No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
G. Gazdar, E. Klein & G. K. Pullum (eds), Order, concord and constituency. Dordrecht: Foris, 1983. Pp. 219.
Review products
G. Gazdar, E. Klein & G. K. Pullum (eds), Order, concord and constituency. Dordrecht: Foris, 1983. Pp. 219.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022226700010148/resource/name/firstPage-S0022226700010148a.jpg)
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985
References
REFERENCES
Ades, A. & Steedman, M. (1982). On the order of words. Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 517–558.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1982). Phrase structure grammar. In Pullum, G. K. & Jacobson, P. (eds.) The nature of syntactic representation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 131–186.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & Pullum, G. K. (1983). Phrase structure grammar: a theoretical synopsis: Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1981). On the position of Walbiri in a typology of the base. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Steedman, M. (1983). A categorial syntax for subject and tensed verb in English and related languages. Unpublished paper, University of Warwick.Google Scholar