193206.Google Scholar
Bonecker, A.C.T., Castro, M.S., Namiki, C.A.P., Bonecker, F.T. and Barros, F.B.A.G. (2007) Larval fish composition of a tropical estuary in northern Brazil (2°18′–2°47′S 044°20′–044°25′W) during the dry season. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 2, 235241.Google Scholar
Boehlert, G.W. and Mundy, B.C. (1988) Roles of behavioral and physical factors in larval and juvenile fish recruitment to estuarine nursery areas. American Fisheries Society Symposium 3, 5167.Google Scholar
Burke, J.S., Tanaka, Y. and Seikai, T. (1995) Influence of light and salinity on behavior of larval Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) and implications for inshore migration. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 34, 5969.Google Scholar
Ferreira, B.P. and Cava, F. (2001) Ictiofauna marinha da APA Costa dos Corais: lista de espécies através de levantamento da pesca e observações subaquáticas. Boletim Técnico-Científico do CEPENE 9, 167180.Google Scholar
Ferreira, B.P., Maida, M. and Souza, A.E.T. (1995) Levantamento inicial das comunidades de peixes recifais da regiao de Tamandare—PE. Boletim Técnico-Científico do CEPENE 3, 213230.Google Scholar
Flores-Coto, C., Sánchez-Iturbe, A., Zavala-García, F. and López-García, D. (1992) Edad y crecimiento de larvas de Achirus lineatus, Etropus crossotus, Syacium gunteri y Symphurus civitatus en el sur del Golfo de México. Anales del Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología 19, 167173.Google Scholar
Florin, A. and Lavados, G. (2010) Feeding habits of juvenile flatfish in relation to habitat characteristics in the Baltic Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86, 607612.Google Scholar
Fuiman, L.A. (1997) What can flatfish ontogenies tell us about pelagic and benthic lifestyles? Journal of Sea Research 37, 257267.Google Scholar
Futch, C.R. (1970) Contributions to the ecology of larval and juvenile lined sole, Achirus lineatus, in Tampa Bay, Florida. Florida Department of Natural Resources, Marine Research Laboratory 17, 15.Google Scholar
Geffen, A.J., Van der Veer, H.W. and Nash, R.D.M. (2007) The cost of metamorphosis in flatfishes. Journal of Sea Research 58, 3545.Google Scholar
Gibson, R.N. (1997) Behaviour and the distribution of flatfishes. Journal of Sea Research 37, 241256.Google Scholar
Godefroid, R.S., Hofstaetter, M. and Spach, H.L. (1999) Larval fish in the surf zone of Pontal do Sul beach, Pontal do Paraná, Paraná, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 16, 10051011.Google Scholar
Kendall, A.W., Ahlstrom, E.H. and Moser, H.G. (1984) Early life history stages of fishes and their characters. In Moser, H., Richards, W., Cohen, D., Fahay, M., Kendall, A. and Richardson, S. (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthyology and Herpetology, pp. 1122.Google Scholar
Lemke, J.L. and Ryer, C.H. (2006) Risk sensitivity in three juvenile (Age-0) flatfish species: does estuarine dependence promote risk-prone behavior? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 333, 172180.Google Scholar
Lira, L., Zapata, M.-C. and Fonseca, V.G. (1979) Aspectos da dinâmica do estuário do Rio Formoso, Pernambuco. Caderno Ômega 3, 133156.Google Scholar
Mafalda, P.O. Jr, Souza, C.S. and Velame, M.P.B. (2008) Fish larvae assemblage of a coastal area under influence of petrochemical activities, in Todos os Santos bay, Bahia, Brazil. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 11, 457464.Google Scholar
Menezes, N.A., Buckup, P.A., Figueiredo, J.L. and Moura, R.L. (2003) Catálogo das espécies de peixes marinhos do Brasil. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Moles, A. and Norcross, B.L. (1995) Sediment preference in juvenile Pacific flatfishes. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 34, 177182.Google Scholar
Munroe, T.A. (2002) Achiridae. In Carpenter, K.E. (ed.) The living marine resources of eastern Central Atlantic. Rome: FAO and American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication No. 5, Volume 3, pp. 19251933.Google Scholar
Nascimento-Filho, G.A., Coelho-Junior, C., Correa, F.M., Longo, A.F.P., Gaspar, F.L. and Schwamborn, R. (2007) Desenvolvimento estrutural de bosque de mangue ao longo do gradiente de inundação do rio Arinquindá—baía de Tamandaré, Pernambuco. Boletim Técnico-Científico do CEPENE 15, 3137.Google Scholar
Nonaka, R.H., Matsuura, Y. and Suzuki, K. (2000) Seasonal variation in larval fish assemblages in relation to oceanographic conditions in the Abrolhos Bank region off eastern Brazil. Fishery Bulletin 98, 767784.Google Scholar
Ortíz-Galindo, J.L., Matus-Nivón, E., Ramírez-Sevilla, R. and González-Acosta, B. (1990) Embrión, larva y prejuvenil del sol mexicano Achirus mazatlanus (Pisces: Soleidae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 38, 195204.Google Scholar
Paiva, A.C.G., Lima, M.F.V., Souza, J.R.B. and Araújo, M.E. (2009) Spatial distribution of the estuarine ichthyofauna of the Rio Formoso (Pernambuco, Brazil), with emphasis on reef fish. Zoologia 26, 266278.Google Scholar
Pereira, P.H.C., Ferreira, B.P. and Rezende, S.M. (2010) Community structure of the ichthyofauna associated with seagrass beds (Halodule wrightii) in Formoso River estuary—Pernambuco, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 82, 617628.Google Scholar
Ramos, R.T.C., Ramos, T.P.A. and Lopes, P.R.D. (2009) New species of Achirus (Pleuronectiformes: Achiridae) from Northeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 2113, 5562.Google Scholar
Reyier, E.A. and Shenker, J.M. (2007) Ichthyoplankton community structure in a shallow subtropical estuary of the Florida Atlantic coast. Bulletin of Marine Science 80, 267293.Google Scholar
Richards, W.J. (2006) Early stages of Atlantic fishes: an identification guide for western central North Atlantic. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rijnsdorp, A.D., Berghahn, R., Miller, J.M. and Van Der Veer, H.W. (1995) Recruitment mechanisms in flatfish: what did we learn and where do we go? Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 34, 237242.Google Scholar
Sarpedonti, V., Anunciação, E.M.S. and Nahum, V.J.I. (2008) Ichthyoplankton variations in two mangrove creeks of the Curuçá estuary, Pará, Brazil. Ecotrópicos 21, 112.Google Scholar
Silva, M.H., Passavante, J.Z.O., Silva-Cunha, M.G.G., Nascimento-Vieira, D.A., Grego, C.K.S. and Muniz, K. (2004) Distribuição espacial e sazonal da biomassa fitoplanctônica e dos parâmetros hidrológicos no estuário do Rio Formoso (Rio Formoso, Pernambuco, Brasil). Tropical Oceanography 32, 89106.Google Scholar
Silva, M.H., Silva-Cunha, M.G.G., Passavante, J.Z.O., Grego, C.K.S. and Muniz, K. (2009) Estrutura sazonal e espacial do microfitoplâncton no estuário tropical do rio Formoso, PE, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 23, 355368.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, H.W. and Leggett, W.C. (2005) Recruitment. In Gibson, R. (ed.) Flatfishes: biology and exploitation. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 120137.Google Scholar
Walsh, H.J., Peters, D.S. and Cyrus, D.P. (1999) Habitat utilization by small flatfishes in a North Carolina estuary. Estuaries 22, 803813.Google Scholar
Yamashita, Y., Tanaka, M. and Miller, J.M. (2001) Ecophysiology of juvenile flatfishes in nursery grounds. Journal of Sea Research 45, 205218.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatiscal analysis. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Estuarine complex of the Formoso River, with indication of sampled mangrove, beach and reef areas.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Mean and standard deviation values for abiotic variables in different estuarine habitats of the Formoso River, Pernambuco, Brazil (– + –, precipitation).

Figure 2

Table 1. Mean larval density and significance levels for non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis (habitat) and Mann–Whitney (period of day and season) analyses of variance of log densities of Achiridae collected between April 2009 and March 2010.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Density of different larval stages of Achirus collected from different estuarine habitats of the Formoso River, Pernambuco, Brazil (shaded, nocturnal period; non-shaded, daytime).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mean and standard deviation of body length values of Achirus larvae collected from different estuarine habitats of the Formoso River, Pernambuco, Brazil.