Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-7g5wt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T10:26:30.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Exposure Time in Immediate Recall on Abnormal and Questionnaire Criteria of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. C. Brengelmann
J. C. Brengelmann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, S.E.5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present investigation deals with the effects of two lengths of exposure time in neurotic and schizophrenic subjects, and with the relations between these effects and measures of extraversion, neuroticism and rigidity. A consideration of previous work, discussed in the following paragraphs, led to three main predictions concerning varying exposure times.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 436 , July 1958 , pp. 665 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

References

Literature

1. Ainsworth, L. H., A Study of Rigidity, 1953. Ph.D. Thesis, London University.Google Scholar
2. Block, J., and Petersen, P., “Some personality correlates of confidence, caution, and speed in a decision situation”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 34–41.Google Scholar
3. Brengelmann, J. C., “Learning in neurotics and psychotics”. Acta psychol., 1958, 13, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Idem , “d-amphetamine and amytal: I. Effects on memory and expressive movement”. J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 153.Google Scholar
5. Idem , “Differential effects of lysergic acid and sodium amytal on immediate memory and expressive movement”. J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 144.Google Scholar
6. Cattell, R. B., and Tiner, L. G., “The varieties of structural rigidity”, J. Pers., 1949, 17, 321–341.Google Scholar
7. Eysenck, H. J., Casey, S., and Trouton, D. S., “Drugs and personality. II. The effect of stimulant and depressant drugs on continuous work”, J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 645–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Idem , “The questionnaire measurement of extraversion and neuroticism”. Riv. psychol., 1956, 50, 113.Google Scholar
9. Idem, The Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
10. Fisher, S., “An overview of trends in research dealing with personality rigidity”, J. Pers., 1949, 17, 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Fleishman, E. A. F., and Hempel, W. E. Jr., “Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor test as a function of practice”, Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 239–252.Google Scholar
12. Iidem , “The relation between abilities and improvement with practice in a visual discrimination task”, J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 301–312.Google Scholar
13. Franks, C. M., “L'échelle de Taylor et 1'analyse dimensionelle de l'anxiété”, Rev. psychol. appl., 1956, 6, 35–44.Google Scholar
14. Goldstein, K., “Concerning rigidity”, Charact. and Personal., 1943, 11, 209–226.Google Scholar
15. Huston, P. E., Shakow, D., and Riggs, L. A., “Studies of motor function in schizophrenia: II. Reaction time”, J. gen. Psychol., 1937, 16, 39–82.Google Scholar
16. Huston, P. E., and Shakow, D., “Learning in schizophrenia: I. Pursuit learning”, J. Pers., 1948, 17, 52–74.Google Scholar
17. Korchin, S. J., and Levine, S., “Anxiety and verbal learning”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 234–240.Google Scholar
18. NIGNIEWITZKY, R. D., A Statistical Study of Rigidity as a Personality Variable, 1955. M.A. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
19. Rapaport, G. M., and Berg, I. A., “Response sets in a multiple-choice test”, Educ. physiol. Measmt., 1955, 15, 58–62.Google Scholar
20. Saltz, E., and Hoehn, A. J., “A test of the Taylor-Spence theory of anxiety”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 114–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Sarason, I. G., “Effect of anxiety and two kinds of motivating instructions on verbal learning”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Soueiff, M. I., “Extreme response sets as a measure of intolerance of ambiguity”. (To appear in Brit. J. Psychol.)Google Scholar
23. Terman, L. M., and Miles, C. C., Sex and Personality, 1936. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.