Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T20:13:00.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radula synthesis by three species of iron mineralizing molluscs: production rate and elemental demand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

J.A. Shaw
Affiliation:
Division of Science and Engineering, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia
D.J. Macey*
Affiliation:
Division of Science and Engineering, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia
L.R. Brooker
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Health and Education, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, 4558, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D.J. Macey Division of Science and EngineeringMurdoch UniversityMurdoch Perth Western Australia 6150Australia email: D.Macey@murdoch.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A cold-shock technique was used to determine radula production rates for the chitons Acanthopleura hirtosa and Plaxiphora albida, and for the limpet Patelloida alticostata, which replaced their radular teeth at rates of 0.40, 0.36 and 0.51 rows d−1, respectively. These rates are far slower than those determined previously for non-iron-mineralizing molluscs, suggesting that the improved working life of the teeth afforded by iron-mineralization acts to significantly reduce replacement rates. In addition, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy has been used to determine the quantity of iron and other elements comprising the radula of each species. These data, used in conjunction with the radula production rates, reveal that A. hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata have daily radula mineralization requirements for iron of 3.06, 4.12 and 0.55 μg, respectively. Such information is vital for continuing studies related to the cellular delivery of ions and subsequent biomineralization of the tooth cusps in chitons and limpets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

INTRODUCTION

The radula is the principal feeding organ of many molluscan species. It comprises an elongated array of transverse tooth rows that are carried forwards in a conveyor belt manner (Lowenstam & Weiner, Reference Lowenstam and Weiner1989). The teeth are prefabricated as an organic matrix by odontoblast cells at the posterior end of the radula, with the overlying epithelial tissue controlling the subsequent transportation and deposition of ions onto this matrix (Mann et al., Reference Mann, Perry, Webb, Luke and Williams1986; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Macey, Webb and Mann1989). Once mature, the teeth are progressively abraded and finally lost as a result of feeding (Runham, Reference Runham1963; Runham & Isarankura, Reference Runham and Isarankura1966).

In chitons (Mollusca: Polyplacophora), each transverse tooth row bears 17 teeth, including a pair of large major laterals whose cusps are hardened with iron and calcium biominerals. Magnetite (Fe3O4) is the principal mineral formed within the posterior cutting face and anterior surface of the tooth cusps, while at later stages of development the tooth core is infilled with either an apatitic calcium phosphate or limonite and lepidocrocite, depending on the species (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Macey, Webb and Mann1989; Lowenstam & Weiner, Reference Lowenstam and Weiner1989; Macey et al., Reference Macey, Webb and Brooker1994; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Brooker, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2003a, Reference Lee, Brooker, van Bronswijk, Macey and Webbb). Limpets (Mollusca: Patellogastropoda) possess fewer teeth per transverse row than chitons, and utilize the ferric oxide goethite (α-FeOOH) to mineralize their major lateral teeth, along with silica as hydrated amorphous opal (SiO2.nH2O) and calcium (Lowenstam, Reference Lowenstam1962; Runham et al., Reference Runham, Thornton, Shaw and Wayte1969; Mann et al., Reference Mann, Perry, Webb, Luke and Williams1986; Liddiard et al., Reference Liddiard, Hockridge, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2004). As a consequence of this mineralization, the teeth of chitons and limpets are well suited for rasping hard surfaces, and are commonly found grazing on hard substrata such as limestone where they rake or excavate the surface, ultimately ingesting the rock in order to extract the epi- or endolithic algal components (Steneck & Watling, Reference Steneck and Watling1982; Macey et al., Reference Macey, Brooker, Webb and St Pierre1996; van der Wal et al., Reference van der Wal, Giesen and Videler2000).

The rate of radula production has been determined for a limited number of molluscs, with most studies concentrating on prosobranch and pulmonate gastropod species (Runham, Reference Runham1962, Reference Runham1963; Runham & Isarankura, Reference Runham and Isarankura1966; Isarankura & Runham, Reference Isarankura and Runham1968; Padilla et al., Reference Padilla, Dittman, Franz and Sladek1996). These studies, which have utilized a number of techniques, have reported radula production rates ranging between 1.0 and 6.4 tooth rows d−1. Recently, a cold-shock technique was employed to determine the radula production rate (0.36 rows d−1) of the chiton Acanthopleura hirtosa (Blainville, 1825) (Shaw et al., Reference Shaw, Brooker and Macey2002), which is considerably slower than rates reported previously.

