Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-g628x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T08:52:10.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) Pragmatics (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Pp. xi+267.

Review products

Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) Pragmatics (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Pp. xi+267.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2008

Anne Reboul
Anne Reboul*
Affiliation:
L2C2 CNRS-UMR5230, Institute for Cognitive Sciences, Lyons
*
Author's address: L2C2 CNRS-UMR5230, Institute for Cognitive Sciences, 67 bd Pinel, 69675 Bron cedex, France. reboul@isc.cnrs.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 519 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fodor, Jerry A. 1998. Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI licensing. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 38.2, 55–82.Google Scholar
Levinson, Steven. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 2000. On clear and confused ideas: An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira A. 2001. When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78.2, 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar