Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-4kfsg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T08:09:33.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idan Landau, Control in generative grammar: A research companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. x+287.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2014

Anna Roussou
Anna Roussou*
Affiliation:
University of Patras
*
Author's address: Department of Philology, University of Patras, GR-26500 Rio, Patras, Greecearoussou@upatras.gr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 242 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Kenneth (eds.), The null subject parameter, 69–109. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Grano, Thomas A. 2012. Control and restructuring at the syntax–semantics interface. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. (2009). PRO, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations. In Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (ed.), Explorations of Phase Theory: Features and arguments, 131–180. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar