No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Suzanne Fleischman, Tense and narrativity: from medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990. Pp. xiii + 443.
Review products
Suzanne Fleischman, Tense and narrativity: from medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990. Pp. xiii + 443.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022226700015176/resource/name/firstPage-S0022226700015176a.jpg)
- Type
- Shorter Notices
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
REFERENCES
Fleischman, S. (1982). The future in thought and language: diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1985). Discourse functions of tense-aspect oppositions in narrative: toward a theory of grounding. Linguistics 23. 851–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, S. (1989). Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language 13. 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkie, R. (1987). Review of Dahl, Ö., Tense and aspect systems. Lingua 72. 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkie, R. (1989). Perfect and pluperfect: what is the relationship? JL 25. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar