Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-v2ckm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T22:41:54.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary investigation on the phytoplankton contribution to the mussel diet on the basis of fatty acids analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2008

F. Biandolino*
Affiliation:
Institute for Coastal Marine Environment, Section of Taranto, CNR, Via Roma 3, 74100 Taranto, Italy
E. Prato
Affiliation:
Institute for Coastal Marine Environment, Section of Taranto, CNR, Via Roma 3, 74100 Taranto, Italy
C. Caroppo
Affiliation:
Institute for Coastal Marine Environment, Section of Taranto, CNR, Via Roma 3, 74100 Taranto, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F. BiandolinoInstitute for Coastal Marine EnvironmentSection of Taranto CNR, Via Roma 3, 74100 TarantoItaly email: francesca.biandolino@iamc.cnr.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The composition of fatty acids was studied in the mussels collected in the Mar Grande of Taranto (northern Ionian Sea) during the four seasons. Micro-, nano- and picophytoplankton abundance, biomass and composition have been also evaluated. Fatty acids compositions were investigated for lipid biomarkers to establish the contribution of phytoplankton to the mussel diet. Saturated (SAFA) and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) were the most abundant components, followed by polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The seasonal variations in the SAFAs, MUFAs and PUFAs were not significantly different during the whole study period (ANOVA, P < 0.05). The most abundant identified FAs were 16:0 (27.51–33.80% of total FAs), 14:1 (3.35–9.91% of total FAs), 18:1n9 (2.92–8.87%), 16:1 n7 (4.53– 7.61%) and 24:1n9 (0.43–8.84%). The most important PUFAs were 22:2 (2.35–3.48% of total FAs) and also 18:2n-6 (1.66–2.61%). PUFAs were characterized by low percentages of n3 and n6 FAs. Analysis of specific FA markers for diatoms (16:1n7, 20:5n3), phytoflagellates and dinoflagellates (16:0, 18:4n3) showed a negligible contribution of phytoplankton to the mussel diet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

INTRODUCTION

Bivalves are often the dominant suspension-feeders in coastal marine environments and many investigations have focused on the feeding and nutrition of this important group of consumers (Dame, Reference Dame1996). Mussels are reared in highly productive ecosystems where usually they adapt themselves to temporal changes in the seston composition and abundance and filter what is available in the environment. Both the quantity and quality of seston are important determinants of food resources of bivalves and these factors are both highly variable in shallow marine environments. Seston contains a temporally and spatially complex mixture, and many studies indicated that mussels may derive nutrients from dissolved organic matter (Roditi et al., Reference Roditi, Fisher and Sando-Wilhelmy2000), bacteria (Kreeger & Newell, Reference Kreeger and Newell2001), phytoplankton (Ogilvie et al., Reference Ogilvie, Ross, James and Schiel2003; Safi & Gibbs, Reference Safi and Gibbs2003) and a range of zooplankton of different sizes (Davenport et al., Reference Davenport, Smith and Packer2000; Wong et al., Reference Wong, Levinton, Twining and Fisher2003a; Zeldis et al., Reference Zeldis, Robinson, Ross and Hayden2004). Suspension feeding bivalves have phytoplankton as the main component of their diet, in the shallow coastal environment (Shumway et al., Reference Shumway, Selvin and Schick1987; Bricelj & Shumway, Reference Bricelj, Shumway and Shumway1991; Mac Donald & Ward, Reference Mac Donald and Ward1994), and this component includes a variety of species differing in cell size, shape and other structural features. This important food source can be associated to changes in both the quantity and quality that may result from different seasonal change (Bayne, Reference Bayne and Dame1993). In response to this dynamic food environment, many filter feeding organisms have developed a highly selective feeding strategy (Shumway et al., Reference Shumway, Cucci, Newell and Yentsch1985; Prins et al., Reference Prins, Smaal and Pouwer1991; Urrutia et al., Reference Urrutia, Iglesias, Navarro and Prou1996).

There is still a limited understanding of how the relative nutritive contribution of these different dietary items may shift during the year associated with variations in both seston composition and the mussel's physiological condition (Kreeger & Newell, Reference Kreeger and Newell2001). On the other hand, in the coastal and estuarine ecosystems, suspension feeding bivalve populations exert crucial effects on the plankton community by filtering large volumes of water. In this way, mussels severely deplete the phytoplankton by selectively feeding, thus altering the phytoplankton species composition (Officer et al., Reference Officer, Smayda and Mann1982; Dame, Reference Dame1996).

Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, is the dominant commercial species in several Italian mussel farms (FAO, 1989). Studies on the biology and ecology of this mollusc species have been carried out in the Mar Grande of Taranto (Pastore et al., Reference Pastore, Panetta, Andreoli and Dell'Angelo1976; Matarrese et al., Reference Matarrese, Tursi, Costantino and Pollicoro1993), but only a small amount of information is available on its feeding behaviour. The existence of a trophic link between Mytilus galloprovincialis and phytoplankton communities has been evidenced, but not directly quantified. The phytoplankton community represents a key link between primary production and the higher trophic levels.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the specific fatty acid markers available for different groups of primary producers and consumers (Perry et al., Reference Perry, Volkman and Johns1979; Volkman et al., Reference Volkman, Jeffrey, Nichols, Rogers and Garland1989) have been successfully used to identify food sources (Kharlamenko et al., Reference Kharlamenko, Zhukova, Khotimchenko, Svetaschev and Kamenev1995, Reference Kharlamenko, Kiyashko, Imbs and Vyshkvartzev2001). Lipid production by phytoplankton is an important process in aquatic ecosystems because they have a high nutritional value. Their synthesis and accumulation by phytoplankton is a principal source of energy for invertebrates because they supply essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g. Lee et al., Reference Lee, Yoon and Oh1998). Particularly, the fatty acid composition of adult bivalves is affected by the availability and composition of the natural diet (Fernandez-Reiriz et al., Reference Fernanadez-Reiriz, Labarta and Babarro1996; Caers et al., Reference Caers, Coutteau and Sorgeloos2000).

No background data exist about fatty composition and the trophic relationship of Mytilus gallaoprovincialis in Mar Grande of Taranto (Ionian Sea). The main purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) fatty acids composition of M. galloprovincialis; (2) abundance and biomass of phyto- and picophytoplankton considered as the main food source of mussels; and (3) the phytoplankton contribution to the mussel's diet by using the fatty acid trophic markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

The Mar Grande of Taranto extends into the Gulf of Taranto and the Ionian Sea with an average depth of 14.5 m and a total surface area of 36.495 km2. Mar Grande is surrounded by the Cheradi Islands (San Pietro and San Paolo) and connected to the Gulf of Taranto throughout a channel 1.1 km long and 34 m deep. In this area many mussel farm plants are localized.

Sampling strategy

Seawater samples and adult stock of Mytilus galloprovincialis were collected in November 2005 (autumn), February 2006 (winter), May 2006 (spring) and August 2006 (summer) from a mussel culture plan in Mar Grande of Taranto (Figure 1). Seawater was sampled at 0.5 m below the water surface and at 0.5 m above the seabed (around 10 m of depth) by using a 5 l Niskin bottle. All the samples for phytoplankton analysis were stored in 4% buffered formaldehyde.

Fig. 1. Map of the study area with the sampling station in Mar Grande of Taranto.

Phytoplankton and picophytoplankton cell counts

For the estimation of the phytoplankton abundance, water samples were preserved with formaldehyde at a final concentration of 2%. Samples for picophytoplankton (PPP) counts were kept at 4°C until analysis. Micro- and nanophytoplankton samples were observed with an inverted microscope (Labovert FS Leitz) equipped with phase contrast. Depending on the phytoplankton concentrations, sub-samples varying from 50 to 100 ml, were allowed to settle for 24–48 hours and examined according to the Utermöhl (Reference Utermöhl1958) method. PPP cell counts were carried out with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope equipped with a halogen (Hg 100) light. A BP 450/490 exciter filter, an FT 510 chromatic beam splitter and an LP 520 barrier filter were used. Under blue light excitation, phycoerithrin-rich Synechococcus is easily distinguishable by the intense orange fluorescence, whereas eukaryotic picoalgae had deep red fluorescence. Duplicate slides were prepared from each sample by filtering 10 ml of seawater on 0.2 µm Millipore black (Maugeri et al., Reference Maugeri, Acosta Pomar and Bruni1990). At least, for each preparation, 40 microscopic fields were counted at × 1000.

Phytoplankton biomass

Phytoplankton carbon content was estimated by assuming 45 g carbon g chlorophyll a –1 (Welschmeyer & Lorenzen, Reference Welschmeyer and Lorenzen1984). Chlorophyll-a was determined by the Parsons et al. (Reference Parsons, Maita and Lalli1984) spectrophotometric method. Phytoplankton chlorophyll-a to carbon estimates were assumed to vary by ±50% considering the wide range of values reported by Welschmeyer & Lorenzen (Reference Welschmeyer and Lorenzen1984), Hunter & Laws (Reference Hunter and Laws1981) and Caron et al. (Reference Caron, Dam, Kremer, Lessard, Madin, Malone, Napp, Peele, Roman and Youngbluth1995).

Picophytoplankton biomass

For picophytoplankton biovolume evaluation, two morphological types were considered: spheroid and ellipsoid. According to Sieracki et al. (Reference Sieracki, Viles and Webb1989), the formula V = π/6W2 L, where L and W are cell length and width, was applied. PPP was successively turned into biomass on the basis of the abundance, geometric cell volume and carbon content of 220 fg C μm−3 (Søndergaard et al., Reference Søndergaard, Jensen and Ærtebjerg1991).

Sample preparation for fatty acid analysis

Animal specimens (40.57±7.11 mm in shell length and 8.36 g ±1.8 wet weight), after collection, were immediately carried to the laboratory and placed in running filtered seawater (~20 hours) for gut content clearance, then stored by freezing at −20°C until analyses. Three sub-sets of mussels, each comprising ten animals, were taken at random. The soft tissues of the individuals of each sub-sample were cleaned thoroughly in filtered seawater, chopped in small pieces and homogenized. The homogenized samples were used for the lipid extraction by following a slightly modified version of the Folch et al. (Reference Folch, Lees and Sloane-Stanley1957) method. Briefly, 0.5–1 g of each sample was homogenized with 1.1% NaCl, total lipids were extracted by using a solvent mixture of chloroform–methanol (2:1, v/v). The chloroform layer, containing dissolved lipids, after its washing with 0.88% potassium chloride, was collected and transferred to small glass vials.

Fatty acids analysis

A fraction of the total lipid extract was transferred to a 10 ml glass vial and the solvent was evaporated under a steam of nitrogen gas. Methyl esters of fatty acids (FAMEs) were prepared by transesterification with boron trifluoride catalysed methanol and benzene solution (1:2 v/v) at 90°C for 20 minutes. When the methylation had finished, 2 ml of distilled water was added to the mixture (Allinger et al., Reference Allinger, Cava, De Jough, Johnson, Lebel and Stevens1986). The upper phase containing the fatty acids was transferred to gas chromatograph (GC) vials. Analysis of fatty acid methyl esters was carried out on a HP 6890 series gas chromatograph equipped with an Omegawax 250 fused silica capillary column (Supelco, Bellefonte, USA) and a flame ionization detector. Splitless injection of 1 µl was performed. The column temperature programme was as follows: from 150 to 250°C at 4°C/minute and maintained at 250°C. The helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow of 1 ml/minute. Fatty acid methyl esters were identified by comparison with retention time of fatty acids standards (FAME mix, Supelco, USA) and the results were expressed as percentages of the total lipid (%).

Trophic markers

Based on the fatty acid composition, a variety of trophic markers and ratios were determined to obtain information on the phytoplankton contribution and feeding behaviour of mussels. PUFAs indicate organic matter derived from fresh phytoplankton (Volkman et al., Reference Volkman, Jeffrey, Nichols, Rogers and Garland1989) while detritus is rich in saturated fatty acids (SAFAs) (Fahl & Kattner, Reference Fahl and Kattner1993). The PUFA/MUFA and PUFA/SAFA ratios have been considered to be a measure of phytoplankton level in the mussel diet. 16:1n7 and 20:5n3 FAs are considered to be indicators of a diatom-based diet (Volkman et al., Reference Volkman, Jeffrey, Nichols, Rogers and Garland1989; Dunstan et al., Reference Dunstan, Volkman, Barrett, Leroi and Jeffrey1994; Kharlamenko et al., Reference Kharlamenko, Zhukova, Khotimchenko, Svetaschev and Kamenev1995), also the ratio of 16:1n7 to 16:0 has been used to discriminate between diatom feeding versus phytoflagellate feeding (Claustre et al., Reference Claustre, Marty, Cassiani and Dagaud1989; Cripps et al., Reference Cripps, Watkins, Hill and Atkinson1999; Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Mooney, Nichols and Phleger2001; Auel et al., Reference Auel, Harjes, da Rocha, Stübing and Hagen2002). This is due to the fact that diatoms are rich in 16:1n7 (Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Nichols and Sullivan1993; Dunstan et al., Reference Dunstan, Volkman, Barrett, Leroi and Jeffrey1994), while phytoflagellates contain higher levels of 16:0 (Sargent & Whittle, Reference Sargent, Whittle and Longhurst1981; Virtue et al., Reference Virtue, Nichols, Nicol, McMinn and Sikes1993). The fatty acid 18:4n3 is usually used as a dinoflagellate marker (Mansour et al., Reference Mansour, Volkman, Jackson and Blackburn1999) and 18:1n7 as a bacteria marker (Perry et al., Reference Perry, Volkman and Johns1979; Gillan & Johns, Reference Gillan, Johns and Johns1986; Kharlamenko et al., Reference Kharlamenko, Zhukova, Khotimchenko, Svetaschev and Kamenev1995). Finally, the ratio of the n3 and n6 polyunsaturated-fatty-acid fractions, was utilized as an indicator of the nutritive value of microalgae (Molina et al., Reference Molina, Martínez, Sánchez, García and Contreras1991).

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on phytoplankton data in order to establish if depth had a significant effect on abundance, biomass and community composition (diatoms, dinoflagellates, coccolithophorids and phytoflagellates). Furthermore, the percentage of the biomarkers and fatty acid ratios in all seasons were also compared. Correlation analysis was performed to test the relationship between each phytoplankton group (diatoms, dinoflagellates and phytoflagellates) and their relative biomarkers. All the statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS software at 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Phytoplankton abundance, biomass and composition

Analysis of variance showed that phytoplankton abundances, biomass and community composition (diatoms, dinoflagellates, coccolithophorids and phytoflagellates) were not statistically different between the surface and bottom layers (Table 1). The seasonal trend of the phytoplankton abundances and biomass in Mar Grande was characterized by significantly higher values in winter and by minimum values in autumn (Figure 2).

Fig. 2. Seasonal trends of the phytoplankton abundances (cells × 104 l−1) and biomass (µg C l−1) in Mar Grande of Taranto. Data are reported as average + standard deviations (bars) of the surface and bottom layers.

Table 1. Statistical summary from one-way ANOVA comparing the surface and bottom phytoplankton data (ns, not significant).

The phytoplankton communities consisted mainly of nano-sized phytoflagellates and diatoms whereas dinoflagellates and coccolithophorids never dominated the community, accounting for only negligible abundances and percentage values (Figure 3). Particularly, phytoflagellates (77.9±2.1%) and dinoflagellates (15.6±2.9%), reached their higher abundance percentages in spring, diatoms in winter (88.0±3.4%), and coccolithophorids in autumn (2.5±3.5%).

Fig. 3. Seasonal trends in percentage abundances of phytoplankton groups in Mar Grande of Taranto. Data are reported as average of the surface and bottom layers.

Picophytoplankton abundance, biomass and composition

Analysis of variance showed that picophytoplankton (PPP) abundances and biomass were not statistically different between the surface and bottom layers (Table 1). The seasonal abundance trend of PPP showed the annual highest values in winter (Figure 4). The biomass distribution (Figure 4) was similar to the abundance one: standing crop distribution was stable throughout the year, except for a slight increase of the values during winter.

Fig. 4. Seasonal trends of the picophytoplankton abundances (cells × 104 ml−1) and biomass (µg C l−1) in Mar Grande of Taranto. Data are reported as average + standard deviations (bars) of the surface and bottom layers.

From a qualitative point of view, intense orange fluorescent round to rod-shaped cells of Synechococcus type accounted for 98% of the total PPP abundances. Red fluorescent cells, to be presumably referred to eukaryotic picophytoplankton, were recorded during the winter period, but their presence was negligible.

Fatty acids composition

A total of 19 fatty acids (FAs) have been identified and their seasonal variation is shown in Table 2. The saturated fatty acids (SAFAs) were predominant in all seasons with a minimum percentage of 46.51% in spring and a maximum of 53.44% in summer. The major SAFAs identified include the 16:0 (with a range 27.51–33.80%) followed by 18:0 (6.05–9.25% of total FAs) and 14:0 (5.68–8.19% of total FAs). Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) varied between 34.14% in winter and 40.18% in spring and showed higher levels of 14:1 (3.35–9.91% of total FAs), 18:1n9 (2.92–8.87%), 20:1n9 (4.66–6.27%), 16:1 n7 (4.53–7.61%) and 24:1n9 (0.43–8.84%). Finally, the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were characterized by percentages between 11.20% in summer and 13.36% in spring. The most important PUFAs were 22:2 (2.35–3.48% of total FAs) and also 18:2n-6 (1.66–2.61%). PUFAs showed low percentages of n3 and n6.

Table 2. Percentages of fatty acids profiles.

Trophic markers

Table 3 shows the summary statistics from ANOVAs comparing the content of selected fatty acids, which are used as trophic markers, among seasons. The seasonal variations in the SAFAs, MUFAs and PUFAs were not significantly different during the whole study period (ANOVA, P > 0.05). ANOVA showed the existence of significant differences among seasons for n3/n6 ratio (ANOVA, P < 0.001) and 16:1n7/16:0 ratio (ANOVA, P < 0.01). The percentage of the sum of 16:1n7 + 20:5n3 was significantly different among seasons (ANOVA, P < 0.05).

Table 3. Statistical summary from one-way ANOVA comparing the percentages of FAs and FAs ratios among all seasons (ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Relative contributions (% of total FAs) of diatoms, dinoflagellates and bacteria fatty acid markers, during the whole period of study are shown in Figure 5. There were significant differences among seasons in diatoms and dinoflagellate markers, but no significant differences were observed for bacteria markers. The mean percentage of 16:1n7 and 18:4n3 were significantly higher in spring. The ratios of PUFA/MUFA, PUFA/SAFA, n3/n6 PUFAs, 16:1n7/16:0 are shown in Figure 6.

Fig. 5. Fatty acids markers (% of total FAs): a–b, diatoms; c, dinoflagellates. Values are mean ±SD (N = 3).

Fig. 6. PUFA/MUFA, PUFA/SAFA, n3/n6 PUFAs, 18:1 n7 in the tissues of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Values are mean ±SD (N = 3).

Correlation analysis between each phytoplankton group (diatoms, dinoflagellates and phytoflagellates) and their relative biomarkers, revealed that the only significant correlation has been found between phytoflagellates and 16:0 (r = 0.84, P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The structural diversity of fatty acids synthesized by marine microalgae and their relative stability allow their use as trophic markers. Specific fatty acids (or combinations) can be associated with particular phytoplankton classes (Claustre et al., Reference Claustre, Marty, Cassiani and Dagaud1989). Previous studies have been focused on their importance as trophic biomarkers for transfer through marine food chains and especially in bivalve molluscs (Joseph, Reference Joseph1982; Voogt, Reference Voogt and Hochachka1983; Sargent et al., Reference Sargent, Bell, Henderson and Tocher1990; Bradshaw et al., Reference Bradshaw, O'Hara, Corner and Eglinton1991). In marine invertebrates and in molluscs in particular, the fatty acids composition is characterized by high levels of two polyunsaturated acids: 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 (Sargent, Reference Sargent, Malins and Sargent1976; Joseph, Reference Joseph1982). This pattern reflects the nature of the ingested food represented by phytoplankton that constitutes the first step of the marine food chain. In the Mar Grande of Taranto, Mytilus galloprovincialis showed a low amount (or were not detected) of these polyunsaturated fatty acids during the whole period of study. This could be explained by the features of the Mar Grande, considered as an oligotrophic ecosystem of the entire northern Ionian Sea (Caroppo et al., Reference Caroppo, Stabili, Aresta, Corinaldesi and Danovaro2006a) where phytoplankton did not reach high values both in terms of abundance and biomass, except for the winter period. Futhermore, the communities collected during our study could be considered as the result of the presence of a rich commercial mussel fishery. It is well known that molluscs may exert a significant control on the phytoplankton population. The filter feeding activity of the bivalve population effectively prevents the occurrence of phytoplankton bloom and may be considered as a natural control on eutrophication (Cloern, Reference Cloern1982; Officer et al., Reference Officer, Smayda and Mann1982). The impact of commercial quantities of filter feeding molluscs as a force regulating the phytoplankton densities cannot be ignored, as in other Apulian sites devoted to the mussel culture (Caroppo, Reference Caroppo2000).

The abundance and biomass phytoplankton values found in these waters seemed to confirm the oligotrophic feature of this area. Furthermore, the phytoplankton data observed in the Mar Grande were comparable to those observed in other Mediterranean sites (Fonda Umani et al., Reference Fonda Umani, Franco, Ghirardelli, Malej, Colombo, Ferrari, Ceccherelli and Rossi1992; Caroppo et al., Reference Caroppo, Fiocca, Sammarco and Magazzù1999; Socal et al., Reference Socal, Boldrin, Bianchi, Civitarese, De Lazzari, Rabitti, Totti and Turchetto1999). As regards picophytoplankton, they were of the same order of magnitude as those reported in other coastal environments (Vanucci et al., Reference Vanucci, Acosta Pomar and Maugeri1994; Acosta Pomar & Giuffrè, Reference Acosta Pomar and Giuffrè1996; Caroppo et al., Reference Caroppo, Turicchia and Margheri2006b).

The PUFA 20:5n3 and the MUFA 16:1n7 predominate in diatoms (Volkman et al., Reference Volkman, Jeffrey, Nichols, Rogers and Garland1989; Dunstan et al., Reference Dunstan, Volkman, Barrett, Leroi and Jeffrey1994) for which they are often used as a marker (Kharlamenko et al., Reference Kharlamenko, Zhukova, Khotimchenko, Svetaschev and Kamenev1995).

In this study the higher percentage of 16:1n7 during the spring period suggested that diatoms, dominant during the previous winter period, contributed to the bivalve diet. Comparison of the relative contribution of diatom markers (20:5n3+16:1n7) among seasons indicates that they were significantly highest in the spring period. Diatoms reached in the column water their higher abundance and biomass in the previous winter period. Particularly, diatoms were represented by the micro-sized species, which were the most important contributors of the total phytoplankton biomass. The most represented diatoms genera were Chaetoceros, Coscinodiscus, Cylindrotheca, Leptocylindrus, Nitzschia, Pseudo-nitzschia and Skeletonema. Previous studies indicate that diatoms are a major dietary component of bivalves (Shumway et al., Reference Shumway, Selvin and Schick1987; Beninger & Decottignies, Reference Beninger and Decottignies2005) and are often used in mussel culture for their nutritional value (Brown et al., Reference Brown, Jeffrey, Volkman and Dunstan1997; Renaud et al., Reference Renaud, Thinh and Parry1999).

The fatty acid profile of M. galloprovincialis showed a considerable contribution of SAFA in their tissues during all seasons, PUFA was the less abundant category. This contrasts with previously published data in other species of bivalves, such as Chlamys islandica (Bell & Sargent, Reference Bell and Sargent1985) and Pecten maximus (Besnard, Reference Besnard1988), in which PUFA were the major fatty acids measured, therefore indicating that phytoplankton is the main feeding source in these species. Rodhouse et al. (Reference Rodhouse, Roden, Burnell, Hensey, McMahon, Ottway and Ryan1984) evidenced also the importance of organic detritus as an energy source for mussels during periods of scarce primary productivity. In this study the major FAs proportion, during all year, was due primarily to the high percentage of SAFA and MUFA. Previous studies reported that detrital material is rich in SAFA and MUFA fatty acids between 14 and 18 carbon atoms (Freites et al., Reference Freites, Fernández-Reiriz and Labarta2002) but also SAFA of 14 and 16 carbons indicate bacterial flora associated to detritus (Perry et al., Reference Perry, Volkman and Johns1979). On the other hand Graeve et al. (Reference Graeve, Hagen and Kattner1994) state that elevated amounts of short-chain, such as 14:0 and 16:0 fatty acids, indicate omnivorous feeding.

The ratio of 16:1n7 to 16:0 has been utilized as flagellate markers; in marine invertebrates, the introduction of flagellates to food, determine a significant decrease in this ratio as also observed by Claustre et al. (Reference Claustre, Marty, Cassiani and Dagaud1989). This could be explained taking into account the role of phytoflagellates to the phytoplankton physiognomy in Mar Grande, where they represented the most conspicuous group, such as in other oligotrophic ecosystems. Nano-sized phytoflagellates, in fact are considered as a ‘bioindicator’ of the oligotrophic ecosystems (Vilicic et al., Reference Vilicic, Leder, Grzetic and Jasprica1995). Also among phytoflagellates there are many species with elevated content of fatty acids (Albentosa et al., Reference Albentosa, Pérez-Camacho, Labarta and Fernández-Reiriz1996; Brown et al., Reference Brown, Jeffrey, Volkman and Dunstan1997; Renaud et al., Reference Renaud, Thinh and Parry1999).

Conway & McDowell Capuzzo (Reference Conway and McDowell Capuzzo1991) reported, for a littoral bivalve Solemya velum containing endosymbiontic chemoautotrophic bacteria, the absence of 20:5 and 22:6 from their fatty acids. On the other hand, they found high contents of n-7 series MUFA indicating bacterial origin and high levels of 20:4n6 which is supposed to have the same function as 20:5 and 22:6.

In our case, 20:4n6 together with 22:2 could be supposed to play the essential role in bivalve metabolism, supporting the hypothesis that bacteria are also important contributors to the mussel diet in the Mar Grande of Taranto. The autotrophic bacterial component, represented mainly by cyanobacteria, contributed only 1.0% of the phytoplankton total biomass. On other the hand, it is known that the food quality of cyanobacteria, in terms of fatty acid composition, is low (Von Elert & Wolffrom, Reference Von Elert and Wolffrom2001). It could be argued that the heterotrophic bacteria represented the main source for the mussels' diet, and particularly for the 20:4n6 together with 22:2 components.

Recent studies have evidenced that also species of micro- and mesozooplankton have been shown to be ingested by suspension marine bivalves (Le Gall et al., Reference Le Gall, Hassen and Le Gall1997; Dupuy et al., Reference Dupuy, Vaquer, Lam-Hoai, Rougier, Mazouni, Lautier, Collos and Le Gall2000; Davenport et al., Reference Davenport, Smith and Packer2000; Lehane & Davenport Reference Lehane and Davenport2002; Wong et al., Reference Wong, Levinton, Twining, Fisher, Kelaher and Alt2003b). An animal dietary input could be evidenced by the relatively high concentration of the fatty acid markers: 18:1 ω 9 and 20:1 ω 9 indicative of zooplankton diet (Knox, Reference Knox1986;. Falk-Petersen et al., Reference Falk-Petersen, Dahl, Scott, Sargent, Gulliksen, Kwasniewski, Hop and Millar2002). These trophic markers during the whole study period, showed their highest level during the summer period, when zooplankton reached their higher abundance values in Mar Grande (Belmonte et al., Reference Belmonte, Fanelli, Gravili and Rubino2001).

Among PUFAs, non-methylene interrupted dienoic (NMID) fatty acids constituted the dominant part. This fatty acid can be related to biosynthetic pathways based on chain elongation and desaturation of n-7 MUFA. Several studies have suggested that in absence of HUFA such as 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 or their precursors, NMID act as a substitute (Zhukova, Reference Zhukova1991; Pond et al., Reference Pond, Bell, Dixon, Fallick, Segonzac and Sargent1998). Whyte (Reference Whyte1988) reported for Crassostrea gigas that the increase of 22:2 coincided with low levels of 20:5n-3 and Klingensmith (Reference Klingensmith1982) reported an inverse relationship between the n-3 PUFAs and NMID fatty acids levels.

In this preliminary step forward about knowledge of food sources of M. galloprovincialis, in Mar Grande of Taranto, we have evaluated the phytoplankton available to mussels, in terms of both quantity and quality and its dynamic as well as the contribution of phytoplankton to diet of mussels. The results evidence that the phytoplankton was not the main food source of M. galloprovincialis but it seems to adopt an omnivorous feeding regime. In the future it would be useful to better quantify the dietary contribution of the complex mixture of natural microparticulate organic material, including phytoplankton, vascular plant detritus, bacteria, heterotrophic nanoflagellates and benthic diatoms. This information could be used to estimate the amount of the nutritional need of mussels. With this information we could construct an overall budget to determine what proportion of each part of seston is utilized by M. galloprovincialis.

