Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T13:58:45.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-dose-rate brachytherapy planning in palliative management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2015

Surega Anbumani*
Affiliation:
HCG Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Ramesh S. Bilimagga
Affiliation:
HCG Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Pichandi Anchineyen
Affiliation:
Healthcare Global Enterprises Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Punitha Jayaraman
Affiliation:
HCG Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Siddanna R. Palled
Affiliation:
Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Marigowda Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
*
Correspondence to: Surega Anbumani, LINAC Center, HCG Bangalore Institute of Oncology, 44-45/2, II Cross, RRMR Extension, Off Lalbagh Double Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Tel: +91 812 347 8031; Fax: +91 08040206075; E-mail: suregaanbumani@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or klatskin’s tumour involves malignant tumours at the liver hilum’s biliary confluence. Incidence of CCA results in unresectable tumours that require appropriate therapy to improve quality of life. The liver is considered as the most frequent site of tumour recurrence. Promising results of long-term survival have been established with computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Materials and methods:

Intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) is performed through the percutaneous transhapatic bile duct drain tube (PTBD). The passage of the brachytherapy guide tube through the bile duct is more complex compared with oesophageal/endobronchial application.

Results/discussion:

It results in a recoiled view of the tube in the abdominal region of the computed tomography (CT) scan. Owing to inherent artefacts induced by metal stents in CT scans, intersected view is possible between the ILBT guide tube and the intra-hepatic drain tube. It would mislead the planner to track wrong passage that could result in fatal error.

Conclusion:

In this case study, we contoured the ILBT guide tube by cross-verifying its position with a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) before catheter tracking. Thus, it ensures precise simulation of source dwell positions, thereby avoiding high-dose delivery to nearby vital organs such as intestines, liver hilum and blood vessels.

Type
Case Study
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Purpose

Computed tomography (CT)-guided brachytherapy is the standard treatment planning method adapted for accurate delineation of target volumes.Reference Blechacz and Gores1Reference Weber, Jarnagin and Klimstra3 Thus, it provides safe dose escalation without harming the adjacent normal structures.Reference Shimada, Kishi and Hata4, Reference Kamphues, Seehofer and Eisele5 CT improves the overall 5-year survival rates by about 3·5%, with the greatest impact on small volume treatments.Reference Ricke, Mohnike and Pech6Reference Ishii, Furuse and Nagase10 Advanced planning systems provide an option for applicator modelling that helps in reducing catheter reconstruction time. However, they offer a material library only for specific gynaecological applicators.12 Auto reconstruction is possible when there is a difference between CT density of applicators and surrounding tissue.Reference Milickovic, Baltas, Giannouli, Lahanas, Uzunoglu and Zamboglu13 CT density is almost similar for the two metal stents used in the biliary duct system. In other words, both intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic (used for intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT)) metal stents introduce artefacts in the CT scans. The planner’s expertise plays a major role in reconstructing the correct passage of the ILBT guide tube that recoils and overlaps with the intra-hepatic drain stent. Digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) is a useful tool in brachytherapy planning when there is no other image guidance avialable.Reference Milickovic, Baltas, Giannouli, Lahanas and Zamboglou14 In this study, we used DRR to reconstruct the ILBT catheter. We contoured the catheter’s passage in each transverse CT section by verifying with DRR view. Thus, it helps in quick reconstruction, reducing the overall planning time. It leads to accurate catheter reconstruction, whereas any displacement could lead to erratic dose calculation for a high-dose-rate brachytherapy source.

Technique

A 64-year-old woman with a known case of Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (Stage I, small cell type) was treated with external beam radiotherapy on January 2004. Recently, she presented with complaints of recurrent vomiting, stomach ache and symptomatic obstructive jaundice. CT investigation revealed an ill-defined lesion at the porta hepatis encasing the right hepatic duct and the common hepatic duct as well as revealed a moderate dilatation of left hepatic duct. Positron emission tomography suggested relapse lymphoma. Ultrasound-guided biopsy confirmed hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) as the second malignancy. To remove the block in common biliary duct, an intra-hepatic stent was inserted at the right side. In addition, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (as extra hepatic drain) was performed for the palliation of obstructive jaundice caused by CCA (Figure 1). ILBT is considered to reduce the risk of recurrent stent occlusion of the self-expanding metal stent.

Figure 1 Patient image showing stent insertions.

The ILBT dummy wire was inserted into the guide tube (LumenCath; Nucletron, an Elekta company, Stockholm, Sweden), which was 1,500-mm long. CT simulation was performed, and the images were exported to Oncentra MasterPlan (Nucletron, an Elekta company) treatment planning system (TPS). Metal stents causing artefacts in the CT slices produced a distorted view of the overlapped dummy tube with the right hepatic stent at the level of T11. Therefore, in addition to distortion due to metallic stents, the passage of the ILBT tube is more complex compared with oesophageal/endobronchial applications. Thus, catheter tracking became difficult. Figure 2 shows the misplaced catheter with an average displacement of 7·2 mm from the original.

Figure 2 Incorrect reconstruction of catheter.

TPS generates an automatic DRR view (Bone window) at the patient’s midplane. The ILBT guide tube was medially placed and the intra-hepatic drain tube was laterally away with respect to the 11th thoracic vertebra (T11) as per the DRR. Therefore, we decided to contour the guide tube passage using Bone window of DRR (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Corrected reconstruction using digitally reconstructed radiograph.

Results and Discussions

Catheter reconstruction becomes easier in the complex bile duct passage with this method. It can be used for quick verification of catheter reconstruction. Two lengths (3 and 3·4 cm) of irradiation separated by a distance of 2 cm were marked, starting at 5 mm from the tip of the guide tube. A dose of 6·5 Gy was prescribed at 2·5 mm from the central axis of the catheter. Total dose prescribed was 32·5 Gy in five fractions (low dose rate equivalent: 53·2 Gy).

ILBT guide tube contour reduces the overall planning time. Planning could be verified easily with this method when computed tomography was used as the only image guidance. Source tracking can be improved with exact placement of the catheter. Although demonstrated for ILBT planning, this method could be used for planning soft tissue sarcoma implants with flexible plastic tubes that could result in overlapped view in adult thigh/knee.

Acknowledgement

I sincerely acknowlege the effort of Dr. InduShekar and Dr. Kranthi Kumar for this HDR procedure.

References

1.Blechacz, B R A, Gores, G J. Cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 2008; 12: 131150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Konstantinos, N L, Gores, G J. Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 16551667.Google Scholar
3.Weber, S M, Jarnagin, W R, Klimstra, D. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: respectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 384391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Shimada, K, Kishi, Y, Hata, S. Surgical outcomes of the mass forming plus periductal infiltrating types of intraheaptic cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study with the typical mass forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 2007; 31: 20162022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kamphues, C, Seehofer, D, Eisele, R M. Recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: single center experience using repeated hepatectomy and radio frequency ablation. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 2010; 17: 509515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ricke, J, Mohnike, K, Pech, M. Local response and impact on survival after local ablation of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma by computed tomography guide dose rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78: 479485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Mohnike, K, Wieners, G, Schwartz, F. Computed tomography guide high dose rate brachytherapyin hepatocellular carcinoma: safety, efficacy and effect on survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 78: 172179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Alberts, S R, Gores, G J, Kim, G P. Treatment options for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82: 628637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lee, J H, Salem, R, Aslanian, Het al. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of unexplained bile duct structures. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 10691073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ishii, H, Furuse, J, Nagase, Met al. Relief of jaundice by external beam radiotherapy and intraluminal brachytherapy in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results without stenting. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 954957.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Barrett, A, Dobbs, J, Morris, Set al. Practical radiotherapy planning, 4th edition. UK: Hodder Arnold, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Comprehensive treatment planning for brachytherapy,Oncentra® Brachy, eBrochure 2011.Google Scholar
13.Milickovic, N B, Baltas, D, Giannouli, S, Lahanas, M, Uzunoglu, N, Zamboglu, N. Autoreconstruction of catheters in CT based Brachytherapy planning. In The use of computers in Radiation therapy. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Berlin; 2000, pp. 502–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Milickovic, N, Baltas, D, Giannouli, S, Lahanas, M, Zamboglou, N. CT imaging based digitally reconstructed radiographs and their application in brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45 (10): 27822800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 Patient image showing stent insertions.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Incorrect reconstruction of catheter.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Corrected reconstruction using digitally reconstructed radiograph.