Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T05:03:21.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redescription of three species of Apseudidae (Tanaidacea) from the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench with general remarks on tanaidacean diversity in oceanic trenches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Piotr Jóźwiak*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Polar Biology and Oceanobiology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:P. Jóźwiak, Laboratory of Polar Biology and Oceanobiology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland email: pjozwiak@biol.uni.lodz.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Redescriptions of three species of Apseudidae are given based on samples collected from the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench during the Kurambio deep-sea expedition: Fageapseudes bicornis, F. vitjazi and Leviapseudes zenkevitchi. The identification key for species of Fageapseudes is given. Tanaidacean fauna from the main world trenches is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

INTRODUCTION

Tanaidacea are known from a wide spectrum of marine habitats e.g. river estuaries, coral reefs, cold seeps or hydrothermal vents (as was summarized by Larsen, Reference Larsen2005) and in a wide range of depth, from shelf to hadal zone (Błażewicz-Paszkowycz et al., Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Bamber and Anderson2012). Tanaidaceans are also described as a poorly taxonomically recognized group of Peracarida with about 1250 known species and according to the most recent estimates the total number of tanaidacean species may be an order of magnitude higher (Błażewicz-Paszkowycz et al., Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Bamber and Anderson2012). Taking this into account it may be surprising that species known from oceanic trenches comprise about 8% of all known Tanaidacea (Anderson, Reference Anderson2013). Although as was shown by Błażewicz-Paszkowycz et al. (Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Pabis and Jóźwiak2014) even for the most frequently studied trenches, the state of knowledge of their tanaidacean fauna is unsatisfactory. First records of Tanaidacea from trenches date to the 1950s, when Wolf (Reference Wolff, Bruun, Greve, Spärck and Wolff1956a, Reference Wolffb) described a series of four neotanaid and one apseudid species collected during Galathea cruises from Kermadec Trench. Later, studies on hadal tanaidaceans were dominated by Russian scientists, who examined materials taken during RV ‘Vitjaz’ expeditions to, for example, Bougainville Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1965), Kurile-Kamchatka Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970), Kermadec Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1972), Aleutian Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973) or Izu-Bonin Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1977). Single records of hadal tanaidaceans were then made by Lang (Reference Lang and Wolff1968) from Sunda Trench, Menzies et al. (Reference Menzies, George and Rowe1973) from Kermadec Trench, Messing (Reference Messing1977) from Puerto-Rico Trench and finally by Gamô (Reference Gamô1984) from Philippine Trench. Significant studies in the field of deep-water Tanaidacea were recently conducted by Bamber (Reference Bamber2007), Bird (Reference Bird2007a, Reference Birdb), Błażewicz-Paszkowycz (Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz2007), Larsen (Reference Larsen2007) and McLelland (Reference McLelland2007). Those studies resulted in 21 new species of tanaidaceans and were summarized in a monograph dedicated to Kurile-Kamchatka and Japan Trenches fauna (Larsen & Shimomura, Reference Larsen and Shimomura2007).

The project KuramBio (Kurile Kamchatka Biodiversity Study) is the continuation of German-Russian studies in the North-west Pacific (after SoJaBio) and is dedicated to examining biodiversity and community patterns of the fauna from the Kurile Kamchatka Trench and adjacent abyssal plain. Quantitative samples taken along the Kurile Kamchatka Trench have resulted so far in 48 tanaidacean species (Błażewicz-Paszkowycz et al., Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Pabis and Jóźwiak2014). Preliminary studies on qualitative samples revealed three additional species representing suborder Apseudomorpha: Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973), Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) and Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966). So far, the morphology of those species is poorly described and the type collections are believed to no longer be in existence. The taxonomic part of this paper presents redescriptions of them based on neotypes designated herein. Knowledge on Tanaidacea fauna from oceanic trenches is summarized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material was collected from July to September 2012 on board RV ‘Sonne’ using Agassiz trawl – AGT (19 stations) from depths ranging between 4869 and 5427 m, and epibenthic sledge – EBS (21 station) from depths ranging between 4830 and 5780 m. Sampling was conducted along Kurile Kamchatka Trench between Hokkaido and Matua islands. Collected samples were immediately transferred into pre-cooled 96% ethanol and kept at least for 48 h in −20°C for DNA. Material from second deployment per station was fixed in formaline (4%).

Specimens were dissected using chemically sharpened tungsten needles. Appendages were then mounted in glycerine. Drawings were prepared using a microscope combined with a camera lucida and redrawn on a digital tablet as proposed by Coleman (Reference Coleman2003). The morphological terminology follows that proposed by Błażewicz-Paszkowycz & Bamber (Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz and Bamber2007). The body length to width ratio was calculated using measurements from tip of the rostrum to end of pleotelson and of the widest part of cephalothorax. The redescriptions are based only on the KuramBio collection, as the type material was not available for the study. The neotypes of redescribed species were designated in accordance with Article 75.3 of the Code of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999). The examined material is deposited in the Zoological Museum, Hamburg. In this study tanaidacean systematics keeps the division into three suborders: Apseudomorpha, Neotanaidomorpha and Tanaidomorpha, unlike that proposed by Kakui et al. (Reference Kakui, Katoh, Hiruta, Kobayashi and Kajihara2011), where neotanaids were demoted to superfamily level within Tanaidomorpha.

SYSTEMATICS

Suborder APSEUDOMORPHA Sieg, 1980
Superfamily APSEUDOIDEA Leach, 1813
Family APSEUDIDAE Leach, 1813
Subfamily LEVIAPSEUDINAE Sieg, Reference Sieg, Gruner and Holthuis1983
Genus Fageapseudes Băcescu & Guţu, 1971
Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973)
(Figures 1–3)

Apseudes bicornis Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973, pp. 143–146; Fageapseudes bicornis Băcescu, Reference Băcescu1978, p. 200; Collosella bicornis Jóźwiak & Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Reference Jóźwiak and Błażewicz-Paszkowycz2007, pp. 8, 14.

Fig. 1. Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973), neotype female: (A) lateral view; (B) dorsal view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 2. Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973), female: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) left mandible; (D) right mandible; (E) mandibular palp; (F) labium; (G) maxillule; (H) maxilla; (I) maxilliped; (J) maxillipedal endites. Scale bars: A–F and H–J, 0.2 mm; G, 0.1 mm.

Fig. 3. Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973), female: (A) cheliped; (B) pereopod-1; (C) pereopod-2; (D) pereopod-3; (E) pereopod-4; (F) pereopod-5; (G) pereopod-6; (H) pleopod. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

Neotype female (drawn in Figure 1), 12 mm long, (So 223, Station 1–10; coordinates: 43°58.26′–43°58.33′N 157°19.68′–157°17.98′E, EBS; water depth: 5417–5423 m) (cat. no. ZMH K-44336) 30 July 2012.

Additional material: one specimen (dissected on slides) (So 223, Station 6–11; coordinates: 42°29.58′–42°28.47′N 154°0.04′–153°59.67′E, EBS-S; water depth: 5290–5305 m) (cat. no. ZMH K-44337) 15 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 6–11; coordinates: 42°29.58′–42°28.47′N 154°0.04′–153°59.67′E, EBS-S; water depth: 5290–5305 m) 15 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 2–10; coordinates: 46°13.54′–46°14.99′N 155°33.58′–155°32.64′E, EBS-S; water depth: 4857–4867 m) 3 Aug 2012; two specimens (So 223, Station 2–9; coordinates: 46°13.60′–46°14.93′N 155°33.42′–155°32.57′E, EBS; water depth: 4860–4866 m) 2 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 3–9; coordinates: 47°13.83′–47°14.87′N 154°41.88′–154°43.18′E, EBS-S; water depth: 4988–4998 m) 5 August 2012; two specimens (So 223, Station 5–9; coordinates: 43°35.50′–43°34.30′N 153°57.89′–153°58.18′E, EBS-S; water depth: 5376–5378 m) 11 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 6–12; coordinates: 42°29.47′–42°28.20′N 153°59.93′–153°59.73′E, EBS-S; water depth: 5290–5307 m) 15 August 2012.

DIAGNOSIS

Pleonites without lateral apophyses and ventral bulbus, mandibles body with crenulated outer margin, article-2 of mandibular palp about 10 times as long as wide, labial palp with one spine, cheliped basis without ventral spine, cheliped propodus with three dorsal subdistal long setae, and dactylus of pereopod-4 simple.

DESCRIPTION

Female. Body (Figure 1A, B) elongated, 12 times as long as wide. Carapace without rostrum, distinctly wider in distal part; eyelobes well developed, acute and fused to carapace, visual elements absent. Pereon of six free pereonites; pereonite-1 smooth laterally, remaining pereonites with well developed lateral apophyses and hyposphenium, pereonites length-width ratio 0.6, 1.6, 2.1, 2.6, 2.3 and 2.3 respectively. Pleon of five free pleonites; pleonites trapezoidal, without lateral apophyses, subequal in length.

Antennule (Figure 2A) peduncle article-1 10 times as long as wide, with four simple setae on inner margin and one simple and seven penicillate setae on outer margin; article-2 about half as long as article-1, with one simple seta on inner margin and one simple and four penicillate setae subdistally; article-3 0.6 times as long as article-2, with three minute setae distally; article-4 with single distal seta. Outer flagellum with eight segments, with usually pair of simple distal setae; segments 4, 5 and 7 with aesthetasc; last segment with six simple setae of varying length. Inner flagellum with two unequal segments; segment-1 with one simple seta and segment-2 with three setae distally.

Antenna (Figure 2B) peduncle article-1 with distal inner projection; article-2 4.4 times as long as wide, with one inner seta; squama elongated, with two simple setae distally; article-3 about 0.3 times as long as article-2, with one simple seta on inner margin; article-4 2.7 times as long as article-3, with two subdistal penicillate setae; article-5 subequal to article-4, with six penicillate setae distally and subdistally. Flagellum of five segments, that bears usually pair of distal setae; segment-2 seta reaches end of last article; segment-5 with four distal setae of varying length.

Mouthparts. Left mandible (Figure 2C) body slightly crenulated on outer margin and with few simple setae distally; incisor well calcified, with five small denticles; lacinia mobilis with five denticles; setiferous lobe with seven multifurcated setae; molar wide and strongly calcified. Right mandible (Figure 2D) incisor bifurcated; setiferous lobe with one simple and five multifurcated setae; molar with numerous minute setae. Palp (Figure 2E) of three articles; article-1 with one simple seta on inner margin; article-2 about 10 times as long as wide, with three long simple and seven serrated setae on inner margin; article-3 with two rows of serrated setae and one simple seta on inner margin. Labium (Figure 2F) with small denticles on outer margin and setation on inner margin; palp narrow covered with setae, distally with one spine. Maxillule (Figure 2G) inner endite with four distal spines, at least two of them plumose; outer endite with pair of simple setae subdistally and 11 spines distally, outer margin with numerous simple setae. Maxilla (Figure 2H) outer lobe of moveable endite with two plumose setae subdistally and one plumose and four simple setae distally; inner lobe of moveable endite with seven plumose setae; outer lobe of fixed endite with four simple, two (one broken) plumose and three multifurcated setae; inner lobe of fixed endite with row of at least 20 setae and one thick plumose seta. Maxilliped (Figure 2I) basis with two inner setae; palp article-1 with one inner and one outer seta; article-2 with one outer distal seta and with inner row of at least 17 simple and plumose setae; article-3 with three simple setae on inner margin; last article with six distal setae, two of them slightly serrated. Endites (Figure 2J) inner margin with four to six coupling hooks and four to six plumose setae; distal margin with bi- and multifurcated setae, caudoinner seta slim leaflike.

Cheliped (Figure 3A) basis with four short setae ventrally and tubercle distally; exopod of three articles, last article with three distal setae (one broken); merus with one dorsal and three ventral short simple setae; carpus about twice as long as merus, with two long dorsal and six long ventral setae; propodus 1.1 times as long as wide, with five setae on dorsal margin and three setae near dactylus insertion; fixed finger as long as propodus, with four ventral setae, cutting edge with strong tooth and row of serrated denticles; dactylus subequal to fixed finger, with three dorsal setae and denticles on cutting edge.

Pereopod-1 (Figure 3B) basis four times as long as wide, with one penicillate seta on ventral and dorsal margins, ventrodistally with single simple seta, subdistally with tubercle; ischium with one simple seta and tubercle; merus about half as long as basis, with two rows of simple setae: one dorsally and one ventrally; carpus 0.6 times as long as merus, with row of simple setae and single spine on dorsal and ventral margins; propodus 0.7 times as long as carpus, with three simple setae and two spines dorsally and three simple setae and six spines ventrally; dactylus with three ventral denticles, dactylus and unguis 0.9 times as long as propodus, dactylus longer than unguis.

Pereopod-2 (Figure 3C) basis 5.7 times as long as wide, with one ventrodistal seta; ischium apparently naked; merus 0.3 times as long as basis, with one dorsodistal simple seta; carpus half as long as basis, with row of ventral setae and six simple setae dorsodistally; propodus 0.6 times as long as carpus, with apparently one serrated and eight simple setae ventrally (some of them broken off) and one spine and five setae dorsally; dactylus broken.

Pereopod-3 (Figure 3D) similar to pereopod-2, but basis with three penicillate setae ventrally, ischium with seta, merus with two subdistal ventral setae, propodus with dorsal penicillate seta.

Pereopod-4 (Figure 3E) basis about six times as long as wide, with three penicillate setae dorsally; ischium naked; merus 0.2 times as long as basis, with one dorsodistal seta; carpus 2.3 times as long as merus, with eight setae distally; propodus 0.6 times as long as carpus, with one long seta ventrally, one penicillate seta dorsally and nine simple and four serrated setae distally; dactylus with single dorsal seta, dactylus and unguis shorter than some of propodus distal setae.

Pereopod-5 (Figure 3F) similar to pereopod-4, but carpus with 13 setae distally in two rows, propodus with row of serrated setae ventrally and only four distal setae, dactylus with distal short seta, dactylus and unguis longer than propodus setae.

Pereopod-6 (Figure 3G) similar to pereopod-5, but basis without penicillate setae, carpus with less setae and dactylus with dorsal seta.

Pleopod (Figure 3H) basis elongated, 7.4 times as long as wide; exopod uniarticled, with plumose seta at the midlength and two setae distally; endopod of two articles, article-1 0.4 times as long as article-2, naked; article-2 with two setae distally.

Uropods broken.

REMARKS

From six currently known Fageapseudes species, F. bicornis closely resembles F. suprema (Jóźwiak & Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Reference Jóźwiak and Błażewicz-Paszkowycz2007) by having only one spine on labial palp, by lacking lateral apophyses on pleonites and by lacking spine ventrally on cheliped basis and denticles on pereopod-4 dactylus. Those similarities may in fact suggest that both species are members of a new genus as was already proposed for F. suprema by Jóźwiak and Błażewicz-Paszkowycz (Reference Jóźwiak and Błażewicz-Paszkowycz2007); although F. bicornis can be distinguished from F. suprema by having mandibles body with crenulated outer margin, article-2 of mandibular palp about 10 times as long as wide and three long setae dorsally on cheliped propodus (near dactylus insertion). Fageapseudes suprema has a smooth outer margin of mandibles body, article-2 of mandibular palp five times as long as wide and only two minute setae on the top of cheliped propodus.

There are slight differences between the description of F. bicornis from the current study and that presented by Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973):

  • length/width ratio of article-3 of maxillipedal palp: it is 1.0 in Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973) and 0.6 in this study;

  • length/width ratio of pereopod-1 carpus: two times as long as wide in oryginal description and 1.2 times in present study;

  • number of dorsal spines on pereopod-1 propodus: one in Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973) and two in this study.

DISTRIBUTION

This species was known so far from two stations from the Gulf of Alaska (incorrectly assigned to Sea of Okhotsk by Anderson, Reference Anderson2013) in a depth range from 3350 to 3620 m (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973). In our studies F. bicornis was recorded in a series of stations west of Kurile Islands in a depth range from 4860 to 5423 m.

Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970)
(Figures 4–7)

Apseudes vitjazi Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970, pp. 342–344, 379; Fageapseudes vitjazi Jóźwiak, Reference Jóźwiak2014, p. 24.

Fig. 4. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970), neotype female: (A) lateral view; (B) dorsal view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 5. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970), female: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) right mandible; (D) left mandible; (E) molar process; (F) mandibular palp articles 1 and 2; (F’) mandibular palp article-3; (G) labium; (H) maxillule. Scale bars: A–B, 0.2 mm; C–H, 0.1 mm.

Fig. 6. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970), female: (A) maxilla; (B) maxilliped; (C) maxillipedal endite; (D) epignath; (E) cheliped; (F) pereopod-1. Scale bars: A–E, 0.2 mm; F, 0.5 mm.

Fig. 7. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970), female: (A) pereopod-2; (B) pereopod-3; (C) pereopod-4; (D) pereopod-5; (E) pereopod-6. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

Neotype female (drawn in Figure 4 and partly dissected – one slide), 21.5 mm long (So 223, Station 9–11; coordinates: 40°34.70′–40°34.45′N 151°0.14′–151°0.15′E, AGT; water depth: 5407–5408 m) (cat. no. ZMH K-44338) 24 August 2012.

Additional material: one specimen dissected on slides (So 223, Station 3–5; coordinates: 47°14.30′N 154°42.23′E, GKG; water depth: 4984 m) (cat. no. ZMH K-443394) 5 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 9–12; coordinates: 40°35.40′–40°34.27′N 150°59.84′–150°59.00′E, EBS; water depth: 5389–5400 m) 24 August 2012; two specimens (So 223, Station 5–9; coordinates: 43°35.50′–43°34.30′N 153°57.89′–153°58.18′E, EBS; water depth: 5376–5378 m) 11 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 3–4; coordinates: 47°14.32′–47°14.32′N 154°42.26′–154°42.26′E, GKG; water depth: 4982 m) 4 August 2012; one damaged specimen (So 223, Station 2–9; coordinates: 46°13.60′–46°14.93′N 155°33.42′–155°32.57′E, EBS; water depth: 4860–4866 m) 2 August 2012; one specimen (So 223, Station 2–10; coordinates: 46°13.54′–46°14.99′N 155°33.58′–155°32.64′E, EBS; water depth: 4857–4867 m) 3 August 2012.

DIAGNOSIS

Pereonites with short lateral apophyses, pleonites with well developed lateral apophyses and ventral bulbus, mandibles body with smooth outer margin, second article of mandibular palp five times as long as wide, labial palp with three spines, cheliped basis with ventral spine, pereopod-1 coxa apophysis short, and dactylus of all pereopods with ventral denticles.

DESCRIPTION

Female. Body (Figure 4A, B) 8.2 times as long as wide. Carapace 14% of total body length, without rostrum but with well developed acute eyelobes, no track of visual elements. Pereon of six free pereonites; pereonites length-width ratio: 0.4, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.0 respectively; pereonites from 2 to 6 with lateral apophyses. Pleon 38% of total body length, with five free pleonites; pleonites squareshaped, subequal in size, with lateral acute apophyses accompanied by ventral bulbus; pleotelson as long as last three pleonites.

Antennule (Figure 5A) peduncle article-1 8.5 times as long as wide, with one penicillate and one simple setae on inner margin and four simple and seven penicillate setae on outer margin; article-2 0.3 times as long as article-1, with five simple and four penicillate setae subdistally; article-3 0.7 times as long as article-2, with three setae distally; article-4 naked. Outer flagellum with at least 10 segments, segment-8 with aesthetasc. Inner flagellum of four segments; segment-2 with two simple and two penicillate setae, segment-3 with one penicillate seta and segment-4 with three simple setae distally.

Antenna (Figure 5B) peduncle article-1 with distaloinner projection; article-2 with one inner seta; squama elongated, with one seta subdistally and four simple setae distally; article-3 with one simple seta on distaloinner margin; article-4 as long as article-5, naked; article-5 with three penicillate and two simple setae distally. Flagellum of seven segments; segments 1 and 2 with elongated simple seta; last segment with four distal setae.

Mouthparts. Right mandible (Figure 5C) incisor with six denticles distally; setiferous lobe with three simple and four bifurcated setae. Left mandible (Figure 5D) incisor with six denticles distally; lacinia mobilis with four denticles; setiferous lobe with three simple and four bifurcated setae; molar process (Figure 5E) with numerous minute setae. Palp (Figure 5F, F’) of three articles; article-1 with single inner seta; article-2 five times as long as wide, with 10 serrated and two simple setae on inner margin; article-3 with nine simple and six serrated setae. Labium (Figure 5G) outer margin serrated; palp covered with numerous simple setae, terminally with three spines. Maxillule (Figure 5H) inner endite with six plumose spines distally and some setae on outer margin; outer endite with two plumose setae subdistally, 11 spines distally and numerous setae on outer margin. Palp of two articles, second article with eight setae with rows of hooks in distal part. Maxilla (Figure 6A) outer lobe of moveable endite with two plumose setae subdistally, two simple and three plumose setae distally; inner lobe of moveable endite with six simple setae; outer lobe of fixed endite with three simple and one serrated setae; inner lobe of fixed endite with row of 27 simple setae and five plumose setae. Maxilliped (Figure 6B) basis naked; palp article-1 with short seta on outer margin and elongated simple seta on inner margin; article-2 with 18 serrated and three simple setae on inner margin and one long seta on distal outer margin; article-3 with seven setae subdistally; last article with one simple seta on outer margin and five simple setae on inner margin. Endite (Figure 6C) outer margin with minute setae; inner margin with three coupling hooks and four plumose spines; distal margin with one simple, five multifurcated and six bifurcated setae; caudoinner seta simple. Epignath (Figure 6D) massive; distal seta half as long as lobe, with fine setation.

Cheliped (Figure 6E) basis 3.2 times as long as wide, with three short setae dorsally, row of short setae and spine ventrally and tuft of four setae ventrodistally, distally with tubercle; merus half as long as basis, with one dorsal seta and four setae and one spine ventrally; carpus 4.3 times as long as wide, with four (three long and one short) setae ventrally, pair of seta ventrodistally and dorsodistally; propodus 2.3 times as long as wide, with two unequal setae near dactylus insertion; fixed finger with six setae ventrally and row of fine setae on cutting edge; dactylus as long as fixed finger, with three middorsal setae.

Pereopod-1 (Figure 6F) basis 4.3 times as long as wide, with seven penicillate setae dorsally, row of paired short setae ventrally and tuft of four setae ventrodistally; ischium with one dorsal seta and three ventral setae; merus 0.4 times as long as wide, with one seta ventrally, two setae and spine ventrodistally and five setae and spine dorsodistally; carpus 1.3 times as long as merus, with six setae and one spine dorsally, two spines distally and four setae and two spines ventrally; propodus half as long as carpus, with four setae and two spines dorsally and one serrated and three simple setae and four spines ventrally; dactylus with two setae dorsally and four denticles ventrally, dactylus and unguis slightly shorter than propodus.

Pereopod-2 (Figure 7A) basis 6.3 times as long as wide, with penicillate seta on dorsal and ventral margin, ventrodistally with four simple setae; ischium with seta; merus 0.3 times as long as basis, with three setae dorsally, one seta distally and four setae ventrally; carpus half as long as basis, with five setae ventrally, five setae dorsally, two setae distally and short spine subdistally; propodus 0.8 times as long as carpus, with one spine and three setae ventrally, two setae and two spines distally; dactylus half as long as carpus, with three ventral denticles accompanied by short setae.

Pereopod-3 (Figure 7B) basis 5.7 times as long as wide, with pair of minute setae on lateral margins and two simple setae ventrodistally; ischium with one dorsal and one ventral setae; merus 0.3 times as long as basis, with three setae ventrodistally; carpus 1.5 times as long as merus, with six setae ventrally, two spines ventrodistally and four setae dorsodistally; propodus slightly longer than merus, with four setae and one spine ventrally, five setae dorsally and two spines subdistally; dactylus with two dorsal setae and two ventral denticles, dactylus and unguis 0.9 times as long as propodus.

Pereopod-4 (Figure 7C) basis 3.7 times as long as wide, with one penicillate seta dorsally, one penicillate and two minute setae ventrally and two setae ventrodistally; ischium with one dorsal and one ventral setae; merus 0.3 times as long as basis, with four setae ventrodistally and single seta dorsodistally; carpus about half as long as basis, with total of 11 setae in two rows distally; propodus 0.7 times as long as carpus, with penicillate seta dorsally and 11 simple setae distally and subdistally; dactylus with two ventral denticles; unguis broken.

Pereopod-5 (Figure 7D) basis six times as long as wide, with one simple and three penicillate setae dorsally, four setae ventrally and two setae ventrodistally; ischium with simple seta; merus 0.4 times as long as basis, with three setae dorsodistally and two setae ventrodistally; carpus 1.2 times as long as merus, with one seta ventrally, two setae ventrodistally and two setae dorsodistally; propodus about as long as merus, with penicillate seta dorsally, strong seta ventrally and distally and row of short spines ventrally and distally; dactylus with two dorsal setae and one ventral denticle, with unguis subequal merus.

Pereopod-6 (Figure 7E) similar to pereopod-5, but merus with four distal setae, carpus with six distal setae, propodus with three long dorsodistal setae and dactylus with three dorsal setae.

Pleopods absent.

Uropods broken.

REMARKS

This species was primarily classified as genus Apseudes (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) but was recently moved to Fageapseudes on the basis of lack of rostrum and shape of pereonites 1 and 6 and pleon (Jóźwiak, Reference Jóźwiak2014). Fageapseudes vitjazi differs from both F. suprema and F. bicornis by having well developed lateral apophyses on pleonites, labial palp with three spines, ventral denticles on dactylus of all pereopods and cheliped basis with ventral spine. It can be distinguished from F. brachyomos Bamber, Reference Bamber2007 by well developed, acute lateral apophyses on pleonites and from F. retusifrons (Richardson, 1912) by relatively short apophyses on pereonites and pereopod-1 coxa. Taking into account the shape of pleonites (including presence of ventral bulbus), armament of cheliped and pereopods 2–6, F. vitjazi resembles F. pluma Drumm & Bamber, 2013; however, both species can be distinguished by the slenderness of their second mandibular palp, carpus and propodus of pereopod-1 (see Jóźwiak, Reference Jóźwiak2014) and by the shape of caudoinner seta of maxillipedal endite.

The main difference between descriptions of F. vitjazi from this paper and Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) is the number of ventral spines on pereopod-1 propodus, since this study showed four in comparison to the five spines stated in the original description.

DISTRIBUTION

Fagapseudes vitjazi was recorded east off Kurile Islands in depths between 4857 and 5408 m (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973; KuramBio collection).

KEY FOR IDENTIFICATION FAGEAPSEUDES SPECIES

  1. 1. Pleonites with distinct lateral apophyses2

    • Pleonites without lateral apophyses4

  2. 2. Pleonites with ventral bulbous processes3

    • Pleonites without ventral bulbous processes F. retusifrons

  3. 3. Cheliped exopod with two setae terminallyF. pluma

    • Cheliped exopod with three setae terminally F. vitjazi

  4. 4. Labial palp with three terminal spinesF. brachyomos

    • Labial palp with one terminal spine5

  5. 5. Mandibles body with crenulated outer margin, palp article-2 ten times as long as wideF. bicornis

    • Mandibles body with smooth outer margin, palp article-2 five times as long as wideF. suprema

Genus Leviapseudes Sieg, Reference Sieg, Gruner and Holthuis1983
Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966)
(Figures 8–10)

Apseudes sp. Belyaev, Reference Belyaev1966, p. 87; Apseudes zenkevitchi Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966, pp. 518–521; Leiopus zenkevitchi Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968, p. 25; Leviapseudes zenkevitchi Sieg, Reference Sieg, Gruner and Holthuis1983, p. 176.

Fig. 8. Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966), neotype juvenile male: (A) body; (A’) pleon dorsal view; manca: (B) cheliped; (C) pereopod-1. Scale bars: A, A’, 1 mm; B–C, 0.2 mm.

Fig. 9. Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966), manca: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) right mandible; (C’) mandibular palp; (D) maxillule; (D’) maxillular palp; (E) maxilla; (F) maxilliped; (F’) articles 3 and 4 of maxillipedal palp; (G) maxillipedal endite. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Fig. 10. Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966), manca: (A) pereopod-2; (B) pereopod-3; (C) pereopod-4; (C’) dactylus and unguis of pereopod-4; (D) pereopod-5; (E) pereopod-6. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

Neotype juvenile male (drawn in Figure 8), 12.2 mm long (So 223, Station 7–9; coordinates: 43°2.87′N–43°1.50′N 152°59.45′E–152°58.35′E, EBS; water depth: 5121–5126 m) (cat. no. ZMH K-44340) 17 August 2012.

Additional material: one manca dissected on slides (So 223, Station 6–11; coordinates: 42°29.58′N–42°28.47′N 154°0.04′E– 153°59.67′E, EBS; water depth: 5290–5305 m) (cat. no. ZMH K-44341) 15 August 2012.

DIAGNOSIS

Pleonites without lateral apophyses, antenna squama slim, with reduced setation, cheliped basis with ventral spine, cheliped carpus elongated (6.4 times as long as wide), and pereopod-1 propodus shorter than carpus.

DESCRIPTION

Juvenile male. Body (Figure 8A, A’) elongated, nine times as long as wide. Carapace 17% of total body length, with well developed rostrum and acute eyelobes that lack visual elements; well developed apophyses additionally in front of branchial chambers. Pereon of six free pereonites, length-width ratio 0.4, 0.8, 1.7, 2.9, 2.8 and 2.1 respectively; pereonites 3–6 with lateral apophyses. Pleon 31% of total body length, of five free pleonites, pleonites trapezoidal without lateral apophyses, subequal in size; pleotelson longer than last three pleonites.

Antennule (Figure 9A) peduncle article-1 6.6 times as long as wide, with two penicillate setae on inner margin and one simple and six penicillate setae on outer margin; article-2 0.3 times as long as article-1, with one simple and six penicillate setae subdistally; article-3 0.6 times as long as article-2, with four minute setae distally; article-4 naked. Outer flagellum with 11 segments, segment-9 with two setae and aesthetasc; last segment with one penicillate and four simple setae. Inner flagellum of three segments; segment-1 with one minute seta, segment-2 with one penicillate seta and segment-3 with one penicillate and three simple setae distally.

Antenna (Figure 9B) peduncle article-1with distaloinner projection; article-2 2.4 times as long as article-3, naked; squama elongated, with two unequal simple setae distally; article-3 with one simple inner seta; article-4 2.6 times as long as article-3, with two penicillate setae distally; article-5 1.4 times as long as article-4, with four penicillate setae distally and subdistally. Flagellum of three segments; segment-1 with simple seta reaching end of antenna; segment-2 with two simple setae; last segment with four distal setae.

Mouthparts. Right mandible (Figure 9C) incisor with five distal denticles; setiferous lobe with five bi- or trifurcated setae; palp (Figure 9C’) of three articles; article-1 with single inner seta; article-2 4.2 times as long as wide, with three serrated setae in distal inner part; article-3 with distal inner row of nine serrated setae increasing in length towards the end of article. Maxillule (Figure 9D) inner endite with simple setae on inner and outer margins, distally with one serrated and two simple spines; outer endite with three setae ventrally, three subdistally and nine distal spines; palp (Figure 9D’) of two articles, article-2 with two simple setae and five setae terminated with row of small hooks. Maxilla (Figure 9E) outer lobe of moveable endite with two plumose setae subdistally and five plumose setae distally; inner lobe of moveable endite with seven plumose setae; outer lobe of fixed endite with one simple, two plumose, four multifurcated and three bifurcated setae; inner lobe of fixed endite with row of 25 setae and three thick plumose setae. Maxilliped (Figure 9F, F’) basis naked; palp article-1 with one short outer seta and one inner seta reaching end of last article; article-2 with two long simple outerodistal setae and five simple and nine serrated setae on inner margin; article-3 with four simple setae on inner margin; last article with five simple setae. Endite (Figure 9G) on inner margin only one coupling hook left; subdistally with three bi- and five multifurcate setae; distally with one simple seta, two bifurcate setae with pointed tip and four multifurcate setae (one seta broken); caudoinner seta leaf shaped.

Cheliped (Figure 8B) basis slim, 4.2 times as long as wide, ventrally with three minute setae in proximal part, one spine at midlength and one long seta in distal part; exopod of three articles, last article with four setae distally; merus half as long as basis, with three ventral setae; carpus 6.4 times as long as wide, with two rows of four setae: ventral and dorsal; propodus 1.5 times as long as wide, with one short and three long setae dorsally and single seta ventrally near dactylus insertion; fixed finger with two ventral setae, cutting edge with few simple setae and denticles; dactylus slightly longer than fixed finger, with three middorsal setae.

Pereopod-1 (Figure 8C) basis 4.3 times as long as wide, with two minute and two penicillate setae dorsally and two minute setae ventrally; ischium with simple seta; merus four times as long as wide, with one spine and three setae ventrally, two simple setae distally and two dorsodistally; carpus half as long as merus, with four setae and one spine dorsally and three setae and two spines ventrally; propodus 0.7 times as long as carpus, with three setae and two spines dorsally and one seta and six spines ventrally; dactylus with dorsal seta and three ventral denticles, dactylus and unguis as long as carpus.

Pereopod-2 (Figure 10A) basis 8.5 times as long as wide, with two penicillate setae dorsally, two minute ventrally and one seta ventrodistally; ischium with single seta; merus about 0.4 times as long as basis, with three setae ventrally and one seta dorsally; carpus half as long as basis, with four setae dorsally, one short seta distally and five setae ventrally; propodus 0.8 times as long as carpus, with five setae dorsally, two spines distally and six setae and two spines ventrally; dactylus with one dorsal seta and one seta ventrally at unguis insertion, dactylus and unguis as long as carpus.

Pereopod-3 (Figure 10B) basis 8.8 times as long as wide, with two penicillate setae ventrally and one simple seta ventrodistally; ischium with single seta; merus 0.3 times as long as basis, with short seta dorsodistally and one long seta ventrodistally; carpus 1.5 times as long as merus, with three setae ventrally, one distally and two dorsodistally; propodus 0.8 times as long as carpus, with four setae dorsally, six setae ventrally and two distal spines; dactylus as long as merus, with one dorsal and one ventral setae, dactylus and unguis half as long as basis.

Pereopod-4 (Figure 10C, C’) basis 9.6 times as long as wide, with two penicillate setae dorsally and simple seta ventrodistally; ischium with one seta; merus with one seta dorsodistally and two setae ventrodistally; carpus 1.8 times as long as merus, with one seta at midlength ventrally and eight setae distally; propodus 0.8 times as long as carpus, with one penicillate seta dorsally and 14 setae dorsodistally; dactylus short, with dorsal seta and ventrodistal apophysis, unguis trifurcated (Figure 10C’).

Pereopod-5 (Figure 10D) basis almost nine times as long as wide, with three penicillate setae dorsally, one penicillate seta ventrally and one simple seta ventrodistally; ischium with single seta; merus with one ventral seta; carpus twice as long as merus, with five setae in distal part; propodus as long as carpus, with one penicillate seta dorsally, three simple setae dorsodistally, two strong setae ventrally and ventral row of short spines; dactylus as long as propodus, with three dorsal and two ventral setae, together with unguis longer than half of basis.

Pereopod-6 (Figure 10E) rudimental and without setation.

REMARKS

The main characters differentiating L. zenkevitchi from remaining species of the genus are:

  • lack of lateral apophyses on pleonites. Apophyses are present in L. abberans (Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968), L. bipartitus Larsen, Reference Larsen2005, L. demerarae Băcescu, 1984, L. galatheae (Wolff, 1956), L. gracillimus (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913), L. hanseni (Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968), L. longispina Băcescu, 1983, L. macaronesia Larsen, 2012, L. pleonudus Błażewicz-Paszkowycz & Larsen, 2004, L. preamazonica Băcescu, 1984, L. tenuimanus Błażewicz-Paszkowycz & Larsen, 2004 and L. wolffi (Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968).

  • ventral spine on cheliped basis. In L. conspicuus (Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968), L. demerarae, L. drachi Băcescu, 1984, L. gracilis (Norman & Stebbing, 1886), L. gracillimus, L. segonzaci gasconicus Băcescu, 1984, L. segonzaci segonzaci Băcescu, 1981, cheliped is smooth.

  • pereopod-4 dactylus-unguis comb-like. Smooth dactylus-unguis is present in L. aberrans, L. angelikae Jóźwiak & Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Reference Jóźwiak and Błażewicz-Paszkowycz2007, L. gracillimus, L. leptodactylus (Beddard, 1886), L. macaronesia, L. preamazonica, L. shiinoi (Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968), L. tenuimanus.

  • pereopod-1 basis ventrodistally only with simple setae. In L. angelikae, L. bipartitus, L. conspicuus, L. macaronesia and L. pleonudus ventrodistal corner of pereopod-1 basis has a simple spine, while in L. gracilis, L. leptodactylus, L. longispina, L. shiinoi and L. wolffi it is terminated with well developed acute process.

Moreover L. zenkevitchi differs from L. caecus (Willemoes-Suhm, 1875) by having reduced, slim squama with only two setae (in latter species at least nine setae). From L. weberi (Nierstrasz, 1913) it differs by elongated carpus of cheliped (6.4 times as long as wide in L. zenkevitchi and 3.2 times as long as wide in L. weberi). Leviapseudes zenkevitchi can be distinguished from L. zenkevitchioides by having propodus of pereopod-1 shorter than carpus (in latter species it is distinctly longer).

The specimens of L. zenkevitchi described herein differ slightly from the original description of this species (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966), as its pereonites from 4 to 6 and cheliped dactylus are narrower. This variability can be explained by the fact that the type specimen was a mature female and our redescription is based on mancas.

DISTRIBUTION

Leviapseudes zenkevitchi is a widely distributed species including Kurile Islands, Kermadec, the Caribbean Sea and Grenada, with the original type locality in the North-east Pacific – 40°19.7′N 175°45.3′E, in depths from 1067 to 6065 m (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966; Kudinova-Pasternak & Pasternak Reference Kudinova-Pasternak and Pasternak1978; KuramBio collection).

DISCUSSION

General remarks on Tanaidacea fauna of oceanic trenches

Up to now, there are 105 Tanaidacea species known from 17 oceanic trenches (Table 1); 94 of them are officially described. The best examined trench with regard to tanaidacean fauna is the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench with 45 recorded species. Next in order are Aleutian and Japan Trenches with 26 and 25 species respectively. The Izu-Bonin Trench has 11 recorded species while Kermadec Trench 10 species. Single Tanaidacea species were found also in: South Shetlands Trench (six species), Bougainville Trench (five species), Puerto Rico Trench (four species), Peru-Chile and Philippine Trenches (each with three species), Romanche and Cayman Trenches (two species each), and finally Banda, Mariana, New Hebrides, Palau and Sunda Trenches (with only one species).

Table 1. List of tanaidacean species recorded for oceanic trenches. Doubtful records are marked with asterisks.

Oceanic trenches fauna is dominated by tanaidomorphs as they were recorded in 13 from 17 considered trenches, with typically deep-water families such as Akanthophoreidae (noted in eight trenches) and Agathotanaidae (in five trenches), and families with suggested deep-water origin such as Colletteidae Larsen & Wilson, 2002 (five trenches), Typhlotanaidae Sieg, 1984 or Pseudotanaidae Sieg, 1973 (noted from four trenches). So far the only record of the typically shallow-water genus – Heterotanoides Sieg, 1977 (representing clearly the shallow-water family Heterotanoididae Bird, 2012) in the Japan Trench at depth 7370 m (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1976) seems to be doubtful. Additionally, according to Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1976) Heterotanoides ornatus has well developed, functional eyes, thus the most reasonable explanation of its presence in the deep sea is contamination of sample (as was proposed by Bird, Reference Bird2012).

Representing exclusively deep-sea forms, Neotanaidomorpha are the second most common group of Tanaidacea in trenches. Members of genus Neotanais Beddard, 1886 were recorded from 12 trenches, while genus Herpotanais Wolff, 1956 is known only from Kermadec Trench.

Members of suborder Apseudomorpha are scarcely represented in trench communities and they are restricted only to members of two taxa, described by Błażewicz-Paszkowycz et al. (Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Bamber and Anderson2012) as exclusively deep water – subfamily Leviapseudinae and family Gigantapseudidae Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1978. Leviapseudinae were recorded only in: Aleutian Trench with Carpoapseudes serratispinosus Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968, Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970), Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966) and Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973); Japan Trench with Carpoapseudes varindex Bamber, Reference Bamber2007 and Fageapseudes brachyomos Bamber, Reference Bamber2007; Kermadec Trench with Carpoapseudes oculicornutus Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968, Leviapseudes aberrans (Lang, Reference Lang and Wolff1968) and Leviapseudes galatheae (Wolff, 1956); Kurile-Kamchatka Trench with F. bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973), Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) and Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1966) and Peru-Chile Trench with Carpoapseudes bacescui Guţu, Reference Guţu1975 and Carpoapseudes menziesi Guţu, Reference Guţu1975. Monogeneric Gigantapseudidae is known so far only from the Philippine Trench with: Gigantapseudes adactylus Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak and Pasternak1978 and Gigantapseudes maximus Gamô, Reference Gamô1984.

Distribution of Tanaidacea recorded from trenches

From 105 tanaidacean species recorded from oceanic trenches, 28 are known from more than one trench (Table 2): 21 species were recorded from two trenches and three species from three trenches. Akanthophoreus gracilis (Krøyer, Reference Krøyer1842) and Chauliopleona armata (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913) were found in four trenches while the most widespread, Neotanais americanus and Parakanthophoreus longiremis, were recorded in five trenches. The highest similarity regarding the composition of Tanaidacea fauna is presented between four West Pacific trenches, for example Aleutian and Kurile-Kamchatka Trenches share 14 species, Japan and Kurile-Kamchatka Trenches share six species, Aleutian and Japanese Trenches and Izu-bonin and Kurile-Kamchatka Trenches have four species in common, while Aleutian and Izu-Bonin Trenches share three species. This similarity can be explained by the fact that all of these trenches are within one basin and moreover three of them lie in a single line with the northernmost Aleutian Trench, Kurile-Kamchatka Trench in the middle and Izu-Bonin Trench in the south. In this trench system, the Japan Trench is the second southern junction of Kurile-Kamchatka Trench. Strong affinities between those areas are derived also indirectly by the fact that they are the best studied trenches regarding tanaidacean fauna. Single species are also shared between other Western Pacific trenches, for example:

  • Parkanthophoreus longiremis was recorded for Philippine, Aleutian, Izu-Bonin and Japan Trenches but also for Kermadec Trench.

  • Bouganville Trench shares Chauliopleona armata with Aleutian and Kurile-Kamchatka Trenches.

  • Pseudotanais nordenskioldi is common to Banda and Izu-Bonin Trenches.

It is noteworthy that a series of 29 tanaidacean species were recorded primarily outside trenches and sometimes even from different basins (Table 1, species marked with asterisks). The best examples of this phenomenon are studies of Kudinova-Pasternak, who recorded in Aleutian Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973): Paranarthrura insignis Hansen, Reference Hansen1913, Akanthophoreus gracilis (Krøyer, Reference Krøyer1842) or Torquella grandis (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913) – tanaidaceans with the type locality limited to the North Atlantic (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913; Krøyer, Reference Krøyer1842). There is a similar situation with some records from Izu-Bonin Trench, where Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1977) found Parakanthophoreus longiremis (Lilljeborg, Reference Lilljeborg1864) or Collettea minima (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913), first species described from littoral of Western Sweden (Lilljeborg, Reference Lilljeborg1864), second from Davis Strait (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913); or with records from Kurile-Kamchatka Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) of, for example, Leptognathia breviremis (Lilljeborg, Reference Lilljeborg1864) with type cords on Swedish and Norwegian fjords (Lilljeborg, Reference Lilljeborg1864) or Typhlamia mucronata (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913) with type locality south-east off Iceland (Hansen, Reference Hansen1913). It cannot be excluded that the species mentioned above are in fact widely distributed, as species common for the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans were previously reported for various deep-sea groups (Vinogradova, Reference Vinogradova and Zenkevitch1969). According to Vinogradova (Reference Vinogradova and Zenkevitch1969) the fauna of the North Pacific is even more closely related to North Atlantic fauna than to South Pacific fauna. At least two possible corridors can be mentioned in explanation of affinities between faunas of Pacific and Atlantic Oceans:

