Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:47:09.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (Amphipoda: Ampithoidae), a new herbivorous amphipod from the Persian Gulf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2016

Yeganeh Layeghi
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Farzaneh Momtazi*
Affiliation:
Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science, Tehran, Iran
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F. Momtazi, Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science, Tehran, Iran email: momtazi.f@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbivorous amphipods of the family Ampithoidae have an important role in marine ecosystems. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. is a new member of Ampithoidae from the Qeshm Island, Persian Gulf. The new species resembles A. kava, A. katae and A. cookana based on the second male gnathopod. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. is characterized by round and reduced distoventral spur on uropod 1 in male, mandibular palp article 3 longer than second one, robust seta on palm of second male gnathopod, and longer flagellum than peduncular article 5 on the second antenna.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

INTRODUCTION

The Ampithoidae are herbivorous amphipods that are vital to the food chain in marine habitats (Grosse et al., Reference Grosse, Pauley and Moran1986; Klumpp et al., Reference Klumpp, Salita-Espinosa and Fortes1992). Tube building behaviour and silk production are also some interesting features of the ampithoids that have been studied by various authors (e.g. Appadoo & Myers, Reference Appadoo and Myers2003).

The genus Ampithoe Leach, Reference Leach1814 is the most speciose genus in the family Ampithoidae with more than 86 species listed in WORMS (Horton et al., Reference Horton, Lowry, De Broyer, Bellan-Santini, Coleman, Daneliya, Dauvin, Fiser, Gasca, Grabowski, Guerra-García, Hendrycks, Holsinger, Hughes, Jaume, Jazdzewski, Just, Kamaltynov, Kim, King, Krapp-Schickel, LeCroy, Lörz, Senna, Serejo, Sket, Tandberg, Thomas, Thurston, Vader, Väinölä, Vonk, White and Zeidler2016). Genus Ampithoe can be distinguished by the absence of the accessory flagellum in antenna 1, notched outer lobes of lower lip, and the spur on the peduncle of uropod 1 absent or reduced and rounded (Poore & Lowry, Reference Poore and Lowry1997).

Previous studies of the family Ampithoidae in the Persian Gulf has been limited to the reporting of two species of the genus Cymadusa from Kuwait (Jones, Reference Jones1986).

In the present study, a new species, Ampithoe qeshmensis, from Qeshm Island in the Persian Gulf is described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials were collected in April 2014 from the intertidal zone of Qeshm Island (26°43′58″N 55°50′2″E). The specimens examined were deposited in the Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science (INIOAC). The material was fixed in 70% ethanol, dissected in glycerol and then mounted by glycerin gelatin. Type material was drawn by Camera Lucida mounted on compound microscope. Due to the loss of mandible and first maxilla during dissection, these parts were drawn based on paratype.

SYSTEMATICS

Order Amphipoda Latreille, Reference Latreille1816
Family Ampithoidae Boeck, Reference Boeck1871
Genus Ampithoe Leach, Reference Leach1814
Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov.
(Figures14)

Fig. 1. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (W♂) whole body, (U1♂) first uropod, (U2♂) second uropod, (U3♂) third uropod, (T) male telson from type specimen and (U1) first uropod of female paratype. Scale a: 0.1 and b: 1 mm.

Type material. Holotype male, 3.6 mm, INIOC1–37S, Qeshm Island, Persian Gulf, Iran (~26°30′N 55°48′E), seaweeds and associates, rocky intertidal zone, 21 April 2014, collected by Y. Layeghi. Paratype: 1 female, 4 mm, INIOC1–38S, same data as holotype.

Other material examined. Five females, four males and five juveniles, INIOC 1–39S, same data as types.

Type locality. Qeshm Island, Persian Gulf, Iran (~26°30′N 55°48′E).

DIAGNOSIS

(based on male) smooth body, antenna 2 densely setose and flagellum longer than peduncular article 5, mandibular palp article 3 longer than second one, palm of second male gnathopod slightly incised with short proximal thumb-like projection and robust seta, round and reduced distoventral spur on uropod 1.

DESCRIPTION

Based on holotype, male, 3.6 mm, INIOC1–37S.

