Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T14:32:03.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inhibition of return in children with perinatal brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2001

JEFFREY SCHATZ
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
SUZANNE CRAFT
Affiliation:
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
DESIREE WHITE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
T.S. PARK
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery and St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
GARY S. FIGIEL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Inhibition of return is a bias in attention that reduces the likelihood of returning attention to previously viewed locations. This attention bias develops during the first 6 months of life and is putatively mediated by midbrain structures. The present study evaluated the effects of perinatal lesions on the development of inhibition of return. Thirty-three children with perinatal injury resulting in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy were grouped based on magnetic resonance exams. Children with anterior (n = 5), posterior (n = 12), diffuse (n = 8), or no apparent (n = 8) lesions were compared with a group of age-matched children without neurologic injury (n = 39) on an orienting task designed to elicit inhibition of return. Short-delay trials demonstrated grossly intact facilitation of attention for all groups. Long-delay trials that produced inhibition of return in the control and posterior injury groups indicated a disruption of inhibition of return in the groups with anterior and diffuse lesions. The findings are consistent with previous reports that anterior regions are important for the developing attention system, and that bilateral injury can result in unilateral disruption of visual attention. (JINS, 2001, 7, 275–284.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 The International Neuropsychological Society