Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-nzzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T07:45:51.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age, growth and mortality of the striped seabream Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Gulf of Tunis (Central Mediterranean Sea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2021

Asma Khaldi*
Affiliation:
Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, LR18ES41 Laboratoire d’écologie, biologie et physiologie des organismes aquatiques, 2092Tunis El Manar, Tunisie
Ines Chater
Affiliation:
Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, LR18ES41 Laboratoire d’écologie, biologie et physiologie des organismes aquatiques, 2092Tunis El Manar, Tunisie
Romain Elleboode
Affiliation:
IFREMER (Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer), Pôle National de Sclérochronologie, 150 quai Gambetta, BP 699, 62321Boulogne Sur Mer, France
Kélig Mahé
Affiliation:
IFREMER (Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer), Pôle National de Sclérochronologie, 150 quai Gambetta, BP 699, 62321Boulogne Sur Mer, France
Nadia Chakroun-Marzouk
Affiliation:
Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, LR18ES41 Laboratoire d’écologie, biologie et physiologie des organismes aquatiques, 2092Tunis El Manar, Tunisie
*
Author for correspondence: Asma Khaldi, E-mail: asmaa.khaldii@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the high commercial value of the striped seabream Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Gulf of Tunis, biological data on its age, growth and exploitation rate are lacking. With the aim of estimating growth parameters, 516 individuals, ranging from 6–27.5 cm total length and from 3.5–293.5 g total weight, were collected from the artisanal fishing fleet between February 2014 and July 2016. The somatic growth presented a positive allometry and was described by the equation TW = 6.54 10−3TL3.213. The monthly analysis of the marginal increment of the otoliths revealed that only one annulus was deposited per year. The estimated von Bertalanffy growth parameters were: L = 30.18 cm, k = 0.303 year−1 and t0 = −1.42 years. Total and natural instantaneous rates of mortality were respectively Z = 0.784 year−1 and M = 0.698 year−1. Exploitation rate (E = 0.1) showed that the Gulf of Tunis stock of L. mormyrus is not overexploited. The estimated length class giving highest yield (Lopt) was 17.15 ± 1.71 cm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

A monotypic species, the striped seabream Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus 1758) belongs to the Sparidae family and is found in the Mediterranean Sea. It also occurs in the Eastern Atlantic from the Bay of Biscay to the Cape of Good Hope, and around the Canary Islands, Cape Verde and Madeira Archipelago. Moreover, it is present throughout the Western Indian Ocean, and in the Black, Azov and Red Seas (Bauchot & Hureau, Reference Bauchot, Hureau, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureau, Nielson and Tortonese1986). The striped seabream is a demersal species that inhabits seagrass beds, and rocky and muddy bottoms down to 150 m, but is found mostly at depths of 10–20 m (Pajuelo et al., Reference Pajuelo, Lorenzo, Mendez, Coca and Ramos2002). Economic interest in this species and its adaptative success over its wide geographic distribution, have justified the study of various aspects of its biology. Qualitative and quantitative studies of the diet of the striped seabream were conducted (Suau, Reference Suau1970; Badalamenti et al., Reference Badalamenti, D'Anna, Fazio, Gristina and Lipari1993; Bradai et al., Reference Bradai, Jarboui, Ghorbel, Bouaïn and El Abed1998; Harchouche et al., Reference Harchouche, Maurin and Quéro2005; Kallianiotis et al., Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005; Šantić et al., Reference Šantić, Paladin and Elez2010; Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al., Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016; Khaldi & Chakroun-Marzouk, Reference Khaldi and Chakroun-Marzouk2016). Weight–length relationships were estimated for the striped seabream from the Mediterranean coast of Spain (Suau, Reference Suau1970), Gokova Bay (Ceyhan et al., Reference Ceyhan, Akyol and Erdem2008), Adriatic Sea (Maci et al., Reference Maci, Longoa and Basseta2009) and Gulf of Gabes (Ghailen et al., Reference Ghailen, Abdallah, Hassan, Mourad and Abderrahmen2010). Reproduction and growth have been investigated in the western Mediterranean (Suau, Reference Suau1970), northern and central Adriatic Sea (Kraljević et al., Reference Kraljević, Dulčić, Cetinić and Pallaoro1996), central-eastern Atlantic (Lorenzo et al., Reference Lorenzo, Pajuelo, Méndez-Villamil, Coca and Ramos2002; Pajuelo et al., Reference Pajuelo, Lorenzo, Mendez, Coca and Ramos2002), Iskenderun Bay (Türkmen & Akyurt, Reference Türkmen and Akyurt2003), coastal waters of the Thracian Sea (Kallianiotis et al., Reference Pajuelo, Lorenzo, Mendez, Coca and Ramos2005), Beymelek Lagoon (Emre et al., Reference Emre, Balik, Sumer, Oskay and Yesilcimen2010), south-eastern coast of Tunisia (Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al., Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016) and in the central coast of Algeria (Boufersaoui et al., Reference Boufersaoui, Kassar, Zakia, Elleboode and Mahé2018).

