No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
European Paleozoic polyplacophora, multiplacophora, and turrilepadida in United States repositories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 July 2015
Abstract
Three important collections of European Devonian and Lower Carboniferous polyplacophorans have been located in United States institutions. The specimens provided a basis for better description of important characters and clarified some taxonomic assignments. Two new polyplacophoran species are in the collections, Helminthochiton carpenteri from the Devonian of Germany and Pterochiton absidatus from the Lower Carboniferous of Belgium. Beloplaxus sagittalis (Sandberger and Sandberger, 1853–1855) is recognized as a multiplacophoran and a new genus and species of turrilepadid, Bouturrilipas scutatus, is proposed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Baily, W. H.
1859. On the occurrence of detached plates of the shell of a new species of Chiton in the Carboniferous limestone at Lisbane, County of Limerick. Natural History Review and Quarterly Journal of Science, 6:330–334.Google Scholar
Baily, W. H.
1860. Observations on two new species of Chiton from the Upper Silurian “Wenlock Limestone” of Dudley. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 3, 6:91–98 (translation of de Koninck, 1857).Google Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R. M.
1943. Preliminary notes on the fossil polyplacophorans from Sweden. Geologiska Förenigen 1 Stockholm, Förhandlinger, 65:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R. M.
1945. A new Carboniferous Lepidopleurus from Scotland. Geologiska Föreningen, Stockholm, Förhandlinger, 67:389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergenhayn, J. R.
1955. Die Fossilen Schwedischen Loricaten nebst einer vorlaufigen Revision des Systems der ganzen Klasse Loricata. Lund Universitet, Årsskrift, n.f., 2:1–41.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D., de.
1816. Prodrome d'une nouvelle distribution systematique de regne animal. Bulletin des Sciences par la Société Philomathique de Paris, p. 105–124.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D., de.
1825. Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie, Polyplaxiphora
. H. G. Levrault, Paris, p. 601–603.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M.
1885. Die fauna des Ibergerkalkes. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie. III, Beilage-Band, p. 337–340.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M.
1896. The structure of certain Palaeozoic barnacles. American Geologist, 17:137–143.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M.
1907. Some new Devonic fossils. New York State Museum Bulletin, 107:153–291.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H.
1882. On the genera of chitons. Proceedings of the U.S.
National Museum, 4:279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., and King, W.
1874. On the Trimerellidae, a Paleozoic family of the palliobranchs or Brachiopoda. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 30:124–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzik, J.
1994a. Evolution of small shelly fossils asemblages. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 39:247–313.Google Scholar
Dzik, J.
1994b. Machaeridians, chitons, and conchiferan molluscs of the Mójcza Limestone. Palaeontologia Polonica, 53:213–252.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. Jr.
1882. A contribution to the study of the British Carboniferous Chitonidae. Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Glasgow, 5:84–107.Google Scholar
Fischer, P.-H.
1957. Revision des Amphineures de la collection de l'École des Mines de Paris. Journal of Conchyliogie, 97:10–24.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B.
1846. Grundriss der Versteinerungskunde, Volume 1, Family Chitonidae. Arnold, Dresden and Leipzig, p. 225–400.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.
1847a. On the genera of the family Chitonidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:63–70.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.
1847b. A list of the genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyms and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M.
1888. Trilobites and other Crustacea of the Oriskany, Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung and Catskill Groups. New York Geological Survey, Paleontology
7, 236 p.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D.
1999. New occurrences and a new species of Pennsylvanian polyplacophorans (Mollusca) in Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 99:49–52.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Cook, A. G.
2000. Devonian and Mississippian Polyplacophora from Western Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 45:395–403.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Smith, A. G.
1984. Permian Polyplacophora (Mollusca) from West Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 58:82–103.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., and Mapes, R. H.
1995. Relationships of the Devonian Strobilepis and related Pennsylvanian problematica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 40:111–128.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. D., Mapes, R. H., Yancey, T. E., and Nestell, M. K.
1996. Late Paleozoic turrilepadid machaeridians from North America. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica;
41:127–145.Google Scholar
King, W.
1850. A momograph of the Permian fossils of England. Paleontographical Society, Monograph
3, 258.Google Scholar
Kirkby, J. W.
1862. On some remains of Chiton from the Mountain Limestone of Yorkshire. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 18:233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koninck, L. G., de.
1842. Description des animaux fossiles, qui se trouvent dans le terrain carbonifère de Belgique. H. Dessain, Liege, 650 p.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G., de.
1883. Faune du calcaire carbonifère de la Belgique, Pt. 4, Gastropodes. Annals Musée Royale d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, séries Paléontologie, 8:193–213.Google Scholar
Koninck, M. L., de.
1857. Sur deux nouvelles especes siluriennes appartenant au genre Chiton
. Bulletin de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 11:190–199.Google Scholar
Lang, V., Marek, J., and Pek, I.
1982. A find of the species Rhombichiton laterodepressus (Bergenhayn, 1945) in the Culm of the Drahanska vrchovina Upland. Vestnik ÚstČedniho ustava geologického, 57:299–302.Google Scholar
Montelmans, G.
1969. L'Étage Tournaisien dans sa localité-type. Sixième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Compte Rendu, Volume 1, p. 19–43.Google Scholar
Münster, G. G., Zu.
1839. Der Chiton priscus and einige andere seltens Versteinerungen aus der Uebergangs-Formation. Beitrage zur Petrefacten-Kunde. Volume 1. Buchner, Bayreuth, 124 p.Google Scholar
Oehlert, M. D.
