Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-4tctr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T08:42:41.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The microhabitat and morphology of Grubea cochlear on the gills of mackerel from lyme bay, Southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A.R. Lyndon  and
V.M. Martinez-Vidal
A.R. Lyndon
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4PS
V.M. Martinez-Vidal
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4PS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The microhabitat and morphology of Grubea cochlear (Monogenea), a rare gill parasite of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus), were investigated for a sample of fourteen parasite individuals obtained from Lyme Bay, southern England. Grubea cochlear showed a preference for the inner hemibranch of the fourth gill arch, this localization contrasting with that of the related and sympatric species Kuhnia scombri. The morphology of G. cochlear in this sample differed slightly from some of the previously documented specimens, especially with regard to the number of small genital hooks and the relative size of the haptor. It is suggested that geographical morphological variation may occur in this species.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , August 1994 , pp. 731 - 734
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Holmes, J.C., 1990. Competition, contacts and other factors restricting niches of parasitic helminths. Annales de Parasitologie Humain et Comparée, 65, Supplement 1, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llewellyn, J., Green, J.E. & Kearn, G.C., 1984. A checklist of monogenean (platyhelminth) parasites of Plymouth hosts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 881–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J., Macdonald, S. & Green, J.E., 1980. Host-specificity and speciation in diclidophoran (monogenean) gill parasites of trisopteran (gadoid) fishes at Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, K.M.L., 1992. The effect of host size on large hamuli length of Kuhnia scombri (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) from Eden, New South Wales, Australia. International Journal for Parasitology, 22, 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., 1986. Grubea australis n. sp. (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea) from Scomber australasicus southeastern Australia, and Grubea cochlear Diesing, 1858 from S. scombrus and S. japonicus in the Mediterranean and western Atlantic. Systematic Parasitology, 9, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., 1989. Kuhnia sprostonae Price, 1961 and K. scombercolias Nasir & Fuentes Zambrano, 1983 (Monogenea: Mazocraeidae) and their microhabitats on the gills of Scomber australasicus (Teleostei: Scombridae), and the geographical distribution of seven species of gill Monogenea of Scomber spp. Systematic Parasitology, 14, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., 1991a. Size differences in hamuli of Kuhnia scombri (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) from different geographical areas not due to differences in host size. International Journal for Parasitology, 21, 113–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., 1991b. Intra- and interspecific interactions in low density populations in resource-rich habitats. Oikos, 60, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. & Hobbs, R.P., 1986. Species segregation: competition or reinforcement of reproductive barriers? In Parasite lives. Papers on parasites, their hosts and their associations to honour J.F.A. Sprent (ed. M., Creminet al.), pp. 189–199. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. & Watson, N., 1985a. Morphology and geographical variation of Pseudokuhnia minor n. g., n. comb. (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea). International Journal for Parasitology, 15, 557–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. & Watson, N., 1985b. Morphology, microhabitats and geographical variation of Kuhnia spp. (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea). International Journal for Parasitology, 15, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somdal, O. & Schram, T.A., 1992. Ectoparasites on northeast Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.) from western and North Sea stocks. Sarsia, 77, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproston, N.G., 1946. A synopsis of the monogenetic trematodes. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 25, 185–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E.D., 1975. A left-handed Grubea sp. from the Pacific coast, Baja California, Mexico. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 42, 97–100.Google Scholar
Whittington, I.D. & Kearn, G.C., 1990. A comparative study of the anatomy and behaviour of the oncomiracidia of the related monogenean gill parasites Kuhnia scombri, K. sprostonae and Grubea cochlear from mackerel, Scomber scombrus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar