Article contents
Comment by the Editor on Maddieson and on Kelly
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2009
Extract
It may be useful to separate out the issue of a choice of symbol from the issue of its status (official approval or individual usage). On the choice of symbol, if we endorse the apparent bias towards articulation as a defining criterion in the IPA then criteria like diachrony, perceptual similarity and even phonology are secondary at best. (Note that in making this inference from current practice, I do not wish to pre-empt any debate about whether the articulatory bias is valid!)
- Type
- Revision of the IPA: Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1987
- 1
- Cited by