Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-cm8hq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T08:55:07.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New and little-known gastropods from the Albian of the Mahajanga Basin, northwestern Madagascar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Steffen Kiel
Steffen Kiel*
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology MRC 121, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thirty-one gastropod species and one type of isolated larval shell are described from a quarry near Ambatolafia in the Mahajanga Basin, northwestern Madagascar. The ammonite fauna indicates a lower Albian age of the fauna (Cleoniceras besairiei Zone). The taxonomic position of the species described earlier is reviewed, incorporating new data on shell structure and protoconch morphology. Twelve species and one genus are new, with four species described in open nomenclature. The oldest hitherto known representatives of Cocculina sensu lato, Iphitus, Conjectura, Entomope, Tomura, and possibly Vatopsis and Paladmete, are described. Nacre is documented in a species of Semisolarium, providing further evidence for the position of this genus within the Vetigastropoda. Eight of the species occur also in the Cretaceous of Europe or are tentatively assigned to European species. Three species have close relatives in the Aptian/Albian of Japan, one species may have relations to the Albian of Texas. The new genus is Mahajangina (family uncertain) for a species having a small, trochispiral teleoconch with spines on the periphery, and a conical, bicarinate larval shell. The new species are: Cirsocerithium collignoni, Zardinistylus betsibokaensis, Pommerozygia mahajangensis, Conjectura minuta, Buvignieria berwaldi, Mahajangina weitschati, Entomope crassilabrum, Paladmete? rasoarinoroae, Tomura ambatolafiensis, Carinathilda parviruga, Carinathilda bandeli, and Gymnothilda pagodoidea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , May 2006 , pp. 455 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbass, H. L. 1973. Some British Cretaceous gastropods belonging to the families Procerithiidae, Cerithiidae and Cerithiopsidae (Cerithiacea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, 23:103–175.Google Scholar
Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1853–1859. The Genera of Recent Mollusca Arranged According to their Organization. John Van Voorst, London, 1:vi–xl, 1–484; 482: 481–661 p. Google Scholar
Akers, R. E., and Akers, T. J. 1997. Texas Cretaceous gastropods. Texas Paleontology Series, 6:1–340.Google Scholar
Andreae, A. 1887. Die Glossophoren der “Terrain à Chailles” der Pfirt. Abhandlungen der geologischen Specialkarte von Elsass-Lothringen, 4(3):1–45.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1975. Embryonalgehäuse karibischer Meso- und Neogastropoden (Mollusken). Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz/Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, 1975:1–133.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1990. Shell structure of the Gastropoda excluding Archaeogastropoda, p. 117–134. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends. Vol. I. Van Nostrand Reinold, New York.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1991. Über triassische “Loxonematoidea” und ihre Beziehungen zu rezenten und paläozoischen Schnecken. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 65(3/4):239–268.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1993. Caenogastropoda during Mesozoic times. Scripta Geologica (special issue), 2:7–56.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1995. Mathildoidea (Gastropoda, Heterostropha) from the Late Triassic St. Cassian Formation. Scripta Geologica, 111:1–83.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1996. Some heterostrophic gastropods from Triassic St. Cassian Formation with a discussion on the classification of the Allogastropoda. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 70:325–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandel, K., and Dockery, D. T. In press. Mollusca of the Coon Creek Tongue of the Ripley Formation in Tennessee and Mississippi, with a systematic discussion of the Gastropoda. Tennessee Division of Geology Bulletin, 86.Google Scholar
Bandel, K., and Frýda, J. 1998. The systematic position of the Euomphalidae (Gastropoda). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 78(1/2):103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandel, K., and Kadolsky, D. 1982. Western Atlantic species of Nodilittorina (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia): Comparative morphology and its functional, ecological, phylogenetic and taxonomic implications. The Veliger, 25:1–42.Google Scholar
Barrier, P., Zibrowius, H., Lozouet, P., Montenat, C., Ott d'Estevou, P., Serrano, F., and Soudet, H.-J. 1991. Une faune de fond dur du bathyal supérieur dans le Miocène terminal des cordillères Bétiques (Carboneras, SE Espagne). Mésogée, 51:3–13.Google Scholar
Batten, R. L. 1972. The ultrastructure of five common Pennsylvanian pleurotomarian gastropod species of the eastern United States. American Museum Novitates, 2501:1–34.Google Scholar
Bieler, R. 1993. Architectonicidae of the Indo-Pacific (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg (NF), 30:3–376.Google Scholar
Bieler, R. 1995. Mathildidae from New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia). Mémoires de Muséum National de Histoire Naturelle, 167:595–641.Google Scholar
Bieler, R., Ball, A. D., and Mikkelsen, P. M. 1998. Marine Valvatoidea—comments on anatomy and systematics with description of a new species from Florida (Heterobranchia: Cornirostridae). Malacologia, 40(1–2):305–320.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P., and Warén, A. 1986. Revision of the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Aclididae, Eulimidae, Epitoniidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bolletino Malacologico, Supplemento, 2:300–574.Google Scholar
Boury, E. D. 1909. Catalogue des sous-genres de Scalidae. Journal de Conchyliologie, 57:225–228.Google Scholar
Bowdich, T. E. 1822. Elements of conchology, including the fossil genera and the animals. J. Smith, Paris and London, v. 1: 79 p., v.72: 40 p.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1789. Encyclopédic Méthodique. Histoire naturelle de vers. Panckoucke, Paris, 1(2), 345–758 p.Google Scholar
Burn, R., and Thompson, T. E. 1998. Order Cephalaspidea, p. 943–959. In Beesley, P. L., Ross, G. J. B., and Wells, A. (eds.), Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol. 5. Pt. B. CIRSO Publishing, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Bush, K. J. 1897. Revision of the marine gastropods referred to Cyclostrema, Adeorbis, Vitrinella, and related genera; with description of some new genera and species belonging to the Atlantic fauna of America. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Science, 10:97–144.Google Scholar
Buvignier, A. 1843. Sur quelques fossiles nouveaux des départements de la Meuse et des Ardennes. Mémoir de la Société Philomatique de Verdun, p. 225–252.Google Scholar
Clench, W. J., and Turner, R. 1952. The genera Epitonium, Pt. 2, Depressiscala, Cylindriscala, Nystiella and Solutiscala in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia, 2(31):289–356.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1949. Recherches sur les Faunes Albiennes de Madagascar I. - L'Albien d'Ambarimaninga. Annales géologiques du Service des Mines, 16:1–128.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1963. Atlas des fossiles characteristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites), 10 (Albien). Geological Survey, Antananarivo, XV + 184 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, R. A. 1858. Observations on a group of Cretaceous fossil shells, found in Tippah County, Mississippi, with descriptions of fifty-six new species. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Journal, 2nd series, 3:323–336.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1882. Description d'espècies nouvelles du Bassin Parisien. Journal de Conchyliologie, 30:279–295.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1888. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles d'Eocène des environs de Paris faisant suite aux travaux paléotologiques de G.-P. Deshayes, 3. Annales de la Société royal de malacologie Belgique, 23:1–328.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1896; Contribution à la paléontologie francaise des terrains jurassiques: Étude sur les Gastropodes des terrains jurassiques. Mémoir de la Société géologique de France, Paléontologie, 14:1–167.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1904. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée, 6. Privately published, Paris, 151 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1906. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée, 7. Privately published, Paris, 261 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1916. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée, 10. Privately published, Paris, 292 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1918. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée, 11. Privately published, Paris, 388 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1921. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée, 12. Privately published, Paris, 348 p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1925. Essais de Paléoconchologie Comparée, 13. Privately published, Paris, 345 p.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1959. Thoughts on the classification of the Gastropoda. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 33:239–261.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. L. C. F. D. 1797. Table Élémentaire de l'Historie Naturelle des Animaux. Baudouin, Paris, 710 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1882. On certain limpets and chitons from the deep waters off the eastern coast of the United States. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum of Natural History, 4:400–414.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico (1877–78) and in the Caribbean Sea (1879–80), by the U.S. Coast Survey steamer “Blake” XXIX. Report on the Mollusca, Pt. 2, Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Havard University, 18:1–492.Google Scholar
Dautzenberg, P., and Fischer, H. 1896. Dragages effectués par l'Hirondelle et par la Princesse-Alice: 1. Molluscques Gastéropodes. Mémoire de la Société Zoologique de France, 9:395–498.Google Scholar
Delpey, G. 1948. Gastéropodes mésozoiques de l'Ouest de Madagascar. Annales géologiques du Service des Mines, 15:7–35.Google Scholar
Deslongchamps, E. E. 1863–1869. Notes paléontologiques. Caen, Paris, 392 p.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. 1993. The streptoneuran Gastropods, exclusive of the Stenoglossa, of the Coffee Sand (Campanian) of northeastern Mississippi. Mississippi Office of Geology Bulletin, 129:1–191.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1842–1843. Paléontologie Française, terrains Crétacés, 2. Gastèropodes. Author, Paris, 645 p.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1904. Paléontologie, mollusques fossiles, p. 191–380. In De Morgan, J. (ed.), Mission Scientifique en Perse. Vol. 3. Pt. 4. E. Leroux, Paris.Google Scholar
Dunker, W. 1848. Über einige neue Versteinerungen aus verschiedenen Gebirgsformationen. Palaeontographica, 1:128–133.Google Scholar
Erben, H. K., and Krampiz, G. 1972. Ultrastruktur und Aminosäuren-Verhältnisse in den Schalen der rezenten Pleurotomariidae (Gastropoda). Biomineralisation, 6:12–31.Google Scholar
Eudes-Deslongchamps, J. E. 1849. Mémior sur les pleurotomaires des terrains secondaires de Calvados. Société linnéan de Normandie Mémoir, 8:1–151, pls. 151–118.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. L. 1927. A further commentary on New Zealand molluscan systematics. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 57:320–485.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. H. 1880–1887. Manuel de Conchyliogie et de Paléontologie Conchyliologique. F. Savy, Paris, 1,367 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1822. The Philosophy of Zoology; or a General View of the Structure, Functions, and Classification of Animals. A. Constable, Edinburgh, 618 p.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1838. Malacologia Monensis. A Catalogue of the Mollusca Inhabiting the Isle of Man and the Neighboring Sea. Edinburgh, 63 p.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1846. Report on the fossil invertebrata from southern India, collected by Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Transactions of the Geological Society of London, 7:97–174.Google Scholar
Forbes, E., and Hanley, C. T. 1848–1853. A History of British Mollusca, and Their Shells. Van Voorst, London, 2,064 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils. California Geological Survey, Paleontology, 1:57–243.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A. 1916. Systematic paleontology, Mollusca, p. 371–733. In Clark, W. B. (ed.), Upper Cretaceous. Maryland Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. S. 1875. On the Gault Aporrhaidae. The Geological Magazine, n. s., Decade II:2:49–57, pl. 43; 124–130, pl. 125; 198–203, pl. 126; 291–298, pl. 127; 392–400, pl. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, T. N. 1870. On the Pterocerae of Lamarck, and their mutual relations. American Journal of Conchology, 5:120–139.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1788–1793. Caroli a Linné … Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. G. E. Beer, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Golikov, A. N., and Starobogatov, Y. I. 1975. Systematics of prosobranch gastropods. Malacologia, 15:185–232.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum. London.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyma and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Record of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Gray, M. E. 1842–1857. Figures of Molluscous Animals. 5 Vols. London.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 1980. Bemerkungen zur Überfamilie Cerithiopsacea H.& A. Adams, 1854 (Gastropoda) sowie zur Fassung einiger ihrer Gattungen. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 204:209–264.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 1997. Heterostropha (Gastropoda) aus dem Dogger Norddeutschlands und Nordpolens. III. Opistobranchia. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Reihe E, 25:177–223.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 1998. Heterostropha (Gastropoda) aus dem Dogger Norddeutschlands und Nordpolens. II. Weitere Allogastropoda. Freiberger Forschungshefte, C474:1–37.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 1999. Gastropoden aus dem höheren Lias von Grimmen, Vorpommern (Deutschland). Archiv für Geschiebekunde, 2(9):629–672.Google Scholar
