Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:44:29.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age, growth and mortality of the yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis (Sphyraenidae) from eastern coasts of Algeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

Nadjette Bourehail
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Bioressources Marines Université d'Annaba Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algérie
M. Hichem Kara*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Bioressources Marines Université d'Annaba Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algérie
*
Author for correspondence: M. Hichem Kara, E-mail: kara_hichem@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Age and growth of the yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis (Cuvier, 1829) was examined in 698 individuals (184 < TL (mm) < 1210; 25 < TW (g) < 7125), sampled monthly from commercial catches in eastern coasts of Algeria between January 2007 and January 2008. Marginal increment analysis of 159 sectioned sagittal otoliths combined with information derived from length–frequency distribution showed that annulus formation occurs between June and August. Maximum observed age of males and females is 14 and 13 years respectively. Back calculations of total length-at-age were used to fit the data to the Bertalanffy growth model: TL = 1113(1 – e−0.165(t+2.251)) in males and TL = 958.3 (1 – e−0.247(t+1.422)) in females. The coefficient of allometry of the length weight relationship is 3.02 and 2.99 in males and females, respectively. Growth performance index Ø = 3.33. Natural mortality (M) was estimated as 0.45 year−1, fishing mortality (F) was 0.06 year−1and the exploitation rate (E) was 0.11.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

The family Sphyraenidae consists of a single genus, Sphyraena, which includes 21 species (Nelson, Reference Nelson2006). These species exhibit a pelagic to demersal habit and both solitary and schooling behaviour. Four species occur in the Mediterranean Sea, two of which, Sphyraena chrysotaenia (Klunzinqer, 1884) and S. flavicauda (Ruppell, 1838), are of Red Sea origin (Kara & Bourehail, Reference Kara and Bourehail2020).

Sphyraena viridensis (Cuvier, 1829) is typically an Atlanto-Mediterranean species. It is known from Iceland to Morocco and Cape Verde, Madeira Island, the Canaries and the Azores (Ben-Tuvia, Reference Ben-Tuvia, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureu, Nielsen and Tortonose1986; Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2014). However, its complete distribution remains unknown because most published works do not separate it from S. sphyraena (Linnaeus, 1758) (Kara & Bourehail, Reference Kara and Bourehail2003). Several investigators have reported these two species as juveniles and adults of the same species, S. sphyraena (Relini & Orsi-Relini, Reference Relini and Orsi-Relini1997; Vacchi et al., Reference Vacchi, Boyer, Bussotti, Guidetti and La Mesa1999; Golani et al., Reference Golani, Ozturk and Basusta2006). Pastore (Reference Pastore2009) described a new species, S. intermedia, and stated that it is not a hybrid between S. sphyraena and S. viridensis.

Three main morphological characteristics have been suggested to avoid misidentification between S. viridensis and S sphyraena (Relini & Orsi-Relini, Reference Relini and Orsi-Relini1997; Kozul et al., Reference Kožul, Tutman, Glavic, Skaramuca and Bolotin2005): preoperculum scale pattern (entirely scaled in S. sphyraena but not in S. viridensis), pectoral fin rays (13 in S. sphyraena, 15 in S. viridensis) and scales above the lateral line (15–17 in S. sphyraena, 21–22 in S. viridensis). Bourehail et al. (Reference Bourehail, Morat, Lecompte-Finiger and Kara2015) distinguished the two species using otolith morphology.

Sphyraena viridensis is a predatory ray-finned fish. It has a long fusiform body, a long streamlined pointed snout, a long mouth lined with two rows of sharp, fang-like teeth and a jutting lower jaw. There are numerous transverse dark bars on the dorsum that are longer, extending below the lateral line. The colouration is countershaded dark above and silvery below, and the barring fades on dead specimens. Juveniles are described as dark yellow or greenish in colour.

In the Mediterranean, Sphyraenidae (all species combined) reached an annual production of 1800 T (metric tons) in 2018 (FAO, 2020). In the western Mediterranean, S. viridensis is becoming increasingly present in fisheries (Azzurro et al., Reference Azzurro, Moschella and Maynou2011) and has become very common on the Algerian coasts since the early 1990s, where it is highly sought by consumers. It is taken from sandy bottoms (20 m) by fishermen using trammel nets and beach seines.

Despite its ecological interest as an indicator of Mediterranean warming (http://www.ciesm.org/marine/programs/Moschella_wk35.pdf) and its economic importance, very little is known about the life history and dynamics of S. viridensis. Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) described its growth in Egyptian waters, Villegas-Hernández et al. (Reference Villegas-Hernandez, Munoz and Lloret2014) compared its reproduction with that of S. sphyraena in the Roses Gulf (north-western Mediterranean), and Kalogirou et al. (Reference Kalogirou, Wennhage and Pihl2012) analysed the diet of specimens from the Rhodes Island coast (eastern Mediterranean). In the Atlantic, Fontes & Afonso (Reference Fontes and Afonso2017) studied the ecology of the species using underwater visual census and telemetry. However, no studies have been carried out in the south-western Mediterranean.

The aim of this study was to describe the life history parameters and population dynamics of the yellowmouth barracuda S. viridensis in eastern Algeria. This information is important to fishery management, especially since this species is an important local fishery resource.

Materials and methods

Random samples of S. viridensis were collected weekly from the commercial fisheries landing of eastern Algeria (36°54′N 7°45′E) (Figure 1) between January 2007 and January 2008. The sea surface temperature in this area ranged from 14–25.5°C (Frehi et al., Reference Frehi, Couté, Mascarell, Perrette-Gallet, Ayada and Kara2007). All fishes were identified according to Relini & Orsi-Relini (Reference Relini and Orsi-Relini1997), measured for total length (TL, mm), and weighed (body wet weight: TW, g). Individual sex was determined by macroscopic observation of the gonads, and the sex ratio was calculated for the whole sample and compared with the 1:1 proportion with a χ2 test. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to verify the normality of the data.

Fig. 1. Location of studied area in the south-western Mediterranean Sea.

To ensure a homogeneous distribution across all size classes, a subsample of 31 juvenile (220 < TL < 455) and 128 adult (455 < TL < 1210) individuals was taken from monthly samples for age determination (N = 159). Sagittal otolith pairs were extracted from each fish, cleaned and stored dry in Eppendorf tubes. Otolith length (OL), the longest distance between the frontal and hindmost points of the otolith, was measured in millimetres with a digital caliper (0.01 mm accuracy). One sagittae per fish was mounted and fixed on glass slides with a thermoplastic polymer (Crystal Bond). Otoliths were then sanded progressively finer (600–1000 mm) to obtain a fine cross-section passing through the nucleus. Polishing was performed with fine-grained sanding discs (3, 1 and 0.3 μm). The otoliths were then observed under a microscope. Age estimates were based on a count of both swift and slow growth, as already defined and described by Irie (Reference Irie1960), which resulted in alternating dark and illuminated light strips observed after thin transverse sections of sagittae. Growth rings were visible as alternating opaque and translucent zones, and ages were assigned to fish specimens based on their counts (one opaque zone combined with one translucent zone was interpreted as one year of growth). Counting was from the nucleus to the rostrum or post rostrum of otoliths because the latter grew much more along the antero-posterior axis. The width of each ring (OLi) and the length of each otolith radius were measured on this axis to the nearest 0.01 mm. A high-resolution microscope with an integrated camera (Visilog 5, Noésis) was used to obtain all measurements. Marginal increment analysis was used to validate annual growth increment formation (Beamish & McFarlane, Reference Beamish and McFarlane1983). The monthly mean marginal increment (MI) was calculated using MI = (RRn)/(RnRn−1). R, Rn and Rn−1 are the radius, the radius of the last, and the radius of the next-to-last growth rings, respectively. Monthly values of MI were compared using a one-way ANOVA test, followed by a multiple-sample comparison of means (Dagnelie, Reference Dagnélie1975). Linear regression analysis was applied to evaluate the link between fish size (TL) and otolith radius size (RL). In accordance with the Fraser–Lee procedure (Carlander, Reference Carlander1981; Francis, Reference Francis1990), the length at age (TLi) was back-calculated as follows: TLi = a + (TLc – a) RLc −1 RLi, where a is the intercept of the TLRL regression, TLc and RLc are the fish length and otolith radius size at capture, respectively, and RLi is the annulus width. The coefficient of determination (r 2) was used to evaluate the quality of the TL–RL regression.

Annular ring counts were made independently by two readers, who were blinded to information about fish length and date of capture. All otoliths were read twice, and final age estimates were achieved when the same results were obtained from the two readers. A third reading was performed if the first two readings differed from each other. If agreement could not be reached, the otolith was discarded. The average error index (APE) (Beamish & Fournier, Reference Beamish and Foumier1981) and the variation coefficient mean (CV) (Chang, Reference Chang1982) were used to compare the reading results. Observed lengths at different ages were compared with the back-calculated data by Student's t-test. The same test was used to compare growth between sexes. The von Bertalanffy growth function (von Bertalanffy, Reference Von Bertalanffy1938) was fitted to the length at age dataset back-calculated using FiSAT II software (Gayanilo et al., Reference Gayanilo, Sparre and Pauly2005). Von Bertalanffy growth parameters (L∞, k, t 0) were calculated by pooling ageing data of males and females. A likelihood-ratio test (Kimura, Reference Kimura1980) was calculated to test whether there were differences in growth between the sexes. The growth performance index Ø = 2 log L∞ + log k (Munro & Pauly, Reference Munro and Pauly1983) was calculated to compare the growth of this species with those of other Sphyraenidae. The relationship between length and weight was described by the power function EW = aTLb, where EW is the eviscerated weight. The regression parameters a and b and the coefficient of determination (r 2) were estimated for the whole population and for each sex by the least square linear regression after log transformation of both variables. According to Ricker (Reference Ricker1975), the slope of the regression was corrected to follow a geometric mean regression. Student's t-test was used to appreciate the hypothesis of isometric relationships, whereas analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to detect any significant differences in the linear relationships between sexes (Zar, Reference Zar2010).

The total mortality rate (Z) was estimated using catch curve analysis, converted in length using the FiSAT II program (Gayanilo et al., Reference Gayanilo, Sparre and Pauly2005). Pauly's method (Pauly, Reference Pauly1980) and Ralston's regression method (Ralston, Reference Ralston, Polovina and Ralston1987) were applied to estimate the natural mortality rate (M). Fishing mortality (F) was assessed as follows: F = ZM, and the exploitation rate was determined using the formula E = F/Z. Statistical analyses were performed with the MINITAB 18 software package.

Results

The Shapiro–Wilk normality test was W = 0.914, with P = 0.01, indicating that the sample came from a normal population distribution. Among the 698 sampled individuals, 169 were females (379–1210 mm TL, 192–7125 g), 102 were males (395–1165 mm TL, 226–5155 g) and 427 were immature (184–567 mm TL, 25–685 g) (Figure 2). The pooled length frequency distribution showed that younger fish (180–450 mm, < 1 year old) represented ~60% of the total catch. Applying the χ2 test for goodness of fit, the sex ratio was 1:1.65 in favour of females (χ2 = 16.56, df = 1, P > 0.1). The otolith length (OL) ranged from 4–24.3 mm. The relationship between the otolith radius OR (1.324 < OR mm < 3.922) and TL (401 < TL mm < 1210) was TL = 301.5 × RL – 82.4 (N = 137, r 2 = 0.856) (Figure 3). Comparisons of otolith age readings indicated good consistency or reproducibility (APE = 2.65%, CV = 3.75%). There was no statistically significant difference between readings (t = 1, df = 159, P > 0.05). Comparing successive monthly mean marginal increment (MI) values of otoliths using one-way ANOVA (F = 4.24, P < 0.0001) showed a significant difference between June and July (Figure 4).

