Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-6tpvb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T09:42:09.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmation of Objective Test Factors and Assessment of Their Relation to Questionnaire Factors: A Factor Analysis of 113 Rating, Questionnaire and Objective Test Measurements of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Ivan H. Scheier  and
Raymond B. Cattell
Ivan H. Scheier
Affiliation:
The Laboratory of Personality Assessment and Group Behavior The University of Illinois
Raymond B. Cattell
Affiliation:
The Laboratory of Personality Assessment and Group Behavior The University of Illinois
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cattell's basic strategy in personality research has been first to establish personality factors for each of three major types of measurement, rating (Life-Record), questionnaire (Self-Rating), and objective tests, then to compare factors from one realm with factors from another (7). A factor in any one realm is established in the first place by being replicated. As Cattell says (4, p. 291): “… a functionally unitary trait or process should nevertheless not be considered established by a pattern in a single factor analytic research, but must reappear consistently and persistently in independently rotated studies.”

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 436 , July 1958 , pp. 608 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

References

1. Bitterman, M. E., and Holtzman, W. H., “Conditioning and extinction of the galvanic skin response as a function of anxiety”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 615–623.Google Scholar
2. Cattell, R. B., The Principal Invariant Personality Factors Established in Objective Tests, 1953. Urbana, Ill: Lab. of Pers. Assess. & Group Behav., Univ. of Illinois. (Adv. Publ. No. 1.)Google Scholar
3. Idem, A Universal Index for Psychological Factors, 1953. Urbana, Ill.: Lab. of Person. Assess. & Group Behav., Univ. of Illinois. (Adv. Publ. No. 3.)Google Scholar
4. Idem , “The principal replicated factors discovered in objective personality tests”, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1955, 3, 291–314.Google Scholar
5. Idem , “Second-order personality factors in the questionnaire realm”, J. Consult. Psychol. 1956, 6, 411–418.Google Scholar
6. Idem, Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, 1957. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1602 Coronado Drive, Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
7. Idem, Personality and Motivation Structure and Measurement, 1957. New York: World Book Co.Google Scholar
8. Idem and Baggaley, A. R., The Salient Variable Similarity Index-s-for Factor Matching, 1954. Urbana, Ill.: Lab. of Person. Assess. & Group Behav., Univ. of Illinois. (Adv. Publ. No. 4.)Google Scholar
9. Idem , “A confirmation of ergic and engram structure in attitudes objectively measured”, The Australian J. of Psychol. (In press.)Google Scholar
10. Idem and Scheier, I. H., “The nature of anxiety: A review of thirteen multivariate studies, comprising 814 variables. Psychological Reports. (In press.)Google Scholar
11. Idem , “The objective test measurement of neuroticism, U.I.23(—): A review of eight factor analytic studies”. Ind. J. Psychol. (In press.)Google Scholar
12. Idem , “Clinical validities by analyzing the psychiatrist: Exemplified in relation to anxiety diagnosis”. Am. J. Orthopsychiat. (In press.)Google Scholar
13. Fairbanks, G., “Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback”, J. Speech Hearing Disorders, 1955, 20, 333–346.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.