On the Tunisian coasts, L. mormyrus, like many other seabream species, is an important member of the continental shelf demersal fish community. The feeding habits, age, growth and reproduction of the striped seabream of the Gulf of Gabes (south-eastern coast of Tunisia) have been studied (Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al., Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016). Moreover, owing to the sexual pattern of the striped seabream which is characterized by protandric hermaphroditism (Türkmen & Akyurt, Reference Türkmen and Akyurt2003; Kallianiotis et al., Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005), a slow growth and a high instantaneous rate of natural mortality (Lorenzo et al., Reference Lorenzo, Pajuelo, Méndez-Villamil, Coca and Ramos2002), the species is potentially vulnerable to overexploitation and therefore a follow-up of its stock status is required. However, biological parameters have not yet been determined for the striped seabream population of the Gulf of Tunis (north-eastern coast of Tunisia). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide basic information on growth parameters of the striped seabream in the Gulf of Tunis and on its exploitation status. The weight–length relationship was established. The methodology, reliability and validity of age estimates derived from the sagittal otolith were assessed. The von Bertalanffy growth parameters, optimum length at capture, mortalities and exploitation rate were evaluated. These biological parameters are essential for the adoption of a sustainable stock management strategy of this species in the Gulf of Tunis.

Materials and methods

Fish sampling

Samples of L. mormyrus (N = 516) were obtained from the landings of the small-scale artisanal fleet of the Gulf of Tunis (central Mediterranean Sea, 37°N 10°30′E). Fish samples were randomly collected on a monthly basis, from February 2014 to July 2015, following capture by gillnet, trammel net and longline (Cherif et al., Reference Cherif, Benmessaoud, Elhechri, Benmoumen and Zaara2019). Each individual was measured to the nearest mm for total length (TL) and weighed to the nearest gram for total weight (TW). After dissection, individuals were sexed as males (M), females (F) or hermaphrodites (H) by a visual observation of the gonads. Hermaphrodites were fishes presenting bisexual gonads clearly visible to the naked eye. Unsexed individuals (U) have thin and translucent gonads preventing any identification of the gender. In addition, sagittal otoliths were extracted, cleaned and stored dry in labelled envelopes for later treatment and examination.

Weight–length relationships

The fish somatic growth was described by the power function TW = a.TLb, where TW is the total weight (g) and TL the total length (cm). According to the recommendations of Froese et al. (Reference Froese, Tsikliras and Stergiou2011) the log-transformed data were plotted and obvious outliers were removed before fitting the linear regression. The regression coefficients a and b were then calculated for the whole sample using a least square linear regression on log-transformed data. The determination of the growth type was realized using the t-test to investigate whether the slope b was significantly different from the theoretical value of 3, whereas analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were employed to detect any significant differences in the linear relationships between sexes (Zar, Reference Zar1999).

Otolith preparation and ageing precision

According to the international ageing protocol used for most Mediterranean species (Vitale et al., Reference Vitale, Worsøe Clausen and Ní Chonchúir2019), sagittal otoliths were used in order to determine age of each specimen analysed. For this species, transverse sections (mean width 0.8 mm) of the otoliths were used for age determination. All otolith sections were photographed using a Zeiss microscope under transmitted light, assisted by an image analysis system using the TNPC software for digital processing of calcified structures. Three thin sections were prepared for each otolith to optimize the observation of a succession of alternate translucent and opaque bands (Figure 1). It was assumed that annual growth rings (the ‘annulus’) consisted of one opaque and one translucent band.

Fig. 1. Transverse section of sagittal otolith of a 5-year-old L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis (TL = 20 cm, female), showing the annual rings (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5).

Counts of the annual growth increments were made by two readers, without reference to fish length or sex to avoid subjectivity on age estimations. To minimize observation errors, only coincident readings were accepted. For that purpose, the index of average percentage error (IAPE) was performed to evaluate the precision of the age determinations between the two readers using the formula described by Beamish & Fournier (Reference Beamish and Fournier1981):

$${\rm AP}{\rm E}_j\lpar \% \rpar = 100 \times \displaystyle{1 \over R}\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^R \displaystyle{{\vert {X_{ij} + X_j} \vert } \over {X_j}}$$

where R is the number of readings, Xij is the ith age determination of the jth fish and Xj is the mean age calculated for the jth fish, with greater precision achieved as the IAPE is minimized.

Validation and estimation of age

To validate the seasonality and to determine the periodicity of the translucent zones, marginal increment ratio analysis (MIR, 0.01 mm) was used. This relies on the assumption that if a zone is laid down once a year, there should be a clear annual pattern of periodic growth on the edge of the otolith during the year. Thus the monthly estimates of the MIR were carried out on the entire otolith sample and followed throughout the year. Marginal increment ratio was calculated using the formula:

$${\rm MIR} = R_o-R_n/R_n-R_{n-1}$$

For that purpose, the radius of the otolith (Ro) was measured and also the distance from the nucleus to the last growth increment (Rn) and to the penultimate growth increment (Rn −1). The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test the homogeneity of MIR among months followed by a Student–Newman–Keuls test (SNK).

Growth biological parameters

Since L. mormyrus displays protandric hermaphroditism, sexes were pooled together for the estimation of the growth parameters as they could be considered as the same individuals but at different reproductive stages (Kallianiotis et al., Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005).

Growth was described by the von Bertalanffy model (Reference von Bertalanffy1938) according to the formula:

$${\rm T}{\rm L}_i = {\rm T}{\rm L}_\infty \lpar 1-{\rm e}^{{-}k\lpar t-t_0\rpar }\rpar $$

Where TLi is the total length at age i, TL is asymptotic total length, k is the growth coefficient (year−1), t is the age (year from birth), and t0 is the theoretical age at zero length (years). The determination of the growth parameters (TL, k and t0) and all the statistical analyses were conducted using Fishparm, a computer program based on a non-linear model with an algorithm for least-square estimation (Saila et al., Reference Saila, Recksiek and Prager1988). The estimated parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth allowed the estimation of the length at maximum yield per recruit (Lopt), and the growth performance index (Φ′). For that purpose, the following empirical relationships of Froese & Binohlan (Reference Froese and Binohlan2000) (Lopt = L  × [3/(3 + M/k)) and Munro & Pauly (Reference Munro and Pauly1983) (Φ′ = log k + 2log TL) were used, with L the asymptotic length, k the growth coefficient (year−1) and M the natural mortality (year−1).

Mortalities and exploitation rates

Instantaneous total mortality (Z, year−1) was estimated from the slope of the linear regression through the descending right limb of the established linearized catch curve (Pauly, Reference Pauly1983). Natural mortality (M, year−1) was calculated using the empirical relationship of Pauly (Reference Pauly1980):

$$\ln M = {-}0.0066- 0.279\,\log L_\infty + 0.6543\,\log k + 0.4634\,\log T\comma \;$$

where T is the mean water temperature. Indeed, after the use of the Alagaraja (Reference Alagaraja1984) equation (Te = 4.605/M year−1), which calculates longevity (Te) from natural mortality (M), it has been found that the obtained value of M with the method of Pauly (Reference Pauly1980) gives an adequate estimation of the striped seabream longevity. The instantaneous rate of fishing mortality (F, year−1) was obtained from the difference between Z and M. The exploitation rate (E) was determined according to Gulland (Reference Gulland1971):

$$E = F/Z.$$

Results

Sample structure, sex ratio and weight–length relationship

Of the 516 fish examined, 231 were males, 224 females and 3 hermaphrodite individuals. The sex of the remaining 58 fish could not be determined and they were recorded as unsexed. The global sex ratio (M:F) did not differ significantly from 1:1 (χ2 test < 3.84; N = 455, P > 0.05).

Males ranged in size from 10.3–27.5 cm and females from 10.7–25.4 cm respectively (Figure 2). The mean total length (TL) of males (TL = 17.28 ± 0.17 cm) was significantly different (Mann–Whitney U test; N = 455; P = 0.003) from that of females (TL = 18.25 ± 0.17 cm). Hermaphrodites were found at sizes between 15.1 and 17.4 cm (16.3 ± 0.66 cm) and unsexed fish between 6 and 18 cm (13.05 ± 0.52 cm). The total weight (TW) of fish was 53.4–293.5 g (mean TW = 66.4 ± 2.4 g) for males and 18.3–285.1 g (mean TW = 79.7 ± 2.8 g) for females. The mean total weight was not significantly different between sexes (Mann–Whitney U test, N = 455, P = 0.0059). Total weight of hermaphrodites and unsexed individuals varied respectively from 57.1 to 69.7 g (63.63 ± 3.66 g) and 2.2 to 72 g (32.95 ± 3.20 g).

Fig. 2. Length frequency distribution of males, females, hermaphrodites and unsexed individuals of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

The estimated weight–length relationship for the combined sexes was TW = 0.00654 TL3.213 (N = 516; r 2 = 0.977; SE (b) = 0.063) and was highly significant (P < 0.001); its slope (b value) differed significantly from the theoretical value of 3 (t-test; P < 0.05) indicating a positive allometric growth of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Age validation

Of the 516 specimens examined, 488 were retained for age determination and the remaining ones were discarded as they showed disagreement in the reading of otoliths. The low value of the IAPE (1.61%) demonstrated consistency and high precision in distinguishing and counting growth marks.

The lowest average values of the otolith marginal increment ratio were observed from February to April (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.04; SNK, P = 0.001) while an increasing trend of MIR values was discerned throughout the rest of the year (Figure 3). Thus, the recorded fluctuations of MIR, performed on the entire sample, validated the deposition of two different growth zones composing a yearly annulus.

Fig. 3. Monthly evolution of average marginal increment of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Growth parameters

To summarize the age composition of L. mormyrus, an age-length key was constructed (Table 1). The age of the sample varied from 0 to 7 years and was characterized by a high percentage of specimens (81%) between 1 and 3 years and a modal age of 2 years. The mean observed length-at-age data were fitted to the von Bertalanffy growth function. The size increments between successive age groups showed a rapid growth until the third year, which slowed down considerably beyond this age.

Table 1. Age length key of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis

N, number of fish; SD, standard deviation; %, frequency of fish by age group.

The estimated parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth were L  = 30.180 ± 0.660 cm, k = 0.303 ± 0.024 year−1 and t 0 = −1.420 ± 0.110 years (Figure 4). The length at maximum yield per recruit (Lopt) was 17.150 ± 1.715 cm. The calculated growth performance index of L. mormyrus was Φ′ = 2.440.

Fig. 4. Von Bertalanffy growth curve of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Mortality and exploitation rate estimates

The instantaneous rate of total mortality, corresponding to the slope of the descending limb of the catch curve was Z = 0.784 year−1 (Figure 5). The calculated instantaneous rate of natural mortality was M = 0.698 year−1. Taking into account the estimated values of Z and M, instantaneous rate of fishing mortality was F = 0.067 year−1. Knowing M and F, the computed exploitation ratio was E = 0.11.

Fig. 5. Length-converted catch curve of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Discussion

Sample characteristics and sex ratio

In the Gulf of Tunis, male and female striped seabream displayed a large overlap in their length distributions and did not present the bimodal distribution often expected in sequential hermaphroditic populations. However, the mean size of females was significantly greater than that of males as a result of the dominance of males in the lower length classes and of females in greater ones. This pattern of gender distribution by size is one of the characteristics of a protandrous hermaphroditism and has been already described in other studies dealing with the sexuality of the striped seabream (Lorenzo et al., Reference Lorenzo, Pajuelo, Méndez-Villamil, Coca and Ramos2002; Türkmen & Akyurt, Reference Türkmen and Akyurt2003; Kallianiotis et al., Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005; Vitale et al., Reference Vitale, Arkhipkin, Cannizzaro and Scalisi2011; Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al., Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016). Moreover, the presence of individuals with visible bisexual gonads, even in very low proportion (0.58%), supports the occurrence of hermaphroditism in the population.

The mean total length (TL = 17.5 ± 0.4 cm) of the sample of the Gulf of Tunis was very similar to the average size (TL = 17.32 ± 2.08 cm) observed for the captured individuals from Tunisian lagoons (Hammami et al., Reference Hammami, Bahri-Sfar, Kaoueche, Grenouilet, Lek, Kara and Ben Hassine2013). However, the mean sizes recorded for the populations from two sites from the Portuguese coasts (TL = 23.79 ± 8.71 cm; TL = 27.73 ± 3.08 cm; Gonçalves et al., Reference Gonçalves, Bentes, Lino, Ribeiro, Canário and Erzini1997) and from the Turkish coast of the Aegean Sea (TL = 23.7 ± 0.35 cm; Ceyhan et al., Reference Ceyhan, Akyol and Erdem2008) were greater. Several factors may be responsible for the differences in the mean sizes among intra-specific populations: the differential growth of fish in their environment, the size selectivity properties of the fishing gears used in the fisheries and the fishing pressure (Gonçalves et al., Reference Gonçalves, Bentes, Lino, Ribeiro, Canário and Erzini1997; Trenkel & Rochet, Reference Trenkel and Rochet2003).

Length–weight relationship

The study of the weight–length relationship in different maritime sectors showed that the observed b values were between 2.69 (Kraljević et al., Reference Kraljević, Dulčić, Cetinić and Pallaoro1996) and 3.14 (Matić-Skoko et al., Reference Matić-Skoko, Ferri, Kraljević and Dulčic2007) (Table 2). In the Mediterranean Sea, most studies showed an isometric somatic growth of the striped seabream, except in those conducted in Kastela Bay on the Northern Adriatic coast (Kraljević et al., Reference Kraljević, Dulčić, Cetinić and Pallaoro1996), the Croatian coast (Matić-Skoko et al., Reference Matić-Skoko, Ferri, Kraljević and Dulčic2007) and the Gulf of Tunis (present study) where growth was allometric. Also, different growth types were registered in Mediterranean lagoons and in the Atlantic. Many factors such as seasonality, temperature, photoperiod, food availability and range sizes of the sample may be responsible for the varying somatic growth rates observed between localities.

Table 2. Biogeographic comparison of the parameters of the sex-combined weight–length relationships of L. mormyrus

N, sample; a, intercept; b, slope; SEb, standard error of b; r2, coefficient of determination; I, isometric growth; A−, negative allometric growth; A+, positive allometric growth.

Age and growth

Precise estimation of fish age and validation of the timing of ring formation are essential steps for age-based evaluation of fish populations and management (Morales-Nin & Panfili, Reference Morales-Nin, Panfili, Panfili, Puntual, Troadec and Wright2002). In the Gulf of Tunis, the monthly fluctuations of the otoliths' marginal increment confirmed an annual periodicity of growth with the deposition of a translucent zone of slow growth in the winter and of an opaque zone of rapid growth in the summer. In the Gulf of Gabes, Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al. (Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016) mentioned a winter hyaline increment deposition while in the Thracian Sea, Kallianiotis et al. (Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005) suggested that the hyaline zone is completed between January and May.

The readings of the growth rings performed by two researchers were efficient as 94.6% of the otoliths were easily interpreted; the otolith is therefore an appropriate tool for age and growth estimation of L. mormyrus.

In the Gulf of Tunis, the oldest striped seabream observed was 7 years old. Previous studies in different marine localities recorded longevities from 7 to 14 years with ages ranging from 7–11 years in the Mediterranean Sea and 8–14 years in the Atlantic Sea (Table 3). Other studies have only reported younger fish, such as in the lagoon of Beymelek (Turkey), where the oldest individuals reached 4 years old (Emre et al., Reference Emre, Balik, Sumer, Oskay and Yesilcimen2010). The variable age ranges may be attributed to geographic and environmental differences, as well as differences in sampling. According to Carbonara et al. (Reference Carbonara, Zupa, Anastasopoulou, Bellodi, Bittetto, Charilaou, Chatzispirou, Elleboode, Esteban, Follesa, Isajlovic, Jadaud, Garcia-Ruiz, Giannakaki, Guijarro, Kiparissis, Ligas, Mahé, Massaro, Medvesek, Mytilineou, Ordines, Pesci, Porcu, Peristeraki, Thasitis, Torres, Spedicato, Tursi and Sion2019) geographic location was the most important factor significantly correlated to age variability in Mullus barbatus in the Mediterranean, with the longitudinal (west–east) sample geographic component influencing more than the latitudinal (north–south) one.

Table 3. Biogeographic comparison of the von Bertalanffy growth parameters of L. mormyrus

N, number of fish; M, Method; O, Otolithometry; S, Scalimetry; F, female; M, male; CS, combined sexes (males, females, hermaphrodites, unsexed); M + F = males + females; TL, total length; TL, asymptotic length; k, growth coefficient; t 0, theoretical age at zero length; Φ′, growth performance index; A, maximum age.

In the Gulf of Tunis, the theoretical maximum length (TL) was found to be similar to values estimated in other areas of the Mediterranean Sea by Türkmen & Akyurt (Reference Türkmen and Akyurt2003), Kallianiotis et al. (Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005), Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al. (Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016) and Emre et al. (Reference Emre, Balik, Sumer, Oskay and Yesilcimen2010), with an exception for the striped seabream in the Adriatic Sea where a higher value was reported (Table 3). However, in the Atlantic, theoretical maximum lengths estimated by Pajuelo et al. (Reference Pajuelo, Lorenzo, Mendez, Coca and Ramos2002), Lorenzo et al. (Reference Lorenzo, Pajuelo, Méndez-Villamil, Coca and Ramos2002) and Monteiro et al. (Reference Monteiro, Bentes, Coelho, Correia, Erzini, Lino, Ribeiro and Gonçalves2010) were greater than reported from the Mediterranean Sea.

Otherwise, the growth coefficient k varied from 0.11–0.30 year−1 over the distribution area of the studied species (Table 3). The specimens from the Gulf of Tunis (north-eastern coasts of Tunisia) presented the fastest growth pattern (k = 0.3 year−1); similar to the results of Emre et al. (Reference Emre, Balik, Sumer, Oskay and Yesilcimen2010) and Kraljević et al. (Reference Kraljević, Dulčić, Cetinić and Pallaoro1996) for Beymelek Lagoon and the northern Adriatic Sea, respectively. This is probably related to the structure of the studied populations as their length–frequency distribution is composed of a higher percentage of young individuals. Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al. (Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016) found, on the south-eastern coast of Tunisia of the Gulf of Gabes, a slower growth pattern (k = 0.11) than on the north-eastern coast of Tunisia of the Gulf of Tunis (k = 0.3 year−1). Hydrological parameters and productivity are different in these two regions (Azouz, Reference Azouz1971; Ben Othman, Reference Ben Othman1973) and the fishing pressure is known to be higher in the Gulf of Gabes. Geographic variations in the estimated growth parameters of fishes may be attributed to several factors, such as gear selectivity, methodologies of study (reader experience), fishing exploitation and geographic location of samples (Carbonara et al., Reference Carbonara, Zupa, Anastasopoulou, Bellodi, Bittetto, Charilaou, Chatzispirou, Elleboode, Esteban, Follesa, Isajlovic, Jadaud, Garcia-Ruiz, Giannakaki, Guijarro, Kiparissis, Ligas, Mahé, Massaro, Medvesek, Mytilineou, Ordines, Pesci, Porcu, Peristeraki, Thasitis, Torres, Spedicato, Tursi and Sion2019); however, they generally represent epigenetic responses to environmental conditions (Ibrahim et al., Reference Ibrahim, Shalloof and Salama2008).

The growth performance index (Φ′) values varied from 2.04–2.54 (Table 3). The growth potential of the striped seabream of the Gulf of Tunis is quite comparable to those estimated in the different areas of the Atlantic and in some locations of the Mediterranean Sea.

Mortality and exploitation rate estimates

The estimation of mortalities indicates that the striped seabream of the Gulf of Tunis (northern coast of Tunisia) have a rational exploitation; this is probably due to the fact that the species is essentially caught by selective fishing gears.

Also, 18 years ago in the same location, Ezzeddine-Najai et al. (Reference Ezzeddine-Najai, Gharbi, Chemmam, Fezzani, Ben Meriem, Besbes, Zarrad, Bedoui, Ghorbel, Sellem, Ben Abdallah and Abed2001) reported that the species was not overexploited. Kallianiotis et al. (Reference Kallianiotis, Torre and Argyri2005) indicated that the trammel net fishery of the Thracian Sea may be sustainable as the fishing mortality rate was low, but that it is necessary to consider the impact of the other fishing gears to determine the real status of exploitation of the species. Monteiro et al. (Reference Monteiro, Bentes, Coelho, Correia, Erzini, Lino, Ribeiro and Gonçalves2010) recommended the use of longlines for sustainable fishing of the striped seabream from the south coast of Portugal, as these fishing gears tend to catch large individuals. However, Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida et al. (Reference Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, Ben Hadj Hamida, Chaouch, Jarboui and Missaoui2016) reported that the striped seabream is overexploited in the Gulf of Gabes (south-eastern coast of Tunisia) and that this status explains its low growth and the absence of very large individuals in this area. Otherwise, the stock of the striped seabream from Iskanderun Bay was found to be heavily exploited (Türkmen & Akyurt, Reference Türkmen and Akyurt2003).

The estimation of percentage of fish caught at optimum length and the percentage of mega-spawners are useful indicators, allowing effective assessment of status and trends in fisheries (Froese, Reference Froese2004). The target will be to catch all fish within Lopt ± 10% to obtain the maximum possible yield in the Gulf of Tunis; 59.27% of the individuals were caught within these size limits. According to Froese (Reference Froese2004), mega-spawners are much more fecund females and constitute reservoirs and distributors of desirable genes that naturally safeguard against recruitment failure by their longevity and by the extension of their reproductive phase. Mega-spawners are represented by all fish whose size is larger than optimum length plus 10%. Moreover, as no upper size limit exists in the Gulf of Tunis, the catch reflects the age and size structure of the stock and the percentage of mega-spawners in the catch is an indicator of the state of the stock. In the sample of the Gulf of Tunis, mega-spawners comprise 28.95% of the stock which represents an almost healthy age structure for the striped seabream.

References

Abecasis, D, Bentes, L, Coelho, R, Correia, C, Lino, PG, Monteiro, P, Gonçalves, JMS, Ribeiro, J and Erzini, K (2008) Ageing seabreams: a comparative study between scales and otoliths. Fisheries Research 89, 3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alagaraja, K (1984) Simple methods for estimation of parameters for assessing exploited fish stocks. Indian Journal of Fisheries 31, 177208.Google Scholar
Azouz, A (1971) Studies of Benthic Biocenoses and Bottom Ichthyological Fauna Trawlers from Tunisia: North and Southeast Region (PhD thesis). University of Caen, France.Google Scholar
Badalamenti, F, D'Anna, G, Fazio, M, Gristina, M and Lipari, R (1993) Trophic relationships between four fish species caught on different substrates in the Gulf of Castellamare (Sicily N/O). Biologia Marina Mediterranea 1, 145150.Google Scholar
Bauchot, L and Hureau, JC (1986) Sparidae. In Whitehead, PJP, Bauchot, ML, Hureau, JC, Nielson, J and Tortonese, E (eds), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 883907.Google Scholar
Beamish, RJ and Fournier, DA (1981) A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 33, 8.Google Scholar
Ben Abdallah-Ben Hadj Hamida, O, Ben Hadj Hamida, N, Chaouch, H, Jarboui, O and Missaoui, H (2016) Age, growth and reproduction of the striped sea bream Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Gulf of Gabes (Southeastern Tunisia, Central Mediterranean). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 57, 113123.Google Scholar
Ben Othman, S (1973) The South of Tunisia (Gulf of Gabes): Hydrology, Sedimentology, Flora and Cycle. Marine Biology and Oceanography (PhD thesis). Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, Tunisia.Google Scholar
Boufersaoui, S, Kassar, A, Zakia, M, Elleboode, R and Mahé, K (2018) Age and growth of the striped seabream, Lithognathus mormyrus (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Sparidae), in the central coast of Algeria, Mediterranean Sea. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 48, 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradai, MN, Jarboui, O, Ghorbel, M, Bouaïn, A and El Abed, A (1998) Diet of Diplodus annularis and Lithognathus mormyrus (Teleostei, Sparidae) in the region of Gulf of Gabes. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Océanographie et de Pêche de Salammbô 4, 1215.Google Scholar
Carbonara, P, Zupa, W, Anastasopoulou, A, Bellodi, A, Bittetto, I, Charilaou, C, Chatzispirou, A, Elleboode, R, Esteban, A, Follesa, MC, Isajlovic, I, Jadaud, A, Garcia-Ruiz, C, Giannakaki, A, Guijarro, B, Kiparissis, SE, Ligas, A, Mahé, K, Massaro, A, Medvesek, D, Mytilineou, C, Ordines, F, Pesci, P, Porcu, C, Peristeraki, P, Thasitis, I, Torres, P, Spedicato, MT, Tursi, A and Sion, L (2019) Explorative analysis on red mullet (Mullus barbatus) ageing data variability in the Mediterranean. Scientia Marina 83, 271279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceyhan, T, Akyol, O and Erdem, M (2008) Length-weight relationships of fishes from Gökova Bay, Turkey (Aegean Sea). Turkish Journal of Zoology 33, 6972.Google Scholar
Cherif, M, Benmessaoud, R, Elhechri, F, Benmoumen, Y and Zaara, K (2019) Portrait de la filiére pêche artisanale dans le golfe de Tunis: engins de pêche, calendrier d'activité et aires d'exploitation. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Océanographie et de Pêche de Salammbô 46, 3339.Google Scholar
Crec'hriou, R, Neveu, R and Lenfant, P (2012) Length–weight relationship of main commercial fishes from the French Catalan coast. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 28, 861862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emre, Y, Balik, I, Sumer, C, Oskay, DA and Yesilcimen, HO (2010) Age, growth, length-weight relationship and reproduction of the striped seabream (Lithognathus mormyrus, Linnaeus, 1758) (Sparidae) in the Beymelek Lagoon (Antalya, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology 34, 93100.Google Scholar
Ezzeddine-Najai, S, Gharbi, H, Chemmam, B, Fezzani, S, Ben Meriem, S, Besbes, A, Zarrad, R, Bedoui, R, Ghorbel, M, Sellem, F, Ben Abdallah, L and Abed, A (2001) State of exploitation and distribution of benthic species in Tunisian northern waters. Proceedings of the Eighth National Days of Agricultural Research Achievements, IRESA (Nabeul 13 and 14 November 2001).Google Scholar
Froese, R (2004) Keep it simple: three indicators to deal with overfishing. Fish and Fisheries 5, 8691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R and Binohlan, C (2000) Empirical relationships to estimate asymptotic length, length at first maturity and length at maximum yield per recruit in fishes, with a simple method to evaluate length frequency data. Journal of Fish Biology 56, 758773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R, Tsikliras, AC and Stergiou, KI (2011) Editorial note on weight–length relations of fishes. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 41, 261–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghailen, H, Abdallah, H, Hassan, A, Mourad, C and Abderrahmen, OJ (2010) Length weight relationships for 13 fish species from the Gulf of Gabes (Southern Tunisia, Central Mediterranean). African Journal of Biotechnology 9, 61776181.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, JMS, Bentes, L, Lino, PG, Ribeiro, J, Canário, AVM and Erzini, K (1997) Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 30, 253256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulland, JA (1971) The Fish Resources of the Oceans. West Byfleet: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Hammami, I, Bahri-Sfar, L, Kaoueche, M, Grenouilet, G, Lek, S, Kara, MH and Ben Hassine, OK (2013) Morphological characterization of striped seabream (Lithognathus mormyrus, Sparidae) in some Mediterranean lagoons. Cybium 37, 127139.Google Scholar