Head. Head as long as deep (Figure 1). Antenna 1 (Figure 2) 1.4 × length antenna 2; peduncular article 1 subequal to article 2; flagellum not complete. Antenna 2 (Figure 2) peduncle densely setose on ventral margin; article 4 subequal to article 5; flagellum with 9 articles, 1.36 × length peduncular article 5. Upper lip (Figure 2) distally setose. Lower lip (Figure 2) outer plates notched forming a deep distal cleft. Mandible (holotype damaged, based on paratype) (Figure 2) molar well developed, triturating, accessory setal row with 4 serrate setae; palp 3-articulate, article 1 shorter than article 2; article 2 subequal in length to article 3, with 2 marginal palmate setae, article 3 with 6 terminal palmate setae. Maxilla 1 (holotype damaged, based on paratype) (Figure 2) inner plate with 2 setae; palp article 2 slender. Maxilla 2 (Figure 2) inner plate narrower than outer plate. Maxilliped (Figure 2) outer plate with row of large robust setae along medial margin, palp 4-articulate.

Fig. 2. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (A1♂) first antenna, (A2♂) second antenna, (U.L♂) upper lip, (L.L♂) lower lip, (Mxp♂) maxilliped, (M2♂) second maxilla from type specimen and (A1♀) first antenna, (A2♀) second antenna, (Mx1♀) first maxilla, (Md♀) mandible from female paratype. Scale a: 0.1 and b: 0.5 mm.

Pereon. Gnathopod 1 (Figure 3) sexually dimorphic; smaller than gnathopod 2; coxa 1 smaller than coxa 2, produced, anterior margin straight, anteroventral corner rounded; basis longer than coxa, anterodistal lobe large, rounded, with 1 robust seta, 2 slender setae on posteroventral corner; ischium small, trapezoid-shaped; merus anterodistal lobe acute; carpus shorter than propodus, subtriangular, with slender setae on posterior margin, anterior margin with one robust seta; propodus subrectangular, length 2.14 × width, palm slightly acute, straight, with one defining large robust seta; dactylus subequal in length to palm, inner margin crenate. Gnathopod 2 (Figure 3) sexually dimorphic; coxa as long as deep; basis with large anterodistal lobe, with 3 slender setae on anterior margin, lobe with one robust seta; merus with long slender setae on ventral margin; carpus shorter than propodus, subtriangular, with small posterodistal lobe, lobe with long slender setae; propodus 1.6 × width, produced anterodistally, anterior margin with fringe of slender setae; palm acute, slightly incised, covered by long setae, posterodistal tooth short and apically blunt with defining one robust seta; dactylus subequal in length to palm, tapering evenly, inner margin crenulate. Pereopod 34 (Figure 4) basis slightly expanded, merus longer than carpus; propodus with 4 slender setae on posterior margin. Pereopod 5 (Figure 4) coxa without medial slender setae; basis expanded, with 4 short slender setae on anterior margin; merus short, subrectangular; carpus subquadrate, short; propodus subrectangular, slightly expanded distally, with 1 robust seta on posterior margin and 3 distal robust setae; dactylus strongly curved with inner smooth margin. Pereopod 6 (Figure 4) basis weakly expanded, with 4 short slender setae on anterior margin, posterior margin curved; propodus with 3 anterodistal robust setae. Pereopod 7 (Figure 4) similar to pereopod 6, propodus with 4 anterodistal robust setae.

Fig. 3. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (G1♂) first gnathopod, (G2♂) second gnathopod from type specimen and (G1♀) first gnathopod, (G2♀) second gnathopod from female paratype. Scale 0.5 mm.

Fig. 4. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (P3) third pereopod, (P4) fourth pereopod, (P5) fifth pereopod, (P6) sixth pereopod and (P7) seventh pereopod from type specimen. Scale 0.25 mm.

Pleon. Uropod 1 (Figure 1) sexually dimorphic; peduncle with 3 robust setae, with long fringe of slender setae, with small rounded distoventral spur; outer ramus without lateral robust setae; inner ramus with 2 lateral robust setae, each ramus with 4 terminal robust setae. Uropod 2 (Figure 1) peduncle with 2 dorsolateral robust setae; rami subequal in length; outer ramus with 2 lateral and 4 terminal robust setae; inner ramus with 3 lateral and 4 terminal robust setae. Uropod 3 (Figure 1) peduncle longer than broad; peduncle with 4 distal robust setae, inner ramus 0.4 × peduncle, with 4 apical robust setae and 4 long simple setae; outer ramus with 2 apical large curved robust setae; inner ramus with one robust and three long simple setae. Telson (Figure 1) subtrapezoidal, apically truncated, with 4 apical and 2 lateral setae.

Female (sexually dimorphic characters). Based on paratype, 4 mm, INIOC1–38S. Antenna 1 (Figure 2) flagellum 20-articulate. Antenna 2 (Figure 2) flagellum 12-articulate. Gnathopod 1 (Figure 3), subequal to gnathopod 2; anterodistal lobe of basis with 1 slender seta, carpus anterior margin without one robust seta. Gnathopod 2 (Figure 3) coxa as long as deep; basis without 3 slender setae on anterior margin, lobe without robust seta; palm sinusodial, with 1 robust seta defining palm. Uropod 1 peduncle with 10 lateral robust setae, with long fringe of slender setae, without small rounded distoventral spur; outer ramus with 5 lateral robust setae; inner ramus with 8 lateral robust setae.

Habitat. Living in intertidal zone, on macroalgae of genus Laurencia.

Etymology. This species is named for its type locality, Qeshm Island.

Remarks. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. is the first representative of the genus Ampithoe from Qeshm Island in the Persian Gulf. The new species is most similar to A. cookana Peart, Reference Peart2007; A. katae Peart, Reference Peart2007; A. kava Myers, Reference Myers1985; A. kuala Myers, Reference Myers1985; A. platycera Sivaprakasam, Reference Sivaprakasam1970; and A. ramondi Audouin, Reference Audouin1826.

Ampithoe qeshmensis differs from A. cookana, A. katae, A. kuala, A. platycera and A. ramondi by having a clearly rounded and reduced distoventral spur on the peduncle of the male uropod 1.

The main characters that separate the new species from Ampithoe kava are the ratio of the flagellum to the peduncular article 5 in Antenna 2 (about 1.4 × in A. qeshmensis, less than 1 × in A. kava), presence of a robust seta on the palm of gnathopod 2 in male (absent in A. kava) and the palm structure in gnathopod 2 (thumb-like with narrow cleft in A. kava, but short thumb-like without cleft in A. qeshmensis).

Ampithoe qeshmensis resembles A. cookana and A. katae based on the propodus of second gnathopod (short thumb-like defining palm) while it differs with A. cookana in the carpal robust setae of gnathopod 2 (more than 4 in A. cookana, absent in A. qeshmensis), a robust seta on the palm of second gnathopod and on the basal lobe of the first gnathopod in A. qeshmensis. It is different from A. katae based on the shorter second mandibular palp article than ultimate article (0.82 ×) in A. qeshmensis, while it is longer in A. katae (1.35 ×), and also the defining robust setae on the palm of gnathopod 2 in A. qeshmensis.

Recently Ampithoe ramondi was recorded from Kuwait in the north-west of the Persian Gulf (Myers & Nithyanandan, Reference Myers and Nithyanandan2016). The type locality of A. qeshmensis is on the eastern part of the region. Consequently, the family Ampithoidae has four members in the Persian Gulf including: Cymadusa filosa (Jones, Reference Jones1986; Myers & Nithyanandan, Reference Myers and Nithyanandan2016), C. setosa (Jones, Reference Jones1986), A. ramondi (Myers & Nithyanandan, Reference Myers and Nithyanandan2016) and A. qeshmensis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr Abdolvahab Maghsoudlou and Vahid Sepahvand for collaboration during this study.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This study was financed by the Iranian National Institute for Oceanography and Atmospheric Science (INIOAS) (project grant number ‘392-011-11').

