Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:19:32.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy and safety of external beam radiation therapy in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a case–control, nested in a cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2013

Guadalupe Vargas
Affiliation:
Endocrinology Service/Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México
Baldomero González
Affiliation:
Endocrinology Service/Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México
Victoria Mendoza
Affiliation:
Endocrinology Service/Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México
Gerardo Guinto
Affiliation:
Endocrinology Service/Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México
Blas López-Félix
Affiliation:
Endocrinology Service/Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México
Moisés Mercado*
Affiliation:
Endocrinology Service/Experimental Endocrinology Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México City, México
*
Correspondence to: Moisés Mercado, Aristóteles 68, Polanco 11560, México City, México. Tel and fax: +5255-52813029 or +5255-52813029. E-mail: mmercadoa@yahoo.com or moises.mercado@endocrinologia.org.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background and objectives

Recurrence is frequent in surgically treated non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA). The use of radiation therapy (RT) to prevent recurrence has to be weighted against the potential side effects, particularly, hypopituitarism. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RT in postoperative patients with NFPA with adenoma remnant.

Patients and methods

The 3- and 5-year outcome of 51 patients with NFPA with a remnant after surgery that received RT (cases) was compared with that of 61 subjects who did not receive RT (controls). Cases and controls were matched for postoperative remnant size, cavernous sinus invasion, age and gender.

Results

Tumour volume decreased in the radiated group from a median of 1,601 mm3 to 816 mm3 after 5 years of follow-up (p = 0·01, 50% tumour volume reduction). In the non-radiated controls median tumour volume decreased at 3 years but increased again after 5 years (baseline 1,415 mm3, 5 years 1,204 mm3, p = 0·93). Recurrence rate was 4% for the radiated group and 29% for the controls (OR 0·10, 95% CI 0·01–0·04, p = 0·02). Although pituitary hormone deficiencies at baseline were more prevalent in the radiated group, after 5 years, both groups showed a significant worsening of pituitary function. No RT-related side effects were recorded.

Conclusion

Postoperative RT is effective in preventing tumour regrowth in NFPA patients with postoperative remnants. The fact that hypopituitarism is highly prevalent even in non-radiated patients should allow a more generalised use of this treatment modality.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Introduction

The treatment of choice for non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) is transsphenoidal surgery (TSS).Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1Reference Jane and Laws3 Tumour recurrence rates can be as low as 20% and as high as 49%, depending on the series.Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1, Reference Roelfsema, Biermasz and Pereira4 Since these tumours do not produce a syndrome of hormonal hypersecretion, the diagnosis of recurrences relies on clinical (visual impairment signs) an imaging data [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing the presence of tumour].Reference Molitch2, Reference Jane and Laws3 Patients who are left with significant tumour remnants after TSS are likely to recur after long-term follow-up.Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1, Reference Roelfsema, Biermasz and Pereira4, Reference Chandler and Barkan5 Although tumour regrowth is usually slow and it can be monitored with serial pituitary imaging studies, in many patients it can be clinically significant and generate compressive complications.Reference Molitch2, Reference Jane and Laws3 A minority of NFPA are actually silent corticotroph adenomas that are known to behave more aggressively and recur more frequently.Reference Webb, Laurent, Oknokwo, Lopes, Vance and Laws6 However, in the majority of patients with NFPA, an accurate prediction of recurrence remains an elusive goal.Reference Roelfsema, Biermasz and Pereira4, Reference Ramírez, Cheng and Vargas7 Thus, in this scenario, the risk of a significant tumour recurrence has to be established primarily based on the size and location of the remnant after surgery. On the other hand, even tumours that are completely removed by surgery also have a risk, albeit lower, of recurrence and a careful clinical and imaging follow-up is indicated.Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1, Reference Jane and Laws3, Reference Roelfsema, Biermasz and Pereira4

There is extensive evidence supporting the effectiveness of external beam radiation therapy (XRT) in preventing recurrences of NFPA after surgery.Reference Boelaert and Gittoes8Reference Wilson, De-Loyde, Williams and Smee11 However, the decision to submit a patient to XRT is not always an easy one. Some centres recommend postoperative XRT routinely to all NFPA patients, even in those with complete resection of their tumours, whereas others do so on a more individual basis, taking into account the size and location of the remnant and the pituitary hormone status. One of the major disadvantages of XRT is the induction of hypopituitarism, which may impact quality of life; however, many of these patients already have one or more anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies because of the tumour itself and/or to the surgical procedure.Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1, Reference Jane and Laws3, Reference O'Sullivan, Woods and Glynn12, Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Roelfsema13 The purpose of this study was to establish whether or not the adjunctive use of XRT in patients with NFPA is effective and safe in preventing tumoural recurrences using a case–control design.

Methods

Patient population

Both our local ethics and scientific committees approved the study; all patients signed an informed consent. Both, cases and controls were selected from a large database (n = 450) of patients diagnosed with and treated for NFPA between January 2000 and December 2010 at our centre. In the case group, we included patients with NFPA who had been submitted to TSS and later on (1–2 years after surgery) received XRT because of the presence of a tumour remnant (defined as a >5 mm lesion, readily identifiable on MRI). The control group consisted of patients with NFPA, who had undergone TSS but who did not receive XRT, despite the presence of a tumour remnant. Both the radiated, and the non-radiated patients were free of tumour compressive symptoms and their pituitary hormone deficiencies were adequately replaced. Groups were carefully matched for age, gender, tumour volume and presence of cavernous sinus invasion. Imaging and hormonal information was gathered at baseline, and thereafter yearly, the end-points being tumour regrowth and the development of new pituitary hormone deficiencies.

The same two neuroradiologists evaluated baseline and follow-up MRIs; tumour volume was calculated using the DeChiro Nelson formulaReference Ertekin, Acer, Turgut, Aycan, Özcelik and Turgut14:

$$volume\: = \:(sagital\:\times \:coronal\:\times \:axial\,diameters)\,{\rm{\pi }}\:/\:6\eqno\rm$$

Panhypopituitarism was diagnosed when three or more hormone deficiencies could be documented. Hypocortisolism was defined by a morning serum cortisol below 3 μg/dL; insulin-induced hypoglycemia was performed in borderline cases when am cortisol was between 3 and 10 μg/dL. Central hypothyroidism was defined by a free T4 below 0·5 ng/dL irrespective of the TSH level; and the diagnosis of central hypogonadism was established when the serum estradiol level was below 10 pg/mL in females and the serum total testosterone was below 300 ng/dL in males. Anterior pituitary hormones, as well as testosterone, estradiol, IGF-1, cortisol and free T4 were all measured by commercially available assays.

Radiation therapy (RT) protocol

Three-dimensional, conformal, external beam radiotherapy was administered by means of a lineal accelerator, at a mean total dose of 52 Gy (range 50–57), delivered as 2–2·5 Gy daily fractions, 5 days a week, over 5 weeks. Optic apparatus radiation dose was kept below 50·4 Gy using a multi-leave collimator.

Statistical analysis

For quantitative variables, data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges or means ± SD depending on data distribution, which was determined using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Differences in categorical variables were analysed by the χ 2-test. The Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to compare medians among the groups. A step wise, lineal, multiple regression analysis was performed to explore which patient characteristic was associated with tumour volume reduction in both groups. A p-value of <0·05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical software package consisted of STATA version 11.0 and SPSS version 16.

Results

Baseline characteristics (Table 1)

The case group consisted of 51 patients (45% women) with a mean age of 56·2 ± 11·7 years; XRT was administered 2–8 months after the last pituitary surgery and the median follow-up was 5 years. The control group included 67 non-radiated patients (46% women), whose mean age was 53·4 ± 12·3 years. Median tumour remnant volume before radiation therapy (RT) was similar between cases and controls (cases: 1,601 mm3, controls: 1,415 mm3). A similar proportion of subjects in both groups had cavernous sinus invasion (cases: 71%, controls: 72%). The number of pituitary surgeries was similar among patients who did and those who did not receive XRT (39% one, 41% two and 20% three). Immunohistochemical analysis of tumour tissue revealed the same proportion of gonadotroph, null cell and corticotroph tumours in both groups.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

Note: aIn the non-radiated controls, this refers to tumour volume at matching time.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; XRT, external beam radiation therapy.