Harchouche, K, Maurin, C and Quéro, JC (2005) Inventory of prey ingested of striped seabream Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces: Perciformes: Sparidae) in the Bay of Alger and Annaba. Annales de la Société des sciences naturelles de la Charente-Maritime 9, 491502.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, SM, Shalloof, KAS and Salama, HM (2008) Effect of environmental conditions of Abu-Zabal Lake on some biological, histological and quality aspects of fish. Global Veterinaria 2, 257270.Google Scholar
Kallianiotis, A, Torre, M and Argyri, A (2005) Age, growth, mortality, reproduction, and feeding habits of the striped seabream, Lithognathus mormyrus (Pisces: Sparidae), in the coastal waters of the Thracian Sea, Greece. Scientia Marina 3, 391404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaldi, A and Chakroun-Marzouk, N (2016) Biometrics and food ethology of two Sparidae Oblada melanura (Linnaeus, 1758) and Lithognathus mormyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Gulf of Tunis. Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique d'Oceanographie et de Pêche Salammbô 43, 18.Google Scholar
Kraljević, M, Dulčić, J, Cetinić, P and Pallaoro, A (1996) Age, growth and mortality of the striped seabream, Lithognathus mormyrus, in the Northern Adriatic. Fisheries Research 28, 361370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, JM, Pajuelo, JG and Méndez-Villamil, M, Coca, J and Ramos, AG (2002) Age, croissance, reproduction et mortalité du marbré Lithognathus mormyrus (Sparidés) aux iles Canaries (Central-East Atlantic). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 8, 204209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maci, S, Longoa, E and Basseta, A (2009) Length-weight relationships for 24 selected fish species from a non-tidal lagoon of the southern Adriatic Sea (Italy). Transitional Waters Bulletin 3, 19.Google Scholar
Matić-Skoko, S, Ferri, J, Kraljević, M and Dulčic, J (2007) Growth of juvenile striped seabream, Lithognathus mormyrus (Teleostein Sparidae), in the Adriatic Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23, 286287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, P, Bentes, L, Coelho, R, Correia, C, Erzini, K, Lino, PG, Ribeiro, J and Gonçalves, JMS (2010) Age and growth, mortality and reproduction of the striped sea bream Lithogonathus mormyrus Linnaeus, 1758, from the South Coast of Portugal (Algarve). Marine Biology Research 6, 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-Nin, B and Panfili, J (2002) Sclerochronological studies: age estimation. In Panfili, J, Puntual, H, Troadec, H and Wright, PJ (eds), Manual of Fish Sclerochronology. Brest: IFREMER-IRD, pp. 9198.Google Scholar
Munro, JL and Pauly, D (1983) A simple method for comparing the growth of fishes and invertebrates. Fishbyte 1, 56.Google Scholar
Osman, A (2005) Age and growth of Lithognathus mormyrus (Teleostein Sparidae) in Mediterranean waters off Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Aquatic Research 31, 274280.Google Scholar
Pajuelo, JG, Lorenzo, JM, Mendez, M, Coca, J and Ramos, AG (2002) Determination of age and growth of the striped seabream Lithognathus mormyrus (Sparidae) in the Canarian archipelago by otolith readings and backcalculation. Scientia Marina 66, 2732.Google Scholar
Pauly, D (1980) On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. ICES Journal of Marine Science 39, 175192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D (1983) Some Simple Methods for the Assessment Package of Tropical Fish Stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 234. Rome; FAO.Google Scholar
Saila, SB, Recksiek, CW and Prager, MH (1988) Basic fishery science programs. A compendium of microcomputer programs and manual of operation. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science 18, 1203.Google Scholar
Šantić, M, Paladin, A and Elez, G (2010) Diet of striped sea bream Lithognathus mormyrus (Sparidae) from eastern central Adriatic Sea. Cybium 3, 345352.Google Scholar
Suau, P (1970) Contribution to the study of the biology of Lithognathus mormyrus (Sparidae). Investigacion Pesquera 34, 237265.Google Scholar
Trenkel, VM and Rochet, MJ (2003) Performance of indicators derived from abundance estimates for detecting the impact of fishing on a fish community. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 60, 6785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkmen, M and Akyurt, I (2003) Growth characteristics, sex inversion and mortality rates of striped sea bream, Lithognathus mormyrus, in Üskenderun Bay. Turkish Journal of Zoology 27, 323329.Google Scholar
Vitale, S, Arkhipkin, A, Cannizzaro, L and Scalisi, M (2011) Life history traits of the striped sea bream Lithognathus mormyrus (Pisces, Sparidae) from two coastal fishing grounds in the Strait of Sicily. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27, 10861094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitale, F, Worsøe Clausen, L and Ní Chonchúir, G (eds) (2019) Handbook of Fish age Estimation Protocols and Validation Methods. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 346. Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5221.Google Scholar
von Bertalanffy, L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws ll). Human Biology 10, 181213.Google Scholar
Zar, JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Transverse section of sagittal otolith of a 5-year-old L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis (TL = 20 cm, female), showing the annual rings (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Length frequency distribution of males, females, hermaphrodites and unsexed individuals of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Monthly evolution of average marginal increment of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Figure 3

Table 1. Age length key of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Von Bertalanffy growth curve of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Length-converted catch curve of L. mormyrus in the Gulf of Tunis.

Figure 6

Table 2. Biogeographic comparison of the parameters of the sex-combined weight–length relationships of L. mormyrus

Figure 7

Table 3. Biogeographic comparison of the von Bertalanffy growth parameters of L. mormyrus