Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:49:52.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case for Dementia Præcox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Thomas Johnstone
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Before submitting to you my ideas on the much-disputed question of dementia præcox, there are one or two points in the papers of Drs. Jones and Urquhart to which I should wish to draw attention. I will take them in the order in which they occur.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 55 , Issue 228 , January 1909 , pp. 64 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1909 

References

(1) Laycock, .—Principles of Medical Observation and Research, 2nd edition, 1864.Google Scholar
(2) Kraepelin, .—Lectures on Clinical Psychiatry, authorised translation from the second German edition. Revised and edited by Thomas Johnstone. Second English edition, 1906.Google Scholar
(3) Manheimer, .—Les Troubles Mentaux de l'Enfance.Google Scholar
(4) Masseion, .—La Démence perécoce, Paris, 1904.Google Scholar
(5) Jung, .—Ueber die Psychologie der Dementia præcox, 1907.Google Scholar
(6) Kraepelin, .—Psych. Arbeiten, Bd. v, H. 1.Google Scholar
(7) Bleuler, .—Psych.-Neurol. Wochenschr., 1904.Google Scholar
(8) Bianchi, .—Text-book of Psychiatry, 1906. Translated by J. A. Macdonald.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.