References

REFERENCES

Acosta Pomar, M.L. and Giuffrè, G. (1996) Pico-, nano- and microplankton communities in hydrothermal marine coastal environments of the Eolian Islands (Panarea and Vulcano) in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 18, 715730.Google Scholar
Albentosa, M., Pérez-Camacho, A., Labarta, U. and Fernández-Reiriz, M.J. (1996) Evaluation of live microalgal diets for the seed culture of Ruditapes decussatus using physiological and biochemical parameters. Aquaculture 148, 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allinger, N.L., Cava, M.P., De Jough, D.C., Johnson, C.R., Lebel, N.A. and Stevens, C.L. (1986) Chimica organica. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Auel, H., Harjes, M., da Rocha, R., Stübing, D. and Hagen, W. (2002) Lipid biomarkers indicate different ecological niches and trophic relationship of the Arctic hyperiid amphipods Themisto abissorum and T. libellula. Polar Biology 25, 374383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. (1993) Feeding physiology of bivalves: time-dependence and compensation for changes in food availability. In Dame, R.F. (ed.) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes. NATO ASI Series G: Ecological Sciences, Volume 33. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Bell, M.V. and Sargent, J.R. (1985) Fatty acid analysis of phosphoglycerides from tissues of the clam Chlamys islandica (Müller) and the starfish Ctenodiscus crispatus (Retzius) from Balsfjorden, northern Norway. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 58, 825841.Google Scholar
Belmonte, G., Fanelli, G., Gravili, C. and Rubino, F. (2001) Composition, distribution and seasonality of zooplankton in Taranto seas (Ionian Sea, Italy). Biologia Marina Mediterranea 8, 352362.Google Scholar
Beninger, P.G. and Decottignies, P. (2005) What makes diatoms attractive for suspensivores? The organic casing and associated organic molecules of Coscinodiscus perforatus are quality cues for the bivalve Pecten maximus? Journal of Plankton Research 27, 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besnard, J.Y. 1988. Etude des constituents lipidiques dans la gonade femelle et les larves de Pecten maximus L. (Mollusque Lamellibranche). Thése de Doctorat, Université de Caen, France, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, S.A., O'Hara, S.C.M., Corner, E.D.S. and Eglinton, G. (1991) Effects on dietary lipids of marine bivalve Scrobicularia plana feeding in different modes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 71, 635653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricelj, V. and Shumway, S. (1991) Physiology. Energy acquisition and utilization. In Shumway, S. (ed.) Scallops: biology and aquaculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV, pp. 305345.Google Scholar
Brown, M.R., Jeffrey, S.W., Volkman, J.K. and Dunstan, G.A. (1997) Nutritional properties of microalgae for mariculture. Aquaculture 151, 315331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caers, M., Coutteau, P. and Sorgeloos, P. (2000) Impact of starvation and of feeding algal and artificial diets on the lipid content and composition of juvenile oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and clams (Tapes philippinarum). Marine Biology 136, 891899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, D.A., Dam, H.G., Kremer, P., Lessard, E.J., Madin, L.P., Malone, T.C., Napp, J.M., Peele, E.R., Roman, M.R. and Youngbluth, M.J. (1995) The contribution of microorganisms to particulate carbon and nitrogen in surface waters of the Sargasso Sea near Bermuda. Deep-Sea Research 42, 943972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroppo, C. (2000) The contribution of picophytoplankton to community structure in a Mediterranean brackish environment. Journal of Plankton Research 22, 381397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroppo, C., Fiocca, A., Sammarco, P. and Magazzù, G. (1999) Seasonal variations of nutrients and phytoplankton in the coastal SW Adriatic Sea (1995–1997). Botanica Marina 42, 389400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroppo, C., Stabili, L., Aresta, M., Corinaldesi, C. and Danovaro, R. (2006a) Impact of heavy metals and PCBs on marine picoplankton. Environmental Toxicology 21, 541551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caroppo, C., Turicchia, S. and Margheri, M.C. (2006b) Phytoplankton assemblages in coastal waters of the northern Ionian Sea (eastern Mediterranean), with special reference to cyanobacteria. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 927937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claustre, H., Marty, J.C., Cassiani, L. and Dagaud, J. (1989) Fatty acids dynamics in phytoplankton and microzooplankton communities during a spring bloom in the coastal Ligurian Sea: ecological implications. Marine Microbial Food Webs 3, 5166.Google Scholar
Cloern, J.E. (1982) Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in south San Francisco Bay? Marine Ecology Progress Series 9, 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, N. and McDowell Capuzzo, J. (1991) Incorporation and utilization of bacteria lipids in the Solemya velum symbiosis. Marine Biology 108, 277292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, G.C., Watkins, J.L., Hill, H.J. and Atkinson, A. (1999) Fatty acid content of Antarctic krill, Euphasia superba, at South Georgia related to regional populations and variations in diet. Marine Ecology Progress Series 181, 177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dame, R.F. (1996) Ecology of marine bivalves. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, J., Smith, R.J.J.W. and Packer, M. (2000) Mussels Mytilus edulis: significant consumers and destroyers of mesozooplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series 198, 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunstan, G.A., Volkman, J.K., Barrett, S.M., Leroi, J.M. and Jeffrey, S.W. (1994) Essential polyunsaturated fatty acids from 14 species of diatom (Bacillariophyceae). Phytochemistry 35, 155161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, C., Vaquer, A., Lam-Hoai, T., Rougier, C., Mazouni, N., Lautier, J., Collos, Y. and Le Gall, S. (2000) Feeding rate of the oyster Crassostrea gigas in a natural planktonic community of the Mediterranean Thau Lagoon. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205, 171184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahl, K. and Kattner, G. (1993) Lipid content and fatty acid composition of algal communities in sea-ice and water from the Weddell Sea (Antarctica). Polar Biology 13, 405409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk-Petersen, S., Dahl, T.M., Scott, C.L., Sargent, J.R., Gulliksen, B., Kwasniewski, S., Hop, H. and Millar, R.M. (2002) Lipid biomarkers and trophic linkages between ctenophores and copepods in Svalbard waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 227, 187194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (1989) Report of the workshop and study tour on mollusc sanitation and marketing. (http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/AB710E/AB710E00.HTM)Google Scholar
Fernanadez-Reiriz, M.J., Labarta, U. and Babarro, J.M.F. (1996) Comparative allometries in growth and chemical composition of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk) cultured in two zones in the Ria sada (Galicia, NW Spain). Journal of Shellfish Research 15, 349353.Google Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. and Sloane-Stanley, G.H. (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonda Umani, S., Franco, P., Ghirardelli, E. and Malej, A. (1992) Outline of oceanography and the plankton of the Adriatic Sea. In Colombo, G., Ferrari, I., Ceccherelli, V.U. and Rossi, R. (eds) Marine eutrophication and population dynamics. Freensborg: Olsen and Olsen, pp. 347365.Google Scholar
Freites, L., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J. and Labarta, U. (2002) Fatty acid profiles of Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lmk) mussel of subtidal and rocky shore origin. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 132, 453461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillan, F.T. and Johns, R.B. (1986) Chemical markers for marine bacteria: fatty acids and pigments. In Johns, R.B. (ed.) Biological markers in the sedimentary environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher BV, pp. 291309.Google Scholar
Graeve, M., Hagen, W. and Kattner, G. (1994) Herbivorous or omnivorous? On the significance of lipid compositions as trophic markers in Antarctic copepods. Deep-Sea Research 41, 915924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, B.L. and Laws, E.A. (1981) ATP and chlorophyll a as estimators of phytoplankton carbon biomass. Limnology and Oceanography 26, 944956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J.D. (1982) Lipid composition of marine and estuarine invertebrates. Part II: Mollusca. Progress in Lipid Research 22, 109153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharlamenko, V.I., Zhukova, N.V., Khotimchenko, S.V.Svetaschev, V.I. and Kamenev, G.M. (1995) Fatty acids as markers of food sources in shallow-water hydrothermal ecosystems (Kraternaya Bight, Yankich Island, Kurile Islands). Marine Ecology Progress Series 120, 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharlamenko, V.I., Kiyashko, S.I., Imbs, A.B. and Vyshkvartzev, D.I. (2001) Identification of food source of invertebrates from the sea grass Zostera marina community using carbon and sulphur stable isotope ratio and fatty acid analyses. Marine Ecology Progress Series 220, 103117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingensmith, J.S. (1982) Distribution of methylene and non methylene-interrupted dienoic fatty acids in polar lipids and triacylglycerols of selected tissue of the hard-shell clam (Mercenaria mercenaria). Lipids 17, 976981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, G.A. (1986) Estuarine ecosystems: a systems approach. Volume I. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 198.Google Scholar
Kreeger, D.A. and Newell, R.I.E. (2001) Seasonal utilization of different seston carbon sources by the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa (Dillwyn) in a mid-Atlantic salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 260, 7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.J., Yoon, B.D. and Oh, H.M. (1998) Rapid method for the determination of lipid from the green alga Botryococcus braunii. Biotechnology Techniques 12, 553556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Gall, S, Hassen, M.B. and Le Gall, P. (1997) Ingestion of a bacterivorous ciliate by the oyster Crassostrea gigas: protozoa as a trophic link between picoplankton and benthic suspension feeders. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152, 301306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehane, C. and Davenport, J. (2002) Ingestion of mesozooplankton by three species of bivalve: Mytilus edulis, Cerastoderma edule and Aequipecten opercularis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82, 615619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, M.P., Volkman, J.K., Jackson, A.E. and Blackburn, S.I. (1999) The fatty acid and sterol composition of five marine dinoflagellates. Journal of Phycology 35, 710720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matarrese, A., Tursi, A., Costantino, G. and Pollicoro, R. (1993) The reproductive cycle of Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck in the Mar Piccolo and in the Mar Grande of Taranto (Ionian sea). Oebalia 19, 111.Google Scholar
Maugeri, T.L., Acosta Pomar, L. and Bruni, V. (1990) Picoplancton. Nova Thalassia 11, 199205.Google Scholar
Mac Donald, B. and Ward, J. (1994) Variation in food quality and particle selectivity in the sea scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Marine Ecology Progress Series 108, 251264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, E., Martínez, M.E., Sánchez, S., García, F. and Contreras, A. (1991) Growth and biochemical composition with emphasis on the fatty acids of Tetraselmis sp. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 36, 2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M.M., Mooney, B.D., Nichols, P.D. and Phleger, C.F. (2001) Lipids of Antarctic amphipods: food chain interactions and the occurrence of novel biomarkers. Marine Chemistry 73, 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, D.S., Nichols, P.D. and Sullivan, C.W. (1993) Fatty acid, strol and hydrocarbon composition of Antarctic sea ice diatom communities during the spring bloom in McMurdo Sound. Antarctic Science 5, 271278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, C.B., Smayda, T.J. and Mann, R. (1982) Benthic filter feeding: a natural eutrophication control. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 9 (2), 203210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S.C., Ross, A.H., James, M.R. and Schiel, D.R. (2003) In situ enclosure experiments on the influence of cultivated mussels (Perna caniliculus) on phytoplankton at times of high and low ambient nitrogen. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 295, 2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y. and Lalli, C.M. (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 173.Google Scholar
Pastore, M., Panetta, P., Andreoli, C. and Dell'Angelo, B. (1976) Accrescimento di Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lam.) nei mari di Taranto. Oebalia 2, 2061.Google Scholar
Perry, G.J., Volkman, J.K. and Johns, Jr R.B. (1979) Fatty acids of bacterial origin in contemporary marine sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 43, 17151725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, D.P., Bell, M.V., Dixon, D.R., Fallick, A.E., Segonzac, M. and Sargent, J. (1998) Stable-carbon-isotope composition of fatty acids in hydrothermal vent mussels containing methano-trophic and thiotrophic bacterial endosymbionts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64, 370375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prins, T.C., Smaal, A.C. and Pouwer, A.J. (1991) Selective ingestion of phytoplankton by the bivalves Mytilus edulis L. and Cerastoderma edule (L.). Hydrobiological Bulletin 25, 93100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaud, S.M., Thinh, L.V. and Parry, D.L. (1999) The gross chemical composition and fatty acid composition of 18 species of tropical Australian microalgae for possible use in mariculture. Aquaculture 170, 147159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhouse, P.G., Roden, C.M., Burnell, G.M., Hensey, M.P., McMahon, T., Ottway, B. and Ryan, T.H. (1984) Food resource, gametogenesis and growth of Mytilus edulis on the shore and in suspended culture: Killary Harbour, Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 64, 513529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roditi, H.A., Fisher, N.S. and Sando-Wilhelmy, S.A. (2000) Uptake of dissolved organic carbon and trace elements by zebra mussels. Nature 407, 7880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safi, K.A. and Gibbs, M.M. (2003) The importance of different size classes of phytoplankton in Beatrix Bay, Pelorus Sound and the potential implications for the aquaculture of the mussel Perna canaliculus. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37, 267272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, J.R. (1976) The structure, metabolism and function of lipids in marine organisms. In Malins, D.C. and Sargent, J.R. (eds.) Biochemical and biophysical perspectives in marine biology. London: Academic Press vol. III, pp. 149212.Google Scholar