Fig. 2. Length frequency of males, females and immature individuals (IMM) of Sphyraena viridensis sampled in eastern coast of Algeria.

Fig. 3. Scatter plot and fitted regression line of fish length (TL) vs maximum radius size (RL) of Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria.

Fig. 4. Monthly evolution of otolith marginal increment of Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria: the different letters indicate significant differences between groups of months; error bars, standard deviations.

Direct reading of otoliths (Figure 5) indicated maximum observed ages of 14 years in males and 13 years in females. Most individuals were aged between 1 and 5 years: 1 (23.27%), 2 (25.78%), 3 (6.29%), 4 (5.66%) and 5 (2.51%) (Table 1). From 6 years old, the number of individuals per age group was very low: 4 for age 6 (1 male 880 mm, 3 females: 807, 903 and 940 mm), 2 for age 7 (1 male 916 mm, 1 female 950 mm), 1 individual for age 8 (female, 905 mm), 1 individual for age 9 (female, 1073 mm), 1 individual for age 10 (female, 1120 mm), 2 individuals for age 11 (1 male 1150 mm, 1 female 1065 mm), 1 individual for age 13 (female, 1210 mm) and 1 individual for age 14 (male, 1165 mm). Then, the back-calculated method was applied to ages 1–6 in females and to ages 1–5 in males (Table 2). For both sexes, linear growth was very rapid during the first year (427 mm). The annual growth rate decreased gradually (121.7 mm at 2 years, 94.4 mm at 3 years). After the third year, the mean annual growth rate was 40.8 mm.

Fig. 5. Transverse section of sagittal otoliths of 7-year-old Sphyraena viridensis (751 mm TL) of the eastern coasts of Algeria. Numbers indicate annuli counted along the sulcal ridge.

Table 1. Age-length key of yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis from eastern coasts of Algeria

N, number of fish; TL, mean length by age class; SD, standard deviation.

The numbers by sex of age groups 7 to 14 are low (< 3) and are indicated in the text (Materials and methods).

Table 2. Total length (mm) at the appearance of each growth ring in the sagittal section of the yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis from eastern coasts of Algeria

R1 to R6, growth rings in the sagittal section; N, number of fish; M, mean length by age class; SD, standard deviation.

The numbers by sex of age groups 7–14 are low (< 3) and are indicated in the text (Materials and methods).

The observed lengths at different ages did not vary significantly from the back-calculated lengths for males and females (Table 3). The back-calculated length at age did not significantly differ between sexes (unpaired t-test, all P > 0.05). Estimated von Bertalanffy growth models were TL = 1113 (1 – e −0.165(t+2.251)) (N = 58, 401 < TL mm < 1165) for males and TL = 958.3 (1 – e −0.247(t+1.422)) (N = 79, 402 < TL mm < 1210) for females. No significant difference was found between the male and female growth models (df = 3, P < 0.05); therefore, a combined-sex von Bertalanffy growth model of TL = 980.2 (1 – e −0.227(t + 1.655)) (N = 137, 402 < TL mm < 1210) was estimated (Figure 6). The predicted lengths at age using the combined-sex model were similar to the mean lengths at age back-calculated. The growth performance index (Ø) values were estimated to be 3.33 in both sexes, 3.44 in males and 3.35 in females.

Fig. 6. Von Bertalanffy growth curves for Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria.

Table 3. Comparison of observed and back-calculated lengths of Sphyraena viridensis from eastern coasts of Algeria

t, t-test; P = significance level; N, number of fish.

The numbers by sex of age groups 7 to 14 are low (< 3) and are indicated in the text (Materials and methods).

The length–weight relationships were EW = 3.09 × 10−5TL 3.021 (r2 = 0.866, N = 102, 395 < TL < 1165) in males, EW = 3.41 × 10−5TL 2.99 (r2 = 0.865, N = 169, 379 < TL < 1210) in females, and EW = 3.17 × 10−5TL 3.011 (r2 = 0.764, N = 698, 184 < TL < 1210) for both sexes combined. Significant differences were obtained from the comparison between males and females (ANCOVA, F = 56.18, P < 0.05). The b-values of the relationships indicate that the fish grew isometrically (t-test, t male = 0.19, t female = 0.103, P < 0.05) (Figure 7).

Fig. 7. Length-weight relationships of Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria.

Using only fish fully recruited to the fishery (TL > 450 mm), we estimated total mortality Z = 0.51 year−1. Natural mortality estimate was M = 0.45 year−1. The estimate of fishing mortality (F) was 0.06 year−1, and the exploitation rate (E) was 0.11.

Discussion

This study is the first documented attempt to evaluate the age, growth and mortality of S. viridensis in the Western Mediterranean. The only available data on the population dynamics of this species in the Mediterranean are given by Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) in Egypt.

Sphyraena viridensis sagittal otoliths showed typical patterns of opaque and translucent alternating zones. The consistency, reproducibility and repeatability of the results (APE = 2.65%, CV = 3.75%) summarized and explained the reliability of the applied process. In agreement with Bourehail & Kara (Reference Bourehail and Kara2018), only one growth ring is formed per year during summer. This discontinuity in growth was observed by Kadison et al. (Reference Kadison, D'Alessandro, Davis and Hood2010) for S. barracuda from Florida Bay. This growth rhythm is described in a large number of fish species living in subpolar, temperate (Beckman & Wilson, Reference Beckman, Wilson, Secor, Dean and Campana1995) and tropical regions (Brothers, Reference Brothers1979).

Thirteen and fourteen age classes were determined by otolith readings in females and males, respectively. The oldest individual was a male of 1165 mm (14 years, 7125 g). Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) found a longevity of 8 years (560 mm TL) in Egyptian waters using otoliths. The longevities of Sphyraena sp. were 18 years for S. barracuda from Florida Bay (Kadison et al., Reference Kadison, D'Alessandro, Davis and Hood2010) and 11 years for S. argentena from California waters (Hart, Reference Hart1973).

The distribution of the ageing samples shows that the young-of-the-year (0+) fish were represented by fish less than 455 mm TL. More than 64% of the ageing samples were in age classes I–III. Ages V to VI were poorly represented (between 9 and 4 individuals by age). In Egyptian waters, Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) found that the individuals of age class II constituted the main bulk of catches (30%). In S. barracuda, an Atlantic Sphyraenidae with the same growth pattern, 50% of the fishes were aged between I and III years (Kadison et al., Reference Kadison, D'Alessandro, Davis and Hood2010).

During the first year of life, yellowmouth barracuda experienced rapid growth (over 50% of the maximal length observed in this study). Bourehail & Kara (Reference Bourehail and Kara2021) found similar rapid growth during the first year, while Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) found that S. viridensis from Egypt attained 26% of maximal length in the first year. The low growth rate after the first year of life may be related to the energetic costs of sexual maturation, which occurs at 625 and 595 mm in females and males, respectively (Bourehail et al., Reference Bourehail, Lecomte-Finiger and Kara2010), causing growth to slow down (Beverton & Holt, Reference Beverton and Holt1957).

Since this study represents the first separate estimations of male and female S. viridensis growth, it was not possible to compare them with other findings. The observed growth coefficient for pooled specimens (k = 0.227) is higher than that (k = 0.089) obtained by Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) in Egyptian Mediterranean waters. These differences could be due to the different hydrobiological conditions between the geographic areas. The estimated asymptotic length (L∞ = 980.2 mm) is similar to other estimates from the Mediterranean. The high r2 value of the combined-sex length-age von Bertalanffy growth model suggests that this curve accurately reflects somatic growth in these fishes (Figure 6). Of the growth parameters L∞ and k, only L∞ differed between the sexes (L∞ = 1113 mm in males, L∞ = 958.3 mm in females), indicating that the small difference between male and female curves was primarily a result of the greater longevity in males. Kadison et al. (Reference Kadison, D'Alessandro, Davis and Hood2010) also reported no significant difference between the growth models of males and females for S. barracuda from Florida Bay. The calculated growth performance index (3.33) is better than that in Egyptian Mediterranean waters (2.95) and among the higher indices in pelagic fish (Zischke & Griffiths, Reference Zischke and Griffiths2015). Values of the b coefficient in the length-weight relationship indicated isometric growth in females and males. In Egyptian waters, Allam et al. (Reference Allam, Faltas and Ragheb2004) found b = 2.93. Within the family Sphyraenidae, the type of growth is variable among species; for instance, negative allometric growth has been reported for S. ensis in Mexican waters (Zavala-Leal et al., Reference Zavala-Leal, Palacios-Salgado, Ruiz-Velazco, Valdez-González, Pacheco-Vega, Granados-Amores and Flores-Ortega2018) and for S. chrysotaenia from the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia). In the Mediterranean Sea, Kalogirou et al. (Reference Kalogirou, Wennhage and Pihl2012) analysed the growth rates of S. viridensis (b = 2.76), S. sphyraena (b = 2.97) and S. chrysotaenia (b = 2.85) and found different types of growth even in species of the same region. For S. guachancho, different types of growth have been detected according to the sampling season (isometric growth in the rainy season and allometric growth in windy and dry seasons) (Bedia et al., Reference Bedia, Franco-López and Barrera-Escorcia2011). Begenal & Tesch (Reference Bagenal, Tesch and Bagenal1978) point out that differences in the length-weight relationship can be found with regard to sex, sexual maturity, season and even time of day as a result of stomach filling; therefore, changes in b value can be found in different developmental stages, at first sexual maturity and when important environmental changes occur.

The estimated average instantaneous rates of total (0.51 year−1), natural (0.45 year−1) and fishing (0.06 year−1) mortalities were lower than 2.8, 1.3 and 1.54 year−1, respectively, as recorded by Najmudeen et al. (Reference Najmudeen, Seetha and Zacharia2015) for S. obtusata of India.

The estimated fishing mortality indicates that S. viridensis is still facing a low exploitation rate in the Gulf of Annaba. Coupled with fisheries-independent surveys and commercial catch-at-age data, all the information provided here will contribute to improved fishery management of the Yellowmouth Barracuda S. viridensis in the south-western Mediterranean.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Algerian Ministry for Higher education and scientific research (General directorate for scientific research and technology development, GDRSDT) which financially supported this study, within the framework of the National Funds of Research (NFR).

