Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:49:25.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modified Leptazol Convulsive Therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

S. Goldin
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, near Wickford, Essex
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of chemically induced convulsive therapy introduced by Von Meduna in 1934 was followed by the introduction of electric convulsive therapy by Cerletti and Bini in 1937. The latter method is now of almost universal use. The main reasons for the change over were the elimination of the unpleasant aura experienced in connection with the leptazol fit and the fact that body accidents were said to be less frequent with E.C.T. There does not appear to be any evidence of greater therapeutic efficiency with E.C.T. Bini and Bazzi (1949) in summarizing statistics covering twelve thousand cases, found no difference in the remission rates in the two therapies. Dedichen (1946) indicated that the value of the two therapies in depressions was similar and Ross (1946) found this also for cases of acute excitements.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

References

Bennett, A. E., Amer. J. Psych., 1941, 5, 97, 1040.Google Scholar
Bini, L., and Bazzi, T., “La Schizofrenia”, Nosografie e Teorie Generali, 1949.Google Scholar
Dedichen, H. H., Acta Psychiat. et Neurol., 1946, Supp. XXXVII.Google Scholar
Ross, D., M. J. Australia, 1946, i, 830833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.