Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T05:30:01.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Case of Richard Loeb and Nathan Leopold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

America has lately been the scene of a murder, and a consequent trial, both of which were remarkable even for that land of sensations. The circumstances of the crime were quite out of the ordinary. The questions discussed at the trial were of the utmost psychological and medico-legal importance. The local newspaper reports, together with many other details, were sent to us through the kindness of Mr. Stephen M. Reynolds, of Chicago. We thus have information which few, if any, in this country possess. The actual trial lasted thirty-two days. The mere reading of the reports was a heavy task. We then had to separate from the mass of journalism those points in the evidence which might be taken as established. And we think that a summary thereof may be of general interest.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1925 

References

(1) Healy, W.The Individual Delinquent, 1915, p. 704.Google Scholar
(2) McConnell, R. M.Criminal Responsibility and Social Constraint, 1912.Google Scholar
(3) Healy, W.Op. cit., pp. 575–77, and Rosanoff, A. J., Manual of Psychiatry , 1920.Google Scholar
(4) Healy, W.Op. cit., p. 708; Sighele, , Le Crime à Deux , 1910.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.