Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-sk4tg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T02:53:20.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the diet and reproduction of the oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus (Perciformes: Gempylidae) in the eastern Mediterranean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2010

P. Vasilakopoulos*
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine Biological Resources, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, P.O. Box 2214, Iraklion, 71003, Greece Department of Biology, University of Crete, Vassilika Vouton, Iraklion, 71409, Greece
M. Pavlidis
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Crete, Vassilika Vouton, Iraklion, 71409, Greece
G. Tserpes
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine Biological Resources, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, P.O. Box 2214, Iraklion, 71003, Greece
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P. Vasilakopoulos, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, UK email: p.vasilakopoulos@abdn.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The oilfish, Ruvettus pretiosus, is an incidental by-catch of the drifting surface longlines targeting swordfish and Thunnidae in the Mediterranean and elsewhere. Despite its global distribution and frequent occurrence in the catch of many fishing gears, little is known about its biology. In this study we examined the dietary preferences and reproductive biology of this species from specimens caught in the eastern Mediterranean. The most numerous and frequently occurring prey items were benthopelagic fish, followed by cephalopods. The sex-ratio was highly skewed in favour of females (1:8.4), while histological examination of the collected ovaries displayed six developmental stages (perinucleolar, early and late lipid stage; early, middle and late vitellogenesis). Oocyte diameter ranged from 23–69 μm at the perinucleolar stage to 224–366 μm at the late vitellogenesis stage. Spawning is expected to occur during mid and late summer; however there were no individuals available from this period. The findings are discussed in relation to the ecology of the species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

INTRODUCTION

The family Gempylidae belongs to the suborder Scombroidei and consists of 16 genera and 23 species, distributed mainly in tropical and temperate seas (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993). The oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus (Cocco, 1829) belongs to the monotypic genus Ruvettus and is a benthopelagic species widely distributed throughout the tropical and temperate waters of the world's oceans (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993; Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001). It is also the only gempylid found in the Mediterranean (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993). Ruvettus pretiosus is the largest representative of the family reaching 2 m in length and over 50 kg in weight; however, individuals under 150 cm and 30 kg in weight are more common (Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001).

Oilfish individuals dwell over the continental slope and seamounts mainly at depths from 100 to 700 m (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993), reaching depths of more than 1000 m (Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001). At night, parts of the species populations perform feeding vertical migrations to the epipelagic zone (Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001).

Fisheries activity targeting R. pretiosus is performed in only a few marine areas of the Indo-Pacific mainly by small scale fishing fleets using handlines (Gudger, Reference Gudger1928; Stobbs & Bruton, Reference Stobbs and Bruton1991; Koslow et al., Reference Koslow, Boehlert, Gordon, Haedrich, Lorance and Parin2000). However, oilfish specimens also appear as an incidental by-catch in numerous drifting surface longline fisheries targeting Thunnidae and swordfish: in the Indo-Pacific (e.g. He et al., Reference He, Bigelow and Boggs1997; Francis et al., Reference Francis, Griggs and Baud2004; Bromhead et al., Reference Bromhead, Ackerman, Graham, Wight, Wise and Findlay2005), in the Atlantic (e.g. Castro et al., Reference Castro, de la Serna, Macías and Mejuto2000; Mejuto et al., Reference Mejuto, García-Cortés and de la Serna2002) and in the Mediterranean (e.g. Castro et al., Reference Castro, de la Serna, Macías and Mejuto2000; Mejuto et al., Reference Mejuto, García-Cortés and de la Serna2002; Tserpes et al., Reference Tserpes, Tatamanidis and Peristeraki2006; Peristeraki et al., Reference Peristeraki, Kypraios, Lazarakis and Tserpes2007). In the eastern Mediterranean, R. pretiosus is the second most abundant species caught by drifting surface longline fleets targeting swordfish both in terms of weight and in terms of frequency, but it is still not often caught; Peristeraki et al. (Reference Peristeraki, Kypraios, Lazarakis and Tserpes2007) report a catch per unit of effort of 1.7 individuals/1000 hooks. Moreover, the species comprises an incidental by-catch of demersal longline and gill net fisheries targeting hake in the north-eastern Atlantic (Erzini et al., Reference Erzini, Goncalves, Bentes, Lino and Ribeiro2001; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Gaspar, Monteiro and Vasconcelos2002) and it is also occasionally caught by other gears such as demersal trawls (Elbaraasi et al., Reference Elbaraasi, Elmariami, Elmeghrabi and Omar2007) and purse seines (Romanov, Reference Romanov2002).

Despite its cosmopolitan distribution and appearance as by-catch in a broad range of marine areas, published information about the biology of R. pretiosus is very scarce. The majority of the studies conducted concern biochemical analyses (e.g. Cox & Reid Reference Cox and Reid1932; Nevenzel et al., Reference Nevenzel, Rodegker and Mead1965; Nevenzel, Reference Nevenzel1970; Bone, Reference Bone1972; Ruiz-Guttierez et al., Reference Ruiz-Gutierrez, Perez-Zarza, Muriana and Bravo1997; Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Mooney and Elliott2001) revealing very high lipid concentrations—mainly in the form of wax esters—in oilfish tissues; hence the common name of the species. As a result, oilfish flesh has purgative properties if eaten in large quantities (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993; Shadbolt et al., Reference Shadbolt, Kirk and Roche2002; Leask et al., Reference Leask, Yankos and Ferson2004). Other studies describe some morphological characteristics of the species (Gudger & Mowbray, Reference Gudger and Mowbray1927; Bone, Reference Bone1972; Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993) and provide information about its spatial and vertical distribution (e.g. Gudger, Reference Gudger1928; Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001; Tserpes et al., Reference Tserpes, Tatamanidis and Peristeraki2006; Damalas & Megalofonou, Reference Damalas and Megalofonou2007) and behaviour (Bone, Reference Bone1972; Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001).

