Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-wdhn8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T15:08:25.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rate of natural mortality in the sea star Archaster angulatus (Echinodermata: Asteroidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

John K. Keesing*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere and University of Western Australia Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, M097, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. K. Keesing, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere and University of Western Australia Oceans Institute, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, M097, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia Email: john.keesing@csiro.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The population size structure from a total of 876 individuals, together with published values of growth rate, maximum size and size at age were used to estimate an instantaneous rate of natural mortality (M) of 0.46–0.59 year−1 in a population of the sea star Archaster angulatus from south-western Australia. Peak abundance (17%) of all animals sampled was 105–109 mm arm radius (means of 4.2–4.8 years of age) and only one per cent of sea stars are predicted to live beyond 8 years in the population studied. There are few comparable studies on sea stars but when compared with rates of natural mortality in other echinoderms (sea urchins), A. angulatus is intermediate among species which exhibit the extremes of life history strategies, that is, those which grow very rapidly and may live just two years or less and those with very slow growth rates and which may live for decades.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

INTRODUCTION

Natural mortality is one of the most important parameters in understanding the population dynamics of animals, however in marine species it is difficult to obtain reliable estimates and the parameter is lacking for many species (Pauly, Reference Pauly1980; Jørgensen & Holt, Reference Jørgensen and Holt2013). Archaster angulatus Müller & Troschel, 1842, is one of the most common sub-tidal sea stars found along the west coast of Australia. It occurs from Cape Naturaliste in the west north to the Northern Territory and south to the Whitsunday Islands in Queensland (Edgar, 2012) as well as occurring throughout the Indian Ocean, north to Japan and eastwards to parts of the western Pacific Ocean (Clark & Rowe, Reference Clark and Rowe1971). Aspects of its population biology including reproductive periodicity, and reproductive physiology and growth have been studied (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Keesing and Irvine2010; Keesing et al., Reference Keesing, Graham, Irvine and Crossing2011; Keesing, Reference Keesing2017). Along with its congener Archaster typicus, which has been studied extensively in Indonesia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Philippines and the Ryukyu Islands (Japan) (Boschma, Reference Boschma1924; Ohshima & Ikeda, Reference Ohshima and Ikeda1934a, Reference Ohshima and Ikedab; Clemente & Anicete, Reference Clemente and Anicete1949; Komatsu, Reference Komatsu1983; Mukai et al., Reference Mukai, Nishihara, Kamisato and Fujimoto1986; Run et al., Reference Run, Chen, Chang and Chia1988; Bos et al., Reference Bos, Gumanao, Van Katwijk, Mueller, Saceda and Tejada2011, Reference Bos, Gumanao, Mueller and Saceda2013), A. angulatus is one of just three species of asteroids where males and females are known to pair up in a pseudocopulatory ‘mating’ posture when spawning (Keesing et al., Reference Keesing, Graham, Irvine and Crossing2011).

Although a large body of literature on population dynamics, biology and physiology of asteroids exists (Lawrence, Reference Lawrence2013), measurements of mortality rates are scant. This paucity of studies is surprising given the importance of such studies to population dynamics of sea stars and early work which characterized growth patterns and methods of parameterizing growth and mortality in asteroids (e.g. Ebert, Reference Ebert1973, Reference Ebert1975; Yamaguchi, Reference Yamaguchi1974, Reference Yamaguchi1975, Reference Yamaguchi1976, Reference Yamaguchi1977). This paper reports on population size structure, growth rates, mortality rates, arm number and arm damage in a population of A. angulatus from south-western Australia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sampling carried out for this project was done as part of studies which have been previously published (Yeo et al., Reference Yeo, Keesing and van Keulen2015; Keesing, Reference Keesing2017) and the collection details are only summarized briefly here. Samples of A. angulatus were collected approximately monthly between February 2009 and June 2011 from Jervois Bank (32°09′13″S 115°45′03″E, water depth 8 m) in Cockburn Sound (Figure 1) using a 85 cm wide by 45 cm high epibenthic sled with a 5 cm cutting depth and 10 mm mesh which was towed along the sea bed at a speed of about 1 knot from 100–200 m behind a 17 m power vessel. The arm radius (mouth to tip of longest undamaged arm) of each sea star was measured to the nearest mm using a pair of callipers. For the analyses presented in this paper, the measurements of sea stars from all monthly samples were pooled and plotted in 5 mm size classes to give a length frequency distribution for the entire study period.