References

REFERENCES

Appadoo, C. and Myers, A.A. (2003) Observations on the tube-building behavior of the marine amphipod Cymadusa filosa Savigny (Crustacea: Ampithoidae). Journal of Natural History 37, 21512164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audouin, J. (1826) Explication sommaire des planches de crustaces de l'Egypte et de la Syrie, Publièes par Jules-Cesar Savigny, membre de linstitut; offrant un expos des caracte`resnaturels des genres, avec la distinction des espèces, Description de lEgypte. Histoire Naturelle 1, 7798.Google Scholar
Boeck, A. (1871) Crustacea Amphipoda Borealia et Arctica. Forhandlingar i videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiana, 1870, 83280.Google Scholar
Grosse, D.J., Pauley, G.B. and Moran, D. (1986) Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (Pacific Northwest) amphipods. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, 82, 1169.Google Scholar
Horton, T., Lowry, J., De Broyer, C., Bellan-Santini, D., Coleman, C.O., Daneliya, M., Dauvin, J.C., Fiser, C., Gasca, R., Grabowski, M., Guerra-García, J.M., Hendrycks, E., Holsinger, J., Hughes, L., Jaume, D., Jazdzewski, K., Just, J., Kamaltynov, R.M., Kim, Y.H., King, R., Krapp-Schickel, T., LeCroy, S., Lörz, A.N., Senna, A.R., Serejo, C., Sket, B., Tandberg, A.H., Thomas, J., Thurston, M., Vader, W., Väinölä, R., Vonk, R., White, K. and Zeidler, W. (2016) World Amphipoda Database. Accessed at http://www.marinespecies.org/amphipodaon8October2016.Google Scholar
Jones, D.A. (1986) A field guide to the sea shores of Kuwait and the Arabian Gulf, 1st edition. Kuwait: University of Kuwait. 188 pp.Google Scholar
Klumpp, D.W., Salita-Espinosa, J.T. and Fortes, M.D. (1992) The role of epiphytic periphyton and macroinvertebrate grazers in the trophic flux of a tropical seagrass community. Aquatic Botany 43, 327349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latreille, P.A. (1816) Amphipoda. In Nouveau Dictionaire d'histoire naturelle, appliquée aux Arts, à l'Agriculture, à l’Économie rurale et domestique, à la Médecine, etc. Par une société de Naturalistes et d'Agriculteurs, Volume 1, 2nd edition. Paris: Deterville, 467469 pp.Google Scholar
Leach, W.E. (1814) Crustaceology. The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia 7, 383434.Google Scholar
Myers, A.A. (1985) Shallow-water, coral reef and mangrove Amphipoda (Gammaridea) of Fiji. Records of the Australian Museum (Supplement) 5, 1143.Google Scholar
Myers, A.A. and Nithyanandan, M. (2016) The Amphipoda of Sea City, Kuwait. The Senticaudata (Crustacea). Zootaxa 4072, 401429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peart, R.A. (2007) A review of Australian species of Ampithoe Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Ampithoidae) with descriptions of seventeen new species. Zootaxa 1566, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poore, A.G.B. and Lowry, J.K. (1997) New ampithoid amphipods from Port Jackson, New South Wales, Australia (Crustacea; Amphipoda: Ampithoidae). Invertebrate Taxonomy 11, 897941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivaprakasam, T.E. (1970) Amphipods on the Family Ampithoidae from the Madras Coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 12, 6480.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (W♂) whole body, (U1♂) first uropod, (U2♂) second uropod, (U3♂) third uropod, (T) male telson from type specimen and (U1) first uropod of female paratype. Scale a: 0.1 and b: 1 mm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (A1♂) first antenna, (A2♂) second antenna, (U.L♂) upper lip, (L.L♂) lower lip, (Mxp♂) maxilliped, (M2♂) second maxilla from type specimen and (A1♀) first antenna, (A2♀) second antenna, (Mx1♀) first maxilla, (Md♀) mandible from female paratype. Scale a: 0.1 and b: 0.5 mm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (G1♂) first gnathopod, (G2♂) second gnathopod from type specimen and (G1♀) first gnathopod, (G2♀) second gnathopod from female paratype. Scale 0.5 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Ampithoe qeshmensis sp. nov. (P3) third pereopod, (P4) fourth pereopod, (P5) fifth pereopod, (P6) sixth pereopod and (P7) seventh pereopod from type specimen. Scale 0.25 mm.