Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-g9frx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T10:09:17.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inability in Delirium to Name the Physician's Vocation on Command, with Retention of the Ability to Name it Spontaneously: An Illustration of Hughlings Jackson's Law of “Reduction to a More Automatic Condition”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Max Levin*
Affiliation:
Baltimore, Maryland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In talking to delirious patients I have observed a curious and characteristic phenomenon: the patient, in spontaneous conversation, addresses me as “Doctor”, yet when the very next moment I ask him my vocation he cannot answer correctly. I propose to show that this is not merely a capricious phenomenon without meaning, but that it demonstrates the soundness of one of Hughlings Jackson's most important principles. I have observed the phenomenon in no less than nine cases of delirium, and more than once in several. Three cases will serve as examples.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1939 

References

Bracketed figures refer to volume and page of the Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson, 1931-32 (Hodder & Stoughton, London).

“Automatic “and” voluntary “are inverse terms. See my paper,“Degrees of Automatic Action: Some Psychiatric Applications of Hughlings Jackson's Concept of 4 Reduction to a More Automatic Condition’”, Journ. Neurol. and Psychopathol., 1936, xvii, p. 153.

This is meant as an anatomical and not a morphological statement; see Jackson's distinction between these (I, 239, footnote; II, 155, 473).

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.