Gründel, J. 2003. Die Gastropoden der Dogger-Geschiebe Deutschland und des nordwestlichen Polens. Archiv für Geschiebekunde, 4(3/4):129–232.Google Scholar
Harasewych, M. G. 2002. Pleurotmarioidean gastropods. Advances in Marine Biology, 42:237–294.Google Scholar
Haszprunar, G. 1987. Anatomy and affinities of cocculinid limpets (Mollusca Archaeogastropoda). Zoologica Scripta, 16:305–324.Google Scholar
Haszprunar, G. 1998. Superorder Cocculiniformia, p. 653–644. In Beesley, P. L., Ross, G. J. B., and Wells, A. (eds.), Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol. 5. Pt. B. CIRSO Publishing, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Hedegaard, C. 1990. Shell structures of the recent Archaeogastropoda. , , 154 p.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S., and McLean, J. H. 1990. Systematic revision and suprageneric classification of trochacean gastropods. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, 35:1–169.Google Scholar
Hörnes, R. 1884. Elemente der Palaeontologie. Veit, Leipzig, 268 p.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1987. Anatomy, reproductive biology, and phylogeny of the Planaxidae (Cerithiacea: Prosobranchia). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 445:1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1989. Campanile revisited: Implications for cerithioidean phylogeny. American Malacological Bulletin, 7(1):1–6.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1991. Systematic review and functional morphology of the mangrove snails Terebralia and Telescopium (Potamididae; Prosobranchia). Malacologia, 33:289–338.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R. S. 1992. Monograph of the genus Cerithium Bruguière in the Indo-Pacific (Cerithiidae: Prosobranchia). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 510:1–211.Google Scholar
Iredale, T. 1915. A commentary on Suter's “Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca.” Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 10:417–497.Google Scholar
Iredale, T. 1917. More molluscan name-changes, generic and specific. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 12(6):322–330.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G. 1883. On the Mollusca procured during the Lightning and Porcupine expeditions, 6. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1883:88–115.Google Scholar
Kaim, A. 2004. The evolution of conch ontogeny in Mesozoic open sea gastropods. Palaeontologica Polonica, 62:1–183.Google Scholar
Kase, T. 1984. Early Cretaceous marine and brackish-water gastropoda from Japan. National Science Museum, Tokyo, 1–262 p.Google Scholar
Kase, T. 1999. The family Pickworthiidae (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda) from tropical Pacific submarine caves: Ampullosansonia n. gen. and Tinianella n. gen. Venus, 58(3):91–100.Google Scholar
Kase, T., and Ishakawa, M. 2003. Mystery of naticid predation history solved: Evidence from a “living fossil” species. Geology, 31(5):403–406.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kase, T., and Maeda, H. 1980. Early Cretaceous Gastropoda from the Choshi district, Chiba prefecture, central Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, n. s., 118:291–324.Google Scholar
Kiel, S. 2004. Shell structures of selected gastropods from hydrothermal vents and seeps. Malacologia, 46(1):169–183.Google Scholar
Kiel, S., and Bandel, K. 2002. About some aporrhaid and strombid gastropods from the Upper Cretaceous. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 76(1):83–97.Google Scholar
Kiel, S., and Bandel, K. 2004. The Gastropoda of the Kassenberg (Germany, Late Cretaceous). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 78(1):103–126.Google Scholar
Kiel, S., Bandel, K., Banjac, N., and Perrilliat, M. C. 2000. On Cretaceous Campanilidae. Freiberger Forschungshefte, C490(8):15–26.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. D. 1881. Faune du calcaire carbonifère de la Bergique. Troisième partie: Gastéropodes. Annales du Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle de Belgique, série paléontologique, 6:1–170.Google Scholar
Ladd, H. S. 1970. Eocene Mollusks from Eua, Tonga. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 640(C):1–12.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. D. M. D. 1799. Prodome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Société d'Historie Naturelle de Paris, 1:63–91.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. D. M. D. 1804. Mémoirs sur les fossiles de environmens de Paris. Annales du Muséum (National) d'Histoire Naturelle, 5:28–36.Google Scholar
Leymiere, A. 1842. Mémoire sur le terrain crétacé du départment de l'Aube. 2e partie. Mémoire de la Societé géologique de France, 5:1–34.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. 1994. Deep-sea gastropods from the New Zealand region associated with recent whale bones and an Eocene turtle. The Nautilus, 108:1–8.Google Scholar
McLean, J. H., and Harasewych, M. G. 1995. Review of western Atlantic species of cocculinid and pseudococculinid limpets, with descriptions of new species (Gastropoda: Cocculiniformia). Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 453:1–33.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1864. Check list of the invertebrate fossils of North America; Cretaceous and Jurassic. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection, 7(177):1–40.Google Scholar
Michelin, H. 1838. Note sur une argile dépendant du Gault, observée au Galy, commune de G'redot, département de l'Aube. Mémoire de la Societé géologique de France, 3.Google Scholar
Montfort, D. P. D. 1810. Conchyliologie systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles: Offrant leur figures, leur arrengement générique, leur description charactéristiques, leur noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. F. Schoell, Paris, 676 p.Google Scholar
Mörch, A. O. L. 1852. Catalogus conchyliorum quae reliquit D. Alphonso d'Aguirra et Gadea Comes de Yoldi. Hafnie, Copenhagen, 170 p.Google Scholar
Murdoch, R. 1905. Additions to the marine Mollusca of New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 37:217–232.Google Scholar
Nützel, A. 2002. An evaluation of the recently proposed Paleozoic gastropod subclass Euomphalomorpha. Palaeontology, 45(2):259–266.Google Scholar
Owen, H. G. 1971. Middle Albian stratigraphy in the Anglo-Paris Basin. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology, supplement, 8:1–164.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1846. Bembicium novum genus molluscorum gastropodorum. Zeitschrift für Malakozoologie, 3:129–133.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1853. Handbuch der Conchyliologie und Malakozoologie. Halle, i–xx + 547 p. Google Scholar
Pictet, F. J., and Campiche, G. 1862. Déscription des fossiles du terrain Crétacé des environs de Sainte-Croix, p. 237–548. In Pictet, F. J. (ed.), Matériaux pour la Paléontologie Suisse ou Recueil de Monographies sur les Fossiles du Jura et des Alpes, série 3, partie 2, livraisons 9–10. H. Georg, Geneva.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., and McGinty, T. L. 1946. Vitrinellidae of Florida, Pt. 4. The Nautilus, 60(1):12–18.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1984. A review of the genera of the Iravadiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea) with an assessment of the relationships of the family. Malacologia, 25(1):21–71.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1991. The anatomy and relationships of a marine valvatoidean (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 56:533–555.Google Scholar
Powell, A. B. W. 1979. New Zealand Mollusca. William Collins Publisher Ltd, Auckland, xiv + 500 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature, ou Tableau de l'Univers et des Corps Organisées. Barraveccia, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Reid, D. G. 1986. Mainwaringia Nevill, 1885, a littorinid genus from Asiatic mangrove forests, and a case of protandrous hermaphroditism. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 52:225–242.Google Scholar
Reid, D. G. 1988. The genera Bembicium and Risellopsis (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in Australia and New Zealand. Records of the Australian Museum, 40:91–150.Google Scholar
Reid, D. G. 1996. Systematics and Evolution of Littorina . The Ray Society, London, 463 p.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum. Johann Christian Trappi, Hamburg, 199 p.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plawen, L. 1980. A reconsideration of systematics in the Mollusca (phylogeny and higher classification). Malacologia, 19:249–278.Google Scholar
Sandberger, F. 1858. Die Conchylien des Mainzer Tertiärbeckens. Wiesbaden, 72 p.Google Scholar
Schröder, M. 1995. Frühontogenetische Schalen jurassischer und untercretazischer Gastropoden aus Norddeutschland und Polen. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, 238(1):1–95.Google Scholar
Semper, O. 1865. Du genre Mathilda . Journal de Conchyliologie, 13:323–345.Google Scholar
Smart, J. G. O., Bisson, G., and Worssam, B. C. 1966. Geology of the country around Canterbury and Folkestone. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, England and Wales, combined memoir in explanation of one-inch geological sheets 289, 305, and 306 (n. s.):1–337.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1960. Archaeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda and stratigraphy of the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 331(A):1–151.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1964. Neogastropoda, Opisthobranchia and Basommatophora from the Ripley, Owl Creek and Prairie Bluff formations. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 331(B):1–334.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1971. North American Cretaceous biotic provinces delineated by gastropods. Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, 2:1610–1637.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. 1832–1841. The Conchological Illustrations. London.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1947. Studies of some Comanche pelecypods and gastropods. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 211:1–116.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrate fossils of the Navarro Group of Texas. The University of Texas Publication, 4103:1–641.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1952. Greater invertebrate fossils from the Woodbine Formation of the Cenomanian, Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 242:1–226.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 78:287–447, pls. 220–232.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D., and Henderson, R. A. 2002. Description and paleobiogeographic significance of a rare Cenomanian molluscan faunule from Bathurst Island, northwestern Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 76:447–471.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1868. Cretaceous fauna of southern India 2, the Gastropoda. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, 5(2):1–500.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology; or the Natural Classification of Shells and Shell-Fish. J. Taylor, London, 419 p.Google Scholar
Tate, R. 1869. Constributions to Jurassic Palaeontology. 1. Cryptaulax, a new genus of Cerithiadae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4:417–419.Google Scholar
Taviani, M., and Sabelli, B. 1982. Iphitus (Mollusca, Gastropoda) a deep-water genus new to the Mediterranean sea. Lavori Società Malacologica Italiana, p. 129–131.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1924. Revision des Systems der Trochacea. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 11(1):47–74.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1925. Gastropoda der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. II Teil. Deutsche Tiefsee-Expedition 1898–1899, 17(2):35–382.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1928. Über ptenoglosse Schecken. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 132:73–94.Google Scholar
Wade, B. 1926. The fauna of the Ripley Formation on Coon Creek, Tennessee. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 137:1–192.Google Scholar
Warén, A. 1992. Comments on and descriptions of eulimid gastropods from tropical West America. The Veliger, 35:177–194.Google Scholar
Warén, A. 1993. New and little known mollusca from Iceland and Scandinavia, Pt. 2. Sarsia, 78:159–201.Google Scholar
Warén, A. 1996a. Ecology and systematics of the north European species of Rissoa and Pusillina (Prosobranchia: Rissoidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K., 76:1013–1059.Google Scholar
Warén, A. 1996b. New and little known Mollusca from Iceland and Scandinavia, Pt. 3. Sarsia, 81:197–245.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda Teil 1: Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, p. 721–1639. In Schindewolf, H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wollemann, A. 1900. Die Bivalven und Gasteropoden des deutschen und holländischen Neocoms. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue Folge, 21:148–180.Google Scholar
Wollemann, A. 1906. Die Bivalven und Gastropoden des norddeutschen Gaults (Aptiens und Albiens). Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue Folge, 27:259–297.Google Scholar
Wollemann, A. 1908. Nachtrag zu meinen Abhandlungen über die Bivalven und Gastropoden der Unteren Kreide Norddeutschlands. Jahrbuch der Königlich Preussischen Geologischen Landelanstalt und Bergakademie, 29:151–193.Google Scholar
Zardini, R. 1978. Fossili Cassiani (Trias Medio-superiore) Atlante dei Gasteropodi della Formazione di S. Cassiano Raccolti della Regione Dolomitica Attorno a Cortina d'Ampezzo. Edizioni Ghedina, Cortina d'Ampezzo, 58 p.Google Scholar