Tumour volume changes

Median tumour volume decreased progressively in the radiated group from a baseline value (after last surgery, before XRT) of 1,601 mm3 (697–1,538), to 1,124 mm3 (382–2,638) and 816 mm3 (92–1,866) after 3 and 5 years of follow-up, respectively (p = 0·01); tumour volume reduction in the radiated subjects after 5 years of follow-up was 50% (Figure 1). In contrast, in the non-radiated controls median tumour volume apparently decreased at 3 years follow-up but in fact increased again after 5 years [baseline 1,415 mm3 (565–3,854), at 3 years 1,066 mm3 (227–3,351), at 5 years 1,204 mm3 (620–2,623), p = 0·93] (Figure 1). Lineal regression analysis revealed a tumour volume reduction in the radiated patients of 388 mm3/year (p = 0·02, 95% CI: −714 to −62), whereas in the non-radiated patients a tumour volume increment of 592 mm3/year was documented (p = 0·05, 95% CI: 12–1,198). The estimated tumour recurrence rate was 4% (2 out of 51) for the radiated group and 29% (20 out of 67) for the non-radiated controls (OR 0·10, 95% CI 0·01–0·04, p = 0·02).

Figure 1 Median tumour volumes at baseline, 3 and 5 years of follow-up, in the radiated (solid line) and control groups (dotted line).

Note: *p = 0·03.

Pituitary hormone deficiencies and XRT-related adverse events

The group of radiated patients had a higher prevalence of pituitary hormone deficiencies after the last surgery than the non-radiated group (Figure 2); in fact, this was the main reason for avoiding XRT in the control group. At 5 years follow-up, pituitary hormone deficiencies had increased significantly in both groups; TSH deficiency was present in 80% of cases and 68% of controls, gonadotrophin deficiency in 95% of cases and 50% of controls, Adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency 62% of cases and 42% of controls and panhypopituitarism in 60% of cases and 38% of controls (Figure 2). No cerebrovascular events, cases of optic neuritis, secondary tumours or deaths were recorded.

Figure 2 Prevalence of pituitary hormone deficiencies at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up in the radiated (a, *p < 0·001), and non-radiated controls (b, **p < 0·01).

Discussion

Pituitary surgery remains the primary treatment of choice for NFPA.Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1Reference Jane and Laws3 However, a significant proportion of these tumours will recur upon long-term follow-up.Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Romjin1Reference Roelfsema, Biermasz and Pereira4 Unfortunately, there are neither clinical/imaging characteristics, nor histopathological features or biomarkers capable of accurately predicting recurrences and therefore indicate the need for prophylactic therapeutic interventions such as postoperative XRT.Reference Roelfsema, Biermasz and Pereira4, Reference Ramírez, Cheng and Vargas7 Although the efficacy of postoperative XRT in preventing tumour regrowth has been documented, most if not all published studies have been retrospective and suffer from a selection bias whereby XRT is reserved for the largest or more invasive tumours.Reference Boelaert and Gittoes8Reference Wilson, De-Loyde, Williams and Smee11 On the other hand, the potential side effects of radiation, particularly the development of pituitary hormone deficiencies, preclude a more generalised use of this therapeutic tool.Reference Al-Mefy, Kersh, Routh and Smith15Reference Chang, Zada and Kim17 Hypopituitarism because of NFPA has been associated with a decreased quality of life and in some studies, with increased mortality.Reference Van den Bergh, van den Berg and Schoorl16, Reference Tomlinson, Holden and Hils18 Studies in this regard have shown rather discrepant results, likely because of the myriad of variables involved in determining life quality and expectancy in this scenario, including the adequacy of hormone replacement.Reference Van den Bergh, van den Berg and Schoorl16, Reference Tomlinson, Holden and Hils18 Thus, in view of the available data, withholding XRT in patients with a complete adenoma resection and no evidence of a tumour remnant on postoperative MRI seems undoubtedly reasonable, particularly if the patient has few or no anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies. However, a significant proportion of NFPA are large and invasive and complete surgical resection is not always possible.Reference Chandler and Barkan5, Reference Barker, Klibanski and Swearingen19 Therefore the fundamental question is whether XRT should be administered routinely to patients with evident tumour remnants after pituitary surgery.

In the present study we have used a case–control design to overcome these caveats and have confirmed that RT is highly effective in reducing tumour remnant volume and regrowth. The main reason for withholding XRT in the control group was in fact the relatively well-preserved pituitary function in these patients (the other reason being patient's and/or treating physician's preference). We did not include cases with complete adenoma resection and tumour remnant volumes were similar in both cases and controls. Only two of the 51 (4%) patients who received XRT had recurred after 5 years, whereas 20 of the 67 (29%) who did not receive XRT showed tumour regrowth at the end of the follow-up period.

Recurrence rates for patients with NFPA who do not receive postoperative XRT can be as low as 9%Reference Dekkers, Pereira and Roelfsema13, Reference Chang, Zada and Kim17 and as high as 50%,Reference O'Sullivan, Woods and Glynn12Reference Barker, Klibanski and Swearingen19 at follow-up periods that range between 5 and 10 years. Multivariate analyses performed in some of these studies show that the presence of an extraselar remnant, an incomplete resection of the adenoma and cavernous sinus invasion are all associated with an increase risk of recurrence.Reference O'Sullivan, Woods and Glynn12, Reference Chang, Zada and Kim17, Reference Barker, Klibanski and Swearingen19 In our study, multivariate analysis revealed that the use of XRT in NFPA patients effectively prevents tumour regrowth.

Although the development of pituitary hormone deficiencies has traditionally been an argument against the use of XRT, hypopituitarism is highly prevalent in patients with NFPA at diagnosis and is unlikely to improve after surgery, even in those subjects who do not undergo XRT. Our data confirms this notion, since the non-radiated group of patients also showed a significant worsening of pituitary function upon follow-up, likely as a result of previous pituitary surgeries but also because of the effects of the growing adenoma itself.

Although cases of radiation-induced damage to the optic chiasm have been well documented,Reference Al-Mefy, Kersh, Routh and Smith15 the use of modern techniques with carefully planned dosing schedules has made this complication an extremely rare event.Reference Boelaert and Gittoes8, Reference Erridge, Conkay and Stockton9 Accordingly, no cases of optic neuropathy were documented in our patients. The development of secondary brain tumours after XRT for pituitary adenomas has also been a concern and has been estimated to be around 2·4% at 20 years of follow-up.Reference Erridge, Conkay and Stockton9, Reference Minitti, Traish, Ashley, Gonsalvez and Brada20, Reference Sattler, van Beek and Wolffenbuttel21 Although our patients have only been followed for 5 years, so far no cases of secondary brain tumours have been detected.

A reduced life expectancy has been reported in patients with pituitary tumours treated with both surgery and RT.Reference Sattler, van Beek and Wolffenbuttel21Reference Erfurth, Bulow, Nordström, Mikoczy, Hagmar and Strömberg24 This increased mortality rate, which in the majority of cases is due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular causes, has been related to hypopituitarism.Reference Tomlinson, Holden and Hils18, Reference Bates, Bullivant, Sheppard and Stewart23, Reference Erfurth, Bulow, Nordström, Mikoczy, Hagmar and Strömberg24 In contrast to GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, where XRT has been associated to an increased mortality rate,Reference Ayuk, Clayton, Holder, Sheppard, Stewart and Bates25 in NFPA the contributory role of XRT is still a matter of debate.Reference Erridge, Conkay and Stockton9 All patients included in our study are alive and no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events have occurred. We are aware that our patients have been followed for only 5 years and thus need long-term surveillance to be able to ascertain whether those who received XRT have a higher mortality rate than those who did not.

Based on the present case–control study we can conclude that postoperative conventional XRT is a highly effective intervention to prevent tumour regrowth in patients with NFPA showing tumour remnants on imaging studies. The fact that hypopituitarism is highly prevalent even in non-radiated patients should allow a more generalised use of this treatment modality.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

*

Guadalupe Vargas and Baldomero González have equally contributed to this work.