To our knowledge there are no systematic studies on the diet and reproduction of the species. There are a few studies where some stomach contents have been reported, including fish, cephalopods and crustaceans (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993; Yamamura, Reference Yamamura1997; Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001); while sex and maturity status were identified in a few specimens by Pakhorukov & Boltachev (Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001). In this study we investigate the diet and we provide for the first time data on the reproductive maturity of R. pretiosus in the eastern Mediterranean, from specimens caught by the Greek fishing fleets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

During the period from October 2007 to July 2008, 50 Ruvettus pretiosus specimens caught by Greek fishing boats targeting swordfish (Xiphias gladius) or hake (Merluccius merluccius) were collected and examined. The fishing gears used were respectively drifting surface longlines or demersal longlines. The specimens were caught in the Cretan Sea, the central Aegean Sea and the Levantine Sea (Figure 1).

Fig. 1. Map of the eastern Mediterranean showing the marine areas from where oilfish specimens were sampled. (1) Cretan Sea; (2) Central Aegean Sea; (3) Levantine Sea.

Drifting surface longlines operated in the open sea, fishing at depths of 10–20 m from the surface during the night. This time period coincides with the vertical migrations of R. pretiosus specimens to the epipelagic zone (Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001). Demersal longlines operated close to the sea bottom (depths 250–550 m) during the whole day, in areas with mostly muddy substrates and gentle slopes which form a suitable habitat for R. pretiosus (Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001). In both fishing gears, the baits used were a variety of fish and cephalopod species.

The specimens of R. pretiosus were collected either on-board (eight specimens) or from landings (42 specimens). In the first case, total length (TL) and head length (HL) were measured, sex was identified, gonad samples were stored in 3.7% buffered formalin and stomachs were stored in deep freeze (–20oC) for later laboratory analysis. In the case of the specimens sampled from landings, only the head, gonads and stomachs were kept in deep freeze (–20oC) by the fishermen, since those body parts were removed on-board and they would be otherwise discarded. Deep frozen heads, gonads and stomachs supplied by the fishermen were transferred to deep freezing facilities ashore for later laboratory analysis. In the laboratory, deep frozen gonads were thawed, sex was identified and gonad samples were stored in 3.7% buffered formalin for later histological analysis. Preserving the stomachs in deep freezing conditions prior to the stomach content analysis (e.g. Chancollon et al., Reference Chancollon, Pusineri and Ridoux2006; Potier et al., Reference Potier, Marsac, Cherel, Lucas, Sabatié, Maury and Ménard2007) aimed to minimize the decrease in quality of the stomach contents and it also allowed identification and measurements of prey items to take place in a controlled environment.

Since the majority of oilfish came from landings—hence no TLs were available—we transformed the HLs to TLs by constructing a TL–HL equation using data from the eight specimens collected on-board for this study and from two other specimens caught in the Mediterranean which were described in the literature (Bettoso & Dulcic, Reference Bettoso and Dulcić1999; Elbaraasi et al., Reference Elbaraasi, Elmariami, Elmeghrabi and Omar2007).

Sex identification was possible in 47 out of 50 specimens, as in three cases the gonads were not supplied by the fishermen. The sex-ratio of the specimens caught with surface and demersal longlines was statistically compared to a 1:1 ratio using a Chi-square (χ2) analysis.

Stomach content analysis

In order to study the diet of R. pretiosus, deep frozen stomachs were thawed in the laboratory, the number of intact empty and full (those containing at least one trophic object) stomachs was counted and stomach content analysis was performed in the latter ones. Only 30 out of the 50 specimens caught had an intact stomach; the remaining 20 stomachs were partially or fully ripped by the fishermen's handling.

Two methods of stomach content analysis were used: percentage numerical abundance and percentage occurrence (Hyslop, Reference Hyslop1980; Hernandez-Garcia, Reference Hernandez-Garcia1995; Chancollon et al., Reference Chancollon, Pusineri and Ridoux2006). A coefficient of prey numerical frequency, %No = (Ni/ Nt) × 100, and a coefficient of prey occurrence frequency, %O = (Nsi/Nsf) × 100 were calculated; where Ni was the number of prey of trophic group i, Nt was the total number of prey estimated as the smallest number from which all fragments could have originated (Cortez et al., Reference Cortez, Castro and Guerra1995), Nsi was the number of stomachs containing each group i, and Nsf was the total number of stomachs containing food, each stomach being counted as many times as the number of different types of prey it contained (Cortez et al., Reference Cortez, Castro and Guerra1995). An index of prey numerical importance (Castro & Santana del Pino, Reference Castro and Santana del Pino1995; Hernandez-Garcia, Reference Hernandez-Garcia1995) was also obtained as %I = (%No × %O)1/2 × 100.

Histological analysis

For the study of the reproduction of R. pretiosus, the gonads from 47 specimens (42 females and 5 males) were examined histologically. Pieces of gonad tissues were dehydrated, cleared in xylol and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were made and stained with Mayer's haematoxylin and eosin Y (Clark, Reference Clark1981).

The ovaries were classified in a total of six histological stages and the testes were classified in two histological stages. Histological scoring in females was according to the maturation stage of the most advanced type of oocytes observed (West, Reference West1990). The diameters of at least 100 oocytes from each stage sectioned through their nucleus were measured in order to calculate the average oocyte diameter in each stage. Oocyte diameters were measured in sections coming from gonad samples collected on board except from the last two histological stages where only deep frozen gonads were available.

RESULTS

Total length–head length equation

The TL–HL equation constructed for Ruvettus pretiosus (Figure 2) was derived from data on a range of head lengths between 25.0 and 44.5 cm. While, as mentioned, only 10 points were used, the range of these head lengths covered the range of all specimens of this study. Based on this equation all head lengths were transformed to total lengths.

Fig. 2. Total length (TL)–head length (HL) relationship for Ruvettus pretiosus.

Stomach fullness

A high percentage (63.3%) of the specimens examined had empty stomachs. All the specimens caught by surface longline and 52.0% of the specimens caught by demersal longline had empty stomachs (Table 1).

Table 1. Number of empty and full oilfish stomachs caught by different fishing gears.

Empty, no stomach contents; full, at least one trophic object.

Stomach contents analysis

The diet of R. pretiosus consisted mainly of fish and cephalopods (Table 2). At least 13 distinct specimens of teleost fish were recorded, thus teleosts were the most important item both by number (61.9%) and occurrence (60.0%). Many fish remnants consisted of single spines, spinal columns and scales and, therefore, could not be attributed to specific species due to extended digestion. No otoliths were detected. Species that could be identified were Merluccius merluccius (Gadiformes, Merluciidae) (4 fish), Lepidopus caudatus (Perciformes, Trichiuridae), Conger conger (Anguilliformes, Congridae) and a macrourid specimen. Two chondricthyan eggs were also found in one stomach.

Table 2. Comparison of the dietary importance of the major forage categories observed in oilfish stomachs. Data are given in terms of numerical frequency (%N), frequency of occurrence (%O) and index of numerical importance (%I).

C.E., chondricthyan eggs.

At least six distinct specimens of cephalopods were detected. These were recorded in 33.3% of the stomachs sampled and represented 28.6% of the total trophic objects. In most cases only the beaks and eye lenses remained in the stomachs except in one case where the remnants allowed the identification of an individual belonging to the genus Todarodes.

Sex-ratio

Ruvettus pretiosus was found to be a gonochoristic species and no signs of intermediate or sex reversed gonads were observed. Testes had a lighter colour (white) than ovaries (pink) and had distinctive sperm ducts on both lobes.

Sex was identified in 47 specimens. Of the 47 fish sexed, 42 (89.4%) were female and five (10.6%) were male. The overall ratio of males to females was 1:8.4 (Table 3). This ratio was 1:2.5 for fish caught with surface longline while it was 1:12.3 for fish caught with demersal longline (Table 3). The sex-ratio of specimens coming from the surface longline did not differ significantly from 1:1 (χ2 = 0.075; df = 1; P = 0.784), however the sample was small. On the contrary, the sex-ratio of specimens caught with demersal longline differed significantly from 1:1 (χ2 = 15.622; df = 1; P < 0.001).

Table 3. Sex of the specimens sampled by each fishing gear.

Reproductive biology

FEMALES

Regarding the macroscopic morphology of R. pretiosus female gonads, from October to February (Table 4) ovarian lobes were large, flaccid and bared a large cavity; hence they were characterized as ‘spent’ (West, Reference West1990). Gonads from specimens caught from April to June were more firm and robust. There was neither difference in the morphology or weight between the two lobes nor difference between the maturity stage of the oocytes coming from the posterior, middle and anterior parts of the lobe.

Table 4. Sampling period, individual total length derived from head length, sex and most advanced oocyte stage (females) or spermatogenetic stage (males).

N/A, no histological analysis performed due to poor gonad condition.

At the histological sections, all the oocytes appeared positioned on ovigerous lamellae of connective tissue. Since there had been no previous histological staging of the oocytes in R. pretiosus, within this study six maturity stages were characterized.

Primary developmental stage

Perinucleolar stage: (oocyte diameter range: 23–9 µm, average: 44 µm) (Figure 3A, B): the perinucleolar-stage oocytes were polyedric with a high nucleus:cytoplasm ratio. During this stage large lipid droplets occurred in the cytoplasm. The nucleus displayed a small number (1–3) of nucleoli and there was intense ooplasm basophily.

Fig. 3. Micrographs of sections (5 µm) of Ruvettus pretiosus ovaries displaying oocytes at different stages of development. Stain: haematoxylin and eosin. (A) Oocytes at perinucleolar and early lipid stage; (B) oocytes at perinucleolar, early lipid stage and late lipid stage showing differences in lipid dispersal among stages; (C) oocytes at late lipid and early vitellogenesis stage; (D) oocyte at middle vitellogenesis stage with yolk globules and a thick zona radiata; (E) oocyte at late vitellogenesis stage with large yolk globules which have covered the whole ooplasm; (F) oocytes at early lipid, late lipid, early vitellogenesis and middle vitellogenesis stage. P, perinucleolar stage; EL, early lipid stage; LL, late lipid stage; EV, early vitellogenesis stage; MV, middle vitellogenesis stage; l, lipids; n, nucleus; ct, connective tissue; bv, blood vessel; yg, yolk granules; ygl, yolk globules; zr, zona radiata; fc, follicle cells. Scale bars = 100 µm (A–E); 200 µm (F).

Early lipid stage: (oocyte diameter range: 54–97 µm, average: 70 µm) (Figure 3B): the oocytes classified at the early lipid stage exhibited a distinct area with lipids in their ooplasm close to the nucleus. At this stage the oocytes appeared larger due to an increase of the ooplasm and they had more nucleoli (5–7) adjoining the nuclear envelope.

Late lipid stage: (oocyte diameter range: 68–161 µm, average: 106 µm) (Figure 3B, C). At this stage, the lipid droplets which were previously concentrated in a distinct area close to the nucleus spread into the ooplasm encircling the nucleus. The ooplasm grew in size and became less basophilic while the size of the nucleoli reduced and their number increased.

Secondary developmental stage

Early vitellogenesis stage: (oocyte diameter range: 102–194 µm, average: 140 µm) (Figure 3C). At this stage an acidophilic zone began to emerge at the periphery of the ooplasm which was formed by small acidophilic granules (yolk granules). In addition, a thin acidophilic zona radiata appeared around the ooplasm and it was encircled by follicle cells. The lipids of the ooplasm continued to increase in size, reducing its basophily.

Middle vitellogenesis stage: (oocyte diameter range: 169–272 µm, average: 211 µm) (Figure 3D). At the middle vitellogenesis stage the acidophilic yolk globules had been formed and they appeared at the periphery of the ooplasm, while the basophily of the ooplasm was further reduced due to an increase of lipid concentration. The lipid droplets were visible only at the area around the nucleus which was the only area that had not been filled with yolk globules. At this stage, the oocyte size increased significantly and zona radiata appeared thicker.

Late vitellogenesis stage: (oocyte diameter range: 224–366 µm, average: 290 µm) (Figure 3E). The oocytes at this advanced stage of vitellogenesis displayed a great increase in both size and number of acidophilic yolk globules which covered the entire ooplasm. The oocyte size increased and zona radiata appeared thicker.

Within this study it was not possible to collect individuals possessing gonads at more advanced maturity stages (i.e. nucleus migratory stage, pre-hydrated stage and hydrated stage). Furthermore, apart from the earlier described oocytes, some atretic forms were also observed.

MALES

Histological examination of the five male specimens showed that the individual caught in early February had spent gonads, while the four sampled between late February and April were in the spermiogenic phase (Table 4), bearing seminiferous tubules where most stages of sperm development were visible (spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatozoa) (Figure 4).

Fig. 4. Seminiferous tubules of a male Ruvettus pretiosus at spermiogenic phase (bar = 50 µm). Stain: haematoxylin and eosin. Section: 5 µm. CT, connective tissue; SG, spermatogonium; SC, spermatocytes; SZ, spermatozoa.

DISCUSSION

The frequency of empty stomachs observed in Ruvettus pretiosus specimens in this study (63.3%) is very large compared to that typically observed in other carnivorous large pelagic Scombroidei such as swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and albacore (Thunnus alalunga), in the same Mediterranean area (Peristeraki & Tserpes, Reference Peristeraki, Tserpes and Tsimenides2001) or in other marine regions (Chancollon et al., Reference Chancollon, Pusineri and Ridoux2006; Potier et al., Reference Potier, Marsac, Cherel, Lucas, Sabatié, Maury and Ménard2007). The frequency of empty stomachs in the above mentioned studies is usually less than 20%. This is probably a result of the species less active mode of life (Bone, Reference Bone1972; Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001) or might be also related to the significant amount of stored energy (Arrington et al., Reference Arrington, Winemiller, Loftus and Akin2002) illustrated by the high concentration of lipids (especially wax esters) in oilfish tissues (Nevenzel et al., Reference Nevenzel, Rodegker and Mead1965; Bone, Reference Bone1972; Ruiz-Guttierez et al., Reference Ruiz-Gutierrez, Perez-Zarza, Muriana and Bravo1997; Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Mooney and Elliott2001). Pakhorukov & Boltachev (Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001) also have reported that only part of the species population performs nocturnal vertical trophic migrations, while the rest remains close to the sea bottom. Furthermore, they observed predatory activity in both epipelagic and benthopelagic zones. In the current study, empty stomachs were observed in all specimens caught in the epipelagic zone, while this was the case for only about half of the specimens caught by demersal longlines at depths between 250 and 550 m (Table 1). In the latter specimens, benthic and benthopelagic preys were identified in the non-empty stomachs. Consequently, it can be speculated that the individuals performing nocturnal vertical trophic migrations—which are very energetically demanding since the nocturnal feeding habitats might occur several hundred meters higher than the diurnal habitats—are generally those that were not able to cover their dietary needs in the benthopelagic zone. However, the small number of specimens sampled from the epipelagic zone does not allow us to conclude on such a hypothesis. Pakhorukov & Boltachev (Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001) also reported mesopelagic prey items in the stomachs of R. pretiosus specimens caught by mesopelagic trawls during the night. In the current study such prey items were not identified, since all specimens caught by surface longlines had empty stomachs.

Stomach content analysis showed that R. pretiosus specimens in the eastern Mediterranean are mostly ichthyophagous (Table 2) consuming also cephalopods, similarly to many other gempylid species (Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993). Those findings are in agreement with fishermen's claims that oilfish are better caught on hooks baited with fish rather than squids. Nakamura & Parin (Reference Nakamura and Parin1993) also include crustaceans among the prey items of R. pretiosus. However, no crustacean remains were identified in the stomachs analysed within the current study.

Sex has been macroscopically identified and classified as ‘male’ or ‘female’ in R. pretiosus specimens in previous studies (Gudger & Mowbray, Reference Gudger and Mowbray1927; Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001), but this is the first time according to our knowledge that the gonochoristic reproductive strategy of the species is confirmed by histological methods. Gonochoristic reproductive strategy has been also observed in all other benthopelagic and mesopelagic gempylid species (Rowling & Reid, Reference Rowling and Reid1992; Nakamura & Parin, Reference Nakamura and Parin1993; Lorenzo & Pajuelo, Reference Lorenzo and Pajuelo1999; Griffiths, Reference Griffiths2002) investigated to date.

The higher abundance of female oilfish specimens caught by demersal longlines in depths from 250 to 550 m (Table 3) could be attributed to differences in the bathymetric distribution between males and females. Lorenzo & Pajuelo (Reference Lorenzo and Pajuelo1999) reported that the sex-ratio in roudi escolar Promethichthys prometheus—another gempylid species with similar ecology to that of the oilfish—varied between 1:6.5 to 1:5.3 in favour of females in depths of 200–500 m, while being 1:0.63 to 1:0.37 in favour of males in depths of 600–900 m. In addition, Griffiths (Reference Griffiths2002) in his study on snoek (Thyrsites atun)—another benthopelagic gempylid species—observed in many areas more females in inshore shallow waters and more males in offshore deep waters during the spawning season. Griffiths (Reference Griffiths2002) attributed this distribution pattern to metabolic processes, i.e. easier access to trophic resources for females during the energetically demanding spawning season. The above mentioned studies support the assumption that there may be different bathymetric distributions for male and female R. pretiosus specimens. This difference could also explain why the clearly unbalanced sex-ratio of specimens caught in the benthic zone does not seem to exist when considering the oilfish caught in the epipelagic zone; specimens of both genders are expected to forage close to the surface at night when they are not able to cover their dietary needs in the benthic zone. This difference in bathymetric distribution could be attributed to energetic reasons, as proposed by Griffiths (Reference Griffiths2002) for snoek. As Lorenzo & Pajuelo (Reference Lorenzo and Pajuelo1999) also proposed for roudi escolar, the observed space partitioning between sexes, which makes females more accessible to demersal longline fisheries than males, could potentially make oilfish populations more vulnerable to unrestrained fishing compared to species without this characteristic.

During the winter period (October–February) the most advanced oocytes in all but one female were at the late lipid stage, i.e. resting stage (Table 4) (Forberg, Reference Forberg1982). The first specimens with early vitellogenetic oocytes appear in April while during May and June the oocytes reach the middle and late vitellogenesis stages (Table 4). According to those results we can assume that the reproductive period occurs during the summer months, possibly peaking around July/August. A similar reproductive period has been observed for roudi escolar (Lorenzo & Pajuelo, Reference Lorenzo and Pajuelo1999).

During the period from May to September, cooperating fishermen tend to switch their fishing effort from the benthic to the epipelagic zone, thus limiting the availability of R. pretiosus specimens from their diurnal habitats. In addition, during July–August the presence of R. pretiosus specimens in surface longlines in the studied area is lower (Vasilakopoulos et al., Reference Vasilakopoulos, Tzanatos and Tserpes2009), suggesting that the species may perform migrations in specific spawning grounds. Therefore, within the current study we were unable to collect specimens from the period of July to September to identify the oocyte maturation stages.

The presence in oilfish ovaries of oocytes from many different developmental stages during May to June (Figure 3F) indicates that the species is a multiple spawner with either asynchronous or group-synchronous oocyte development pattern. The exact type of oocyte development pattern has to be confirmed in the future by checking the oocyte diameter distribution in specimens closer to the spawning time (Murua & Saborido-Rey, Reference Murua and Saborido-Rey2003). Nevertheless, histological studies on other gempylid and also trichiurid and scombrid species have shown that the asynchronous pattern generally prevails among those fish (Martins & Haimovici, Reference Martins and Haimovici2000; Griffiths, Reference Griffiths2002; Murua & Saborido-Rey, Reference Murua and Saborido-Rey2003; Abascal & Medina, Reference Abascal and Medina2005).

The oocyte maturity stages that we identified within the current study generally agree with the classification suggested by Corriero et al. (Reference Corriero, Desantis, Deflorio, Acone, Bridges, De La Serna, Megalofonou and De Metrio2003) for bluefin tuna. The only differences are in regard to the division of the lipid stage into two stages instead of one and the division of the vitellogenetic into three stages rather than two. The latter categorization has been also proposed for the amberjack (Seriola dumerili) (Grau et al., Reference Grau, Crespo, Riera, Pou and Carmen Sarasquete1996).

A distinctive morphological characteristic of the oilfish oocytes is the presence of several lipid droplets as early as the perinucleolar stage. Several perinucleolar oocytes also displayed a large lipid droplet with similar size to that of the nucleus (Figure 3A). In most other large pelagic species the accumulation of lipids in the ooplasm commences later; during the lipid/previtellogenic stage (Grau et al., Reference Grau, Crespo, Riera, Pou and Carmen Sarasquete1996; Arocha, Reference Arocha2002; Corriero et al., Reference Corriero, Desantis, Deflorio, Acone, Bridges, De La Serna, Megalofonou and De Metrio2003). The reason for this early and intense accumulation of lipids in the species oocytes is unknown but it might be related to the particularly high presence of lipids in all its tissues (Nevenzel et al., Reference Nevenzel, Rodegker and Mead1965; Bone, Reference Bone1972; Ruiz-Guttierez et al., Reference Ruiz-Gutierrez, Perez-Zarza, Muriana and Bravo1997; Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Mooney and Elliott2001).

Another significant characteristic of the species oocytes is their relatively small size, indicating that oifish spawn pelagic eggs. Comparing the oocyte size calculated for R. pretiosus in our study with the oocyte size of other large pelagic or benthopelagic species that also produce pelagic eggs, the inferior size of the former is obvious (Table 5). Even if we take into account the small shrinkage of the oocytes during the preparation of the histological sections (West, Reference West1990), R. pretiosus is expected to spawn eggs with a diameter of about 1 mm at most. It is also noted that diameters of middle and late vitellogenetic oocytes were measured in histological sections of initially deep frozen gonads sampled from landings. Deep freeze tends to increase oocyte size (Klibansky & Juanes, Reference Klibansky and Juanes2007), therefore oocyte diameters of middle and late vitellogenetic oocytes might be slightly overestimated. However, no obvious differences in oocyte size were observed in the earlier maturity stages between gonads sampled on-board and from landings, therefore this could be also the case for middle and late vitellogenetic oocytes.

Table 5. Oocyte diameters as measured in histological sections at early and late vitellogenesis and hydration stage for some large pelagic and benthopelagic species with pelagic eggs.

N/A, not available.

The relatively small egg size of the oilfish compared to other large pelagic and benthopelagic species could be balanced by a possible higher caloric value due to the high presence of lipids that we observed (Kamler, Reference Kamler2005). Spawning great numbers of small-sized eggs can be attributed to an evolutionary pressure such as great and stochastic egg/larvae mortality (Kolm & Ahnesjo, Reference Kolm and Ahnesjo2005) which could be related to the fact that oilfish possibly spawn in depths of several hundred metres, as observed for other gempylids with similar ecology (Lorenzo & Pajuelo, Reference Lorenzo and Pajuelo1999), and its fry occurs in the surface layers (Shcherbachev et al., Reference Shcherbachev, Parin, Pakhorukov and Piotrovskii1986 in Pakhorukov & Boltachev, Reference Pakhorukov and Boltachev2001). Therefore, small egg size probably serves the quicker dispersal and movement to the epipelagic zone and is related to the high mortality that the eggs/larvae are expected to experience. It is also noted that egg diameters of approximately 1 mm or smaller are typically observed in small bathypelagic species (Marshall, Reference Marshall1953).

