Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:17:27.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Another Look at the Great Area-Coverage Controversy of the 1950's

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2005

Walter Blanchard
Affiliation:
Email: blanch@pncl.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the immediate aftermath of WW2 there sprang up an international argument over the relative merits for aerial navigation of area-coverage radio navaids versus point-source systems. The United States was in favour of point-source whereas the UK proposed area-coverage, systems for which had successfully been demonstrated under very adverse conditions during the war. It rumbled on for many years, not being finally settled until the ICAO Montreal Conference of 1959 decided for point-source. Since then, VOR/DME/ADF/ILS have been the standard aviation radio navaids and there seems little likelihood of any change in the near future, GNSS notwithstanding, if one discounts the phasing-out of ADF. It now seems sufficiently in the past to perhaps allow a dispassionate evaluation of the technical arguments used at the time–the political ones can be left to another place and time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 The Royal Institute of Navigation