1850. Documents pour servir a l'étude des faunes Dévoniennes dans l'ouest de la France. Mémoirs de Société Géologie de France, series 3, 1:15–17.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A., d'.
1850. Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés. Volume 1. Victor Masson, Paris, 349 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A.
1892. Monograph of the Polyplacophora: Manual of Conchology. Volume 14. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 350 p.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A.
1900. Amphineura, p. 433–436. In
von Zittel, K. A. (ed.), Textbook of Paleontology (Eastman translation). MacMillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A.
1916. The sessile barnacles (Cirripedia) contained in the collections of the U.S. National Museum; including a monograph of the American species. U.S. National Museum Bulletin
93, 366 p.Google Scholar
Pompeckj, J. F.
1912. Amphineura-Palaontologie. Handworterbuch der Naturwissenschaften, 1:354–357.Google Scholar
Robson, G. C.
1913.
Helminthochiton aeqyuvica, n. sp., Lower Ordovician, Bohemia. Geological Magazine, 10:302–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochebrune, A. T., de.
1883. Monographie des espèces fossiles appartenant à la Classe des Polyplaxiphores. Annales des Sciences/Géologiques, 14:1–74.Google Scholar
Roemer, C. F., von.
1876. Lethaea geognostica oder Beschreibung und Abbildung der fur die Gebirgs-Formationen bezeichnendsten Versteinnerungen, Theil 1, Lethaea Palaeozoica, Volume 1, Atlas. J. C. Henzler, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ryckholt, P., de.
1845. Résumé géologique sur le genre Chiton Lin. Bulletin de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et des Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles, 12:36–62.Google Scholar
Ryckholt, P., de.
1852. Mélanges Paleontologiques—Chitonidae. Mémoires Couronnes et Mémoires des Savants étrangers. L'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaus-Arts de Belgique, 24:63–65.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W.
1846. Addenda, p. 71. In
McCoy, F. (ed.), A. Synopsis of the Silurian fossils of Ireland. Privately issued by R. Griffith, Dublin.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W.
1847. Description of a fossil chiton from the Silurian rocks, with remarks on the fossil species of the genus. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 3:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberger, F.
1845. Kurtze Bemerkungen zu der Schrift von F. A. Roemer: “die Versteinerungen des Harz-Gebirges, mit XII Steindruck-Tafeln. Hanover, 1843.”
Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaken-Kunde, p. 42, 427–441.Google Scholar
Sandberger, G.
1842. Vorläufige Ubersicht uber die eigenthumlichen bei Villmar an der Lahn auftretenden jungered Kalk-Schichten der alteren (sog. Uebergangs-) Formation, besonders nach ihren organischen Einschlussen, und Beschreibung ihrer wesentlichsten neuen Arten nebst einem Vorwert über Namengebung in der Naturbeschreibung überhaupt und in der Palëontologie inbesondere. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefakten-Kunde, p. 379–402.Google Scholar
Sandberger, G., and Sandberger, F.
1853–1855. Die Versteinerungen des Rheinischen Schichten Systems in Nassau. Kreidel and Niedner, Weisbaden, 564 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H., von.
1951. Neue faunen aus der Namur des nordöstlichen Spaniens. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 24:184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirenko, B. I.
1997. The importance of the development of articulamentum for taxonomy of chitons (Mollusca, Polyplacophora). Ruthenica, 7:1–24.Google Scholar
Sirenko, B. I., and Starobogatov, Ya. I.
1977. On the systematics of Paleozoic and Mesozoic chitons. Paleontological Journal, 11:285–294 (translated by AGI).Google Scholar
Smith, A. G.
1960. Amphineura, p. 141–176. In
Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (I) Mollusca 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G.
1971. The Carboniferous genus Glyptochiton de Köninck, 1883, (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 37:567–574.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G.
1976. Two new Permian chitons from West Texas (Mollusca: Polyplacophora). The Veliger, 18:281–288.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., and Hoare, R. D.
1987. Paleozoic Polyplacophora: a checklist and bibliography. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, No. 146, 71 p.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. P.
1858. Description of new Carboniferous fossils from the Appalachian, Illinois, and Michigan coalfields. American Journal of Science and Arts, 25:285–265.Google Scholar
Thiele, J.
1909. Revision des Systems der Chitonen. Zoologica, 22:1–70; 1910. p. 71–132.Google Scholar
Turek, V., and Prokop, R. J.
1982. Two remarkable finds of molluscs in the Carboniferous of Slovakia. Časopis pro mineralogii a geologii, 27:285–293.Google Scholar
Tyron, G. W. Jr.
1883. Manual of structural and systematic conchology. An introduction to the study of the Mollusca. Volume 2. G. W. Tyron, Philadelphia, 430 p.Google Scholar
Van Belle, R. A.
1975. Sur la classification des Polyplacophora: II. Classification systématique des Lepidopleurina (Neoloricata), avec la description des Helminthochitoninae nov. subfam. (Lepidopleuridae) et de Mesochiton nov. gen. (Helminthochitoninae). Informations de la Société Belge de Malacologie, 6:135–145.Google Scholar
Whidborne, G. F.
1892. A Monograph of the Devonian Fauna of the South of England, Pt. IV. The Fauna of the Limestones of Lummaton, Wolborough, Chircombe Bridge, and Chudleigh, 2:251–344.Google Scholar
Withers, T. H.
1926. Catalogue of the Machaerida. British Museum of Natural History, 99 p.Google Scholar
Woodward, H.
1885. On the discovery of a new genus of Cirripedia in the Wenlock limestone and shale of Dudley. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 21:486–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar