Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:48:46.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly

V. Some Factors Influencing the Appearance of the Block Design Rotation Effect in Normal Subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Aubrey J. Yates*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present paper is a continuation of work previously carried out and is an attempt to define more accurately the conditions under which the rotation effect can be induced in normal subjects.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

References

Asch, S. E., and Witkin, H. A., “Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted”, 1948, J. Expt. Psychol., 38, 455477.Google Scholar
Holway, A. H., and Boring, E. G., “Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant”, Amer. J. Psychol., 1941, 54, 2137.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. B., “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. I. Initial experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 90110.Google Scholar
Idem , “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. II. Confirmatory and explanatory experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 605617.Google Scholar
Idem , “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. III. The testing of an explanatory theory”, J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 394409.Google Scholar
WITKIN, H. A., and Asch, S. E., “Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields”, J. Expt. Psychol., 1948, 38, 762782.Google Scholar
Yates, A. J., “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. IV. The effect of monocular vision on rotation”, J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 975979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.