References

Allam, MS, Faltas, SN and Ragheb, E (2004) Age and growth of barracudas in the Egyptian Mediterranean waters. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 30, 281289.Google Scholar
Azzurro, E, Moschella, P and Maynou, F (2011) Tracking signals of change in Mediterranean fish diversity based on local ecological knowledge. PLoS ONE 6, e24885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagenal, T and Tesch, F (1978) Age and growth. In Bagenal, T (ed.), Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 101136.Google Scholar
Beamish, RJ and Foumier, DA (1981) A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 982983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, RJ and McFarlane, GA (1983) Validation of age determination estimates: the forgotten requirement. In Prince ED and Pulos LM (eds), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Age Determination of Oceanic Pelagic Fishes: Tunas, Billfishes, and Sharks, 15–18 February 1982, Miami, FL. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 8, pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
Beckman, DW and Wilson, CA (1995) Seasonal timing of opaque zone formation in fish otoliths. In Secor, DH, Dean, JM and Campana, SE (eds), Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 2743.Google Scholar
Bedia, SC, Franco-López, J and Barrera-Escorcia, H (2011) Análisis de la relación peso-longitud, alimentación y maduración gonádica de Sphyraena guachancho Cuvier, 1829 (Sphyraenidae) en Playa Barrancas, Municipio de Alvarado, Veracruz. Revista de Zoología 22, 2332.Google Scholar
Ben-Tuvia, A (1986) Sphyraenidae. In Whitehead, PJP, Bauchot, M-L, Hureu, J-C, Nielsen, J and Tortonose, E (eds), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vol. III. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 11941196.Google Scholar
Beverton, RJH and Holt, SJ (1957) On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations. Fishery Investigations Series II, Marine Fisheries. Great Britain Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 19.Google Scholar
Bourehail, N and Kara, MH (2018) Young-of-the-year yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis (Cuvier, 1829) growth in eastern Algeria based on otolith microstructure analysis. Proceeding of the 6th International Otolith Symposium 2018, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Bourehail, N and Kara, MH (2021) Young-of-the-year yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis (Cuvier, 1829) growth in eastern Algeria based on otolith microstructure analysis. Thalassas 37, 107112. doi: 10.1007/s41208-020-00256-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourehail, N, Lecomte-Finiger, and Kara, MH (2010) Age, croissance et reproduction du barracuda Sphyraena viridensis (Sphyraenidae) des côtes de l'est algérien. Rapp Comm Int Mer Médit 39, 459.Google Scholar
Bourehail, N, Morat, F, Lecompte-Finiger, R and Kara, MH (2015) Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish barracudas Sphyraena sphyraena and Sphyraena viridensis from the Algerian coast. Cybium 39, 271278.Google Scholar
Brothers, EB (1979) Age and growth studies on tropical fishes. In Saila SB and Roedel PM (eds), Stock Assessment for Tropical Small-scale Fisheries. Proceedings of international workshop held Sept. 19–21, 1979, at University of Rhode Island, pp. 119–136. [Copies available from Agency for International Development. AID-DIHF/ARDA, 7222 – 47th St., Chevey Chase, MD 20815.]Google Scholar
Carlander, KD (1981) Caution on the use of the regression method of back-calculating lengths from scale measurements. Fisheries 6, 24.Google Scholar
Chang, WYB (1982) A statistical method for evaluating the reproducibility of age determination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 39, 12081210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnélie, P (1975) Théorie et Méthodes Statistiques, Volume 1: La Statistique Descriptive et les Fondements de L'inférence Statistique. Gembloux: Duculot editions.Google Scholar
FAO (2020) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Statistics and Information Service. FishStatJ: Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time Series. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Fontes, J and Afonso, P (2017) Long-term residency and movements of yellowmouth barracuda (Sphyraena viridensis) at a shallow seamount. Marine Biology 164, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, RICC (1990) Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review. Journal of Fish Biology 36, 883902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frehi, H, Couté, A, Mascarell, G, Perrette-Gallet, C, Ayada, M and Kara, MH (2007) Dinoflagellés toxiques et/ou responsables de blooms dans la baie d'Annaba (Algérie). Comptes Rendus Biologies 330, 615628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R and Pauly, D (2014) FishBase. www.fishbase.org, version (04/2014) (accessed on 25 June 2014).Google Scholar
Gayanilo, FC, Sparre, P and Pauly, D (2005) The FAO– ICLARM Stock-Assessment Tools II (FiSAT II). User's Guide, Revised Version. FAO Computerized Information Series (Fisheries), 8.Google Scholar
Golani, DB, Ozturk, B and Basusta, N (2006) The Fishes of Eastern Mediterranean. Istanbul: Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Publication No. 24.Google Scholar
Hart, JL (1973) Pacific fishes of Canada. Bulletin of Fisheries Research Board Canada 180, 740 pp.Google Scholar
Irie, T (1960) The growth of the fish otolith. Journal of the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Hiroshima University 3, 203229.Google Scholar
Kadison, E, D'Alessandro, EK, Davis, GO and Hood, PB (2010) Age, growth, and reproductive patterns of the great barracuda, Sphyraena barracuda, from waters of the Florida Keys. Bulletin of Marine Science 86, 773784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalogirou, S, Wennhage, H and Pihl, L (2012) Non-indigenous species in Mediterranean fish assemblages: contrasting feeding guilds of Posidonia oceanica meadows and sandy habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 96, 209218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kara, MH and Bourehail, N (2003) Présence du Barracuda, Sphyraena viridensis (Sphyraenidés), sur les côtes de l'est algérien. Cybium 27, 5960.Google Scholar
Kara, MH and Bourehail, N (2020) First record of the Indo-Pacific yellowtail barracuda, Sphyraena flavicauda (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Sphyraenidae), in the Western Mediterranean. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 50, 363366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111120..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kožul, V, Tutman, P, Glavic, N, Skaramuca, B and Bolotin, J (2005) First record of the yellowmouth barracuda, Sphyraena viridensis (Sphyraenidae) from Adriatic Sea. Cybium 29, 201202.Google Scholar
Munro, JL and Pauly, D (1983) A simple method for comparing growth of fishes and invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte 1, 56.Google Scholar
Najmudeen, TM, Seetha, PK and Zacharia, PU (2015) Fishery and population dynamics of the obtuse barracuda Sphyraena obtusata (Cuvier) landed by trawlers at Cochin, south-west coast of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries 62, 1418.Google Scholar
Nelson, RJS (2006) Fishes of the World. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pastore, MA (2009) Sphyraena intermedia sp. nov. (Pisces: Sphyraenidae): a potential new species of barracuda identified from the central Mediterranean Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 12991303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D (1980) On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. CIEM 39, 175192.Google Scholar
Ralston, S (1987) Mortality rates of snappers and groupers. In Polovina, JJ and Ralston, S (eds), Tropical Snappers and Groupers: Biology and Fisheries Management. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 375404.Google Scholar
Relini, M and Orsi-Relini, L (1997) The two species of barracuda (Sphyraenidae) in the western Mediterranean. Cybium 21, 216222.Google Scholar
Ricker, WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191, 1–382.Google Scholar
Vacchi, M, Boyer, M, Bussotti, S, Guidetti, P and La Mesa, G (1999) Some interesting species in the coastal fish fauna of Ustica Island (Mediterranean Sea). Cybium 23, 323331.Google Scholar
Villegas-Hernandez, H, Munoz, M and Lloret, J (2014) Life-history traits of temperate and thermophilic barracudas (Teleostei: Sphyraenidae) in the context of sea warming in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 84, 19401957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Bertalanffy, L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth. Human Biology 10, 181213.Google Scholar
Zar, JH (2010) Biostatistical Analysis, 5th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zavala-Leal, I, Palacios-Salgado, D, Ruiz-Velazco, JMJ, Valdez-González, F, Pacheco-Vega, JM, Granados-Amores, J and Flores-Ortega, JR (2018) Reproductive aspects of Sphyraena ensis (Perciformes: Sphyraenidae) inhabiting the coast of San Blas Nayarit, southeast Gulf of California. California Fish and Game 104, 718.Google Scholar
Zischke, M and Griffiths, SP (2015) Per-recruit stock assessment of wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri) in the southwest Pacific Ocean. Fishery Bulletin 113, 407418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of studied area in the south-western Mediterranean Sea.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Length frequency of males, females and immature individuals (IMM) of Sphyraena viridensis sampled in eastern coast of Algeria.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Scatter plot and fitted regression line of fish length (TL) vs maximum radius size (RL) of Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Monthly evolution of otolith marginal increment of Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria: the different letters indicate significant differences between groups of months; error bars, standard deviations.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Transverse section of sagittal otoliths of 7-year-old Sphyraena viridensis (751 mm TL) of the eastern coasts of Algeria. Numbers indicate annuli counted along the sulcal ridge.

Figure 5

Table 1. Age-length key of yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis from eastern coasts of Algeria

Figure 6

Table 2. Total length (mm) at the appearance of each growth ring in the sagittal section of the yellowmouth barracuda Sphyraena viridensis from eastern coasts of Algeria

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Von Bertalanffy growth curves for Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria.

Figure 8

Table 3. Comparison of observed and back-calculated lengths of Sphyraena viridensis from eastern coasts of Algeria

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Length-weight relationships of Sphyraena viridensis in eastern coasts of Algeria.