Finally, the histological examination of the species male gonads showed that they resemble those of other phylogenetically related large pelagic species, such as the swordfish (Corriero et al., Reference Corriero, Desantis, Bridges, Kime, Megalofonou, Santamaria, Cirillo, Ventriglia, Di Summa, Deflorio, Campobasso and De Metrio2007), since generally spermatogenesis is highly conserved among the different fish species (Nobrega et al., Reference Nóbrega, Batlouni and Franca2009). In addition, we observed mature male specimens much earlier in the year than the expected spawning period, which is in accordance with results obtained for other Scombroidei such as swordfish (Young et al., Reference Young, Drake, Brickhill, Farley and Carter2003) and Pacific bluefin tuna (Sawada et al., Reference Sawada, Seoka, Kato, Tamura, Nakatani, Hayashi, Okada, Tose, Miyashita, Murata and Kumai2007).

In general, biological studies for fish species that are not targeted by some specialized fisheries but appear only as incidental by-catches are difficult to conduct due to the low availability and/or quality of samples. In this study, the small number of individuals caught during the on-board sampling forced us to use landed specimens for which TL was indirectly estimated from the available HL measurements. This however did not affect stomach content and gonad analysis and the information provided clarifies some basic biological aspects of a poorly studied species. Such information could potentially have a higher significance for fisheries in the future as the overexploitation of traditional fish stocks worldwide leads to increasing interest in new fisheries resources; both by profiting better from the by-catches and by switching fishing effort to deeper waters (Pieiro et al., Reference Pieiro, Casas and Baón2001). Experimental fishing targeting R. pretiosus that would focus on collecting specimens from the species diurnal and nocturnal habitats throughout the year could contribute further valuable information about the species diet and reproduction, in addition to other biological and ecological aspects such as growth and distribution.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the captains and the crews of the fishing vessels ‘Fountoulakis’ and ‘Popi’ for their assistance in sample collection. Many thanks also to P. Peristeraki and Dr S. Somarakis for their advice on the stomach content analysis and oocyte staging respectively, and to L. McPherson and Dr E. Tzanatos for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Thanks are also due to an anonymous referee for providing valuable comments and suggestions. This study has been carried out with the financial assistance of the European Commission, in the frames of the STREP Project ‘EFIMAS’ (Contract No. SSP8-CT-2003-502516). P.V. was also supported by a scholarship from the Greek Public Welfare Foundation ‘Propondis’.

References

REFERENCES

Abascal, F.J. and Medina, A. (2005) Ultrastructure of oogenesis in the bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus. Journal of Morphology 264, 149160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arocha, F. (2002) Oocyte development and maturity classification of swordfish from the north-western Atlantic. Journal of Fish Biology 60, 1327.Google Scholar
Arrington, D.A., Winemiller, K.O., Loftus, W.F. and Akin, S. (2002) How often do fishes ‘run on empty’? Ecology 83, 21452151.Google Scholar
Bettoso, N. and Dulcić, J. (1999) First record of the oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus (Pisces, Gempylidae) in the northern Adriatic Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 11451146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, Q. (1972) Buoyancy and hydrodynamic functions of integument in the castor oil fish, Ruvettus pretiosus (Pisces, Gempylidae). Copeia 1972, 7887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromhead, D., Ackerman, J., Graham, S., Wight, M., Wise, B. and Findlay, J. (2005) Byproduct: catch, economics and co-occurrence in Australia's pelagic longline fisheries. 1st Meeting of the Scientific Committee of the Western Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, WCPFC–SC1, Noumea, New Caledonia, 8–19 August 2005, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Castro, J.J. and Santana del Pino, A. (1995) Feeding preferences of Scomber japonicus in the Canary Islands area. Scientia Marina 59, 325333.Google Scholar
Castro, J., de la Serna, J.M., Macías, D. and Mejuto, J. (2000) Estimaciones científicas de los desembarcos de especies asociadas realizados por la flota española de palangre de superficie en 1997 y 1998. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 51, 18821893.Google Scholar
Chancollon, O., Pusineri, C. and Ridoux, V. (2006) Food and feeding ecology of Northeast Atlantic swordfish (Xiphias gladius) off the Bay of Biscay. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 10751085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. (1981) Staining procedures. 4th edition.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Corriero, A., Desantis, S., Deflorio, M., Acone, F., Bridges, C.R., De La Serna, J.M., Megalofonou, P. and De Metrio, G. (2003) Histological investigation on the ovarian cycle of the bluefin tuna in the western and central Mediterranean. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 108119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corriero, A., Desantis, S., Bridges, C.R., Kime, D.E., Megalofonou, P., Santamaria, N., Cirillo, F., Ventriglia, G., Di Summa, A., Deflorio, M., Campobasso, F. and De Metrio, G. (2007) Germ cell proliferation and apoptosis during different phases of swordfish (Xiphias gladius L.) spermatogenetic cycle. Journal of Fish Biology 70, 8399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortez, T., Castro, B.G. and Guerra, A. (1995) Feeding dynamics of Octopus mimus (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) in northern Chile waters. Marine Biology 123, 497503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W.M. Jr and Reid, E.E. (1932) The chemical composition of oil of Ruvettus pretiosus, the ‘castor oil fish’. Journal of the American Chemical Society 54, 220229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damalas, D. and Megalofonou, P. (2007) By-catches of oilfish (Ruvettus pretiosus, Cocco 1829) in the swordfish longline fishery of the eastern Mediterranean Sea and their association with spatial, temporal and environmental factors. In Proceedings of the 13th Hellenic Congress of Ichthyologists, Mytilene, 27–30 September 2007, pp. 113116.Google Scholar
Elbaraasi, H., Elmariami, M., Elmeghrabi, M. and Omar, S. (2007) First record of oilfish, Ruvettus pretiosus (Actinopterygii, Gempylidae), off the coast of Benghazi, Libya (southern Mediterranean). Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 37, 6769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erzini, K., Goncalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Lino, P.G. and Ribeiro, J. (2001) The hake deepwater semi-pelagic (‘pedra-bola’) longline fishery in the Algarve (southern Portugal). Fisheries Research 51, 327336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forberg, K. (1982) A histological study of development of oocytes in capelin (Mallotus villosus villosus (M)). Journal of Fish Biology 20, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, M.P., Griggs, L.B. and Baud, S.J. (2004) Fish bycatch in New Zealand tuna longline fisheries, 1998–99 to 1999–2000. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2004/22, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Grau, A., Crespo, S., Riera, F., Pou, S. and Carmen Sarasquete, M. (1996) Oogenesis in the amberjack Seriola dumerili (Risso, 1810). A histological, histochemical and ultrastructural study of oocyte development. Scientia Marina 60, 391406.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M.H. (2002) Life history of South African snoek, Thyrsites atun (Pisces, Gempylidae), a pelagic predator of the Benguela ecosystem. Fishery Bulletin 100, 690710.Google Scholar
Gudger, E.W. (1928) The distribution of Ruvettus, the oil fish, throughout the South Seas, as shown by the distribution of the peculiar wooden hook used in its capture. American Naturalist 62, 467477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudger, E.W. and Mowbray, L.L. (1927) The oilfish, Ruvettus pretiosus, at Bermuda. Science 65, 145146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, X., Bigelow, K.A. and Boggs, C.H. (1997) Cluster analysis of longline sets and fishing strategies within the Hawaii-based fishery. Fisheries Research 31, 147158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Garcia, V. (1995) The diet of the swordfish Xiphias gladius Linnaeus, 1758, in the central east Atlantic, with emphasis on the role of cephalopods. Fishery Bulletin 93, 403411.Google Scholar
Hyslop, E.J. (1980) Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 411429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamler, E. (2005) Parent–egg–progeny relationships in teleost fishes, an energetics perspective. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 15, 399421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klibansky, N. and Juanes, F. (2007) Species-specific effects of four preservative treatments on oocytes and ovarian material of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), and American plaice (Hippoglossoides platessoides). Fishery Bulletin 105, 538547.Google Scholar
Kolm, N. and Ahnesjo, I. (2005) Do egg size and parental care coevolve in fishes? Journal of Fish Biology 66, 14991515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslow, J.A., Boehlert, G.W., Gordon, J.D.M., Haedrich, R.L., Lorance, P. and Parin, N. (2000) Continental slope and deep-sea fisheries, implications for a fragile ecosystem. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 548557.Google Scholar
Leask, A., Yankos, P. and Ferson, M.J. (2004) Fish, so foul! Foodborne illness caused by combined fish histamine and wax ester poisoning. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 28, 8385.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, J.M. and Pajuelo, J.G. (1999) Biology of a deep benthopelagic fish, roudi escolar Promethichthys prometheus (Gempylidae), off the Canary islands. Fishery Bulletin 97, 9299.Google Scholar
Marshall, N.B. (1953) Egg size in Arctic, Antarctic and deep-sea fishes. Evolution 7, 328341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, A.S. and Haimovici, M. (2000) Reproduction of the cutlassfish Trichiurus lepturus in the southern Brazil subtropical convergence ecosystem. Scientia Marina 64, 97105.Google Scholar
Mayer, I., Shackley, S.E. and Ryland, J.S. (1988) Aspects of the reproductive biology of the bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L. I. A histological and histochemical study of oocyte development. Journal of Fish Biology 33, 609622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejuto, J., García-Cortés, B. and de la Serna, J.M. (2002) Preliminary scientific estimations of by-catches landed by the Spanish surface longline fleet in 1999 in the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 54, 11501163.Google Scholar
Murua, H. and Saborido-Rey, F. (2003) Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the north Atlantic. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 33, 2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, I. and Parin, N.V. (1993) FAO species catalogue. Volume 15. Snake mackerels and cutlassfishes of the world (families Gempylidae and Trichiuridae). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the snake mackerels, snoeks, escolars, gemfishes, sackfishes, domine, oilfish,cutlassfishes, scabbardfishes, hairtails, and frostfishes known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125, 136 pp.Google Scholar
Nevenzel, J.C. (1970) Occurrence, function and biosynthesis of wax esters in marine organisms. Lipids 5, 308319.Google Scholar
Nevenzel, J.C., Rodegker, W. and Mead, J.F. (1965) The lipids of Ruvettus pretiosus muscle and liver. Biochemistry 4, 15891594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, P.D., Mooney, B.D. and Elliott, N.G. (2001) Unusually high levels of non-saponifiable lipids in the fishes escolar and rudderfish, identification by gas and thin-layer chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 936, 183191.Google Scholar
Nóbrega, R.H., Batlouni, S.R. and Franca, L.R. (2009) An overview of functional and stereological evaluation of spermatogenesis and germ cell transplantation in fish. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 35, 197206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pakhorukov, N.P. and Boltachev, A.R. (2001) On the distribution and behavior of the oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus (Gempylidae) over seamounts. Journal of Ichthyology 41, 755760.Google Scholar
Peristeraki, P., Kypraios, N., Lazarakis, G. and Tserpes, G. (2007) By-catches and discards of the Greek swordfish fisheries. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 106, 10701073.Google Scholar
Peristeraki, P. and Tserpes, G. (2001) Feeding habits of swordfish (Xiphias gladius L., 1758) in the S. Aegean Sea. In Tsimenides, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th Hellenic Congress of Ichthyologists, Chania, 18–20 October 2001, pp. 2528.Google Scholar
Pieiro, C.G., Casas, M. and Baón, R. (2001) The deep-water fisheries exploited by Spanish fleets in the northeast Atlantic, a review of the current status. Fisheries Research 51, 311320.Google Scholar
Potier, M., Marsac, F., Cherel, Y., Lucas, V., Sabatié, R., Maury, O. and Ménard, F. (2007) Forage fauna in the diet of three large pelagic fishes (lancetfish, swordfish and yellowfin tuna) in the western equatorial Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research 83, 6072.Google Scholar
Romanov, E.V. (2002) Bycatch in the tuna purse-seine fisheries of the western Indian Ocean. Fishery Bulletin 100, 90105.Google Scholar
Rowling, K.R. and Reid, D.D. (1992) Effect of temporal changes in size composition on estimates of von Bertalanffy growth parameters for gemfish, Rexea solandri (Cuvier), Gempylidae. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43, 12291239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Perez-Zarza, M.C., Muriana, F.J.G. and Bravo, L. (1997) Lipid and fatty acid composition of muscle and internal organs from Ruvettus pretiosus. Journal of Fish Biology 50, 13531357.Google Scholar
Santos, M.N., Gaspar, M.B., Monteiro, C.C. and Vasconcelos, P. (2002) Gill net and long-line catch comparisons in a hake fishery, the case of southern Portugal. Scientia Marina 66, 433441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawada, Y., Seoka, M., Kato, K., Tamura, T., Nakatani, M., Hayashi, S., Okada, T., Tose, K., Miyashita, S., Murata, O. and Kumai, H. (2007) Testes maturation of reared pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis at two-plus years old. Fisheries Science 73, 10701077.Google Scholar
Shcherbachev, Y.N., Parin, N.V., Pakhorukov, N.P. and Piotrovskii, A.S. (1986) Meobenthal and mesobenthopelagic fish of some seamounts in the western tropical part of the Indian ocean. Trudy Instituta Okeanologie Akademia Nauk SSSR 121, 195214. In Pakhorukov N.P. and Boltachev A.R. (2001). On the distribution and behavior of the oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus (Gempylidae) over seamounts. Journal of Ichthyology 41, 755–760.Google Scholar
Shadbolt, C., Kirk, M. and Roche, P. (2002) Diarrhoea associated with consumption of escolar (rudderfish). Communicable Diseases Intelligence 26, 436438.Google Scholar
Stobbs, R.E. and Bruton, M.N. (1991) The fishery of the Comoros, with comments on its possible impact on coelacanth survival. Environmental Biology of Fishes 32, 341359.Google Scholar
Tomkiewicz, J., Tybjerg, L. and Jespersen, A. (2003) Micro- and macroscopic characteristics to stage gonadal maturation of female Baltic cod. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 253275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tserpes, G., Tatamanidis, G. and Peristeraki, P. (2006) Oilfish and shark by-catches of the Greek swordfish fishery in the E. Mediterranean, a preliminary analysis applied to ‘presence–absence’ data. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 59, 987991.Google Scholar
Vasilakopoulos, P., Tzanatos, E. and Tserpes, G. (2009) Distribution of Ruvettus pretiosus (Cocco 1829) in the eastern Mediterranean. In Proceedings of the 9th Hellenic Symposium for Oceanography and Fisheries, Patras, 13–16 May 2009, pp. 789794.Google Scholar
West, G. (1990) Methods of assessing ovarian development in fishes, a review. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41, 199222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamura, O. (1997) Scavenging on discarded saury by demersal fishes off Sendai Bay, northern Japan. Journal of Fish Biology 50, 919925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., Drake, A., Brickhill, M., Farley, J. and Carter, T. (2003) Reproductive dynamics of broadbill swordfish, Xiphias gladius, in the domestic longline fishery off eastern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 315332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the eastern Mediterranean showing the marine areas from where oilfish specimens were sampled. (1) Cretan Sea; (2) Central Aegean Sea; (3) Levantine Sea.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Total length (TL)–head length (HL) relationship for Ruvettus pretiosus.