Fig. 1. Locality map of the collection site of the Archaster angulatus samples.

Natural mortality rates were calculated by constructing a length converted catch curve (King, Reference King1995) whereby the natural log of the abundance of each size class is plotted against the mean age of sea stars of that size class and the slope of the resulting line (best linear fit by least squares) is the estimated rate of natural mortality. The predicted age for each size class (at the midpoint of each 5 mm size class) was calculated using the growth parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth model for A. angulatus of 2 years and over from Keesing (Reference Keesing2017), equation (1).

(1)$${\rm Arm}\;{\rm radius}\;{\rm in}\;{\rm mm} = 73.7 + [53.2(1 - e^{ - kT})],$$

where age in years is T + 2. Mortality rates were calculated for growth coefficients over the range of 0.35–0.45.

RESULTS

Abundance of A. angulatus peaked at the 105–109 mm size class with 148 animals or 17% of all animals sampled (Figure 2). The mid-point of this size class (107 mm) corresponds to a mean age of 4.5 years when the growth constant (k) is 0.4. For the range of likely k values between 0.35 and 0.45 the mean age of this size class is between 4.8 and 4.2 years. Beyond this peak, abundance at subsequent size classes declines due to a decreasing rate of annual survivorship with just 1% of sea stars predicted to live beyond 8 years (Figure 2). The length converted catch curve (Figure 3) plots this decline and yields an estimate of mortality of 0.53 year−1 (for growth coefficient k = 0.4). For the most likely upper and lower estimates of k (0.35 and 0.45) mortality is estimated to be within the range of 0.46–0.59 year−1.

Fig. 2. Size frequency distribution (bars) of Archaster angulatus for all 869 sea stars captured between February 2009 and June 2011. Age in years (lines) is estimated from the von Bertalanffy growth model at three values of k with L inf set at 126.9 mm.

Fig. 3. Length converted catch curve for Archaster angulatus showing the natural log of abundance of each size class (see Figure 2 for abundance) plotted against the mean age of sea stars of that size class according to the von Bertalanffy growth model with parameters of maximum average size (L inf) of 126.9 mm and growth rate (k) of 0.4. The slope of the line fitted by least squares best fit to the points of peak and declining abundance (closed circles) (0.5312) is the estimated rate of natural mortality per year.