Sargent, J.R. and Whittle, K.J. (1981) Lipids and hydrocarbons in the marine food web. In Longhurst, A. (ed.) Analysis of marine ecosystems. Academic Press: London, pp. 491533.Google Scholar
Sargent, J.R., Bell, M.V., Henderson, R.J. and Tocher, D.R. (1990) Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the marine and terrestrial food webs. In Animal Nutrition and transport processes. Part I. Nutrition in wild and domestic animals 5, 1123.Google Scholar
Shumway, S., Cucci, T., Newell, R. and Yentsch, C. (1985) Particle selection, ingestion, and absorption in filter-feeding bivalves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 91, 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, S.E., Selvin, R. and Schick, D.F. (1987) Food resources related to habitat in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin, 1791): a qualitative study. Journal of Shellfish Research 6, 8995.Google Scholar
Sieracki, M.E., Viles, C.L. and Webb, K.L. (1989) Algorithm to estimate cell biovolume using image analyzed microscopy. Cytometry 10, 551557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Socal, G., Boldrin, A., Bianchi, F., Civitarese, G., De Lazzari, A., Rabitti, S., Totti, C. and Turchetto, M. (1999) Nutrient, particulate matter and phytoplankton variability in the photic layer of the Otranto strait. Journal of Marine Systems 20, 381398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Søndergaard, M., Jensen, L.M. and Ærtebjerg, G. (1991) Picoalgae in Danish coastal waters during summer stratification. Marine Ecology Progress Series 79, 139149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urrutia, M.B., Iglesias, J.I.P., Navarro, E. and Prou, J. (1996) Feeding and absorption in Cerastoderma edule under environmental conditions in the bay of Marennes-Oleron (Western France). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76, 431450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utermöhl, H. (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilungen Internationale Vereins Theoretisch Angewiesen Limnologie 9, 138.Google Scholar
Vanucci, S., Acosta Pomar, M.L.C. and Maugeri, T.L. (1994) Seasonal pattern and phototrophic picoplankton in the eutrophic coastal waters of the Northern Adriatic Sea. Botanica Marina 37, 5766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilicic, D., Leder, N., Grzetic, Z. and Jasprica, N. (1995) Microphytoplankton in the Strait of Otranto (eastern Mediterranean). Marine Biology 123, 619630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtue, P., Nichols, P.D., Nicol, S., McMinn, A. and Sikes, E.L. (1993) The lipid composition of Euphasia superba Dana in relation to the nutritional value of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim. Antarctic Science 5, 169177.Google Scholar
Volkman, J.K., Jeffrey, S.W., Nichols, P.D., Rogers, G.I. and Garland, C.D. (1989) Fatty acid and lipid composition of 10 species of microalgae used in mariculture. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 128, 219240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Elert, E. and Wolffrom, T. (2001) Supplementation of cyanobacterial food with polyunsaturated fatty acids does not improve growth of Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography 46, 15521558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voogt, P.A. (1983) Lipids: their distribution and metabolism. In Hochachka, P.W. (ed.) The Mollusca. I. New York: Academic Press, pp. 329370.Google Scholar
Welschmeyer, N.A. and Lorenzen, C.J. (1984) Carbon-14 labelling of phytoplankton carbon and chlorophyll a carbon: determination of specific growth rates. Limnology and Oceanography 29, 135145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, J.N.C. (1988) Fatty acid profiles from direct methanolysis of lipids in tissue of cultured species. Acquaculture 75, 193203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.H., Levinton, J.S., Twining, B.S. and Fisher, N.S. (2003a) Assimilation of micro- and mesozooplankton by zebra mussels: a demonstration of the food web link between zooplankton and benthic suspension feeders. Limnology and Oceanography 48, 308312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.H., Levinton, J.S., Twining, B.S., Fisher, N.S., Kelaher, B.P. and Alt, A.K. (2003b) Carbon assimilation from rotifer Brachionus plicatilis by mussels, Mytilus edulis and Perna viridis: a potential food web link between zooplankton and benthic suspension feeders in the marine system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253, 175182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldis, J., Robinson, K., Ross, A. and Hayden, B. (2004) First observations of predation by New Zealand greenshell mussels (Perna canaliculus) on zooplankton. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 311, 287299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhukova, N.V. (1991) The pathway of the biosynthesis of non-methylene-interrupted dienoic fatty acids in molluscs. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 100B, 801804.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the study area with the sampling station in Mar Grande of Taranto.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Seasonal trends of the phytoplankton abundances (cells × 104 l−1) and biomass (µg C l−1) in Mar Grande of Taranto. Data are reported as average + standard deviations (bars) of the surface and bottom layers.

Figure 2

Table 1. Statistical summary from one-way ANOVA comparing the surface and bottom phytoplankton data (ns, not significant).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Seasonal trends in percentage abundances of phytoplankton groups in Mar Grande of Taranto. Data are reported as average of the surface and bottom layers.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Seasonal trends of the picophytoplankton abundances (cells × 104 ml−1) and biomass (µg C l−1) in Mar Grande of Taranto. Data are reported as average + standard deviations (bars) of the surface and bottom layers.

Figure 5

Table 2. Percentages of fatty acids profiles.

Figure 6

Table 3. Statistical summary from one-way ANOVA comparing the percentages of FAs and FAs ratios among all seasons (ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Fatty acids markers (% of total FAs): a–b, diatoms; c, dinoflagellates. Values are mean ±SD (N = 3).

Figure 8

Fig. 6. PUFA/MUFA, PUFA/SAFA, n3/n6 PUFAs, 18:1 n7 in the tissues of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Values are mean ±SD (N = 3).