Figure 2

Table 1. Number of empty and full oilfish stomachs caught by different fishing gears.

Figure 3

Table 2. Comparison of the dietary importance of the major forage categories observed in oilfish stomachs. Data are given in terms of numerical frequency (%N), frequency of occurrence (%O) and index of numerical importance (%I).

Figure 4

Table 3. Sex of the specimens sampled by each fishing gear.

Figure 5

Table 4. Sampling period, individual total length derived from head length, sex and most advanced oocyte stage (females) or spermatogenetic stage (males).

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Micrographs of sections (5 µm) of Ruvettus pretiosus ovaries displaying oocytes at different stages of development. Stain: haematoxylin and eosin. (A) Oocytes at perinucleolar and early lipid stage; (B) oocytes at perinucleolar, early lipid stage and late lipid stage showing differences in lipid dispersal among stages; (C) oocytes at late lipid and early vitellogenesis stage; (D) oocyte at middle vitellogenesis stage with yolk globules and a thick zona radiata; (E) oocyte at late vitellogenesis stage with large yolk globules which have covered the whole ooplasm; (F) oocytes at early lipid, late lipid, early vitellogenesis and middle vitellogenesis stage. P, perinucleolar stage; EL, early lipid stage; LL, late lipid stage; EV, early vitellogenesis stage; MV, middle vitellogenesis stage; l, lipids; n, nucleus; ct, connective tissue; bv, blood vessel; yg, yolk granules; ygl, yolk globules; zr, zona radiata; fc, follicle cells. Scale bars = 100 µm (A–E); 200 µm (F).

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Seminiferous tubules of a male Ruvettus pretiosus at spermiogenic phase (bar = 50 µm). Stain: haematoxylin and eosin. Section: 5 µm. CT, connective tissue; SG, spermatogonium; SC, spermatocytes; SZ, spermatozoa.

Figure 8

Table 5. Oocyte diameters as measured in histological sections at early and late vitellogenesis and hydration stage for some large pelagic and benthopelagic species with pelagic eggs.