In order to elucidate the relative disparity between the rate determined for A. hirtosa (Shaw et al., Reference Shaw, Brooker and Macey2002) and those determined for other molluscs, radula production has been re-examined in A. hirtosa and has been investigated in two sympatric iron-mineralizing mollusc species, the chiton Plaxiphora albida (Blainville, 1825) and the limpet Patelloida alticostata (Angas, 1865). These species are key inhabitants of intertidal communities in Western Australia (Black et al., Reference Black, Fisher, Hill and McShane1979, Reference Black, Lymbery and Hill1988), and have been the focus of numerous studies in relation to tooth biomineralization (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Macey, Webb and Mann1989; Macey et al., Reference Macey, Brooker, Webb and St Pierre1996; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Brooker, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2003a; Liddiard et al., Reference Liddiard, Hockridge, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2004). Further studies on the mineralization process require a detailed understanding of the demand for elemental precursors during radula development. As such, the quantitative elemental composition of radulae from each species has also been established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radula production rates

All mollusc specimens were collected from intertidal limestone rocks within the Perth metropolitan area of Western Australia (32°S 116°E). Adult animals, as determined by size, were subjected to a cold-shock treatment (Isarankura & Runham, Reference Isarankura and Runham1968) within 30 minutes of collection. This procedure induces a constriction anomaly in the developing radula membrane, the progression of which can be tracked after the subsequent production of new radula material. For Acanthopleura hirtosa, the cold-shock procedure followed that described in Shaw et al. (Reference Shaw, Brooker and Macey2002), where freshly collected animals were immersed for 48 h in seawater that had been pre-cooled to 4°C. For Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata, the technique was modified to account for species variation in procedure tolerance. Optimum shock parameters (seawater temperature and duration) were determined to be 4°C for 24 h and 1°C for 48 h for Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata, respectively (data not shown).

Following the cold-shock, a natural feeding regime was promoted by maintaining animals within an artificial environment approximating that of their natural habitat. This consisted of twin open-air tanks containing limestone rocks that were kept moist and partially submerged in fresh seawater, which was delivered via an overhead reticulation system at a rate of ~6.5 l. m−1. During the course of each study, air and water temperatures were recorded using minimum/maximum thermometers.

Every two days a single animal was removed from each tank for immediate dissection. Following excision, radulae were cleaned in 2.5% NaOCl before observation under an Olympus SZH10 stereo dissecting microscope, where both the total number of tooth rows and the number of tooth rows occurring posterior to the constriction anomaly were recorded. Radula production rate curves were generated by plotting the number of tooth rows formed against the number of hours that had elapsed between the end of the cold-shock and dissection. As the cold-shock treatment is likely to result in a temporary slowdown of radula production (Shaw et al., Reference Shaw, Brooker and Macey2002), animals in which zero radula production was observed were discounted and the post-shock effect in the remaining animals was accounted for by justifying data points through time zero. The radula production rates calculated for individuals of each species were subsequently compared using regression analysis. The radulae of ten individuals from each species were excised from animals taken straight from the wild for comparison to cold-shocked radulae.

Elemental analysis

The radulae were excised from ten freshly collected specimens of A. hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata and cleaned using a fine jet of water. The number of tooth rows in each radula was documented, following which they were dried at 60°C for 12 h, and the sample dry weight recorded. A nitric acid with peroxide digest was then used to dissolve the radulae, followed by quantitative elemental analyses for Fe, Ca, P, S, Mg, Na, Zn, K, Al, Cu and extractable Si using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (McDaniel, Reference McDaniel1991). Results were calculated as total µg of each element per sample, which was then converted to µg.g tissue−1 using the radula dry weights. The concentrations of elements in the tissues of each species were compared statistically using analysis of variance. Daily requirements were estimated by dividing the total µg of each element by the total number of tooth rows and by the radula production rates determined for each species.

RESULTS

Radula production rates

No constrictions were observed in radulae dissected from non-cold-shocked animals taken directly from the wild, indicating that constriction anomalies are attributable to the cold-shock and are not a natural part of radula formation. Radula production rates in adult individuals of Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata were calculated to be 0.40, 0.36 and 0.51 rows. d−1, respectively (Table 1). Regression analyses demonstrated a high positive fit for individuals within each study, with r2 values of 0.96 (y = 0.02x−3 × 10−5), 0.91 (y = 0.01x +3 × 10−5) and 0.90 (y = 0.02x + 4 × 10−6) for A. hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata, respectively (Figure 1). The two chiton species were similar in body length, although A. hirtosa possessed a greater number of tooth rows per radula compared to Plaxiphora albida. Patelloida alticostata was smaller in body length than either of the chiton species but possessed the greatest number of tooth rows. The temperatures recorded during each study were similar for all species.

Fig. 1. Radula production rates for Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata. Points represent the number of tooth rows produced after a cold-shock treatment. Data and regression lines have been justified through time zero to account for post-shock effects.

Table 1. Data (±1 SE) for Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata maintained within an artificial habitat after a cold-shock treatment.

SE, standard error.

Elemental analysis

Iron formed the major elemental component in the radulae of each of the three species examined, with those of A. hirtosa and Plaxiphora albida containing approximately 88,500 and 98,000 µg. g−1 of Fe, respectively. That of Patelloida alticostata contained significantly less Fe at 65,000 µg. g−1 (P = 0.03 and 0.01 for A. hirtosa and Plaxiphora albida, respectively, α = 0.05) (Table 2). Relative to the two other species, the radula of A. hirtosa contained significantly higher concentrations of Ca, P, Mg and Zn (P < 0.01, α = 0.05 in all cases). Notably, high concentrations of S were detected from all species, although the radula of Patelloida alticostata contained significantly less than that of the two chitons (P < 0.01, α = 0.05 in all cases). Patelloida alticostata also had significantly higher concentrations of Al and extractable Si than either A. hirtosa or Plaxiphora albida (P < 0.01, α = 0.05 in all cases).

Table 2. Composition and daily requirement of elements for the process of radula formation in Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata.

Note: The nitric acid with peroxide digest cannot fully dissolve Si, and as such the results only provide an indication of the relative extractable Si for each species. SE, standard error; BDL, below detectable limits.

The daily requirements for elements involved in radula synthesis were calculated using the radula production rates determined for each species in the previous section (Table 2). The limpet Patelloida alticostata was shown to require 0.55 µg Fe. d−1, while A. hirtosa and Plaxiphora albida required 3.06 and 4.12 µg Fe. d−1 for radula mineralization. A substantial daily demand for Ca, P, Mg and S was also established, especially in A. hirtosa. All remaining elements were typically required in amounts <0.1 µg. d−1.

DISCUSSION

Radula production rates

The radula production rates of 0.40, 0.36 and 0.51 rows per day determined for Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata are among the slowest reported to date for any mollusc. Rates have been determined for 21 mollusc species (including the current study), with five being species that incorporate significant amounts of iron into their radula teeth. In a comprehensive study by Isarankura & Runham (Reference Isarankura and Runham1968), radula production rates were determined for eight prosobranch and seven pulmonate gastropod species, with production rates ranging from 1 to 6.4 rows per day, and averaging approximately 3.3 rows per day across all species. Relatively fast radula production rates have also been determined for the prosobranch molluscs Lacuna vincta and L. variegata, which produce 2.94 and 2.97 rows per day, respectively (Padilla et al., Reference Padilla, Dittman, Franz and Sladek1996).

A major distinction between the species investigated in the current study, and most of those observed by previous researchers, is that A. hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata each incorporate iron biominerals into their tooth cusps. The only iron-mineralizing species investigated by Isarankura & Runham (Reference Isarankura and Runham1968) was the limpet Patella vulgata, which had a replacement rate of ~1.5 rows per day, comparatively slow relative to the remaining species documented in their study. Further evidence for slow rates in iron-mineralizing species has been provided by Nesson (Reference Nesson1969), who reported a rate of between 0.4 and 0.8 rows per day for the chiton Mopalia muscosa, comparable to the rates determined for the species in the present study.

Research by van der Wal et al. (Reference van der Wal, Giesen and Videler2000) on the mechanical properties of chiton and limpet teeth demonstrated that tooth hardness was dependent on the relative amounts of mineral and organic matter present in the tooth. As such, the inclusion of iron minerals in the teeth of chitons and limpets acts to prolong the working life of the teeth when feeding on hard substrata such as calcareous limestone (Runham et al., Reference Runham, Thornton, Shaw and Wayte1969; Bullock, Reference Bullock1989; Lowenstam & Weiner, Reference Lowenstam and Weiner1989). The results determined for A. hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata suggest that the extended functional life of the teeth, attributable to iron-mineralization, translates to a slower rate of radula replacement.

However, it is acknowledged that numerous factors combine to influence the given radula production rate, therefore making it difficult to make direct comparisons between any particular species. Previous studies have proposed that tooth size and shape, the mode of feeding, the properties of the food source and tooth hardness all contribute to tooth wear qualities (Isarankura & Runham, Reference Isarankura and Runham1968; Steneck & Watling, Reference Steneck and Watling1982; Padilla, Reference Padilla1985; Okoshi & Ishii, Reference Okoshi and Ishii1996). In addition, both Isarankura & Runham (Reference Isarankura and Runham1968) and Padilla et al. (Reference Padilla, Dittman, Franz and Sladek1996) have reported slower rates in larger animals, proposing that this is due to the slower metabolic rates of large individuals compared to small ones. It is likely that rates would be faster in juvenile A. hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida or Patelloida alticostata compared to their adult counterparts, even though size may not be useful for making rate comparisons between adults of various species.

During the course of the study, animals were observed to be feeding, as evidenced by the deposition of faecal pellets and the maintenance of limited algal coverage on the rock near each individual. Although grazing effort, and therefore radula wear and replacement, may have been influenced by the lack of a tidal system in the tanks, the continual supply of reticulated seawater is likely to have promoted opportunities for feeding rather than reduce them. As such, the rates determined for each of the species examined may be slight overestimates compared to those of animals in the wild. However, given the extremely small tidal amplitudes (Pattiaratchi et al., Reference Pattiaratchi, Hegge, Gould and Eliot1997) and narrow patterns of zonation experienced along the Perth coastline (Black et al., Reference Black, Fisher, Hill and McShane1979) the rates observed for the chitons and limpet are likely to be representative of those in their natural habitat.

The rate of radula production determined for A. hirtosa in the current study was slightly higher compared to the rate determined previously for this species by Shaw et al. (Reference Shaw, Brooker and Macey2002) (0.40 rows per day compared with 0.36). Notably, a slightly higher average water temperature was also recorded in the current study (24°C compared to 22°C). Although temperature has been shown to influence radula production rate (see, for example Isarankura & Runham, Reference Isarankura and Runham1968; Padilla et al., Reference Padilla, Dittman, Franz and Sladek1996), its effect is likely to be small for animals acclimatized/acclimated within their natural metabolic range. The higher rate observed in the current study is likely to be attributable to the correction made to the post cold-shock slowdown of radula production, which has a short-term affect on all animals during the early stages of the study, and which, if not corrected for, will result in a slight depression of the actual rate. This lag effect was acknowledged by Shaw et al. (Reference Shaw, Brooker and Macey2002), but not accounted for in the final determination of radula production rate in that study.

Although they are similar in overall size, the major lateral teeth of A. hirtosa are unicuspid, while those of Plaxiphora albida are tricuspid. As these two species are sympatric, it is likely that they are exploiting different niches on the same substratum. This is supported by the composition of their faeces, which contained significantly different amounts of inorganic material, at 88% and 70% for A. hirtosa and P. albida respectively (Macey et al., Reference Macey, Brooker, Webb and St Pierre1996). It is possible that A. hirtosa is targeting the endolithic algal component of the rock, whilst P. albida targets the epilithic component and, thereby, interspecific differences in tooth structure are balanced out.

Elemental analysis

A number of studies have determined the elemental composition of chiton and limpet radulae (Nesson, Reference Nesson1969; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Webb, Macey and Cohen1986; Okoshi & Ishii, Reference Okoshi and Ishii1996). The concentration of elements, especially iron, determined in these earlier studies compares closely with those established in the present study. A single exception is the radula of Mopalia muscosa, which contains 80 µg of iron per tooth row (Nesson, Reference Nesson1969); eight times higher than the value determined for the chitons in the present study. The reasons for the difference are unclear, as M. muscosa is similar in body size and radula morphology to P. albida (Nesson, Reference Nesson1969).

The difference in the amount of iron in P. albida compared to that of A. hirtosa is likely due to differences in the distribution of this element within the major lateral teeth of these two species. In P. albida, magnetite covers the posterior cutting face of the cusp and coats the anterior tooth surface, thus enveloping the tooth's limonite/lepidocrocite core (Figure 2). In A. hirtosa, the extent of magnetite coverage is primarily limited to the cutting face of the cusp and the apatitic calcium phosphate core region contains no iron (Macey et al., Reference Macey, Brooker, Webb and St Pierre1996; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Brooker, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2003a). Similarly, the low amount of iron observed in the limpet Patelloida alticostata is likely to derive from its reliance on the iron oxide goethite with silica in the form of hydrated amorphous opal to strengthen and cushion its teeth (Runham et al., Reference Runham, Thornton, Shaw and Wayte1969; Lowenstam, Reference Lowenstam1971; Mann et al., Reference Mann, Perry, Webb, Luke and Williams1986; Liddiard et al., Reference Liddiard, Hockridge, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2004).

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic representation of cross-sections through the posterior cutting surface and tooth core, showing the distribution of magnetite in (A) Acanthopleura hirtosa; (B) Plaxiphora albida; and goethite and silica in (C) Patelloida alticostata. (Adapted from Liddiard et al. (Reference Liddiard, Hockridge, Macey, Webb and van Bronswijk2004).)

The process of biomineralization in chiton and limpet teeth continues to draw interest within the emerging fields of biomimetics and nanotechnology, with the ultimate aim of controlling the formation of nanocomposite structures. One of the remaining objectives in this discipline is to elucidate the mechanisms that control the cellular transport and deposition of ions responsible for tooth mineralization. Such studies will require an accurate understanding of the demand for elemental precursors in radula mineralization in order to facilitate accurate dosing with reagents for molecular and immunological studies. In addition, an understanding of the physiological demand for iron in radula synthesis may assist further studies pertaining to the supply of this element, which is likely to be derived from a combination of sources, such as algae, substratum, seawater and even tooth recycling.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the TAFE Fremantle Maritime Centre for the allocation of space for this study. We are grateful to Garth Maker and Mark Maddern who assisted in animal collections. Special appreciation to Professor Kenji Okoshi and Edward Stockdale for their valuable advice and time. Financial support was provided by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant. All experiments conducted during the study comply with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 7th edition 2004.

References

REFERENCES

Black, R., Fisher, K., Hill, A. and McShane, P. (1979) Physical and biological conditions on a steep intertidal gradient at Rottnest Island, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 4, 6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R., Lymbery, A. and Hill, A. (1988) Form and function: size of radular teeth and inorganic content of faeces in a guild of grazing molluscs at Rottnest Island, Western Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 121, 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, R.C. (1989) Mechanical wear of radula denticle caps of Acanthopleura granulata (Gmelin, 1791) (Polyplacophora: Chitonidae). American Malacological Bulletin 7, 1319.Google Scholar
Isarankura, K. and Runham, N.W. (1968) Studies on the replacement of the gastropod radula. Malacologia 7, 7191.Google Scholar
Kim, K.S., Macey, D.J., Webb, J. and Mann, S. (1989) Iron mineralization in the radula teeth of the chiton Acanthopleura hirtosa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 237, 335346.Google Scholar
Kim, K.S., Webb, J., Macey, D.J. and Cohen, D.D. (1986) Compositional changes during biomineralization of the radula of the chiton Clavarizona hirtosa. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 28, 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A.P., Brooker, L.R., Macey, D.J., Webb, J. and van Bronswijk, W. (2003a) A new biomineral identified in the cores of teeth from the chiton Plaxiphora albida. Journal of Biological and Inorganic Chemistry 8, 256262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A.P., Brooker, L.R., van Bronswijk, W., Macey, D.J. and Webb, J. (2003b) Contribution of Raman Spectroscopy to identification of biominerals present in teeth of Acanthopleura rehderi, Acanthopleura curtisiana, and Onithochiton quercinus. Biopolymers (Biospectroscopy) 72, 299301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddiard, K.J., Hockridge, J.G., Macey, D.J., Webb, J. and van Bronswijk, W. (2004) Mineralisation in the teeth of limpets Patelloida alticostata and Scutellastra laticostata (Mollusca: Patellogastropoda). Molluscan Research 24, 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstam, H.A. (1962) Goethite in radular teeth of recent marine gastropods. Science 137, 279280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstam, H.A. (1971) Opal precipitation by marine gastropods (Mollusca). Science 171, 487490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstam, H.A. and Weiner, S. (1989) On biomineralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, D.J., Brooker, L.R., Webb, J. and St Pierre, T.G. (1996) Structural organization of the cusps of the radular teeth of the chiton Plaxiphora albida. Acta Zoologica 77, 287294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, D.J., Webb, J. and Brooker, L.R. (1994) The structure and synthesis of biominerals in chiton teeth. Bulletin de l'Institut Oce´anographique 14, 191197.Google Scholar
Mann, S., Perry, C.C., Webb, J., Luke, B. and Williams, R.J.P. (1986) Structure morphology composition and organization of biogenic minerals in limpet teeth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 227, 179190.Google Scholar
McDaniel, W. (1991) Sample preparation procedure for spectrochemical determination of total recoverable elements in biological tissues. Revision 1.0. In Method 200: 3, vol. Method 200.3 Ohio: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Nesson, M.H. (1969) Studies on radula tooth mineralization in the Polyplacophora. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.Google Scholar
Okoshi, K. and Ishii, T. (1996) Concentrations of elements in the radular teeth of limpets, chitons and other marine mollusks. Journal of Marine Biotechnology 3, 252257.Google Scholar
Padilla, D.K. (1985) Structural resistance of algae to herbivores. Marine Biology 90, 103109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, D.K., Dittman, D.E., Franz, J. and Sladek, R. (1996) Radula production rates in two species of Lacuna Turton (gastropoda: Littorinidae). Journal of Molluscan Studies 62, 275280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattiaratchi, C., Hegge, B., Gould, J. and Eliot, I. (1997) Impact of sea-breeze activity on nearshore and foreshore processes in southwestern Australia. Continental Shelf Research 17, 15391560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runham, N.W. (1962) Rate of replacement of the molluscan radula. Nature 194, 992993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runham, N.W. (1963) A study of the replacement mechanism of the pulmonate radula. Quarterly Journal of Microscopial Science 104, 271277.Google Scholar
Runham, N.W. and Isarankura, K. (1966) Studies on radula replacement. Malacologia 5, 73.Google Scholar
Runham, N.W., Thornton, P.R., Shaw, D.A. and Wayte, R.C. (1969) The mineralization and hardness of the radular teeth of the limpet Patella vulgata L. Zeitschrift f¨r Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 99, 608626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, J.A., Brooker, L.R. and Macey, D.J. (2002) Radular tooth turnover in the chiton Acanthopleura hirtosa (Blainville, 1825) (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Molluscan Research 22, 9399.Google Scholar
Steneck, R.N. and Watling, L. (1982) Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivorous molluscs: a functional group approach. Marine Biology 68, 299319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, P., Giesen, H. and Videler, J. (2000) Radular teeth as models for the improvement of industrial cutting devices. Materials Science and Engineering C: Biomimetic Materials, Sensors and Systems 7, 129142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Radula production rates for Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata. Points represent the number of tooth rows produced after a cold-shock treatment. Data and regression lines have been justified through time zero to account for post-shock effects.

Figure 1

Table 1. Data (±1 SE) for Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata maintained within an artificial habitat after a cold-shock treatment.

Figure 2

Table 2. Composition and daily requirement of elements for the process of radula formation in Acanthopleura hirtosa, Plaxiphora albida and Patelloida alticostata.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Diagrammatic representation of cross-sections through the posterior cutting surface and tooth core, showing the distribution of magnetite in (A) Acanthopleura hirtosa; (B) Plaxiphora albida; and goethite and silica in (C) Patelloida alticostata. (Adapted from Liddiard et al. (2004).)