Tanaidacea (as with most of the peracarids) are known to have limited dispersal abilities mainly by having non-planktonic larvae and by their almost sedentary lifestyle (Błażewicz-Paszkowycz et al., Reference Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, Bamber and Anderson2012). Therefore, the general and the most trustworthy explanation of very wide distribution of deep-sea Tanaidacea is taxonomic misidentification (Larsen, Reference Larsen2005). Trench records of numerous tanaidacean species were already questioned by several studies, for example Bird (Reference Bird2007a, Reference Birdb), Larsen (Reference Larsen2007) or McLelland (Reference McLelland2007). Bird (Reference Bird2007a) suggested that records of A. gracilis from Japan and Kurile-Kamchatka Trenches (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1976) may be in fact A. undulatus Bird, 2007 and Akanthophoreus sp.KK#1, while C. armata from Aleutian (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973) and Kurile-Kamchatka Trenches (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) can be records of two putative new species found by Bird (Reference Bird2007a) in the Kurile-Kamchatka collection. It was also Bird (Reference Bird2007b), who doubted the presence of North Atlantic Collettea cylindrata (Sars, 1882) in Kurile-Kamchatka Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) and suggested that this record may refer to Aleutian species – C. larviformis (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1973). Agathotanais ingolfi was described from the Davis Strait and often recorded in Atlantic waters, for example Hebrides Slope, Rockall Trough, North Feni Ridge, Porcupine Seabight, Celtic Slope, Bay of Biscay, off Iceland or off Faroes. Unexpectedly Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) found it also on two stations in Kurile-Kamchatka Trench. Later Larsen (Reference Larsen2007) has pointed out morphological similarities between A. ingolfi sensu Kudinova-Pasternak (Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970) and newly described A. hadalis Larsen, Reference Larsen2007, and suggested that these species may be the same. Finally, McLelland (Reference McLelland2007) stated that it is less probable that Cryptocopoides arcticus, which is widely distributed in the North Atlantic and Arctic area, was found in Kurile-Kamchatka Trench (Kudinova-Pasternak, Reference Kudinova-Pasternak1970). As an explanation of this phenomenon Mclelland (Reference McLelland2007) suggested that this finding is in fact C. pacificus McLelland, Reference McLelland2007.

Table 2. List of tanaidacea species common for the trenches.

At present, none of the doubtful records of Tanaidacea from trenches (Table 2) have been satisfactorily explained as the literature data are still scarce and the access to the old tanaidacean material from trenches is limited or impossible (Błażewicz-Paszkowycz personal communication). Moreover, as pointed out by Larsen (Reference Larsen2005), in cases of cryptic species we cannot rely only on morphological methods. To solve the problem further studies on Tanaidacean fauna from trenches are needed with emphasis on molecular methods.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author would like to thank Professor Angelika Brandt (University of Hamburg) and Dr Marina Malyutina (Zhirmunsky's Institute of Marine Biology) for making tanaidacean material available for studies as well as the crew of RV ‘Sonne’ and scientists participating in the KuramBio Expedition for collecting and processing the samples. Acknowledgements are extended to Professor Magdalena Błażewicz-Paszkowycz for initial identification of the material and for help in preparation of the tables, and for anonymous reviewers for their comments. This is KuramBio publication # 36.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The project was funded by the PTJ (German Ministry for Science and Education), grant 03G0223A to Angelika Brandt and by the Russian Foundation of Basis Research (project 13-04-02144), the Council of the President of the Russian Federation (project МК−2599.2013.4), Russian Federation Government grant No 11.G34.31.0010, grant of Presidium of the Far East Branch of RAS (12–I–P30–07). Tanaidacean studies were financially supported by grant 2014/13/B/NZ8/04702 of the National Science Centre, Poland.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. (2013) Tanaidacea taxa and literature. Available at http://peracarida.usm.edu/.Google Scholar
Băcescu, M. (1978) Contribution to the knowledge of Monokonophora (Crustacea: Tanaidacea) from the NW of the Indian Ocean. Memoriile Sectiunii Stiintifice 4, 197220.Google Scholar
Bamber, R.N. (2007) Suborders Apseudomorpha Sieg, 1980 and Neotanaidomorpha Sieg, 1980. In Larsen K. and Shimomura M. (eds) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan III. The Deep Trenches: The Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench. Zootaxa 1599, 1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyaev, G.M. (1966) Hadal bottom fauna of the world oceans. Moscow: Izatel'stvo “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Bird, G.J. (2007a) Family incertae cedis. In Larsen K. and Shimomura M. (eds) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) From Japan III. The Deep Trenches: The Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench. Zootaxa 1599, 121149.Google Scholar
Bird, G.J. (2007b). Families Anarthruridae Lang, 1971, Colletteidae Larsen & Wilson, 2002, and Leptognathiidae Sieg, 1976. In Larsen K. and Shimomura M. (eds) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan III. The Deep Trenches: The Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench . Zootaxa 1599, 6185.Google Scholar
Bird, G.J. (2012) A new leptochelioid family, Heterotanoididae (Crustacea: Peracarida: Tanaidacea), and a new species of Heterotanoides from New Zealand. Zootaxa 3481, 126.Google Scholar
Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, M. (2007) Family Nototanaidae Sieg, 1976 and Typhlotanaidae Sieg, 1984. In Larsen K. and Shimomura M. (eds) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan III. The Deep Trenches: The Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench . Zootaxa 1599, 101120.Google Scholar
Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, M. and Bamber, R.N. (2007) New apseudomorph tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida: Tanaidacea) from eastern Australia: Apseudidae, Whiteleggiidae, Metapseudidae and Pagurapseudidae. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 64, 107148.Google Scholar
Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, M., Bamber, R. and Anderson, G. (2012) Diversity of Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) in the world's oceans – how far have we come? PLoS ONE 7, e33068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033068.Google Scholar
Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, M., Pabis, K. and Jóźwiak, P. (2014) Tanaidacean fauna of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench – abundance, diversity and rare species. Deep-Sea Research Part II. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.08.021.Google Scholar
Coleman, C.O. (2003) “Digital inking”: how to make perfect line drawings on computers. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 14, 114.Google Scholar
Dick, M.H., Herrera-Cubilla, A. and Jackson, J.B. (2003) Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of free-living Bryozoa (Cupuladriidae) from both sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27, 355371.Google Scholar
Duda, T.F. and Kohn, A.J. (2005) Species-level phylogeography and evolutionary history of the hyperdiverse marine gastropod genus Conus . Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34, 257272.Google Scholar
Gamô, S. (1984) A new remarkably giant tanaid, Gigantapseudes maximus sp. nov. (Crustacea) from the abyssal depths far off southeast of Mindanao, the Philippines. Science Reports of the Yokohama National University, Section II Biology and Geology 31, 112.Google Scholar
Gardiner, L.F. (1975) The systematics, postmarsupial development, and ecology of the deep-sea family Neotanaidae (Crustacea: Tanaidacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 170, 1265.Google Scholar
Guţu, M. (1975) Carpoapseudes bacescui n. sp. and C. menziesi n. sp. (Crustacea – Tanaidacea) from the Peru-Chile Trench. Revue Roumaine de Biologie 20, 93100.Google Scholar
Hansen, H.J. (1913) Crustacea, Malacostraca. II. IV. The Order Tanaidacea. The Danish Ingolf Expedition 3, 1145.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th edn. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.Google Scholar
Jóźwiak, P. (2014) Zoidbergus, a new genus of Apseudidae (Tanaidacea) with remarks on Apseudes siegi and Apseudes vitjazi . Polish Polar Research 35, 389414. doi: 10.2478/popore–2014–0020.Google Scholar
Jóźwiak, P. and Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, M. (2007) Apseudomorpha (Malacostraca: Tanaidacea) of the ANDEEP III Antarctic Expedition. Zootaxa 1610, 125.Google Scholar
Kakui, K., Katoh, T., Hiruta, S.F., Kobayashi, N. and Kajihara, H. (2011) Molecular systematics of Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) based on 18S sequence data, with an amendment of suborder/superfamily-level classification. Zoological Science 28, 749757.Google Scholar
Knowlton, N. and Weigt, L.A. (1998) New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 265, 22572263.Google Scholar
Krøyer, H. (1842) Nye Arter af Slaegten Tanais . Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift 4, 167188.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1965) Deep-sea Tanaidacea from the Bougainville Trench of the Pacific. Crustaceana 8, 7591.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1966) Tanaidacea (Crustacea) of the Pacific ultra-abyssals. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 45, 518535.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1970) Tanaidacea of the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 86, 341381.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1972) Notes about the Tanaidacean fauna (Crustacea Malacostraca) of the Kermadec Trench. Complex Research of the Nature of the Ocean (Moscow) 3, 257258.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1973) Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) collected on the R/V “Vitjas” in regions of the Aleutian Trench and Alaska. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 91, 141168.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1975a) Tanaidacea (Malacostraca) of the deep-sea trench Romansh and Guinea Hollow. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 54, 682687.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1975b) Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) from the Atlantic sector of Antarctic and Subantartic. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 103, 194229.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1976) Additional notes on the fauna of Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) of the deep water trenches. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 99, 115125.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1977) Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) from the deep-sea trenches of the western part of the Pacific. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 108, 115135.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. (1978) Gigantapseudidae fam. n. (Crustacea, Tanaidacea) and composition of the suborder Monokonophora. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 57, 11501161.Google Scholar
Kudinova-Pasternak, R.K. and Pasternak, F.A. (1978) Deep-sea Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) collected in the Caribbean Sea and Puerto-Rico Trench during the 16-th cruise of R/V “Akademic Kurchatov” and the resemblance between fauna of deep-sea Tanaidacea of the Caribbean region and the Pacific. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii 113, 178197.Google Scholar
Lang, K. (1968) Deep-Sea Tanaidacea. In Wolff, T. (ed.) Galathea report, Vol. 9. Copenhagen: Danish Science Press, pp. 23210.Google Scholar
Larsen, K. (2005) Deep-sea Tanaidacea (Peracarida) from the Gulf of Mexico. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Larsen, K. (2007) Family Agathotanaidae Lang, 1971a. In Larsen K. and Shimomura M. (eds) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan III. The Deep Trenches: The Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench. Zootaxa 1599, 4160.Google Scholar
Larsen, K. and Shimomura, M. (2007) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan III. The deep trenches: the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench. Auckland: Magnolia Press.Google Scholar
Lilljeborg, W. (1864) Bidrag til kännedomen om de inom Sverige och Norrige förekommande Crustaceer af Isopodernas underordning och Tanaidernas familj. Inbjudningsskrift till Åhörande av de Offentliga Föreläsningar. Uppsala universitets Årsskrift 1865, 131.Google Scholar
McLelland, J.A. (2007) Family Pseudotanaidae Sieg, 1976. In Larsen K. and Shimomura M. (eds) Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Japan III. The Deep Trenches: The Kurile-Kamchatka Trench and Japan Trench. Zootaxa 1599, 8799.Google Scholar
Menzies, R.J., George, R.Y. and Rowe, G.T. (1973) Abyssal environment and ecology of the world oceans. London: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Messing, C.G. (1977) Biological results of the University of Miami deep-sea expeditions. Neotanais persephone, a new species of hadal Tanaidacean (Crustacea: Peracarida). Bulletin of Marine Science 17, 511519.Google Scholar
Nikula, R., Strelkov, P. and Väinölä, R. (2007) Diversity and trans-arctic invasion history of mitochondrial lineages in the North Atlantic Macoma baltica complex (Bivalvia: Tellinidae). Evolution 4, 928941.Google Scholar
Palumbi, S.R. and Kessing, B.D. (1991) Population biology of the Trans-Arctic exchange: MtDNA sequence similarity between Pacific and Atlantic sea urchins. Evolution 45, 17901805.Google ScholarPubMed
Sieg, J. (1983) Tanaidacea. Part 6. In Gruner, H.E. and Holthuis, L.B. (eds) Crustaceorum catalogus. Hague: W. Junk, pp. 1552.Google Scholar
Vinogradova, N.G. (1969) Vertical distribution of deep-sea benthic fauna. In Zenkevitch, L.A. (ed.) The Pacific Ocean. The biology of the Pacific Ocean. Part II. The deep-sea bottom fauna. Pleuston. Akademija Nauk SSSR. Moscow: Institut Okeanologii, pp. 144174.Google Scholar
Wolff, T. (1956a) Crustacea Tanaidacea from depths exceeding 6000 meters. In Bruun, A., Greve, S., Spärck, R. and Wolff, T. (eds) Galathea report: scientific results of the Danish deep-sea expedition round the world 1950–52. Copenhagen: Danish Science Press, pp. 187241.Google Scholar
Wolff, T. (1956b) Six new abyssal species of Neotanais (Crust. Tanaidacea). Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening. Videnskabelige Meddelelser 118, 4152.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1973), neotype female: (A) lateral view; (B) dorsal view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1973), female: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) left mandible; (D) right mandible; (E) mandibular palp; (F) labium; (G) maxillule; (H) maxilla; (I) maxilliped; (J) maxillipedal endites. Scale bars: A–F and H–J, 0.2 mm; G, 0.1 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Fageapseudes bicornis (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1973), female: (A) cheliped; (B) pereopod-1; (C) pereopod-2; (D) pereopod-3; (E) pereopod-4; (F) pereopod-5; (G) pereopod-6; (H) pleopod. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1970), neotype female: (A) lateral view; (B) dorsal view. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1970), female: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) right mandible; (D) left mandible; (E) molar process; (F) mandibular palp articles 1 and 2; (F’) mandibular palp article-3; (G) labium; (H) maxillule. Scale bars: A–B, 0.2 mm; C–H, 0.1 mm.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1970), female: (A) maxilla; (B) maxilliped; (C) maxillipedal endite; (D) epignath; (E) cheliped; (F) pereopod-1. Scale bars: A–E, 0.2 mm; F, 0.5 mm.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Fageapseudes vitjazi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1970), female: (A) pereopod-2; (B) pereopod-3; (C) pereopod-4; (D) pereopod-5; (E) pereopod-6. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1966), neotype juvenile male: (A) body; (A’) pleon dorsal view; manca: (B) cheliped; (C) pereopod-1. Scale bars: A, A’, 1 mm; B–C, 0.2 mm.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1966), manca: (A) antennule; (B) antenna; (C) right mandible; (C’) mandibular palp; (D) maxillule; (D’) maxillular palp; (E) maxilla; (F) maxilliped; (F’) articles 3 and 4 of maxillipedal palp; (G) maxillipedal endite. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Leviapseudes zenkevitchi (Kudinova-Pasternak, 1966), manca: (A) pereopod-2; (B) pereopod-3; (C) pereopod-4; (C’) dactylus and unguis of pereopod-4; (D) pereopod-5; (E) pereopod-6. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 10

Table 1. List of tanaidacean species recorded for oceanic trenches. Doubtful records are marked with asterisks.

Figure 11

Table 2. List of tanaidacea species common for the trenches.