Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:00:00.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Mania include two distinct varieties of Insanity, and should it be Sub-divided?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

George M. Robertson
George M. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Royal Asylum, Morningside, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The first difficulty one meets with in deciding these points is in knowing exactly what is meant by mania. Pinel's definition of mania was insanity, marked “by a strong nervous excitement” of the mind and body, “accompanied by lesions of one or more of the functions of the understanding.” Melancholia was distinguished from it, by there being “no propensity to acts of violence,” and by the insanity being “exclusively upon one subject.”

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 36 , Issue 154 , July 1890 , pp. 338 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1890 

References

* Paper read at the Quarterly Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, held at Manchester, March 13th, 1890.Google Scholar
† His Manie avec Delire.Google Scholar
‡ Pinel, , “Treatise on Insanity,” translated by Davis, , p. 159.Google Scholar
§ Ibid., p. 149.Google Scholar
Varieties of Insanity.Google Scholar
* Esquirol, , “Maladies Mentales,” p. 22.Google Scholar
† Or Lypemanie.Google Scholar
‡ Esquirol, , “Maladies Mentales,” Vol. 1, p. 404.Google Scholar
§ Griesinger, , “Mental Diseases,” p. 298.Google Scholar
* Ibid., p. 51.Google Scholar
* Lewis, Bevan, “Mental Diseases,” p. 163.Google Scholar
* Chiaruggi, , quoted by Prichard, , Treatise, , etc., p. 76.Google Scholar
† Savage, , “Insanity,” p. 384.Google Scholar
‡ Chiarnggi, , op. cit. Google Scholar
§ Bucknill, and Tuke, , op. cit., p. 295.Google Scholar
* Op. cit., Vol. 2., p. 157.Google Scholar
† The Amenomania of Rush, recognized as a distinct type by Bucknill, and Take, , p. 234.Google Scholar
‡ Esquirol, , op. cit., Vol. 2., p. 6.Google Scholar
* Op. cit., p. 319.Google Scholar
† Op. cit., p. 207 Google Scholar
* Op. cit., p. 293.Google Scholar
† Op. cit., Vol. 2., p. 134.Google Scholar
‡ “Lectures on Insanity,” p. 172.Google Scholar
§ “Treatise on Insanity,” p. 26.Google Scholar
∥ Op. cit., Vol. 1., p. 22.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.