References

1.Dekkers, O M, Pereira, A M, Romjin, J A. Treatment and follow up of clinically non-functioning pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 37173726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Molitch, M E. Non-functioning pituitary tumors and pituitary incidentalomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Amer 2008; 37: 151171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Jane, J A Jr, Laws, E R Jr. The management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Neurol India 2003; 51: 461465.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Roelfsema, F, Biermasz, N R, Pereira, A M. Clinical factors involved in the recurrence of pituitary adenomas after surgical remission: a structure review and meta-analysis. Pituitary 2012; 15: 7183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Chandler, W F, Barkan, A L. Treatment of pituitary tumors: a surgical perspective. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Amer 2008; 37: 5166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Webb, K M, Laurent, J J, Oknokwo, D O, Lopes, M B, Vance, M L, Laws, E R Jr. Clinical characteristics of silent corticotroph adenomas and creation of an internet-accessible database to facilitate their multi-institutional study. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 10761084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ramírez, C, Cheng, S, Vargas, Get al. Expression of Ki-67, PTTG1, FGFR4 and SSTR 2, 3 and 5 in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a high throughput TMA immunohistochemical study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 17451751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Boelaert, K, Gittoes, N J. Radiotherapy for non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2001; 144: 569575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Erridge, S C, Conkay, D S, Stockton, Det al. Radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas: long-term efficacy and toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 597601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Loeffler, J S, Shih, H A. Radiation therapy in the management of pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 19922003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Wilson, P J, De-Loyde, K J, Williams, J R, Smee, R I. A single centre's experience of stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for non-functioning pituitary adenomas with lineal accelerator (Linac). J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19: 370374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.O'Sullivan, E P, Woods, C, Glynn, Net al. The natural history of surgically treated but radiotherapy-naïve nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol 2009; 71: 709714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Dekkers, O M, Pereira, A M, Roelfsema, Fet al. Observation alone after transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 17961801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Ertekin, T, Acer, N, Turgut, A T, Aycan, K, Özcelik, Ö, Turgut, M. Comparison of three methods for the estimation of the pituitary gland volume using magnetic resonance imaging: a stereological study. Pituitary 2011; 14: 3138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Al-Mefy, O, Kersh, J E, Routh, A, Smith, R R. The long-term side effects of radiation therapy for benign brain tumors in adults. J Neurosurg 1990; 73: 502512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Van den Bergh, A C, van den Berg, G, Schoorl, M Aet al. Immediate postoperative radiotherapy in residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: beneficial effect on local control without additional negative impact on pituitary function and life expectancy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 863869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Chang, E F, Zada, G, Kim, Get al. Long-term recurrence and mortality after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for nonfunctional pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 736745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Tomlinson, J W, Holden, N, Hils, R Ket al. Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. West Midlands prospective hypopituitary study group. Lancet 2001; 357: 425431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Barker, F G II, Klibanski, A, Swearingen, B. Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors in the United States, 1996–2000: mortality, morbidity and the effect of hospital and surgeon volume. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 47094719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Minitti, G, Traish, D, Ashley, S, Gonsalvez, A, Brada, M. Risk of second brain tumor after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: update after an additional 10 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 800804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Sattler, M G A, van Beek, A P, Wolffenbuttel, B H Ret al. The incidence of second tumours and mortality in pituitary adenoma patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone. Radiother Oncol 2012; 104: 125130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Bülow, B, Hagmar, L, Mikoczy, Z, Nordström, C H, Erfurth, E M. Increased cerebrovascular mortality in patients with hypopituitarism. Clin Endocrinol 1997; 46: 7581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Bates, A S, Bullivant, B, Sheppard, M C, Stewart, P M. Life expectancy following surgery for pituitary tumours. Clin Endocrinol 1999; 50: 315319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Erfurth, E M, Bulow, B, Nordström, C H, Mikoczy, Z, Hagmar, L, Strömberg, U. Double mortality rate in irradiated patients reoperated for regrowth of a macroadenoma of the pituitary gland. Eur J Endocrinol 2004; 150: 497502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Ayuk, J, Clayton, R N, Holder, G, Sheppard, M C, Stewart, P M, Bates, A S. Growth hormone and pituitary radiotherapy but not insulin-like growth factor-1 concentrations predict excess mortality in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 16131617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

Figure 1

Figure 1 Median tumour volumes at baseline, 3 and 5 years of follow-up, in the radiated (solid line) and control groups (dotted line).Note: *p = 0·03.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Prevalence of pituitary hormone deficiencies at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up in the radiated (a, *p < 0·001), and non-radiated controls (b, **p < 0·01).