Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T04:53:01.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Controlled Study of Post-Partum Mental Illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

C. P. Seager
C. P. Seager*
Affiliation:
Barrow Hospital, Barrow Gurney, near Bristol
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although modern opinion recognizes that there is no such entity as puerperal insanity, views on the part played by the pregnancy in producing mental illness are not so unanimous. The fact that the onset of a patient's illness is related to the puerperium is considered by some authors to have a favourable, and others an unfavourable, prognostic significance. Puerperal mental illness achieves the distinction of separate identification in the International Nomenclature of Disease, not as “Schizophrenia in association with the Puerperium” or “Manic depressive psychosis in association with the Puerperium” but as Puerperal Psychosis, 688.1.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 442 , January 1960 , pp. 214 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

References

Anderson, E. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1933, 79, 137–149.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. med. J., 1950, ii, 276.Google Scholar
Arkle, J., Brit. med. J., 1957, i, 558–560.Google Scholar
Armstrong-Jones, R., Lancet, 1923, 204, 1297–1298.Google Scholar
Bayliss, R. I. S., Brit. med. J., 1955, i, 495–501.Google Scholar
Brew, M. F., and Seidenberg, R. J., Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1950, 111, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, W. H., and Altschule, M. D., New. Eng. J. Med., 1956, 254, 157, 160.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A., Am. J. Obst. Gynaec., 1942, 43, 148–163 and 335–349.Google Scholar
Clarke, G., J. Ment. Sci., 1913, 59, 67–74.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, W. H., Canad. M.A.J., 1940, 53, 571–576.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. M., Am. J. Psychiat., 1936, 92, 1331–1346.Google Scholar
Delay, J., Boitelle, G., and Corteil, A., Ann. Méd-psychol., 1948, 106, 62–68.Google Scholar
Ekblad, M., Acta. Psychiat. Neurol. Scand., 1955, Suppl. 99.Google Scholar
Feldman, F., Susselman, S., Lipetz, B., and Barrera, S. E., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1946, 103, 494–502.Google Scholar
Fondeur, M., Fixsen, C., Triebel, W. A., and White, M. A., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1957, 77, 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frumkes, G., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1934, 79, 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. S., Brit. med. J., 1936, i 835–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, A. B., Brit. med. J., 1955, i, 637–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, R. E., Brit. med. J., 1952, ii, 1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzer, G., Allg. Z. Psychiat., 1906, 63, 244–274.Google Scholar
Impastato, D. J., and Gabriel, A. R., J. Am. Med. Ass., 1957, 163, 1017–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B., J. Ment. Sci., 1943, 89, 242–256.Google Scholar
James, G. W. B., Lancet, 1935, i, 1515–1516.Google Scholar
Karnosh, L. J., and Hope, J. M., Am. J. Psychiat., 1937, 94, 537–550.Google Scholar
Kasanin, J., Am. J. Psychiat., 1940, 97, 99–100.Google Scholar
Laboucarié, J., Ann. Méd-psychol., 1949, 102, 231–235.Google Scholar
Madden, J. J., Luhan, J. A., Tuteur, W., and Bimmerle, J. F., Am. J. Psychiat., 1958, 115, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marley, E., J. Ment. Sci., 1959, 105, 19–43.Google Scholar
Martin, M. E., Brit. med. J., 1958, ii, 773–777.Google Scholar
McIlroy, A. L., Lancet, 1928, i, 377–381.Google Scholar
Parfitt, D. N., J. Ment. Sci., 1934, 80, 43–57.Google Scholar
Piker, P., Am. J. Obst. Gynaec., 1938, 35, 901–909.Google Scholar
Polonio, P., and Figuieredo, M., Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 1955, 130, 304–319.Google Scholar
Skottowe, I., Practitioner, 1942, 148, 157–163.Google Scholar
Smalldon, J. L., Am. J. Psychiat., 1940, 97, 80–98.Google Scholar
Solomons, B., J. Ment. Sci., 1931, 77, 701–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, G. I., Textbook of Obstetrics, 1947. London.Google Scholar
Strecker, E. A., and Ebaugh, F. G., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 15, 239–252.Google Scholar
Tetlow, C., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 629–639.Google Scholar
Tylden, E., Brit. med. J., 1950, ii, 276.Google Scholar
Vislie, H., Acta. Psychiat. Neurol. Scand., 1956, Suppl. 111.Google Scholar
White, M. A., Prout, C. T., Fixsen, C., and Foundeur, M., J. Am. Med. Ass., 1957, 165, 138–143.Google Scholar
Wick, S., Wisc. Med. J., 1941, 40, 299–302.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. A., and Christie, T., Brit. med. J., 1925, ii, 797–798.Google Scholar
Zilboorg, G., Am. J. Obst. Gynaec., 1928, 15, 145–148.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.