DISCUSSION

Despite the important role sea stars play in structuring benthic communities by predation, both where they occur naturally (e.g. Acanthaster planci, Endean, Reference Endean1973) and as invasives (e.g. Asterias amurensis, Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, O'Hara, Lawrence and Lawrence2013) together with their impact on bivalve aquaculture industries (e.g. Asterias spp., Galstoff & Loosanoff, Reference Galstoff and Loosanoff1939; Sloan & Aldridge, Reference Sloan and Aldridge1981), quantification of the key population parameters of growth and mortality remain poorly studied. Growth parameters are established for a modest number of species (see summary of this literature in Keesing, Reference Keesing2017) but estimates of natural mortality are especially scant. Indeed, there have been few other estimates of the rate of population decline in adult sea stars, with most studies having focussed on measuring the mortality rates among juveniles (e.g. Doherty & Davidson, Reference Doherty and Davidson1988; Zann et al., Reference Zann, Brodie and Vuki1990; Keesing & Halford, Reference Keesing and Halford1992; Keesing et al., Reference Keesing, Weidermeyer, Okaji, Halford, Hall and Cartwright1997). Doherty & Davidson (Reference Doherty and Davidson1988) followed populations of juvenile A. planci and found rates of mortality of 99.3% (1.08% day−1) between 8 and 23 months of age (18–130 mm diameter) and 75% (0.39% day−1) from 22 and 34 months of age (95–220 mm). Ebert (Reference Ebert1973) had access to limited data for Acanthaster planci and estimated M of 0.11 year−1 and k of 0.1 which suggested that the species was slow growing and long lived. Later, Lucas (Reference Lucas1984) showed that A. planci was fast growing and lived for 5–8 years with a k of about 0.3. In general species with a rapid growth rate and early maturity also exhibit higher mortality rate and shorter lifespan (Ebert, Reference Ebert1975) and A. angulatus appears to conform to this pattern. In terms of longevity, A. angulatus is similar to that estimated for Asterina stellifera (>5.5 years, Meretta et al., Reference Meretta, Farias, Cledón and Ventura2016) but less than that estimated for Protoreaster nodosus (at least 17 years; Bos et al., Reference Bos, Gumanao, Alipoyo and Cardona2008). Nojima (Reference Nojima1979) did measure mortality in A. latespinosus, however post-spawning morbidity of >99% of spawning adults was a significant feature of mortality rates in that species. There are no confirmed reports of post-spawning morbidity in A. angulatus. However, there are frequent reports of mass mortalities of A. angulatus at different times of the year, including summer in Cockburn Sound where this study was undertaken (Cockburn Sound Management Council, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012; Rose et al., Reference Rose, Smale and Botting2012). The cause of those mortality events is not known but other possible explanations include disease, high water temperatures and/or strandings at low tide. Predation is also a possible cause of mortality in A. angulatus. Lawrence et al. (Reference Lawrence, Keesing and Irvine2010) and Keesing (Reference Keesing2017) measured arm damage rates attributed to sub-lethal predation of between 5.4 and 13.7% in two populations of A. angulatus. The higher of these rates was measured at the same location as in this study. For A. typicus arm damage of 3% was recorded in Taiwan (R. Chen, unpublished, in Lawrence, Reference Lawrence, Scalera-Liaci and Canicatti1992).

Although there are few measurements of mortality rates of asteroids, there have been numerous such studies on echinoids (reviews by Ebert, Reference Ebert1982, Reference Ebert and Lawrence2013) and these can provide some context to the rate estimated here for A. angulatus. Ebert (Reference Ebert and Lawrence2013) showed that a strong inverse relationship exists between growth rate and annual survivorship. That is, echinoids that grow rapidly tend to have a short lifespan and a high value of M while those that grow slowly, live a long time and have a low value of M.

Typifying these two examples in echinoids are the short-lived tropical Tripneustes gratilla with k values of 1.08 to 1.80 and M values of 4.74–5 year−1 (Bacolod & Dy, Reference Bacolod and Dy1986; Regalado et al., Reference Regalado, Campos and Santillan2011) and those such as the long lived Antarctic Sterechinus antarcticus with k of 0.017 and M of 0.07 year−1 (Brey, Reference Brey1991) and the sub-Arctic Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (M = 0.04–0.30 year−1) which lives commonly in excess of 50 years and may reach 100 years (Russell et al., Reference Russell, Ebert and Petraitis1998). Intermediate among these extremes and comparable to A. angulatus are the subtropical echinoid Cassidulus mitis (k = 0.39 and M = 0.812 year−1, Freire et al., Reference Freire, Santos, Fontoura, Magalhaes and Grohmann1992) and the temperate S. franciscanus (k = 0.51 and M = 0.26–0.34 year−1, Ebert & Russell, Reference Ebert and Russell1993).

