Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T05:24:55.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Psychometric Method of Determining Intellectual Loss following Head Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

W. R. Reynell*
Affiliation:
Military Hospital for Head Injuries; West End Hospital for Nervous Diseases
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

About 15–20 per cent. of cases of head injury of moderate or severe degree are followed by persisting intellectual impairment, causing loss of efficiency often increased by psychoneurotic symptoms arising from such incapacity. Deterioration of powers of sustained attention, of recent memory and of emotional control are characteristic of post-traumatic states after severe head injury, but ignorance of the patient's previous capacity and personality makes it difficult to assess psychological and physical factors—to distinguish between the patient who is ineffective because he is neurotic and the one who is neurotic because he is ineffective—as a result of cerebral damage. Therefore any reliable index of damage to the “matrix of the mind” will be helpful in prognosis and in deciding disposal.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1944 

References

(1) Babcock, (1930), Arch. of Psychol., No. 117.Google Scholar
(2) Shipley, W. C. (1941), “Measurement of Intellectual Impairment in Psychotics,” Amer. J. Psychol., 97, 1313.Google Scholar
(3) Brody, (1942), Journ. Ment. Sci., 88, 317 and 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Conkey, Clark (1938), Arch. Psych., 232. New York, October.Google Scholar
(5) Wechsler, D. (1941), Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
(6) Gilbert, J. D. (1935), Arch. Psychol., No. 188.Google Scholar
(7) Symonds, C. P., and Russell, W. R. (1943), Lancet, January.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.