A similar degree of variation in growth rate patterns and longevity probably exists among species in asteroids and will be instructive in understanding their ecology and physiology. For example, Ebert (Reference Ebert1982) found fast-growing, short-lived urchins had thinner, less ossified test than long-lived species contrasting the investment in body wall maintenance between short- and long-lived species. He also found that body wall thickness was related to exposure to wave energy with urchins in sheltered waters having to invest less energy in heavy test ossification. Birkeland (Reference Birkeland1989) also suggested this may occur in asteroids by contrasting the fast-growing, fast-moving, thin body walled A. planci with the slow-growing, slow-moving, thick body walled Linckia laevigata. However, a wider set of studies of sea star growth and survivorship are required in order to relate asteroid life history strategy to biology, ecology and physiology.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thank you to Dr Sharon Yeo for providing the monthly samples of sea stars for this study and to Kirsty Brooks and Dr Baoquan Li for assistance in sorting and measuring the sea stars.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This study was funded in part by the Western Australian Marine Sciences Institution (WAMSI).

References

REFERENCES

Bacolod, P.T. and Dy, D.T. (1986) Growth, recruitment pattern and mortality rate of the sea urchin, Tripneustes gratilla Linnaeus. Philippine Scientist 23, 114.Google Scholar
Birkeland, C. (1989) The faustian traits of the crown of thorns starfish. American Scientist 77, 154163.Google Scholar
Bos, A.R., Gumanao, G.S., Alipoyo, J.C. and Cardona, L.T. (2008) Population dynamics, reproduction and growth of the Indo-Pacific horned sea star, Protoreaster nodosus (Echinodermata; Asteroidea). Marine Biology 156, 5563.Google Scholar
Bos, A.R., Gumanao, G.S., Mueller, B. and Saceda, M.M. (2013) Size at maturation, sex differences, and pair density during the mating season of the Indo-Pacific beach star Archaster typicus (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in the Philippines. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 57, 113119.Google Scholar
Bos, A.R., Gumanao, G.S., Van Katwijk, M.M., Mueller, B., Saceda, M.M. and Tejada, R.L.P. (2011) Ontogenetic habitat shift, population growth, and burrowing behavior of the Indo-Pacific beach star, Archaster typicus (Echinodermata; Asteroidea). Marine Biology 158, 639648.Google Scholar
Boschma, H. (1924) Űber einen Fall von Kopulation bei einer [About a case of copulation in an] Asteridae (Archaster typicus). Zoologischer Anzeiger 58, 283285.Google Scholar
Brey, T. (1991) Population dynamics of Sterechinus antarcticus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) on the Weddell Sea shelf and slope, Antarctica. Antarctic Science 3, 251256.Google Scholar
Byrne, M., O'Hara, T. and Lawrence, J. (2013) Asterias amurensis. In Lawrence, J.M. (ed.) Starfish: biology and ecology of the Asteroidea. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 174180.Google Scholar
Clark, A.M. and Rowe, F.W.E. (1971) Monograph of shallow-water Indo-West Pacific echinoderms: i–vii, 1–238, pls 1–31. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Clemente, L.S. and Anicete, B.Z. (1949) Studies on sex-ratio, sexual dimorphism and early development of the common sea star, Archaster typicus Müller and Troschel (Family Archasteridae). Natural and Applied Science Bulletin 9, 297318.Google Scholar
Cockburn Sound Management Council. (2008) State of Cockburn Sound 2008 Report. Report to the Parliament of Western Australia. http://www.der.wa.gov.au/about-us/cockburn-sound-management-council/372-state-of-cockburn-sound.Google Scholar
Cockburn Sound Management Council. (2009) State of Cockburn Sound 2009 Report. Report to the Parliament of Western Australia. http://www.der.wa.gov.au/about-us/cockburn-sound-management-council/372-state-of-cockburn-sound.Google Scholar
Cockburn Sound Management Council. (2010) State of Cockburn Sound 2010 Report. Report to the Parliament of Western Australia. http://www.der.wa.gov.au/about-us/cockburn-sound-management-council/372-state-of-cockburn-sound.Google Scholar
Cockburn Sound Management Council. (2011) State of Cockburn Sound 2011 Report. Report to the Parliament of Western Australia. http://www.der.wa.gov.au/about-us/cockburn-sound-management-council/372-state-of-cockburn-sound.Google Scholar
Cockburn Sound Management Council. (2012) State of Cockburn Sound 2012 Report. Report to the Parliament of Western Australia. http://www.der.wa.gov.au/about-us/cockburn-sound-management-council/372-state-of-cockburn-sound.Google Scholar
Doherty, P.J. and Davidson, J. (1988) Monitoring the distribution and abundance of juvenile Acanthaster planci in the Central Great Barrier Reef. Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium 2, 131136.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.A. (1973) Estimating growth and mortality rates from size data. Oecologia 11, 281298.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.A. (1975) Growth and mortality of post-larval echinoids. American Zoologist 15, 755775.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.A. (1982) Longevity, life history, and relative body wall size in sea urchins. Ecological Monographs 52, 353394.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.A. (2013) Growth and survival of post-settlement sea urchins. In Lawrence, J.M. (ed.) Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology, 3rd edition. New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 83117.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.A. and Russell, M.P. (1993) Growth and mortality of subtidal red sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) at San Nicolas Island, California, USA: problems with models. Marine Biology 117, 7989.Google Scholar
Endean, R. (1973) Population explosions of Acanthaster planci and associated destruction of hermatypic corals in the Indo-West Pacific region. Biology and Geology of Coral Reefs 2, 389438.Google Scholar
Freire, C.A., Santos, P.J.P., Fontoura, N.F., Magalhaes, R.A.O. and Grohmann, P.A. (1992) Growth and spatial distribution of Cassidulus mitis (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) on a sandy beach in Southeastern Brazil. Marine Biology 112, 625630.Google Scholar
Galstoff, P.S. and Loosanoff, V.L. (1939) Natural history and method of controlling the starfish (Asterias forbesi). Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 49, 73132.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, C. and Holt, R.E. (2013) Natural mortality: its ecology, how it shapes fish life histories, and why it may be increased by fishing. Journal of Sea Research 75, 818.Google Scholar
Keesing, J.K. (2017) Population size structure, growth, arm number and damage in the sea star Archaster angulatus Müller & Troschel, 1842 (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 61, 119127. doi: 10.1080/07924259.2017.1287782.Google Scholar
Keesing, J.K., Graham, F., Irvine, T.R. and Crossing, R. (2011) Synchronous aggregated pseudo-copulation of the sea star Archaster angulatus Müller & Troschel, 1842 (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) and its reproductive cycle in south-western Australia. Marine Biology 158, 11631173.Google Scholar
Keesing, J.K. and Halford, A.R. (1992) Field measurement of survival rates of juvenile Acanthaster planci (L.): techniques and preliminary results. Marine Ecology Progress Series 85, 107114.Google Scholar
Keesing, J.K., Weidermeyer, W.L., Okaji, K., Halford, A.R., Hall, K.C. and Cartwright, C.M. (1997) Mortality rates of juvenile starfish Acanthaster planci and Nardoa spp. measured on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia and in Okinawa, Japan. Oceanologica Acta 19, 441448.Google Scholar
King, M. (1995) Fisheries biology, assessment and management. Oxford: Fishing News Books, 341 pp.Google Scholar
Komatsu, M. (1983) Development of the sea-star, Archaster typicus, with a note on male-on-female superposition. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 56, 187195.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.M. (1992) Arm loss and regeneration in Asteroidea (Echinodermata). In Scalera-Liaci, L. and Canicatti, C. (eds) Echinoderm Research 1991: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Echinoderms. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 3952.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.M. (2013) Starfish: biology and ecology of the Asteroidea. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 267 pp.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.M., Keesing, J.K. and Irvine, T.R. (2010) Population characteristics and biology of two populations of Archaster angulatus (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in different habitats off the central-western Australian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 15771585.Google Scholar
Lucas, J.S. (1984) Growth, maturation and effects of diet in Acanthaster planci (L.) (Asteroidea) and hybrids reared in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 79, 129147.Google Scholar
Meretta, P.E., Farias, N.E., Cledón, M. and Ventura, C.R. (2016) Growth pattern and changes in abundance of the endangered bat star Asterina stellifera. Marine Ecology 37, 14231433.Google Scholar
Mukai, H., Nishihara, M., Kamisato, H. and Fujimoto, Y. (1986) Distribution and abundance of the sea-star Archaster typicus in Kabira Cove, Ishigaki Island, Okinawa. Bulletin of Marine Science 38, 366383.Google Scholar
Nojima, S. (1979) Ecological studies of a sea star, Astropecten latespinosus Meissner. I. Survivorship curve and life history. Publication of the Amakusa Marine Biological Laboratory, Kyushu University 5, 4565.Google Scholar
Ohshima, H. and Ikeda, H. (1934a) Sexual size-dimorphism in the sea star Archaster typicus. Müll. et Trosch. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Japan 10, 180183.Google Scholar
Ohshima, H. and Ikeda, H. (1934b) Male-female superposition of the sea-star Archaster typicus Müll. et Trosch. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Japan 10, 125128.Google Scholar
Pauly, D. (1980) On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. ICES Journal of Marine Science 39, 175192. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/39.2.175.Google Scholar
Regalado, J.M., Campos, W.L. and Santillan, P. (2011) Population biology of Tripneustes gratilla (Linnaeus) (Echinodermata) in seagrass beds of Southern Guimaras, Philippines. Science Diliman 22, 4149.Google Scholar
Rose, T.H., Smale, D.A. and Botting, G. (2012) The 2011 marine heat wave in Cockburn Sound, southwest Australia. Ocean Science 8, 545550.Google Scholar
Run, J-Q., Chen, C-P., Chang, K.-Y. and Chia, F-S. (1988) Mating behaviour and reproductive cycle of Archaster typicus (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Marine Biology 99, 247253.Google Scholar
Russell, M.P., Ebert, T.A. and Petraitis, P.S. (1998) Field estimates of growth and mortality of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Ophelia 48, 137153.Google Scholar
Sloan, N.A. and Aldridge, T.H. (1981) Observations on an aggregation of the starfish Asterias rubens L. in Morecambe Bay, Lancashire, England. Journal of Natural History 15, 407418.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M. (1974) Growth of juvenile Acanthaster planci (L.) in the laboratory. Pacific Science 28, 123138.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M. (1975) Estimating growth parameters from growth rate data. Oecologia 20, 321332.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M. (1976) Estimating the length of the exponential growth phase: growth increment observations on the coral-reef asteroid Culcita novaeguineae. Marine Biology 39, 5759.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, M. (1977) Population structure, spawning, and growth of the coral reef asteroid Linckia laevigata (Linnaeus). Pacific Science 31, 1330.Google Scholar
Yeo, S., Keesing, J.K. and van Keulen, M. (2015) Reproductive biology of the sand dollar, Peronella lesueuri (L. Agassiz, 1841) (Echinoidea: Clypeasteroida: Laganidae), in south-western Australia. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 59, 141154.Google Scholar
Zann, L., Brodie, J. and Vuki, V. (1990) History and dynamics of the crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci (L.) in the Suva area, Fiji. Coral Reefs 9, 135144.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Locality map of the collection site of the Archaster angulatus samples.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Size frequency distribution (bars) of Archaster angulatus for all 869 sea stars captured between February 2009 and June 2011. Age in years (lines) is estimated from the von Bertalanffy growth model at three values of k with Linf set at 126.9 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Length converted catch curve for Archaster angulatus showing the natural log of abundance of each size class (see Figure 2 for abundance) plotted against the mean age of sea stars of that size class according to the von Bertalanffy growth model with parameters of maximum average size (Linf) of 126.9 mm and growth rate (k) of 0.4. The slope of the line fitted by least squares best fit to the points of peak and declining abundance (closed circles) (0.5312) is the estimated rate of natural mortality per year.